|
Bifauxnen posted:I like where you ended up at the end of this post with suspecting Gaspy, but I don't get this point at all. I don't even think it's scummy it just BUGS ME so I have to post it The point you have problems with, what i meant was that he made himself sound potentially dangerous to scum in an ambiguous way. It didn't even sound protective at first because I didn't take you're to mean you, and as such, I felt like he was threatening the scum in joke phase which usually is just garbage. I don't see why scum would prioritize him.
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 03:16 |
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:I can't speak for others but I think your pushing on KB was very, very stretched. And the way you showed up all suss on him but making a show of how you hadn't read the last few pages was weird. And it was also weird that you cased him then threw out some quickie case of "one of these is a scum vote" on some other people but then voted me who you seemed to be casing the least. (not to mention how I am the towniest town!) You're a loose cannon, Moat! As I've always been :bigtran: I can speak to that post then about King B. I started with a deadset idea that he was scum who buried his vote in tithin (who imo was never a viable lynch candidate) and then ended with a vote on you because I cant reconcile the fact that if there was a Vig they wouldn't claim it to oust scum. King Bs posting is really off to me still but I don't feel as confident as I did in the beginning of the post. The vote on you really was more of an experiment to see how you would react to the extremely light pressure. I've had no intention of leaving my vote on you ##unvote I'm gonna ##vote TQ for now
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:29
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Eh I'm still getting caught up. Was active in fate, but died, and yesterday was just a crummy day for me. Anomalous Amalgam posted:I mixed up moat and gene on my list. Anomalous Amalgam posted:I'll vote beemen if it comes down to it, but more interested in moat or gene Can you elaborate on your thoughts re: GeneX? This kind of came out of nowhere.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:29
|
|
|
I would also vote mithross and probably Hal unless he picks it up
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:30
|
|
|
My “weird” argument, B, is the same argument you agreed with earlier
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:32
|
|
|
yaaaay Pod's back! ok I'm still not seeing Moat in the clear but not really the worst scum no more. ##unvote ##vote Hal
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:51
|
|
|
Podima posted:Can you elaborate on your thoughts re: GeneX? This kind of came out of nowhere. I kind of need to back pedal. I originally had my list order right, with the nod to Gene possibly as turk, Moat as possible Shinra. Moat may not be scum, and I'd be ok switching off of him if someone else I found scummy became the target. The nod to Gene as turk hinges entirely on a comment from Gulag and how he was digging into to tithin, and rereading it, it is not the subtle communication I thought it was. It's weak. That whole post was weak, which is why I apologized for my drive by posts. I started playing the game today. It doesn't excuse the bad posts leading up to today, but I just wasn't in a good headspace to play any yesterday and was involved with Fate stuff(which I also subbed into).
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:52
|
|
|
Eh, Hal is lurking sure, but I'd much rather not lurker lynch today when there are better players to test.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:54
|
|
|
I mean, admittedly I was lurking from the time of my replacement until mid-day 2 sooo... can't really talk.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:54
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Eh, Hal is lurking sure, but I'd much rather not lurker lynch today when there are better players to test. yeah lots of better players who are playing
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:55
|
|
|
I have an incredible amount of IRL bullshit going on atm but the AA/GeneX thing jumped out at me while catching up. I'll reread in more depth tomorrow. One other thing that's been on my mind that I want to get out here re: Nat20: Day 1: Podima posted:This feels like Jafarposting, especially the first line. Natural 20 posted:As much as I love this phrase, I'm confused. Jokephase did end a lot faster than I'd expect out of a 3 day D1. Natural 20 posted:I think the Pod vote is a gamble. I didn't really like his drive by earlier in the thread, notably I responded: Podima posted:Coming back to what I affectionately termed Jafarposting - this is a lot of words to say, in fact, very little at all about the players in this game. It’s similar to what I recall you doing in Ma-chat when you were trying to rile Bif up towards a mis-execution by dispensing general criticism about the rest of the useless thread. Summary: I call out Nat20 in a vague way, he responds with a lot of words that say not much (which is what I was initially pointing at), and then doubles back to throw shade at me for not responding - but still gives himself an out to pull back, and still hasn't made any strong alignment reads. Note that he never responds directly to my last post characterizing my concerns with him in clear terms. This is the closest thing he made to a strong alignment call D1: Natural 20 posted:No, me neither. I'm unsure if we're going to get very much out of the next few hours, but: The rest of it is just jokephase, sidelong commentary on the gamestate/postcounts, and that's about it. Day 2: Natural 20 posted:I was sus on Pod on my readthrough of D1. Podima posted:Full stop I would not be that much of an rear end in a top hat to case someone based on when I know they'll be asleep vs not, entirely regardless of alignment. That's not how I play. You're going a little too paranoid here, considering I didn't even vote you. Natural 20 posted:Shade is shade. You wouldn't have thrown a vote out because it would have had literally no momentum. The idea that I was weighing in in the same way as I was with Bif was raised. When I asked why the initial point I raised was illegitimate I got no response and then when I can't respond I get an elaboration saying that I'm acting in a manner that's non-committal. Having committed my own vote prior to that based on a quick analysis of risk and reward around lunching a lurker against someone who might turn the tide. More back-and-forth on me without fully committing, including harping on me "not responding" in the same breath as claiming I'm casing him when he can't respond because I know when he's asleep? He's leaving himself outs. Waiting to see if anyone else jumps on it? GeneX posted:Mafia Edit: Natural 20 posted:1. My issue is that there's a claim d1 that I'm acting similarly to my masonry chat with Bif. This is a continued mis-characterization of my point from Day 1, which he notably never responded to. My case on him is not his sleep schedule, it's that he keeps commenting on the game instead of playing the game and making alignment reads. He FINALLY starts doing that here when explicitly pressed by GeneX, but all he can come up with "Bif isn't getting mad" and "Juchero is a terrible vig" rehashed from D1. Overall Self-Excusing Just look at his post history and how many times he's excusing himself for not participating or focusing on filler posts. I started quoting but came up with WAY too many so I will leave a link to his post history as an exercise for the viewer, and a couple of snippets. https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3848100&userid=124675&perpage=40&pagenumber=1 Natural 20 posted:I actually agree with you. We've kinda stormed straight through jokephase a lot earlier than I would have anticipated, which seems odd to me. Natural 20 posted:So the return to jokephase struck me as really odd as well. Natural 20 posted:
Natural 20 posted:
Natural 20 posted:This got me thinking. Natural 20 posted:So I'm going to metagame. Natural 20 posted:I'm going to be at work now so I can only get short responses in until I'm home this evening. Natural 20 posted:I'm honestly having trouble because as scum I could just fake a read on anyone I wanted and back it up with walls of text. Now I'm really worried about making incorrect cases. Extreme TL;DR: Nat20 is posting a lot of nothing and excusing himself a lot for posting nothing, instead of scumhunting. He's also gotten Hella Paranoid about me calling him out, yet keeps only going halfway towards calling me out in turn without ever committing.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:58
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:yeah I think you broke this up for emphasis, but I'm having trouble parsing. Hal always lurks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:58
|
|
|
"i have an incredible amount of irl bullshit" *makes a mega-casepost* mafia is a harsh mistress, why can't i quit
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 04:59
|
|
|
Podima posted:Extreme TL;DR: Nat20 is posting a lot of nothing and excusing himself a lot for posting nothing, instead of scumhunting. He's also gotten Hella Paranoid about me calling him out, yet keeps only going halfway towards calling me out in turn without ever committing. yeah and the only hard call he seems to stick to is calling me town, which, well duh  poor Jafar 
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 05:10
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I think you broke this up for emphasis, but I'm having trouble parsing. I what I give up
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 05:14
|
|
|
Also one more addendum: I get that Nat20 has been running a mafia game and he has work, that's ok! That's life! But to have that little actual content in 57 posts when D1 started 5 IRL days ago is worrisome. If he comes back tomorrow and picks it right back up with some solid cases, then I'll reevaluate.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 05:22
|
|
|
Normally I'd be all for lurker lynches, but we killed two yesterday and CPig is getting on their cases. People who are posting but mostly empty posting are a different story (like what Pod thinks Nat20 is doing), I'll take a look at him. I still like b-minus and Moat for scum. Gaspy has made (1) post referencing me today and hasn't responded to anyone calling him out on it, not sure how I feel about that yet.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 05:55
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:interesting thoughts on flerp Gaspy, but how you feeling about TQ now? At work at the moment but I’ve been compiling notes on TQ and I’ll throw up an effort post in about an hour.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 06:07
|
|
|
Finally home and catching up now. Going back to read the start of the day forward and will also take a look at the cases on the current voteleaders. Sorry again for my lack of play so far- if life continues to get in the way I'll just go ahead and ask Pig for a sub even though I hate to do that.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 06:32
|
|
|
Does anyone cc B-'s flavor claim?
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 06:41
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I think you broke this up for emphasis, but I'm having trouble parsing. Sorry I am being extra bad this game, one of the busy times at work. Going to catch up now
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 06:50
|
|
|
Tired Moritz posted:Does anyone cc B-'s flavor claim? I mentioned this before, but it bears repeating: CPig is very careful to provide fake claims to scum in this games, including at least one or two main characters. We won't get a cc unless a scum messes up very badly or is running a gambit.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 06:51
|
|
|
Mithross posted:I mentioned this before, but it bears repeating:
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 06:52
|
|
|
Oh ok
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 06:54
|
|
|
Here's Moat: D1: - still joking around post-jokephase - one of those "Hi I'm a bunch of pages behind, someone tell me what to do" posts - calls tithin scum for his vote on NGO (+ all his posts, though, uh, there's no explanations here. Good call though!) - also calls tobbs and flerp scum because ??? - Does not like NGO, thinks he's faking being overwhelmed due to wording of "a high level" (which...yeah, I assumed it was sarcastic, sorta, but it's a weird sarcasm.) - Pokes Pod for suspecting juchero and then not voting for Juchero (I'll add that Pod actually posted multiple times about Juchero, with no vote, anywhere. I like this post.) - backtracks a bit on NGO, sees the sarcasm now - (Small aside: Pod comes in about now and addresses Moat's point by pointing to meta a bit, then backing off Juchero completely. Anyone here knowledgeable enough to say whether Pod is as sparing with his vote as he seems to be in this situation?) - shies away from LM and NGO, hops onto tithin as an alternate - questions tobbs' thought that any lynch swap will require scum - asks Pod to look at Asiina (not sure what he's getting at here, he doesn't expand on it later either), jumps on db early - dayvig is a nulltell Thoughts: I don't love the "drop reads and run" bits earlier in the day (or the reluctance to expand on what he thought he saw with Asiina), but his later stuff is pretty good, actually. I'm notably pleasantly surprised with the read on Pod, catching the lack of vote is something someone doesn't do if they aren't reading in depth (eg what the whole reads without explanations thing tends to indicate). He's obviously not scum with tithin and DB, too, as an aside. D2: - Hoo boy. B/w Pod and Bif there's a scum, and it's probably Pod because he...joined scum in wanting to lurker lynch moat. Also Tobbs or KB are members of Shinra, and Moat wants it to be KB. (What the hell is this post? Like, the only way this makes any sense to me is if Moat is a double scientist role or something, because he's mentioned KB and Bif 0 times in reads, and tobbs only twice, with no explanations) - dismissive response to tobbs' confusion/skepticism over Moat's read of tobbs as shinra #3 - joke at KB - Oh, okay, now he's got words on KB, thinks he's suspicious because he shot gulag instead of tithin. (Also one of TQ/Juchero is scum because of their votes on b-) (This...makes much more sense. It's also true, taking a detour to check KB, dude was all over tithin. Still unclear where the hell Bif fits into all of this though.) - not voting for b-, thinks he's town and has a power. Still wants to know why KB killed gulag and not tithin, doesn't buy KB's explanation (not sure I do either, tbh, but I don't think KB is scum so whatever, maybe he left out a bit or something). And then a vote for Bif (why?) - laughing at TQ poking at him over KB - Brushes off Bif rearing in KB's defense, pokes at her going in hard in KB's defense - buys b-'s claim - wants someone to actually case him, wants bif to give him an actual case on b- - Backs off of KB a bit, says he still feels weird. Vote on Bif was "an experiment", now votes for TQ - would vote Mithross, Hal Thoughts: The wheels fell off for a bit but I actually think I understand where he's coming from, even if there's a bit of lingering suspicion due to the way he went about voting/unvoting Bif. I don't have a metaread on KB (shine doesn't really count for him), so I can't say if there's something to that, but I suppose it's worth keeping an eye on just in case the 3p team nat20 pondered over instead of actually participating really does exist. I also wish Moat wouldn't drop reads without explaining them, he keeps vacillating between being annoyingly vague and thoughtfully precise and I wish he would just stick to the latter because he's obviously capable of it, and many of his reads make much more sense when he explains them. Overall: I think he's town. His reads make sense, he's demonstrably reading the game, he's asking good questions, and he's revising his opinions in a believable manner.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 07:01
|
|
|
Mafia edit: goddammit I keep forgetting to append questions Moat, any particular reason you think (thought?) Pod and tobbs are scum?
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 07:03
|
|
|
It’s my lunch break and all I want to do is play more FF7 but I promised an effort post
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 07:19
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:It’s my lunch break and all I want to do is play more FF7 but I promised an effort post I'm strongly tempted to just use the nightphase to analyze you instead of doing it tomorrow, so just play FF7 and post whenever effort cases are a pain and I regret my lack of note-taking more and more every game
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 07:22
|
|
|
GeneX posted:I'm strongly tempted to just use the nightphase to analyze you instead of doing it tomorrow, so just play FF7 and post whenever Nah I have pages of notes on TQ I’ll just do it now. You never know which day is your last so get the data out asap. Doing it now.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 07:24
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Nah I have pages of notes on TQ I’ll just do it now. You never know which day is your last so get the data out asap. Doing it now. Asphyxious posted:Nah I have pages of notes on TQ Asphyxious posted:pages of notes 
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 07:48
|
|
|
yeah I gotta say I find it kinda weird that the first thing to barely ping Gaspy on D1 just so happens to still be worth pages of notes on apparently, just when TQ seems to be participating a lot more meaningfully than they were in jokephase, too. I wonder just how TQ earned this much attention from Gaspy more than any other. I find it a little suspicious. But hey, maybe it'll be some ironclad linguistics slip that means he's totally scum for all I know.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 07:57
|
|
|
Quick and dirty thoughts from my re-read: KB is on my radar as possible scum because I don't see how someone who was presumably provided a wiki link with their role (assuming because I was, and one's been provided with all the flips so far) could open their wiki link, look at this photo at the top of the page:  ...and not have a very good idea that stabbing was the flavor of their vig. I find KB to be too good of a player to make this mistake from his role PM- so my current theory is that he realized he needed to come up with a cover story for lack of flavor, went searching through the wiki after the fact, and landed on this. Since no one immediately counter-claimed the stabbing kill, he could claim the flavor. That said, I've liked his questioning of others today (Moat/b-minus), so I'm willing to admit I could be wrong, but I still don't think everything is on the up-and-up with that claim. Mithross posted:I'm concerned about Moat, his case doesn't feel like it evolved naturally. He claimed to be behind on the thread as he posted it, but then didn't change anything as he caught up. He just disregarded the new information and said he saw the answers to his question and didn't buy it. I agree with this. Nothing at all felt natural about that response to me. King Burgundy posted:Now here is some content from this game to look at: I agree with this too and I think it's a really good catch. I don't have much else to add to it at the moment, but I haven't gotten to his defense yet. Juchero posted:i won't be around until tomorrow due to some very stressful irl poo poo Off-topic, but hope all is well, Juchero. I can certainly sympathize. b-minus1 posted:well, i was genuinely concerned that my breadcrumbs were too obvious and i would be nk'd 1. turns out they only confused a handful of people who now want to kill me. drat it. I see his claim but missed any direct response to KB's case above. If it's a fake claim, it's a well-designed one, but it bothers me that he doesn't have an answer to the evolution of his reads (or lack thereof) as KB pointed out. Anomalous Amalgam posted:I'll vote beemen if it comes down to it, but more interested in moat or gene Why Gene? I don't recall seeing a case on him. b-minus1 posted:also KB: I was thinking about those posts of mine that you quoted from the shine game. remember i was turboed d1 in that game even though (i thought) I had posted more detailed reads than i have in this game. so can you really blame me for trying a different strategy? i was a little overzealous and probably should not have breadcrumbed my role so early in this game, but i never thought i would be attacked so aggressively by a few players in this game. i don't get it Here's B-'s reply to the meta case from the previous game KB posted and a defense of his breadcrumb, but still nothing about the discrepancy around his reads in this game. Don't like it. Anomalous Amalgam posted:I kind of need to back pedal. I originally had my list order right, with the nod to Gene possibly as turk, Moat as possible Shinra. Moat may not be scum, and I'd be ok switching off of him if someone else I found scummy became the target. Okay, I'll buy this re: the Gene thing. Feels genuine to me. ----------- TL:DR: watching KB (and would like to hear more about how he missed that picture?), suspicious of both B- and Moat. I think the B- thing unfortunately takes care of itself if he's really town, for as much as he revealed about his role, but would happily dunk him in a day or two if he's still around. For now, though, I like ##vote Moat better (and it rhymes).
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 08:00
|
|
|
That was a bunch to type out on phone and it's late so I'm going to bed. Will try to be around early in the day tomorrow before work heats up.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 08:02
|
|
|
Truth Quark Day one: - soft flavour claim “into some hardcore poo poo,” , literally no idea. - Votes bif (current vote leader) saying “lynch her before she goes crazy!” lovely thing to say, bad vote. - Votes Tobbs (new vote leader) “gut read”. Weak, again piggybacking. - Jokes around with Tithin (now confirmed scum) - Votes me when I point out he’s bandwagoning - Jokes with Tithin again. Why the focus on Tithin? - Makes a second “Bif is so crazy” comment, again feels like scum trying to do an undermining meta attack, not someone engaging in good faith. - Claims he’s looking forward to his flip proving my analysis wrong, incredibly common scum response to getting pinged. - Takes a dig at me and Bifauxnen (there it is again) for making scum calls d1. - Takes a dig at me for being too certain, says town players should hedge their language and their calls. - Sticks up for flerp. - Joke votes YPM for saying “Jester”. Joke phase is essentially over by this point so not a fan of this kind of content. - Gets supremely confident when I call him out again. Not sure about this one, options are: defensive/town-possible role/solid flavour claim/fakeclaim. No idea. Confidence here is weird. - Asks questions about people being scum or 3P. Says he has a theory about pod but is going to sit on it. Lots of lurking around arguments, not actually putting any real thoughts forward. - Says juchero is probably town - Light shade (joke) on TM, post the dayvig. - Actual content from TQ! He posits that because Pod is asking questions but not following up lines of inquiry, he’s fake scum hunting. Two things with this; it’s not necessarily so, some people throw stuff out then see what the responses are and work from there, two.... what the gently caress has TQ done to accuse someone else of not scum hunting? No one seems to pick up on the staggering hypocrisy of this claim. This changes! His conclusion is pod is probably scum, so he votes for.... NGO. Claiming that he’s following Bif’s case on them. After TQ has been pretty consistently throwing shade on Bif. AND it’s another piggyback vote. - YPM calls TQ out on this!!! TQ’s only Defense is “actually I am posting to hunt scum”, literally no evidence of this. He claims the questions about 3P stuff was looking for a scum gotcha. - YPM blindly accepts this explanation, weirdly. Thought YPM would catch that TQ’s claim of activity didn’t mesh with his actual content. Maybe he read something into the tone. - TQ says he wants to hear more from AA but Hal gets a pass as he’s normally better later in the game. I feel better in this case is a relative value as I’ve only ever seen Hal lurk right the way through. - TQ claims he’s been making original cases with his own analysis. He hasn’t. - TQ starts spouting overly familiar stuff about me and how I play scum. I claim at the time it sounds like an Auspoller is feeding him lines. Lo and behold, Tithin flips scum. - Calls little Mac out for saying lovely stuff to Bif based on previous games. More hypocrisy. - Calls out a list of people who need to contribute more. DB at top of list. Not sure how I feel about that, as I’m pretty sure he’s on Tithin’s scum team, which DB was also on. - Votes for DB, then defends the shift to DB when b-minus gets upset about it. By the end of Day one,I’m convinced Quark is scum. He’s consistently lied about his contributions and demonstrated nothing but a desire to jump on to other people’s votes, while having opinions so inconsistent that they are outright hypocritical. So far day 2 he’s been riding b-minus hard, who I also think is scum, so I think this is a member of the shinra scum team now aware of a second scum team switching to actual scumhunting now they know it’s an option.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 08:03
|
|
|
##vote Asphyxious I think I need to stick to my guns here. I was suss on him before and waiting for more signs that I could be wrong. This TQ effortpost hasn't done it. I was looking at TQ from the start too, of course. But I'll be the first to admit it was a shaky stretch of a case built on the tiniest scraps of whatever we could find D1. I got no qualms about charging forward with the best D1 poo poo I got even if it's still poo poo. But when D2 comes along and people got a little more clue what they're doing, I think that content should be weighted a bit more highly than the awkward D1 scraps. Instead, Gaspy seems to be actively looking for reasons to cling onto an outdated case. He even admits a bit in his effortpost that it doesn't quite add up: Asphyxious posted:
That big list of points, mimicing the GeneX style, also looks like him trying to work through a way to literally manufacture the case. I know it cramps Gaspy's style to lock him too hard into a meta, but right now, he seems to be awkwardly caught between his old and new styles. I'm not saying this to try and prove that because he isn't acting exactly as before, he's scum... I'm saying that the particular styles he's landed on here when I know he's capable of different ones seems to conveniently line up well with a scum objective. Old Gaspy would just drop a vote and not bother to explain his methods, but arrogantly (I mean that only in the best way  ) presume that people should follow his insightful forensic linguistic deductions if they want to catch a scum. He didn't care about getting bogged down trying to actively sway and convince people about it, though. He'd just stand by his one best vote without moving even if it led to a no-lunch, because it wasn't about even making the best game moves for a town win to him. It was about solving the puzzle, about being as right as he could be.In this game he's not giving off much of that old attitude, but he's admitted himself how he is still using some of those voting mannerisms. It just so happens to neatly explain why he was allegedly fine with a DB lunch, but didn't lift a finger to actually help that switch get off the ground in the final hour. In Shine V Gaspy proved he was capable of being much more cooperative, of explaining his thought process much more casually and naturally instead of being too secretive about it. And he cast a wide net, looking at multiple people at all times. He might not always look totally in-depth at everybody to the same extent, but he could share that process as it went along. Maybe just a quick comparison here and there, like how Cat sounded townie because her language sounded direct and honest, while pera sounded scummy for using far more obfuscation. Here, this big list of all these minute details of TQ seem more like justifying things to himself to try and "prove" the process is genuine, instead of actually being genuine. It doesn't feel as comfortable or natural, and he seems far more blinkered on TQ than he should be when there's a lot of potential scummy people to look at. Overall, the way he's playing, regardless of whether he's done it before or not, feels more scummy than townie. ok I think thats enough explaining!
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 10:23
|
|
|
This is exactly the post I was expecting from you Bif after posts like this:Bifauxnen posted:I like where you ended up at the end of this post with suspecting Gaspy. You’ve seemed from day one hunkered down on the idea I’m scum regardless of what I do, so although I think you’re town this game, I have no real interest in trying to prove myself to you. I think you’ll work it out in time but you’re actively searching for something that isn’t there.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 10:32
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:This is exactly the post I was expecting from you Bif after posts like this: agreed that trying to just go out to prove it to me specifically will probably backfire. You should know its just the opposite though about thinking you're scum no matter what! I'm looking dor excuses to lunch anybody else first! Just that TQ post really made me think I was right at start of day after all
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 10:35
|
|
|
Nah I don’t believe that. But it’s all good. I’m confident in my read of TQ and B- so when they flip I’ve already won.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 10:52
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Nah I don’t believe that. But it’s all good. I’m confident in my read of TQ and B- so when they flip I’ve already won. hmmm, but if you don't believe that then why do you think I'm town? but you dont need to answer, it's a rhetorical question to the thread
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 10:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 03:16 |
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:hmmm, but if you don't believe that then why do you think I'm town? It’s because of posts like this, that seek more like you’re running a narrative about me rather than engaging with me. During day one I had this niggle in the back of my mind “is Bif fake-casing me?” and every interaction I’ve had with you since has just built on that and built on that. Fact is, linguistically you’re coming across town but the content in regards to me is well off and I haven’t worked out yet why. My current theory is you’re in a 3P team with KB, but it’s only vague at the moment and I need more data.
|
|
#
?
Feb 8, 2018 11:16
|
|