|
Pinterest Mom posted:right, that guy This person right here is scum I have decided to drop the PR because it is preventing my engagement. This is a direct result of my bro ulixes I am feeling good about the following peeps Mmt, tmm, chores My vote is gonna remain here even thought it began as an easy OMGUS while in character it has developed into an actual suspicion Namaste
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:11 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 13:47 |
|
yeah that's not a great post. i feel like moritz has done something like that in every game i've played though.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:12 |
|
raaaaa okay. i don't think i want to dunk pmom though. i guess you could call their voting pattern 'opportunistic' but we're struggling to get annnnything done. his thought process seems pretty evident and i can see how he's reaching his conclusions, so!
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:14 |
|
I have reservations on TM because he basically always looks scummy in his approach to mafia That being said I would rather not no lynch
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:15 |
|
Max posted:How do you feel about Ernie? Gut says town. Ernie. posted:And if I'm wrong about that, explain to me like I'm five why someone mischaracterizing how many times you've voted to call you town is a scum strategy. Walk me through my hypothetical masterplan. I agree with Ernie's point that what he's being accused of, regardless of whether or not he did it, isn't something that makes me think he's scum. Ernie. posted:reads Ernie's tone throughout this game has come off as someone who's (a) reading through it and (b) unconcerned with dying.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:18 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:right, that guy Pinterest Mom posted:wait i thought db was tm i might not want to vote db So... was your first comment based on the content of my post you thought was TM? That doesn't even make sense. How can your opinion of something change solely on the knowledge of who is posting vice what they posted? A post is a post regardless right?
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:19 |
|
Moatillata posted:This person right here is scum Putting it out there - I'm suspicious of Moat based on his signal : noise ratio. Moat: can you sell us on what makes you think PMom is scum? Right now it feels like you're posting just to have an opinion on the record.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:22 |
|
Moat, could you also explain what about Chores makes you feel "good"?
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:25 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:So... was your first comment based on the content of my post you thought was TM? That doesn't even make sense. How can your opinion of something change solely on the knowledge of who is posting vice what they posted? A post is a post regardless right? reading your post, i remembered that i thought tm was scummy based on that earlier awkward jump off ernie and would vote for him. i thought you were tm, you're not.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:26 |
|
Murmur Twin posted:Putting it out there - I'm suspicious of Moat based on his signal : noise ratio. *Turns the dial clockwise about 45 degrees* It's day one and most of the arguments have been boring/based on semantics. I think of it all pmom would be a good choice and I have a feeling they are scum. Why are you grandstanding my dear mmt?
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:32 |
|
Moatillata posted:*Turns the dial clockwise about 45 degrees* Murmur Twin posted:I don't know if you're town or scum. I'm engaging you in conversation to determine your alignment.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:35 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:Moat, could you also explain what about Chores makes you feel "good"? I'm laughing irl to this question rn so many good snarky responses my brain rn https://i.makeagif.com/media/11-06-2015/rD9Q9N.gif
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:37 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:Madman, do you draw a distinction between non-posting versus low-content/low-volume of posts in a given day? How do you define lurking exactly? IMO lurking is most often determined by volume, but it's possible to be a low volume poster without being a lurker by good coherent posts and analysis. It's also possible for a high volume poster to be a lurker by overloading the thread with useless posts and content meant to distract or annoy. In this game, dongs is lurking through low volume and low content while Keane is kind of being a high volume/low content lurker.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:39 |
|
Oh yeah, I also trust keane Something about him.. maybe his roguish good looks? I dunno it must be subconscious
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:42 |
|
Moatillata posted:I'm laughing irl to this question rn so many good snarky responses my brain rn I want to read them....all of them
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:47 |
|
Moatillata posted:Oh yeah, I also trust keane I am also drinking the Keane cool-aid. At least for today.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:50 |
|
Comfortable keeping my vote
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:50 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:Moat, could you also explain what about Chores makes you feel "good"? I'll give you a straight answer instead Chores was a high volume low content (for the most part) poster in shine. I believe he is doing something different this time. He also doesn't really like to post much d1 because he really wants to make it to lylo and d1 is normally a poo poo show. What I'm seeing is fine with me however I would be suss if he continued in this fashion
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:52 |
|
Murmur Twin posted:Gut says town. Ah this post confuses me so much. Until I read it I was sure I was going to vote you, now not so much. Where I'm at right now is I think somber is town. The way he got angry at TMM not understanding him felt like it was coming from a position of wanting to be relevant and understood rather than from a scum pov which would want to spin it into an advantage. You missing that and instead commenting on the tone of it made me feel like you're scum easily hopping on a case that's easy to make. Now I just don't know what to do. Part of me thinks you'd make this exact post as scum but part of me thinks if you were you'd append 'im not 100% on ernie but I feel good because:' to make sure id still be a viable cuddle on future days.
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:52 |
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:Comfortable keeping my vote How was TMs vote on Ernie bad (not disagreeing here, just a question)
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:53 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:Madman, do you draw a distinction between non-posting versus low-content/low-volume of posts in a given day? How do you define lurking exactly? this is pretty funny because I think dick is one of the people doing high-volume/low-content posts. a lot of his posting is either asking questions to other people Dick Bastardly posted:What about it is stinky? Dick Bastardly posted:Keane, what do you think about the interaction so far between pmom and moat? You mentioned something of your olfactory senses tingling? Dick Bastardly posted:I agree that Ernie. seems slightly erratic. Most likely my vote, but will withhold for now. Dick Bastardly posted:So... was your first comment based on the content of my post you thought was TM? That doesn't even make sense. How can your opinion of something change solely on the knowledge of who is posting vice what they posted? A post is a post regardless right? Dick Bastardly posted:Moat, could you also explain what about Chores makes you feel "good"? He really only has one decent content post which is this one: Dick Bastardly posted:Did a re-read and to be honest I can't say I see anything that jumps out at me as "oh yeah, 100% scum slam dunk" material. I've cooled on Ernie, I appreciate the list he put up and after reading it again I've decided to ##unvote more posts incoming now that I have time and a computer handy
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:57 |
|
pmom has also been a high-postcount/low-content voter
|
# ? Nov 17, 2016 23:59 |
|
Wow. Asking questions to further propagate discussion, who would've thought that would be related to low content posting? I mean just think about that, it's a paradox.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 00:01 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:How was TMs vote on Ernie bad (not disagreeing here, just a question) It was opportunistic and hedged from the beginning. Note the specific wording of the vote. It's icing on the cake that they abandoned it right after I objected
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 00:06 |
|
i think tmm is probably town. his logic is pretty consistent and pro-town.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 00:07 |
|
Dick Bastardly posted:Wow. Asking questions to further propagate discussion, who would've thought that would be related to low content posting? I mean just think about that, it's a paradox. except you're not contributing to the discussion. you're asking questions and peacing out.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 00:07 |
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:except you're not contributing to the discussion. you're asking questions and peacing out. Touche. It's not for lack of trying though. I just don't have any "aha!" reads. To be honest, I feel like if I post stuff that I'm not 100 about I'll get challenged and ultimately fall flat on my face about it. I actually have to try to put myself in a non-self-conscious state of mind in order to put myself out there like that, it doesn't come easy for me. But I will try drat it.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 00:20 |
|
Asking questions isn't that suspicious d1
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 00:22 |
|
If you really want to know how I feel right now, other than what I've already said, I will add that I'm not liking Keane or Chores for their mystery posting although I do have a non-scum type theory for Keane's behavior and would like to see how night mafia shakes out. Same with chores, except my read here is really more middle of the road not leaning scum or town. I really feel like without results, their play will fall apart.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 00:25 |
|
Ernie. posted:You missing that and instead commenting on the tone of it made me feel like you're scum easily hopping on a case that's easy to make. I seem to remember having a meta on you where you tunneled hard as scum D1 whereas this game you sound more like someone who isn't sure of their reads. To me, it reads like town. I talked about your tone, rather than your case, because I was asked specifically what my read was on you and that was my thought process.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 00:37 |
|
Feeling a bit better now, or well my fever is down at least. I'm sticking with my vote for now, TM's response and nothing else since have swayed me. I seriously doubt dick is scum. He's asking questions that I also would want to know and it feels pretty genuine. I would be leaning pmom if we were considering high volume/low content posters but that's not necessary right now imo Chores is really weirding me out this game, and I have no idea if that's a good or bad thing
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 00:42 |
|
about to enter a realm of mystery and wonder where cell phones don't exist, can we please get a consensus going?
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 01:37 |
|
Somberbrero posted:about to enter a realm of mystery and wonder where cell phones don't exist, can we please get a consensus going? Actually I would prefer to hear more about this land
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 01:57 |
|
It sure is a good thing we had these extra two days to end up in the exact same position.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 01:57 |
|
Keep telling that same joke
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 01:58 |
|
TMMadman posted:It sure is a good thing we had these extra two days to end up in the exact same position. There is a portrait of this joke hidden in tmms house that grows my decrepit by the minute
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 01:59 |
|
Vote moritz. They're scum.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 02:00 |
|
Jonathan Fisk posted:Vote Pmom. They're scum.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 02:01 |
|
##unvote ##vote tired moritz
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 02:05 |
|
|
# ? May 19, 2024 13:47 |
|
##unvote ##vote Pmom All he's done is throw around his vote. He's not actually looking for scum, he's just looking to get a vote that sticks.
|
# ? Nov 18, 2016 02:08 |