|
gradenko_2000 posted:Isn't it within a private business owner's rights to refuse service to certain patrons, so long as the basis for the refusal isn't discrimination under a protected classification (which "being a Trump supporter" would not be)? In about 47 states yes. A small handful ban political discrimination, and it's mostly liberal ones that do. Joementum posted:Paul Ryan seems to think July 4th was when a battle happened. We won the Civil War on July 4th, 1863 - that was the day that Grant took Vicksburg, the last holdout fort on the Mississippi, and the day that Lee retreated from Gettysburg. It took about a year and a half for the South to give up, but they lost it then.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 15:36 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 06:21 |
|
Side note: General Betrayus is the name of the villain in the Pac man cartoon Z which is somehow worse than that one Battletoads cartoon from the nineties, and my three year old unfortunately loves it.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 15:37 |
|
greatn posted:Side note: General Betrayus is the name of the villain in the Pac man cartoon Z which is somehow worse than that one Battletoads cartoon from the nineties, and my three year old unfortunately loves it. Oh god my son watches that, its awful.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 15:37 |
|
Reminder, the reason they went after Petraeus wasn't because he gave classified information to his mistress -- that was the stated reason of course -- but it was because he lied to investigators.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 15:42 |
|
Jackson Taus posted:In about 47 states yes. A small handful ban political discrimination, and it's mostly liberal ones that do. it looks like just DC and puerto rico? plus NY for "political activities" but that's just wikipedia since i cba to do a extensive search, but if you have another source that talks about it i'd like to see it quote:We won the Civil War on July 4th, 1863 - that was the day that Grant took Vicksburg, the last holdout fort on the Mississippi, and the day that Lee retreated from Gettysburg. do you think he really meant that? curious to see how many people would pick that up without needing to search for it, but i'm not a big civil war buff
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 15:43 |
|
Live Feed of FBI Director's statement: http://www.nbcnews.com/video/watch-live-fbi-director-comey-makes-statement-322521155994
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:00 |
|
I have a luncheon with the President of my uni soon, so I am prolly going to miss the fireworks.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:01 |
|
Trump will announce his VP pick next week. http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/donald-trump-vice-president-search/index.html CNN sources say it will be either: - Chris Christie - Newt Gingrich - Mike Pence - Joni Ernst
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:06 |
|
Clinton emails contain classified info at time of sending.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:07 |
|
Sounds like Hillary might be sunk.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:07 |
|
But will anything actually happen? Gonna guess not.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:07 |
|
Leon Trotsky 2012 posted:Trump will announce his VP pick next week. I actually heard last night that Sen. Bob Corker should be added to that list. No link handy at the moment though.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:08 |
|
I'm rooting for Jeff Sessions
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:09 |
|
FBI doesn't think Clinton deleted emails for the purpose to conceal.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:09 |
|
Karl Sharks posted:do you think he really meant that? curious to see how many people would pick that up without needing to search for it, but i'm not a big civil war buff He means the thousands of people who were sacrificed as a token to the Great Old Ones so that they would leave the young nation alone for the next 250 years.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:09 |
|
More on the possible Corker nod.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:11 |
|
No clear evidence Clinton intended to mishandle classified info but sloppy with its handling.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:12 |
|
Deadulus posted:Clinton emails contain classified info at time of sending. The difference is semantic, but this isn't unsurprising. Every department considered them to have different levels of classification based on which organization "owns" them --- but State might not consider them classified. Big difference.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:12 |
|
Looks like he is winding up to a slap on the wrist. I think.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:12 |
|
So depending on whoever you're rooting for you can say smoking gun or nbd.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:13 |
|
"Extreme carelessness," "misconduct"
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:13 |
|
SedanChair posted:"Extreme carelessness," "misconduct" She is so loving lucky to be running against Trump. What a horrific candidate she is.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:14 |
|
At last... Sanders will be king and usher in full communism...
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:14 |
|
So, much ado about nothing, and nothing will happen.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:14 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:The difference is semantic, but this isn't unsurprising. Every department considered them to have different levels of classification based on which organization "owns" them --- but State might not consider them classified. Big difference. Not true in all cases. According to Comey some of the data that was classified at the time of sending was not owned by the State Department, so whatever the State Department felt it should be classified as is irrelevant.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:15 |
|
No indictment.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:15 |
|
FBI Does not recommend indictment
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:15 |
|
Deadulus posted:Looks like he is winding up to a slap on the wrist. I think. Scot free, baby.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:16 |
|
"No reasonable prosecutor would take such a case." So no indictment. Let the bloodgates be open.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:16 |
|
Deadulus posted:No indictment. No poo poo. This will not end any of the "controversy," sadly.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:16 |
|
"Our judgment is no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case." "We cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal [prosecution] on these facts" "No charges are appropriate in this case."
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:16 |
|
Going to be a lot of whining from the right wing today. I'm glad they're not dragging this out.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:16 |
|
nessin posted:Not true in all cases. According to Comey some of the data that was classified at the time of sending was not owned by the State Department, so whatever the State Department felt it should be classified as is irrelevant. That's a long-running inter-agency debate -- more aptly pointed out when he talked about how things weren't tagged correctly which is more or less the FBI taking a shot a state's well known laissez-faire attitude towards the FBI and DoD's equally well-known proclivity towards over-classification.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:16 |
|
Sounded bad initially but yeah as time went on, I guess it sounds like it don't matter. Score one for Hillary?
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:17 |
|
Xanderkish posted:"Our judgment is no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case"
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:17 |
|
WampaLord posted:No poo poo. It shouldn't. Her actions were at BEST stupid and careless. She should not have been able to get a nomination of a major party for president.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:17 |
|
Hope someone is keeping an eye on HA Goodman right now.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:17 |
|
"The FBI has determined that Clinton can continue running for president but also that everyone can keep complaining about her email server."
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:18 |
|
dreffen posted:Sounded bad initially but yeah as time went on, I guess it sounds like it don't matter. Score one for Hillary? He gave the GOP plenty of material for advertising.
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:18 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 06:21 |
|
USPOL July: Trump shot the (((Sheriff))), but he didn't indict Hillary
|
# ? Jul 5, 2016 16:18 |