|
Stymie posted:it is bad because it will benefit google and other large online companies at the expense of customers stymie is right enjoy subsidizing tech companies. ur now gonna pay more every month or there will be bandwidth caps
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 13:15 |
|
|
Shaggar posted:you will pay through increased ISP subscription costs. however, its still highly likely that this just causes ISPs to abandon new infrastructure improvements at their edges. either way its a terrible day for the internet. that or they go to pay per use which would make me lol super hard cause the big net neutrality proponents also torrent 24/7
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2015 22:18
|
|
|
how do u even know what the rules are they havent released them. they've also said they aren't going to regulate rates
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2015 22:21
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:they released a summary, idiot post the summary
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2015 22:31
|
|
|
uncurable mlady posted:the only difference this is going to make in the short term is when isps and mobile carriers do their annual 'jack up rates because gently caress you' they'll be able to cry about Obama rather than making up some other excuse they are specifically not going to regulate rates ISPs can charge so no u cant
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2015 22:33
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:why don't you just google it crebnob because i think ur lying
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2015 22:38
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:[FCC Commissioner] Pai claimed that an Internet provider could "find itself in the FCC's crosshairs" if it doesn't want to offer unlimited data plans. The FCC's order does not actually ban data caps; instead, the FCC is claiming authority to intervene when companies use data caps to harm competitors or customers. there's nothing in the summary about caps
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2015 22:54
|
|
|
anyone who actually thinks ISPs haven't been doing anything is really dumb. ISPs spend billions of dollars every year which is why municipal broadband is going to be really hilarious. u think ppl are gonna pay more in property taxes in a few years when they try to keep up with private companies in capex spending? lol municipal internet will be stuck in the past and then u will realize just how much comcast, verizon, etc actually do invest
|
|
#
¿
Feb 26, 2015 23:50
|
|
|
AT&T spokesman Mark Siegel said the company invested $11.8 billion into its wireless and wireline network in the first six months of 2014. He said the carrier confirmed in July that it expects to spend a total of around $21 billion this year on its network.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2015 00:04
|
|
|
Speaking at the UBS Annual Global Media And Communications Conference today, Shammo said that Verizon continues to expect to spend roughly $17 billion this year on capital expenses across its wireless and wireline business, which he said is at the high end of the carrier's guidance for the year.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2015 00:04
|
|
|
DaNzA posted:or if fios was unbundled then you can just get another ISP using the same fios line with less congestion on the backend this is a good way to ensure that no ISP ever invests in fiber
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
that was actually the best possible propaganda for net neutrality proponents and its been going around forever
|
|
#
¿
Feb 28, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 13:15 |
|
|
hahhhahahahhahahaha http://variety.com/2015/digital/news/netflix-now-says-it-didnt-actually-want-fcc-to-regulate-broadband-so-heavily-1201446282/ http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/3/8142899/netflix-net-neutrality-flipfl
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2015 21:09
|
|