|
Violator posted:
I'm fine with the Holy United Imperial Americlintonian Demopublic
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:34 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 16:26 |
|
Boon posted:^^^ Stop trying to suppress the youth vote man!
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:54 |
|
Taerkar posted:Stop trying to suppress the youth vote man! How can you suppress the youth vote? They do that themselves.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:59 |
|
zoux posted:New thread? Time for your anti-Arzy booster. Also this From http://election.princeton.edu/house-polling-margin/
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 17:59 |
|
Trump's burning down the GOP but the election is much too far away to consider flipping the House as more than a fevered dream. Is it more likely than Clinton getting charged with anything for the email server? Sure, but "it's July but the House might flip Dem!" is like some alt-Arzy levels of crazy.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:04 |
|
fishmech posted:I'm fine with the Holy United Imperial Americlintonian Demopublic Fine with it then, fine with it now. Woof. Is the dumpster fire actually putting the house into play?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:05 |
|
Snatch Duster posted:This has been making rounds on my facebook feed.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:07 |
|
Evil Fluffy posted:Trump's burning down the GOP but the election is much too far away to consider flipping the House as more than a fevered dream. Is it more likely than Clinton getting charged with anything for the email server? Sure, but "it's July but the House might flip Dem!" is like some alt-Arzy levels of crazy. As long as the massive gerrymandering remains intact and voters easily swayed to mindlessly trust "their" congressmen, yeah. The possibility of Trump taking office has horrified some into waking up, but let's not pretend that its anywhere near enough to make the usual GOP congress voters pay attention.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:11 |
|
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/07/report_fbi_ordered_journalists_not_to_record_clintonlynch_meeting.htmlquote:“The former president steps into her plane. They then speak for 30 minutes privately. The FBI there on the tarmac instructing everybody around ‘no photos, no pictures, no cell phones.'” What did they mean by this? ----------------
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:12 |
|
Really enjoyed that Mother Jones prison article, so much so that I looked up its author. I didn't realize he was one of the Iranian hikers who was held for two years. I wonder if mentioning that would have got him some cred? Also, I would have been interested in hearing how things in Alabama compared to Iran.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:13 |
|
Mentioning that probably would've blown his cover pretty much immediately.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:15 |
|
Narciss posted:http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/07/report_fbi_ordered_journalists_not_to_record_clintonlynch_meeting.html It means you're looking for a conspiracy that doesn't exist.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:15 |
|
poo poo is apparently getting real in Bangladesh - sounds like ISIS doing a Paris-style restaurant hostages style attack.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:18 |
|
So we just gonna ignore Ted Cruz using the senate to openly accuse sitting members of congress as being terrorist sympathizers just because they're Muslim? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/congress-muslim-brotherhood_us_5772b615e4b0352fed3e0372 e: I might be late on this actually
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:21 |
|
A Fancy 400 lbs posted:Mentioning that probably would've blown his cover pretty much immediately. Well, I was being facetious. Just surprised there was no mention of it in the article, he writes like he's never been in prison before.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:21 |
|
Narciss posted:http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/07/report_fbi_ordered_journalists_not_to_record_clintonlynch_meeting.html A complete list of things meant by this:
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:25 |
|
Raerlynn posted:It means you're looking for a conspiracy that doesn't exist. Hillary Clinton is under federal investigation by the FBI. Her husband meets with the woman who will decide whether or not to pursue charges for 30 minutes, and he does so secretly on a parked plane with 0 press coverage. Lynch then says all they talked about was grandkids and golf. These are indisputable facts. If you fail to take these facts and form the opinion "this stinks a little bit", I have to question your sanity. ----------------
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:28 |
|
pathetic little tramp posted:poo poo is apparently getting real in Bangladesh - sounds like ISIS doing a Paris-style restaurant hostages style attack. Islamists have been pretty furious there for a while. After a string of assassinations of prominent secularist/atheist bloggers and writers and some gay rights advocates, the government finally cracked down and nabbed some ringleaders. I imagine this is that group getting "back" at the government for doing so.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:29 |
|
Narciss posted:Hillary Clinton is under federal investigation by the FBI. It's also really suspicious that afterwards she said she'd follow the recommendations of the FBI, which is out of her hands. This is definitely a huge conspiracy.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:38 |
|
Narciss posted:Hillary Clinton is under federal investigation by the FBI. "It stinks" because you are. Looking for. A conspiracy. That does not. Exist. Your post history indicates you already have an answer; you're posting the question because you're trying to concern troll. gently caress. Off.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:40 |
|
Narciss posted:Hillary Clinton is under federal investigation by the FBI. The optics are horrid. This is a prime example of the Democratic tendency to do everything in their power to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:40 |
|
Talmonis posted:The optics are horrid. This is a prime example of the Democratic tendency to do everything in their power to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. "Optics are horrid"...? For who? Who could possibly care about this? They could be talking on the phone for two hours every day and nobody would know. They talk for thirty minutes in person, and it's a big deal?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:42 |
|
Lemming posted:"Optics are horrid"...? For who? Who could possibly care about this? They could be talking on the phone for two hours every day and nobody would know. They talk for thirty minutes in person, and it's a big deal? Exchanging long protein strands confuses voters.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:44 |
|
Goatman Sacks posted:So we just gonna ignore Ted Cruz using the senate to openly accuse sitting members of congress as being terrorist sympathizers just because they're Muslim? He keeps trying to raise the bar for being human scum, doesn't he?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:50 |
|
Boon posted:^^^ Thanks for posting but none of this changes reddit being bad
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:56 |
|
Hillary was never going to be indicted and politicians using their political capital to protect themselves is pretty standard. It's like how no one is going to arrest anyone in the Oakland Police Department for repeatedly raping a child. Whose going to arrest them? Anyone who tried would have to arrest themselves in turn, since the whole department is in on it. Corruption never changes.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:56 |
|
Narciss posted:Hillary Clinton is under federal investigation by the FBI. Just so you know this is level poo poo.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 18:57 |
|
Lemming posted:"Optics are horrid"...? For who? Who could possibly care about this? They could be talking on the phone for two hours every day and nobody would know. They talk for thirty minutes in person, and it's a big deal? It's a objective fact that the optics are terrible. Why is it so hard to admit that? Forget Bill or Hillary or Lynch or any specific person and look at it as it is being seen -- a meeting took place, which was purposefully tried to be kept secret, between the AG and the husband of the person who is the subject of a investigation. There is no political theory in which that doesn't equate to bad optics.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:03 |
|
Wikkheiser posted:This should be the national anthem. Or maybe we could have a national symbol that doesn't feature God for once?
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:04 |
|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:It's a objective fact that the optics are terrible. Why is it so hard to admit that? The camera on my phone is all blurry now cause Hillary and Lynch did a thing. Thanks OBAMA
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:04 |
|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:It's a objective fact that the optics are terrible. Why is it so hard to admit that? This is a true statement. It was a bad idea, regardless of intention, as it gives the media something to scream about and pretend there's a horse race.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:05 |
|
Battle Hymn of the Republic is good but everyone knows that America the Beautiful is objectively the best National Anthem
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:06 |
|
The pol cartoon in the OP is wrong. Christie isn't fat enough.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:07 |
|
there wolf posted:Or maybe we could have a national symbol that doesn't feature God for once? Sorry that historically signifigant songs, sung by the literal saviors of the Republic offend you by mentioning God in them. I assure you, it wasn't the "God" reference, that has many of us revere that song and it's implications.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:07 |
Obviously Lynch has never met a Clinton ever and is going to be hugely influenced by 30 minutes with Bill
|
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:08 |
|
Boon posted:^^^ Big Bernie supporter here that plans to skip merrily into the voting booth and cast my vote for Hillary come November while humming a jaunty tune. I seriously don't understand how someone can say they stand for Sanders and go Trump.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:08 |
|
BetterToRuleInHell posted:It's a objective fact that the optics are terrible. Why is it so hard to admit that? The optics are bad. Sure. Horrible optics is something like Trump saying all Mexicans are rapists broadcast on TV where people are going to talk about it for years. This is something people are going to whine about for about thirty more minutes and then nobody will know it ever happened, except for a few screeds on news article comments. It's bad but it just don't matter and nobody will know or care a week from now. It's just not a big deal.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:08 |
|
^^^^^ You don't have to misdirect by mentioning Trump or excusing it away as no big deal, that's not the argument being made ^^^^^Talmonis posted:This is a true statement. It was a bad idea, regardless of intention, as it gives the media something to scream about and pretend there's a horse race. Lynch had to speak about it at the Aspen Summit this morning and publicly affirm that she would abide by the recommendations by the FBI -- even she knows she had to get out in front of it because it looked bad. Clinton's aids had to be asking what Bill was thinking after that meeting. It was a silly move.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:10 |
|
Lemming posted:The optics are bad. Sure. Horrible optics is something like Trump saying all Mexicans are rapists broadcast on TV where people are going to talk about it for years. The problem you're forgetting is that Democrats, especially and in this case specifically Hillary Clinton, are held to a much higher standard by the media. Trump saying something terrible, that should have already had him removed from the race, is just another Friday at this point.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:10 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 16:26 |
|
Talmonis posted:This is a true statement. It was a bad idea, regardless of intention, as it gives the media something to scream about and pretend there's a horse race. I guess for me it's difficult picturing someone ordering armed guards to tell people "No phones! No recording! They're talking about GRANDKIDS in there, stand back!" unless there was something more going on. But then, this has to be the sloppiest way to "keep something secret" I can think of, because even though the meeting itself wasn't recorded, it wasn't exactly a secret meeting either. Because now there's a lot of questions about it since such a big deal was made. It's just sloppy if nothing else, and I admit it looks shady on top of that.
|
# ? Jul 1, 2016 19:14 |