|
also somebody is claiming that the double-spend attempt Robawesome found wasn't made using the transaction mallability problem and is asking how i found that transaction. where'd you get that, Robawesome?
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 20:56 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 15:16 |
|
transfatphobic posted:and scene
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 20:58 |
|
Cold on a Cob posted:not sure what's funnier, that this is a known flaw that they told everyone to work around, or that nobody did so latter the solution is "don't trust untrusted data" in a protocol that assumes nothing is trustworthy until a few trees are dead to verify it as an actual bug id probably having a hard time getting funding for a fix bc the work around is so simple and the fix would be magnitudes more expensive then again i also am mostly a hw side and no one is paying me to respin old boards when we hit eol for components
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 20:59 |
|
ayn rand hand job posted:latter It's a drat terrible programming practice to leave holes in your product like that with the justification of "your implementation MUST DO THIS". A much simpler solution is "don't give the user the wrong impression in the first place." Basically, at this point, the transaction ID is...nothing. A transaction's Unique ID is a combination of stats about it, not the transaction ID. That's a bad practice, and I'd be ashamed of any code I wrote that did it. note: Much of the code I have written had far worse practices than that. i am always ashamed
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:02 |
Dex posted:that man stole my kidney to make a point about the inherent oppression in regulating the organ trade industry but that's a known issue with having kidneys.
|
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:05 |
|
keep your kidneys offline
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:06 |
|
uploading my cyber kidneys to hold my cyber coins oh cyber piss
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:07 |
|
Shifty Pony posted:but that's a known issue with having kidneys. there's a wiki page on this, so we're not culpable. gently caress you got both my kidneys
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:07 |
|
i keep my kidneys in cold storage myself
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:07 |
|
hey no one's posted a wall of text in a while so here's one from the verge on the "bitcoin bump"The Bitcoin bump: stores turn to virtual currency for a marketing boost posted:Accepting Bitcoin brings press and a surge of geeky customers
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:08 |
BeOSPOS posted:there's a wiki page on this, so we're not culpable. gently caress you got both my kidneys also got some other guy's kidney because he didn't sufficiently armor his flank and really that's just asking for me to take it.
|
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:09 |
|
listen, if mtgox didn't want its bitcoins stolen, it wouldn't have been dressed like that
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:10 |
|
Shifty Pony posted:also got some other guy's kidney because he didn't sufficiently armor his flank and really that's just asking for me to take it. i didnt even need that kidney but i had to prove a point
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:11 |
|
Heresiarch posted:i know, it's just really funny that blockchain.info is calling it that lol
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:14 |
|
ok gently caress kidneys, i have built my own altorgan to do the same thing but even better, and i'm sure my body will catch on and start using it any day now
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:14 |
|
theflyingorc posted:Basically, at this point, the transaction ID is...nothing. A transaction's Unique ID is a combination of stats about it, not the transaction ID. That's a bad practice, and I'd be ashamed of any code I wrote that did it. and of course they aren't always going to be unique but that's the workaround they want everyone to use
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:14 |
|
i think it's wrong to have regulations against harvesting and selling organs if the free market is providing a market for it, who are we to judge?
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:15 |
|
Heresiarch posted:also somebody is claiming that the double-spend attempt Robawesome found wasn't made using the transaction mallability problem and is asking how i found that transaction. where'd you get that, Robawesome? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=457546.0 http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1xkp1e/recent_large_volume_double_spending/ One of those, i think
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:21 |
|
stoutfish posted:i think it's wrong to have regulations against harvesting and selling organs if people dont want their organs or are irresponsible with them, then they should go to someone who wants an organ and will treat it better
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:22 |
|
I don't think this was posted here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhIz2Dz_KEE
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:23 |
|
[–]tulipfutures -4 points 43 minutes ago* Coke and Pepsi should just work together right? Ask me if I'm surprised that bitcoiners don't understand that competition is GOOD for business. It forces businesses to compete for consumer dollars, otherwise it's a monopoly and they can charge what they want. You should really take an "introduction to economics" class if you're going to be involved with bitcoin. It's really embarassing that you don't even understand the fundamentals, and funny that you got 3 upvotes for it. [–]yonkfu 2 points 32 minutes ago Your kidding yourself if you don't think coke and Pepsi work together
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:26 |
unpacked robinhood posted:I don't think this was posted here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhIz2Dz_KEE it was
|
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:27 |
it's still funny though
|
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:27 |
|
Robawesome posted:[]tulipfutures -4 points 43 minutes ago* lol
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:27 |
|
coke and pepsi are just nsa government shills anyway. you delusional loving goons.
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:29 |
|
so we're all agreed, coke and pepsi teamed up with the reverse vampires
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 21:35 |
|
some coiner posts his own physical coin designquote:[–]donniesf 2 points 6 heures de ça
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:05 |
|
Dex posted:ok gently caress kidneys, i have put filter paper down my throat to do the same thing but even better, and i'm sure my body will catch on and start using it any day now
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:07 |
|
Robawesome posted:[–]tulipfutures -4 points 43 minutes ago* best buddies coke and pepsi
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:08 |
|
So are they saying collusion is a good thing or a bad thing?
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:10 |
|
TVarmy posted:So are they saying collusion is a good thing or a bad thing? he thinks coke and pepsi are working together to make sure they both have a healthy amount of market share and revenue, literally Darkman Fanpage posted:best buddies coke and pepsi
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:12 |
|
anthonypants posted:if those stats are always going to be unique then why not just make a transaction id out of the hash of those stats i thought that was what the transaction id was, only you can combine them in any order before hashing so each set of unique stats can have loads of different txids
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:13 |
|
Robawesome posted:he thinks coke and pepsi are working together to make sure they both have a healthy amount of market share and revenue, literally despite the fact that the two get into legal battles fairly regularly
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:23 |
|
anthonypants posted:if those stats are always going to be unique then why not just make a transaction id out of the hash of those stats
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:24 |
|
Darkman Fanpage posted:despite the fact that the two get into legal battles fairly regularly just a ploy by the rich banksters
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:24 |
|
Friend Commuter posted:i thought that was what the transaction id was, only you can combine them in any order before hashing so each set of unique stats can have loads of different txids theflyingorc posted:it is generated that way, apparently somebody did the hash in a stupid manner
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:26 |
|
Robawesome posted:https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=457546.0 thanks interestingly enough, the first transaction is no longer flagged as potential double-spend and the second transaction isn't there at all anymore is this how it's supposed to work with orphaned transactions or did blockchain.info do some fiddling?
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:35 |
|
Using TXID to track your Bitcoin balance is as stupid as using bank note serial numbers to track the amount of money you have in your wallet. (self.Bitcoin) submitted 1 minute ago by Rodyland The analogy isn't perfect, but I think it's a reasonable lay-person explanation. Just like someone can swap out a $10 note from your wallet and make you "lose" $10, transaction malleability means you can transfer Bitcoin and "lose" that transaction. The best way to know how much is in your wallet is to count the notes, and the best way to know how much Bitcoin you have is to count the unspent outputs.
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:40 |
|
Heresiarch posted:thanks yeah that's how it's supposed to work one reached six confirmations and found its way into the official blockchain and the other was orphaned and discarded
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 22:48 |
|
|
# ? May 13, 2024 15:16 |
|
http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/11/usa-bitcoin-idUSL2N0LG1P520140211 capital requirements for bitcoin-related businesses
|
# ? Feb 11, 2014 23:03 |