|
When said in the context of a crack mayor talking about 1st degree murdering some guy while hanging out with crack traffikers that has a brother who used to run a drug empire? I'm not saying I'm just saying.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 04:01 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 12:17 |
|
Odddzy posted:The minister in charge of the charter (Bernard Drainville) has asked the people that are for it to go and sign a petition. 26000 people transmitted their opinion on it, 0.4 percent of the population of quebec. The video then ends with Drainville stating that it's a beautiful day for democracy and the narrator countering that it's a terrible one for mathematics.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 04:24 |
|
The Dark One posted:Quebec's take on equality has always felt paternalistic to me. Instead of making a name change after marriage available to either spouse, the province, in the name of equality, forbid women from legally changing them. When my grandmother (who was married in another province, and decades before the rules were changed) had to be admitted to the hospital, all of her records referred to her with a name she hadn't used most most of her life. That's pretty much on point, and it reflects on how much Quebec has changed, the paternalism that the Quiet Revoluationaries decried was only replaced with a different kind of paternalism.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 06:06 |
|
Really, the name change thing is now an important issue in this thread? Use the name you want. Who cares if your tax report has a different one? I'd be weirded out if a woman I married wanted to take my name, but I've never given it a thought before today.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 06:27 |
|
JayMax posted:Really, the name change thing is now an important issue in this thread? Why is it any business of the state though? What if both partners decided to hyphenate their last names, which is a thing that is happening more and more? Why should the state have any role in deciding it at all?
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 06:53 |
|
Cordyceps Headache posted:Why is it any business of the state though? What if both partners decided to hyphenate their last names, which is a thing that is happening more and more? Why should the state have any role in deciding it at all? They should do whatever they want, but the state doesn't have to change the names in their database. Everybody wins!
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 07:37 |
|
The SJW's that caused GBS to go nuclear have come to loiter in D&D. Sad day for democracy indeed.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 08:18 |
|
Rime posted:The SJW's that caused GBS to go nuclear have come to loiter in D&D. Sad day for democracy indeed. What the hell prompted this? JayMax posted:They should do whatever they want, but the state doesn't have to change the names in their database. Everybody wins! If it was for reasons of database maintenance, they would just ban all name changes, instead of instituting a system whereby a bureaucrat gets to decide whether or not your name-change is for a good reason (which does include changing your name to your spouse's due to religious beliefs, but it's up to the Directeur de L'Etat Civile to decide whether or not you are really devout, or just faking to get the namechange). I don't really see why the state has to take such a paternalistic role in deciding who gets to utilize a public service. Are they just fearful that too many people will be demanding name changes otherwise? E: Now, on its own the name change thing is a trivial issue, and not something I'm loosing sleep over. But it is reflective of the same kind of paternalistic attitude that informs the charter. There are a lot of people who believe that what the charter will do is force Muslim women to not wear the hijab at work, and that this would be a good thing for women. It assumes that women can't be trusted to make a decision like this for themselves, and require the protection of the state to prevent them oppressing themselves. Political Whores fucked around with this message at 08:44 on Nov 8, 2013 |
# ? Nov 8, 2013 08:22 |
|
Daynab posted:Quebec isn't part of the Constitution. Sorry to burst your bubble but Quebec is fully subject to the Charter, excepting use of the Notwithstanding Clause.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 14:37 |
|
Yesterday's Full Punditquote:Happy Friday to you!
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 14:51 |
|
He's a young economics grad working in the public service.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 14:59 |
|
The place where that argument falls apart is that based on his track record Rob Ford is just as bad at managing government money as you'd expect a crackhead to be.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 15:07 |
|
Did he back up his assertion that the government is switching from austerity to spending and growth by just linking the Globe and Mail's main page? Was there a headline article to that effect at the time, or was he just saying "go look it up, it's probably in here"? Also noting the implicit assumption that you can just say switching from austerity to spending is always bad, rather than making some token effort to suggest that austerity is a response to a particular recession or debt problem (the fig leaf that covers up that austerity is simply the end goal). And if he's a public service worker, I wonder if he considers his own job and the money the government collects to pay for it to be "stealing"?
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 15:10 |
|
When I hear someone is a crackhead, my first thought is "surely I can trust what he says about his finances."
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 15:13 |
|
quote:When Robbie drinks, he just goes full tilt. Hey, that sounds like me! I guess I can run for office!
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 15:15 |
|
Dolash posted:Did he back up his assertion that the government is switching from austerity to spending and growth by just linking the Globe and Mail's main page? Was there a headline article to that effect at the time, or was he just saying "go look it up, it's probably in here"? Also noting the implicit assumption that you can just say switching from austerity to spending is always bad, rather than making some token effort to suggest that austerity is a response to a particular recession or debt problem (the fig leaf that covers up that austerity is simply the end goal). http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ontarios-economic-plan-to-shift-focus-from-austerity-to-spending-and-growth/article15303331/ Which is good news for anyone who's been watching the UK and Europe, and bad news for him I guess.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 15:34 |
|
Hey, does anyone want to hear Terence Corcoran's opinion on the by-election battle between the NDP's Linda McQuaig and Liberal Chrystal Freeland in Toronto Centre (Bob Rae's old seat)? Neither do I.Terence Corcoran posted:Linda McQuaig and Chrystia Freeland stage Marxist battle in downtown Canada The comments are pretty much all about how Marxism failed and killed 500 million people and how socialism never works anywhere, not even in those Scandinavian hell-holes.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 15:35 |
|
It's been a few days, but even now, I can't get over 'one of my drunken stupors'. One. of. One of. Even with my bullshit homework load from college, this has been the best week ever .
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 15:50 |
|
And the way he phrases it, its like a monthly occurrence.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 15:59 |
|
spacemost posted:
Show him this KPMG *global comparative tax study that ranked Toronto 5th out of 113 cities on their index. Then tell him to go screw. http://www.competitivealternatives.com/reports/2012_compalt_report_tax_en.pdf
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:02 |
|
Baloogan posted:And the way he phrases it, its like a monthly occurrence. Or possibly more common than that, even. I was discussing the whole Rob Ford thing with some guys at the pub yesterday, and we all agreed that it's a shame Klein's tenure as mayor and premier was before the age of cameraphones. I bet there would've been some funny, funny videos.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:03 |
|
"Why were you yelling at your staff?" "I never yelled at anyone." "We have witnesses that say you did." "Oh. Well, yes, that happened, but I was very drunk." "Why were you smoking crack?" "I do not smoke crack." "We have a videotape that shows you did." "Oh. Well, yes, that happened, but I was very drunk." "Why were you threatening to have some motherfucker killed?" "That never happened." "We have video that shows it did." "Oh. Well, yes, that happened, but I was very drunk." This would make a great SNL sketch if we could just find a way to drag it out for way longer than necessary.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:04 |
|
flakeloaf posted:"Why were you yelling at your staff?" Well, Ford isn't resigning, and it seems like he's a neverending fount of comedy, so I think that they'll have enough material so that they can open up a January show with it.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:06 |
|
Imagine Stephen Harper saying "I was told about the senate expenses issue, but it was during One Of my Druken Stupors."
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:09 |
|
Hey, JT, what's your favourite quote:Q: Which nation, besides Canada, which nation’s administration do you most admire, and why? Oh, okay then.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:09 |
|
Good god what a terribly worded answer. I know where he was going with it and he just didn't arrive properly... at all.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:11 |
|
Former Iggy speechwriter: Can you think of a country whose administration is admirable besides China? I can't. Not a single one! e: V Yeah, it has several good answers. Norway, Sweden, Finland, Iceland, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Australia, New Zealand, hell throw Poland and the Baltic states in there. You'll note that those all happen to be democraties. Pinterest Mom fucked around with this message at 16:15 on Nov 8, 2013 |
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:12 |
|
The question does have a good answer. Using it to make a crack at Harper and attempt to call the CPC a dictatorship wasn't a good way to answer it.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:13 |
|
Then don't answer it... Jesus, what a terrible answer that'll be used against him.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:13 |
|
I admire China because they're infinitely more autocratic than Stephen Harper's Conservatives could ever hope to be. Wait, what?
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:15 |
|
EngineerJoe posted:Then don't answer it... Jesus, what a terrible answer that'll be used against him. He actually joked that Sun News will use the answer to say he prefers China. He dodged the question entirely when trying to explain more about it. It's kind of painful. If I donate to his campaign, does he still call? I might donate to yell at him.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:15 |
|
Recall that debate about smoking we had a little while back, when several people pointed out that e-cigarettes would be a great alternative for current smokers? Well, not according to the Alberta government -- they want to ban e-cigs in public places, along with waterpipes, smoking in cars with minors, and all flavoured tobacco (because the pipe smoking rate is just skyrocketing and we need to deal with that menace). The Alberta government are the worst kind of conservatives: they're perennially interested in controlling our own personal choices, and restricting small business (e.g. the minimum production levels for craft brewers), yet abhor the idea of regulation on larger businesses, or doing the things that the government should be doing, like paying for infrastructure, education and healthcare properly.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:16 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Hey, JT, what's your favourite The very next paragraph, of the actual answer "But if I were to reach out and say which…which kind of administration I most admire, I think there’s something to be said right here in Canada for the way our territories are run. Nunavut, Northwest Territories, and the Yukon are done without political parties around consensus. And are much more like a municipal government. And I think there’s a lot to be said for people pulling together to try and solve issues rather than to score points off of each other. And I think we need a little more of that. But Sun News can now report that I prefer China.” But I'll agree he shouldn't have lumped 'admiration' and China's dictatorship in the same sentence. 'Interesting' was a better choice in light of what he was trying to say, and he used it later in the quote. edit: and god yes, pick any of the dozens of better examples of well-run countries than China
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:17 |
|
You can be envious of their agility and still be appalled by the things they've done to attain it. The Chinese government can flick a switch and say "Everyone do this" and it'll loving happen, even if "this" is a stupid thing like killing all of the birds by or setting up cheap smelters in everyone's yard so they can make useless pig iron while starving to death. Unfortunately, if you're a politician who wants to be chosen to run an ostensibly free and democratic government, it's probably not a good idea to say you find their exercise of that power "admirable". e: in a way that could be incompletely quoted to make you sound like you look up to dictators. Which it was.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:18 |
|
flakeloaf posted:You can be envious of their agility and still be appalled by the things they've done to attain it. The Chinese government can flick a switch and say "Everyone do this" and it'll loving happen, even if "this" is a stupid thing like killing all of the birds by or setting up cheap smelters in everyone's yard so they can make useless pig iron while starving to death. Unfortunately, if you're a politician who wants to be chosen to run an ostensibly free and democratic government, it's probably not a good idea to say you find their exercise of that power "admirable". yeah that line in general was pretty . I hope his handlers got on him after that and told him 'JT for CHRISTS SAKE, you obviously know your going to be quoted in the worst possible way, DON'T MAKE IT EASY FOR THEM.' God, how can he be our best chance against Harper right now. C'mon Mulcair, time to turn on the shine and live up to Jack's Legacy. e: VV I know.... gently caress this country sometimes. Ron Paul Atreides fucked around with this message at 16:27 on Nov 8, 2013 |
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:22 |
|
Samurai Quack posted:God, how can he be our best chance against Harper right now. C'mon Mulcair, time to turn on the shine and live up to Jack's Legacy. Living up to Jack's legacy is still failing to become a government. Trudeau is still the best chance because Canadians are loving dumb and if he continues to appeal to how dumb they are and just plays the role of the Pretty Prince of Canada he'll probably still take government.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:26 |
|
I vaguely remembered the Globe and Mail running an article supporting a strong mayor system for Canadian cities around the time Rob Ford was elected and wanted to cackle at it, but couldn't find it. I did find this, though: Doug Ford calling for a mayoral veto back in 2011! "I believe in a strong mayor system, like they have in the States. The mayor should have veto power ... so he has enough power to stop council," Mr. Ford said. "The mayor should be the mayor. At the end of the day ... the mayor's responsible for everything." It's been a tough transition for the Ford camp to shift from a highly partisan, highly successful mayoral campaign to the enforced diplomacy of governing, attempting to woo councillors and win votes on a 45-person council with no party system, in which the mayor has only one ballot to cast. "You've always got that council. You've got to have your 23 votes to get it passed," Mr. Ford said. He'd like the mayor to be able to override council "100 per cent. … So the mayor has veto power." http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/toronto/toronto-needs-strong-mayor-with-veto-power-doug-ford-says/article566760/
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:27 |
|
I just love the idea of an elected Dictator, don't you? God it's Larry O'Brien all over again.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:29 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Former Iggy speechwriter: Seeing as how the governments of the Baltic states are literally holding parades in honour of actual nazis, I wouldn't bunch them in with the other guys.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:33 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 12:17 |
|
Paper Jam Dipper posted:Living up to Jack's legacy is still failing to become a government. I'm all in favour of a socialist system coming up, but since that won't happen in my lifetime () I'll take a relatively benign privileged douchebag oligarch over one that's actively antagonistic to everyone on the lower rungs of society. Just stopping the Conservative "tough on crime" crusade would be worth it.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2013 16:34 |