|
Heresiarch posted:also known as the Post vs poo poo-Post Problem, which also involves the sets of SP-Hard (To
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 10:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 18:48 |
|
|
TVarmy posted:if overstock is holding 10 percent of their bitcoins, and bitlicences go into effect, won't they have to cash out? or stop selling things to new york? no because you see a bitcoin is just a string of digits and therefore is covered by the first amendement much like how cocaine is just a string of chemical symbols and therefore is covered by the first amendment, your honour
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 10:39
|
|
|
much like how these computer files are just strings of numbers, and if the fbi happen to load them into a program that interprets them as child pornography then why am I the one being charged and not them. MOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 11:17
|
|
|
People's need to be in collectibles will never cease to amaze: https://www.deckbound.com/?r=rd1
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 15:54
|
|
|
TVarmy posted:if overstock is holding 10 percent of their bitcoins, and bitlicences go into effect, won't they have to cash out? or stop selling things to new york? They could comply with the bitlicense. Presumably, as a large business, they have accountants and attorneys on staff.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 16:18
|
|
|
sonatinas posted:People's need to be in collectibles will never cease to amaze: another on to add to the butwithbitcoin business name generator
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 16:27
|
|
|
someone needs to start an exchange to sell those online tradable playing cards.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 16:38
|
|
|
AlbieQuirky posted:They could comply with the bitlicense. Presumably, as a large business, they have accountants and attorneys on staff. His point is that the Bitlicense appears to have strong limitations on how you can speculate with client funds, and Bitcoins aren't on the approved list of things you can speculate in. to comply with the license, bitpay/coinbase should have to sell their BTC holdings, which are likely pretty large
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 16:41
|
|
|
TVarmy posted:someone needs to start an exchange to sell those online tradable playing cards. maybe there's an old domain name that someone could use
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 17:20
|
|
|
TVarmy posted:someone needs to start an exchange to sell those online tradable playing cards.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 18:36
|
|
|
TVarmy posted:someone needs to start an exchange to sell those online tradable playing cards.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 20:27
|
|
|
theflyingorc posted:His point is that the Bitlicense appears to have strong limitations on how you can speculate with client funds, and Bitcoins aren't on the approved list of things you can speculate in. to comply with the license, bitpay/coinbase should have to sell their BTC holdings, which are likely pretty large bitpay and coinbase, yes. overstock is not an exchange or broker, though, and it's allowed to speculate in whatever the hell it wants with its loose change, subject only to its reporting obligations as a publicly-traded corporation and its fiduciary duties to its shareholders
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 21:02
|
|
|
TVarmy posted:someone needs to start an exchange to sell those online tradable playing cards.  And the circle is complete
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:05
|
|
|
Man...bitcoins are boring now.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:07
|
|
|
sharknado slashfic posted:Man...bitcoins are boring now. the laff mines are stripped bare, and the mining staff are tired
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 22:11
|
|
|
it still has its moments: http://money.cnn.com/infographic/technology/what-is-bitcoin/#sectionFive
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:10
|
|
|
if there were a way to upload farts to the buttchain i think the technology could really take off
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:15
|
|
|
i mean, i know wikipedia wont accept my bottled farts as donations, but if i could digitize them somehow..
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:16
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:22
|
|
|
the glassy-eyed hipsters stare past each other. a thin stream of piss sprays from one phone to the other. this is the future of money.
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:23
|
|
|
this facial hair sharing app works wonders brother. now we can each have half a goatee. how does the guy on the right's glasses stay on without the pince nez part? Is he wearing two monocles? Is he dual-noc'cing it?
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:25
|
|
|
duh those are obviously robot eyes and he being controled by a consciousness on the blockchain. its the future of technology
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:30
|
|
|
two phones, back and forth, forever
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:31
|
|
|
))[]<>[]((
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2014 23:56
|
|
|
LethalGeek posted:it still has its moments: i almost feel sorry for the bitcoiners; it can't be fun to have cnn call you a fat loser nerd 
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:03
|
|
|
uranus posted:duh those are obviously robot eyes and he being controled by a consciousness on the blockchain. its the future of technology what if someone doublespent your soul? would you be both souls? e: and what if someone put your soul in the same wallet as hitler's soul and your souls got mixed up and you were in hitler's body? would you be evil, then because of hitler's evil brain? ee: hitler got cloned by some manboys from brazil.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:05
|
|
|
LethalGeek posted:it still has its moments: it's really telling that every single bitcoin explanation I've seen (at least, the ones that don't immediately slam it into the ground based on the protocol's failings) is laid out like a web3.0 picture book with small words next to big bright pictures that pop in and out of view as you scroll via the magic of html5/CSS. Isn't this sort of 'treat the reader like a toddler with zero attention span' presentation one of the hallmarks of crazy cults seeking new members?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:09
|
|
|
Soricidus posted:the glassy-eyed hipsters stare past each other. a thin stream of piss sprays from one phone to the other. this is the future of money. the yospostest of pics
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:20
|
|
|
 http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/09/scotland-independence-referendum-currency-bitcoin
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:23
|
|
|
bitcoin: a reliable* medium** of exchange***
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:26
|
|
|
Why wouldn't they just use the euro
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:26
|
|
|
Segmentation Fault posted:Why wouldn't they just use the euro end english economic domination! begin much, much harsher german economic domination!
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:29
|
|
|
fermun posted:
i used to think highly of mother jones. what happened to them?
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:29
|
|
CoolCab posted:end english economic domination! begin much, much harsher german economic domination! I don't really know much about Scottish independence or indeed European politics in general.
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:32
|
|
|
prefect posted:i used to think highly of mother jones. what happened to them? literally my first thought as well
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:34
|
|
|
i enjoy seeing infographics gloss over how utterly inefficient mining is.  pants.   the blurb is confusing and does little to explain how this lazy projection was made. does this mean near 21 million bitcoins times the projected value of bitcoin in the distant future from an up uP UP chart would be bigger than the US economy? or that in the future, there will be more bitcoins than dollars (alert ron paul and awaken satoshi)?  multiple ways to hodl and cash out? neat.
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:37
|
|
|
CoolCab posted:end english economic domination! begin much, much harsher german economic domination! this is a surprisingly good post for the bitcoin thread
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:41
|
|
|
prefect posted:i almost feel sorry for the bitcoiners; it can't be fun to have cnn call you a fat loser nerd
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 00:52
|
|
|
ugh, they installed a buttcoin atm next to the redbox machine by my work
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 01:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 18:48 |
|
|
maybe i can jam the bill acceptor with pokemon cards
|
|
#
?
Sep 17, 2014 01:06
|
|