- Khanstant
-
|
we hear about them in the news all the time but then none ever actually show up. ive never seen anyone with molecules. just another clickbait media trap?
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2022 01:30
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2024 21:50
|
|
- FutonForensic
-
|
they're right over there
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2022 02:30
|
|
- Buttchocks
-
No, I like my hat, thanks.
|
The Molecules broke up shortly after their hit single.
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2022 03:53
|
|
- Viginti Septem
-
Oculus Noctuae
|
The Molecules broke up shortly after their hit single.
It's was an entangled mess
|
#
?
Dec 8, 2022 03:57
|
|
- Buttchocks
-
No, I like my hat, thanks.
|
what if the c was pronounced like an s?
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 04:37
|
|
- Farecoal
-
There he go
|
I was told there were sexy single molecules in my area. Where are they
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 06:23
|
|
- alnilam
-
|
What if molecules was pronounced like hercules?
Really makes you think
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 07:45
|
|
- canyoneer
-
I only have canyoneyes for you
|
one of them stole an electron from me. i'm positive
|
#
?
Dec 9, 2022 07:57
|
|
- Escape From Noise
-
|
Up ur butt, op.
|
#
?
Dec 11, 2022 18:15
|
|
- xcheopis
-
|
my grandpa wasn't a proton i can tell you that much
Your mother was a proton and your father smelt of acetone!
Fifteen years taking prescriptions
Now a shrink like, "I dunno, maybe get a kitten"
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2022 03:35
|
|
- canyoneer
-
I only have canyoneyes for you
|
The Molecules broke up shortly after their hit single.
For our next number, we call this one Avogadro
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2022 04:11
|
|
- HELLOMYNAMEIS___
-
|
this article has microscope images of molecules, so i guess one answer would be "they're there in this picture, see!". however, all empiricism eventually reduces into trusting our sensory perception. sense-impressions from the sense media only become known once they reach the corresponding sense-consciousness (eye-consciousness, in this case). there is an object, there is the sense-medium impression, and then there is consciousness of the sense impression - the meeting of the three is "contact".
what is the object, when we are looking at the microscope image of these "molecules"? it is an image of something, not that something itself. in a way, we still have not "seen molecules", only an image of molecules.
i dont need some egghead scientist to tell me what fundamental units im made of
indeed - we could just as well choose as our "framework of thought" the classic fundamental elements of fire (heat), water (fluidity), earth (solidity) and wind (movement). throw in æther for good measure! at least these can be directly observed.
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2022 19:57
|
|
- HELLOMYNAMEIS___
-
|
"there are more grains of sand in the sahara than there are molecules in the universe", it can be argued, because when thinking of the sahara, you think of a great number of sand grains, but when thinking of the universe, you barely think of molecules at all. so, the sahara in your mind has a greater number of grains of sand than the universe in your mind has molecules. the sahara can hardly be thought about without thinking of grains of sand, but the universe can be entirely conceptualized without thinking of molecules.
|
#
?
Dec 12, 2022 21:56
|
|
- canyoneer
-
I only have canyoneyes for you
|
stenciling block letters into my sign for the protest
"ITS ADAM AND EVE
NOT ATOM AND eV"
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2022 20:18
|
|
- canyoneer
-
I only have canyoneyes for you
|
someone on the subway once offered to sell me "moly" (street name for molecules) and I'm all, phtt, yeah right nerd why don't you try selling magic beans next?!
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2022 20:20
|
|
- Quadramind
-
|
hey you got a mole?
Uh, no, not on me
Well, it'd be a lot culer if you did
|
#
?
Dec 13, 2022 21:23
|
|
- Khanstant
-
|
.
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2022 02:38
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
Apr 27, 2024 21:50
|
|
- Quadramind
-
|
|
#
?
Dec 14, 2022 16:36
|
|