|
Is the Doctor working with the Silence now?
|
# ? Dec 11, 2013 19:59 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 12:11 |
|
Barry Foster posted:It does feel right that Matt 'friend to all children' Smith's Doctor gets to be a puppet in a Punch and Judy show for his regeneration episode. Didn't we JUST get over all of these nursery rhyming bullshit?
|
# ? Dec 11, 2013 21:16 |
|
I guess the trap is to kill him while he's in regeneration? Like.. Lake Silencio?
|
# ? Dec 11, 2013 23:33 |
|
Harlock posted:I guess the trap is to kill him while he's in regeneration? Like.. Lake Silencio? that actually would be a pretty cool callback
|
# ? Dec 11, 2013 23:44 |
|
Harlock posted:I guess the trap is to kill him while he's in regeneration? Like.. Lake Silencio? I'm pretty sure that it's not. Supposedly thanks to Ten's botched regeneration and The War Doctor, Moffat says that Smith is technically the thirteenth, meaning that he shouldn't regenerate unless the rules are broken. The idea is that this is where he dies so that he can be dead with a timestream that ends at Smith and his current TARDIS in the last finale.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 01:10 |
|
These new pictures from the episode are adorable:
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 01:26 |
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 01:44 |
|
Oh yeah, Olivia Coleman was in the show. Well, she is in everything.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 01:57 |
|
Republican Vampire posted:I'm pretty sure that it's not. Supposedly thanks to Ten's botched regeneration and The War Doctor, Moffat says that Smith is technically the thirteenth, meaning that he shouldn't regenerate unless the rules are broken. The idea is that this is where he dies so that he can be dead with a timestream that ends at Smith and his current TARDIS in the last finale. I don't usually begrudge RTD but his botched regeneration thing pisses me off.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 02:51 |
Mooseontheloose posted:I don't usually begrudge RTD but his botched regeneration thing pisses me off. It was a staggeringly cheap cliffhanger, yeah. And made the Tenth Doctor look even more of an arsehole than usual.
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 12:02 |
|
Once, just once, I'd like them to do a regeneration like Six to Seven, except on purpose. Have the Doctor regenerate a third of the way in, just to surprise the hell out of all of us.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 12:07 |
|
Barry Foster posted:It was a staggeringly cheap cliffhanger, yeah. And made the Tenth Doctor look even more of an arsehole than usual. To be fair, having him have the typical post-regeneration trauma from a full regeneration would probably waste time that he didn't have. Gau posted:Once, just once, I'd like them to do a regeneration like Six to Seven, except on purpose. Have the Doctor regenerate a third of the way in, just to surprise the hell out of all of us. That would be interesting, I suppose. I'm not sure it's very feasible.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 13:12 |
Yvonmukluk posted:To be fair, having him have the typical post-regeneration trauma from a full regeneration would probably waste time that he didn't have. From the character's perspective, maybe, although he basically says 'I like who I am now too much to change'. But what bugs me far more is that RTD should never have written that situation at all. The whole getting half-shot by a Dalek while running in slow motion thing, the whole fake regeneration thing, and the whole dildo-doctor thing. It's big dumb cheap ideas all the way down. It's Russell 'The' Davies at his most half-arsed.
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 13:27 |
|
Burkion posted:Didn't we JUST get over all of these nursery rhyming bullshit? Ja, how original. Doctor Who bringing in more creepy childrens' games. Sigh.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 13:37 |
|
Barry Foster posted:From the character's perspective, maybe, although he basically says 'I like who I am now too much to change'. But what bugs me far more is that RTD should never have written that situation at all. The whole getting half-shot by a Dalek while running in slow motion thing, the whole fake regeneration thing, and the whole dildo-doctor thing. It's big dumb cheap ideas all the way down. It's Russell 'The' Davies at his most half-arsed. I don't know, I think the whole "River Song is suddenly part Time Lord and can give her regenerations to the Doctor to save his life" far more annoying.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 22:44 |
|
River was shown to be able to pilot the tardis long before they revealed what she was. Being a psuedo time lord herself was not totally out of left field. BTW, since the daleks screm about the doctor regenerating in the trailer, does that mean they're going back on the daleks forgetting about who the doctor is thing? I don't think anyone would mind forgetting about that.
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 22:54 |
Davros1 posted:I don't know, I think the whole "River Song is suddenly part Time Lord and can give her regenerations to the Doctor to save his life" far more annoying. That was Moffat at his most half-arsed. Recurring villains and regeneration bumpf, two things that have a nasty habit of being crap.
|
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 23:24 |
|
Forktoss posted:New pics from The Time of the Doctor! I don't use this emote in an un-ironic manner but I'm going to make an exception here: Mr. Snazz posted:...Introducing Mads Mikkelsen as The Doctor?
|
# ? Dec 12, 2013 23:40 |
Rita Repulsa posted:River was shown to be able to pilot the tardis long before they revealed what she was. Everything about the Doctor needing to be smaller has been forgotten, so yep. Also we already know that that sound bite is from the end of the episode when the Doctor regenerates due to old age and his regeneration energy wipes out the Daleks.
|
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 00:17 |
|
According to someone on another forum, who got it from yet another forum, the previously posted spoilers is a 100% accurate plot description and its caused a minor shitstorm involving internal BBC memos, several set people being fired, and future series are to be filmed in complete lockdown. Anyone know anything about this?
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 00:42 |
|
I heard it from a guy that you're 100% correct that this rumour exists
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 00:54 |
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:I heard it from a guy that you're 100% correct that this rumour exists Like, for reals and junk?
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 00:59 |
|
MrL_JaKiri posted:I heard it from a guy that you're 100% correct that this rumour exists We'll have to wait to see if it shows up in Private Eye.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 01:04 |
|
twoot posted:According to someone on another forum, who got it from yet another forum, the previously posted spoilers is a 100% accurate plot description and its caused a minor shitstorm involving internal BBC memos, several set people being fired, and future series are to be filmed in complete lockdown. My uncle who works at Nintendo confirmed this.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 01:15 |
|
twoot posted:According to someone on another forum, who got it from yet another forum, the previously posted spoilers is a 100% accurate plot description and its caused a minor shitstorm involving internal BBC memos, several set people being fired, and future series are to be filmed in complete lockdown. It wouldn't surprise me if it was true. It shocked me that pretty much NOTHING besides a few set pics was leaked from Day of the Doctor and all the "spoilers" were wildly wrong, and then the very next episode we got a blow by blow, apparently 100% accurate synopsis. It kind of took my by surprise, since my usual "spoiler mode" with finales and big episodes is "stay in spoiler thread til as late as possible when the full details come out." This came so soon and was so full it's probably more than I would have wanted to know.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 01:16 |
|
Astroman posted:It wouldn't surprise me if it was true. It shocked me that pretty much NOTHING besides a few set pics was leaked from Day of the Doctor and all the "spoilers" were wildly wrong, and then the very next episode we got a blow by blow, apparently 100% accurate synopsis. I was still on the fence about how accurate it could be, but then somebody capped this from one of the BBC christmas trailers; It pretty much confirms the ages 900 years part of the spoiler synopsis. It also looks really rubbish.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 01:26 |
|
Barry Foster posted:It was a staggeringly cheap cliffhanger, yeah. And made the Tenth Doctor look even more of an arsehole than usual. It made the ratings jump like, half a million for the following episode though.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 01:36 |
|
twoot posted:It pretty much confirms the ages 900 years part of the spoiler synopsis. It also looks really rubbish. Still better than Dobby the Time Lord House Elf.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 01:39 |
|
twoot posted:I was still on the fence about how accurate it could be, but then somebody capped this from one of the BBC christmas trailers; This Christmas see Jeremy Clarkson as: The Doctor!
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 01:45 |
|
It's baTTle. There are T's in that word. Fucks sake.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 01:47 |
|
twoot posted:I was still on the fence about how accurate it could be, but then somebody capped this from one of the BBC christmas trailers; Why are y'all hating, this is pretty legit.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 02:36 |
|
RyuujinBlueZ posted:This Christmas see Jeremy Clarkson as: The Doctor! I would watch this, but only if they made James May ginger and put him in a miniskirt.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 02:38 |
|
That's a legit fatsuit face and light-saber, yes. Do we flush Moffat with the regen or are we just losing the talent?
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 02:39 |
|
moths posted:That's a legit fatsuit face and light-saber, yes. And then you watch David Tennant the imp become Telepathic Jesus. Or two random, annoying hicks randomly slipping and falling to their death in a pit of nuclear fire. Time of the doctor is going to be a much better episode than any non-Moffat episode. You're just never content.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 02:47 |
|
Whizbang posted:I would watch this, but only if they made James May ginger and put him in a miniskirt. I'm still sad, given all three recent Doctors (and Billie Piper) have been on Top Gear that they didn't do a Race of the Doctors special on Top Gear to further celebrate the 50th. But yes, I too would watch that. May can be Amy and Hammond can be Rory.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 02:56 |
|
Super.Jesus posted:Time of the doctor is going to be a much better episode than any non-Moffat episode. Are you privy to some information that the rest of the world isn't?
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 03:15 |
moths posted:Are you privy to some information that the rest of the world isn't? He's privy to the secret of enjoying entertainment, passed down from the secret TV monks of Darbyshire, preserved for the time when the world would be ready for its wisdom. That time will never come.
|
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 03:26 |
|
moths posted:Are you privy to some information that the rest of the world isn't? Doing a marathon from the 9th doctor to season 7 with people who are new to the series. The increase in quality since Moffat has started running the show is readily apparent, and his episodes in RTD's run are the strongest. From the Time Lord's last downright terrible plan to fat people with funny names falling in a pit randomly, Moffat has consistently been a better showrunner. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdeF8eg8bIU Super.Jesus fucked around with this message at 03:43 on Dec 13, 2013 |
# ? Dec 13, 2013 03:40 |
|
I'm just asking if there's some esoteric reason to think that the finale won't be the steaming shitpile it looks like from the spoilers. Because you're saying it's going to be better than Douglas Adams episodes, and those are some huge-rear end shoes.
|
# ? Dec 13, 2013 03:50 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 12:11 |
|
moths posted:I'm just asking if there's some esoteric reason to think that the finale won't be the steaming shitpile it looks like from the spoilers. I have read those spoilers and it looks like a pretty fine Doctor Who season finale. Meanwhile, you think it's going to be steaming pile of poo poo based on half a paragraph of second-hand testimony. I rather prefer cautious optimism. I mean: quote:Christmas Special: (possibly called Time Of The Doctor) Please identify problems in this plot that can't be explained by the fact that this is a rather fragmentary spoiler plot outline. Super.Jesus fucked around with this message at 03:59 on Dec 13, 2013 |
# ? Dec 13, 2013 03:53 |