|
I made a gimmick account of a certain fictional FBI agent but I'm lacking in inspiration. Oh well.
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 10:47 |
|
|
Xanthine posted:I made a gimmick account of a certain fictional FBI agent but I'm lacking in inspiration. Oh well. Agent Smecker?
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:06
|
|
|
Well, I just got IP banned. I was hoping to have that character around for a long time and I honestly have no idea what I did to tip them off that I was a troll. Anyway, it was all worth it to get a bunch of likes on a post I made about el-hajj malik el-shabazz.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:10
|
|
|
I Fought The Mom posted:So I presented the "is it wrong for a man to steal bread to feed his starving family" dilemma and nobody seemed to understand it because 'thou shalt not steal', instead railing on me for the idea that a man would allow himself to become starving because he was lazy and that I was such a lib that the only solution I could think of was stealing. Town Hall posted:Pet Food Stamps are now a Thing?! These people are opposed to a private charity providing dog food to people in desperate times that might otherwise be forced to surrender their dog for euthanasia because they can't afford to feed it anymore. Why? Because it makes people lazy and dependent on government. Basically they are monsters, don't listen to them when they whine that they aren't opposed to charity just BIG GOVERNMENT. Three Olives fucked around with this message at 02:21 on Feb 28, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:17
|
|
|
 I honestly can't tell who the trolls are responding to Djw...I'm more inclined to think the people being nice are, because they seem so out of place.In other news I would really like to see more terrible bible verses posted as being from the Koran, and nice Koran passages being attributed to the bible. Also using nothing but Jesus' own words to get banned with. I really like seeing TPC ban Jesus. It's just so...telling.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:19
|
|
|
Shall we, Soro Screw? Hm, trying the attachment [img] thing for a title but it no worky since the attachment doesn't end in a file format... Ehhh???? Can an experienced goon help out, I thought this was how it went. Edit: AAAA Dammit img codes aren't allowed anymore in the text. AAAAA. A loving mod? A caring mod? Help us, hear our cry? Paradox Personified fucked around with this message at 02:28 on Feb 28, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:20
|
|
SoroScrew
|
Three Olives posted:These people are opposed to a private charity providing dog food to people in desperate times that might otherwise be forced to surrender their dog for euthanasia because they can't afford to feed it anymore. Why? Because it makes people lazy and dependent on government. Basically they are monsters, don't listen to them when they whine that they aren't opposed to charity because of BIG GOVERNMENT. They are opposed to this idea because other people (who?) might turn it into a government program.  Don't be a thoughtful person, someone might notice and make it into a socialist mandate! Clearly the best policy stance for the GOP to recover its position is a Hobbesian war of all against all.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:20
|
|
|
I Fought The Mom posted:Grey areas of morality don't exist for these people. When I was doing my first long-con gimmick before it got banned for posting that "I don't think Obama is literally Hitler" image macro, I suggested that morality isn't black and white, citing the use of nuclear weapons against the Japanese: I was then told that the bombings were a purely good act and that all of the civilians deserved to die because they allowed their government to be bad. So I presented the "is it wrong for a man to steal bread to feed his starving family" dilemma and nobody seemed to understand it because 'thou shalt not steal', instead railing on me for the idea that a man would allow himself to become starving because he was lazy and that I was such a lib that the only solution I could think of was stealing. I cannot even imagine how people who think like are able to function in society. What do they do when they encounter new or conflicting information? If your boss is a "bad man" because he's a Muslim, what do these people do? If you have no grey area for morality, then shouldn't America by and large be considered evil because of the immensely successful "Sin Industry"? If there's only black and white morality, "Pure Good" and "Pure Evil", then doesn't your morality system require you to treat every sinner the same? How do you levy appropriate punishments on "evil"? This thread just makes me sad. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:22
|
|
|
Fun fact: The woman who co-hosts the TPC show is Tamara Scott, one of Iowa's official RNC Committee members.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:25
|
|
|
Finklemeyer posted:Fun fact: The woman who co-hosts the TPC show is Tamara Scott, one of Iowa's official RNC Committee members. It would figure Iowan Republicans would be in favor of this.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:29
|
|
|
I think I've stared into the abyss too long. I am about to successfully get one member on TPC to send dick pics to another member who has a huge sissy fetish. I just... I just don't know anymore. Why would these people who are for "traditional" family values be so hypocritical about their own sexuality? I feel so terrible for women who get on these social networks and get bombarded with essentially unsolicited pictures of mens genitals.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:35
|
|
|
McDowell posted:'America, reap what you sow.' - There's a new sheriff in town
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:37
|
|
|
Three Olives posted:These people are opposed to a private charity providing dog food to people in desperate times that might otherwise be forced to surrender their dog for euthanasia because they can't afford to feed it anymore. Why? Because it makes people lazy and dependent on government. Basically they are monsters, don't listen to them when they whine that they aren't opposed to charity just BIG GOVERNMENT. It's the same as when then bitch and moan about government health care wasting their tax dollars but then immediately complain when private insurances cover things they don't agree with.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:41
|
|
|
Welp, I got laid off. Time to take my dog out back and put it down with my AR-15.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:47
|
|
|
I really want to go into the freep thread and extract all the shitthatneverhappened.txts and hand them out to goons to read on air for that call in program. The one with the rear end in a top hat asking his 7yo child's doctor about how many dildos she had would be wonderful to hear on air.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:50
|
|
|
Three Olives posted:These people are opposed to a private charity providing dog food to people in desperate times that might otherwise be forced to surrender their dog for euthanasia because they can't afford to feed it anymore. Why? Because it makes people lazy and dependent on government. Basically they are monsters, don't listen to them when they whine that they aren't opposed to charity just BIG GOVERNMENT. I never would have guessed I would have another use for this image I made years ago. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:53
|
|
|
Beatnik-Filmstar posted:Welp, I got laid off. Time to take my dog out back and put it down with my AR-15. Killing your pet is better than getting a HANDOUT from charity. -TPC logic
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:53
|
|
|
Three Olives posted:These people are opposed to a private charity providing dog food to people in desperate times that might otherwise be forced to surrender their dog for euthanasia because they can't afford to feed it anymore. Why? Because it makes people lazy and dependent on government. Basically they are monsters, don't listen to them when they whine that they aren't opposed to charity just BIG GOVERNMENT. They are against it because the headlines use the term "food stamps" and they just stop reading. That's it. If it were called "St.Francis Charity For the Animals" they'd be crowing about how wonderful the people behind it are.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:55
|
|
|
Parallax Scroll posted:Killing your pet is better than getting a HANDOUT from charity. Basically poor people aren't allowed to have things that provide them with enjoyment. The Tea Party's social model is Victorian-era England in more ways than one, on their radio show I heard them advocating making public assistance as unpleasant as possible so that you'd "want" to find work and get off of it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:56
|
|
|
This image is going around on TPC: Somebody make an avatar out of one of the photos.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 02:58
|
|
|
You guys do what the chat is for, right? Right???
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:13
|
|
|
Talking about Three Olives' condo?
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:18
|
|
|
Inevitable posted:This image is going around on TPC: Please tell me you wouldn't exploit the raping of a little child for a "funny" avatar? Tell me that you have more compassion than that. You ridicule the Tea Party, but is this your style?
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:18
|
|
|
I was thinking of rolling up a character but TOR keeps saying "This Connection is Untrusted". Any thoughts?
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:20
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:Talking about Three Olives' condo? NO CONDO CHAT.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:20
|
|
|
WhackAWonderful posted:Please tell me you wouldn't exploit the raping of a little child for a "funny" avatar? Tell me that you have more compassion than that. You ridicule the Tea Party, but is this your style? Yeah that's really unnecessary. While very unlikely, it's also not good to potentially waste some hotline or center's time with TPC-retards calling in.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:21
|
|
|
The Ape of Naples posted:I was thinking of rolling up a character but TOR keeps saying "This Connection is Untrusted". Any thoughts? They use a self-signed SSL certificate. It means they're incompetent at web hosting, but otherwise should be safe. Edit: Fat fingered typo
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:22
|
|
|
So I accidentally registered an account on this site using my real google account apparently. Is there any way to delete it or revoke access to my google credentials? I obviously don't want my real life being at all connected with this terrible site.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:23
|
|
|
looking.glass.eyes posted:They use a self-signed SSL certificate. It means they're incompetent at web hosting, but otherwise should be safe. This is the serial number of the certificate if you're that cautious about protecting your account details on that site: 00:F4:99:B1:37:E0:70:62:FD:FA:17:8C:1D:10:A1:7A:3A Talorat posted:So I accidentally registered an account on this site using my real google account apparently. Is there any way to delete it or revoke access to my google credentials? I obviously don't want my real life being at all connected with this terrible site.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:28
|
|
|
^^^^^welp Talorat, maybe you're just effed Talorat posted:So I accidentally registered an account on this site using my real google account apparently. Is there any way to delete it or revoke access to my google credentials? I obviously don't want my real life being at all connected with this terrible site. Go to "Account Settings". At the bottom there is blue text on the white background that says "Cancel Account". pig slut lisa fucked around with this message at 03:32 on Feb 28, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:29
|
|
|
Talorat posted:So I accidentally registered an account on this site using my real google account apparently. Is there any way to delete it or revoke access to my google credentials? I obviously don't want my real life being at all connected with this terrible site. If you can't delete your account, you can revoke access from the google side of things like this: http://webapps.stackexchange.com/questions/12440/track-and-administer-openid-permissions-on-google-account quote:Go to https://www.google.com/accounts/b/0/IssuedAuthSubTokens Numeron fucked around with this message at 03:37 on Feb 28, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:34
|
|
|
Schwza posted:I think I've stared into the abyss too long. I am about to successfully get one member on TPC to send dick pics to another member who has a huge sissy fetish. I just... I just don't know anymore. Why would these people who are for "traditional" family values be so hypocritical about their own sexuality? I feel so terrible for women who get on these social networks and get bombarded with essentially unsolicited pictures of mens genitals. Convince more people that posting nudes proves they aren't a troll.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:37
|
|
|
Schwza posted:I think I've stared into the abyss too long. I am about to successfully get one member on TPC to send dick pics to another member who has a huge sissy fetish. I just... I just don't know anymore. Why would these people who are for "traditional" family values be so hypocritical about their own sexuality? I feel so terrible for women who get on these social networks and get bombarded with essentially unsolicited pictures of mens genitals. Then you must feel terrible for me, who gets bombarded with porn while I post on TPC. I don't ask for those types of pictures that come from here as a joke. But it's common practice for some posters on this thread to spam TPC with porn. How is that different?
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:41
|
|
|
Numeron posted:If you can't delete your account, you can revoke access from the google side of things like this: Fantastic thanks
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:42
|
|
|
WhackAWonderful posted:Then you must feel terrible for me, who gets bombarded with porn while I post on TPC. I don't ask for those types of pictures that come from here as a joke. But it's common practice for some posters on this thread to spam TPC with porn. How is that different? Because nobody here is posting porn with the subtext of "hey you and I should have sexytimes together because I'm a guy and you're a girl and so I know you want this baby unnnnhhhhhh yeah" Here, take a look at a couple past posts of mine from when I was pretending to be a 21 year old college girl to get a sense of what I mean: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3531828&pagenumber=48&perpage=40#post412283990 http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3531828&pagenumber=95&perpage=40#post412391828 pig slut lisa fucked around with this message at 03:48 on Feb 28, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:45
|
|
|
zylche posted:They got $250 in donations for an SSL certificate, then bought one from PositiveSSL, who are a Comodo reseller. Try and find one on that site for that price though, especially since the certificate is only for a year. Bonus points: Common Name is blank. $250 for one year of a certificate? This is nothing compared to their horrible racism and xenophobia, but still. What the hell.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:47
|
|
|
Nice Davis posted:Because nobody here is posting porn with the subtext of "hey you and I should have sexytimes together because I'm a guy and you're a girl and so I know you want this baby unnnnhhhhhh yeah" Simple solution.....report him/her. So just because nobody here adds a caption to the porn they post, that's okay? I see. Interesting.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:48
|
|
|
WhackAWonderful posted:Simple solution.....report him/her. So just because nobody here adds a caption to the porn they post, that's okay? I see. Interesting. This is a comedy website. Start posting funny things you dumb rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:49
|
|
|
WhackAWonderful posted:Please tell me you wouldn't exploit the raping of a little child for a "funny" avatar? Tell me that you have more compassion than that. You ridicule the Tea Party, but is this your style? I'll point out that I'm unequivocally against the rape of children. And yeah, I thought it might be funny just because he looked like such a typical tea partier. But okay, bad idea. Withdrawn. Edit: I also just subconsciously assume that every picture they post is fake.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 10:47 |
|
|
WhackAWonderful posted:Simple solution.....report him/her. So just because nobody here adds a caption to the porn they post, that's okay? I see. Interesting. haha this is in private messages because plenty of people see social networking as a means to meet people to gently caress. People posting porn are doing it as an affront to your prudishness for cheap laughs. People making 'hot girl' accounts and being immediately hit on by horny repressed men subverts all the moralizing behind this prudishness. Actions and motivations can have many dimensions, but it's hard to see that when TV makes you see the world as 'two legs good, four legs bad'.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2013 03:59
|
|