|
cravius posted:Why do you need this thing? I don't understand how you could possibly see utility in it. What are you trying to say exactly  E; 
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:22
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 14, 2024 03:13 |
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:It's actually very common for handguns to be used for hunting, target shooting, and fast-paced shooting competitions like IPSC.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:22
|
|
|
This is the most pathetic comparison, but this attack is like Gone Girl where the woman explains that she's framing her husband for murder to get revenge for patriarchy. But non-MRAs are able to see past the bullshit and say no, lady. You're a narcissistic sociopath looking for justification after the fact. E: Nice thread icon switcheroo
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:23
|
|
|
If my hobbies were enabling murderers I'd get better hobbies.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:23
|
|
|
DOOP posted:In non-gun news, some of the names on the witness list for Chaka Fatah's trial include Please tell me that's the sometimes funny MAD TV Will Sasso.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:24
|
|
|
Talmonis posted:A lot of people actually need protection in their line of work. Certain kinds of lawyers for instance. People who perform evictions or repossession. Police need them solely due to the public already having so many. Anyone who transports money/gems. My point exactly. Why should we ban things because a section if the population thinks that you don't need to have it? Need is a very relative concept.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:24
|
|
|
Talmonis posted:A lot of people actually need protection in their line of work. Certain kinds of lawyers for instance. People who perform evictions or repossession. Police need them solely due to the public already having so many. Anyone who transports money/gems. Add reporters to that.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
cravius posted:My point exactly. Why should we ban things because a section if the population thinks that you don't need to have it? Need is a very relative concept. Hell, better not ban anything ever again I guess.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
An Angry Bug posted:If my hobbies were enabling murderers I'd get better hobbies. Oh, I'm sure they are one way or another. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
This sounds like a perfect time for North Dakota to legalize police taserdrones.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:26
|
|
|
cravius posted:My point exactly. Why should we ban things because a section if the population thinks that you don't need to have it? Need is a very relative concept. In Europe the people that need guns for their work have them and the rest of the populace doesn't tho.. But oh well gunchat 
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:27
|
|
|
haveblue posted:This sounds like a perfect time for North Dakota to legalize police taserdrones. Cool, they sound like a good less lethal incapacitation that can keep officers out of harms way.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:28
|
|
|
zoux posted:Hell, better not ban anything ever again I guess. No, but passing laws banning anything should have a better justification than "why do you need that?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:28
|
|
|
Talmonis posted:A lot of people actually need protection in their line of work. Certain kinds of lawyers for instance. People who perform evictions or repossession. Police need them solely due to the public already having so many. Anyone who transports money/gems. "Needing a gun for work" is different from "needing a gun to have it."
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:29
|
|
|
cravius posted:My point exactly. Why should we ban things because a section if the population thinks that you don't need to have it? Need is a very relative concept. Not really. The vast majority have no business owning or carrying a handgun, and are a danger to themselves and others by doing so. It should require a license to purchase or carry one. One that would make drat sure you knew what you were doing, and could prove an actual need for it. Regardless, it is impossible to change the legal status of firearms, and the point is moot. Nelson Mandingo posted:"Needing a gun for work" is different from "needing a gun to have it."
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:29
|
|
|
haveblue posted:This sounds like a perfect time for North Dakota to legalize police taserdrones. Cyberpunk is back, and in a big way
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:29
|
|
|
Teflon Don posted:Cyberpunk is back, and in a big way The only way to stop a bad drone with a taser is a good guy with a broken microwave.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:It's actually very common for handguns to be used for hunting, target shooting, and fast-paced shooting competitions like IPSC. Handgun hunting is just the oddest drat thing. I can understand the skill that goes into it and the draw of needing to be close to the animal to take it but it is still strange, especially because many of the things being hunted can absolutely gently caress you up and aren't something you generally want to get near.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
Teflon Don posted:Cyberpunk is back, and in a big way It never left.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:32
|
|
|
I want an anti-drone drone.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:32
|
|
|
Believe me, if not for the proliferation of illegal handguns, most gunowners wouldn't feel the need to carry. But, as has been acknowledged, Pandora's box is already open and there's really no going back.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:33
|
|
|
Drones that grab people's guns and eat them, each one personally signed by Obama.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:35
|
|
|
cravius posted:No, but passing laws banning anything should have a better justification than "why do you need that?" Yeah, well I can't think of a single reason for banning guns besides I don't think they're necessary, so I guess the NRA wins again.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:36
|
|
|
chitoryu12 posted:The only thing more annoying than claims that a shooting are false flags or blaming it on "libtards" are the people whose knee-jerk response to every murder is to copy and paste the same passive-aggressive "NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO TALK ABOUT GUNS" stuff until they flood the first page of the incident with it. Man if we gotta wait till all the bodies are cold before we can talk about gun control then we are going to have to wait a very long time. zoux posted:Home defense, slippery slope, 2nd Amendment. If you pay attention to gun memes, apparently shotguns are made for home defense.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
Wait I thought of one.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
Shifty Pony posted:Handgun hunting is just the oddest drat thing. Isn't that danger part of the appeal as well?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:38
|
|
|
Stop being a coward and use a spear or bow like your ancestors did. You want to kill an animal, it deserves a shot at killing you instead.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:39
|
|
|
An Angry Bug posted:Stop being a coward and use a spear or bow like your ancestors did. You want to kill an animal, it deserves a shot at killing you instead. Our ancestors were actually all about industrial hunting. If they'd had AKs they'd have been mowing down animals like nothing. Plus we already restrict a lot of the *really* unfair weapons like punt guns. 
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:43
|
|
|
Every time people talk about how you absolutely don't ever need guns I just think of the stories from people talking about using guns to defend themselves. Some of those stories don't involve using guns, but most do and I just read them thinking about how all of those people would have been doomed to those horrible experiences or being murdered if they weren't able to defend themselves. The Command and Conquer one is particularly disturbing. Fun thing to think about! The vast majority of people who are killed with a firearm in America have criminal records! If you're not a young black male and don't have a criminal record you have a vanishingly small chance of being a firearm homicide victim. But let the media whip up the hysteria and frenzy.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:43
|
|
|
Brannock posted:Fun thing to think about! The vast majority of people who are killed with a firearm in America have criminal records! If you're not a young black male and don't have a criminal record you have a vanishingly small chance of being a firearm homicide victim. But let the media whip up the hysteria and frenzy. I would prefer less people to be killed with firearms in general, thanks.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:45
|
|
|
What couldn't find a relevant article on Stormfront?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:45
|
|
|
Brannock posted:Fun thing to think about! The vast majority of people who are killed with a firearm in America have criminal records! If you're not a young black male and don't have a criminal record you have a vanishingly small chance of being a firearm homicide victim. But let the media whip up the hysteria and frenzy.  Ok friend, I guess everything is alright after all. Those people probably deserved it anyway.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:45
|
|
|
Brannock posted:Fun thing to think about! The vast majority of people who are killed with a firearm in America have criminal records! If you're not a young black male and don't have a criminal record you have a vanishingly small chance of being a firearm homicide victim. But let the media whip up the hysteria and frenzy. I'm sorry, do you think this is an argument against gun control?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
The universe is random, cruel and insane. Owning a gun won't protect you from that. If anything it just makes your death by gun more likely. Existence is a dark comedy, not an action movie.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
Why don't we do something that'd really help reduce this sort of thing, and improve treatment for mental illness?
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
Brannock seems to think that the only reason to be for gun control is if you personally are afraid of being shot to death. Empathy does not exist. Vote Ron Paul.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:47
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:CNN went back on their thing and are going to show the shooting footage once per hour. CNN is the worst network on television. At least Fox and MSNBC are just disingenuous shills.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:48
|
|
|
Warcabbit posted:Why don't we do something that'd really help reduce this sort of thing, and improve treatment for mental illness? How are u posted:Brannock seems to think that the only reason to be for gun control is if you personally are afraid of being shot to death. Empathy does not exist. Vote Ron Paul.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:48
|
|
|
Warcabbit posted:Why don't we do something that'd really help reduce this sort of thing, and improve treatment for mental illness? That costs money.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:50
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 14, 2024 03:13 |
|
|
Brannock, please. This isn't the right time to defend gun ownership. Two people are dead.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2015 18:51
|
|
