An Adventure in Arrentia - A Game of Mafia - The Something Awful Forums

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Traditional Games > The Game Room > An Adventure in Arrentia - A Game of Mafia

«‹›75 »

dorkanoid: Dec 21, 2004

In fact: ##vote Somber

# ? Aug 21, 2014 14:43

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Apr 27, 2024 07:23

dorkanoid: Dec 21, 2004

Jamuraan posted:

##vote somberbrero

You're definitely scum. Game solved.

I see my predecessor agreed.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 14:43

JakeP: Apr 27, 2003; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS; Lipstick Apathy

did winvirus post his epic case yet? im riveted

# ? Aug 21, 2014 14:48

winvirus: Jan 23, 2009; You only delay the inevitable. All of this island will soon belong to me.

patience my dear jakep. let me get home from work

# ? Aug 21, 2014 14:50

tearshed: Mar 26, 2010; Leave it to me!

Ehh I'm not seeing anything bad about somber. A little awkward maybe but coming across to me as genuine.

Occams razor, the dudes made like 80 posts and it's early D2. No scum posts that often and with such fervor.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 14:52

tearshed: Mar 26, 2010; Leave it to me!

##unvote
##vote Rarity a slightly more sensible vote. Opop is also a badguy.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 14:53

merk: May 20, 2003; ##interact

tearshed posted:

Whenever Cpig claims VT, he usually means it. I haven't seen an exception to this yet. Also winvirus' cop thing is bogus so I have no idea why you are including that.

Looking forward to hearing your keane case though.

So you don't think CPig was scummy yesterday?

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:08

merk: May 20, 2003; ##interact

tearshed posted:

Occams razor, the dudes made like 80 posts and it's early D2. No scum posts that often and with such fervor.

? I do.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:08

tearshed: Mar 26, 2010; Leave it to me!

merk posted:

So you don't think CPig was scummy yesterday?

I'll reread him again, but usually after cpig claims VT I stop listening to him and just put him in the town bucket.

merk posted:

? I do.

You're an exception to that rule. You post crazy regardless of alignment. Most scums do not.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:22

merk: May 20, 2003; ##interact

##vote tearshed

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:23

merk: May 20, 2003; ##interact

tearshed posted:

##unvote
##vote Rarity a slightly more sensible vote. Opop is also a badguy.

Make a case on Rarity that is compelling or I'm voting you until you're dead.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:23

tearshed: Mar 26, 2010; Leave it to me!

merk posted:

So you don't think CPig was scummy yesterday?

Nah, I just re-read him. He seemed pretty committed to voting CE through all phases of D1. I like him.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:25

tearshed: Mar 26, 2010; Leave it to me!

merk posted:

Make a case on Rarity that is compelling or I'm voting you until you're dead.

Stuff like this sets off scumdar;

Rarity posted:

Somberbrero posted:
I don't understand why rapidly switching your vote is scummy.

I think it shows a lack of conviction in your opinion so you're not actually voting for someone you think is scum.

Rarity posted:

I agree that Keane doesn't seem like he's trying. His votes in particular are totally non-effort.

##vote Keane

It's D1, besides merks exceptional effort, you can't expect people to put in a ton of effort D1. Lazy voting reason.

Rarity posted:

merk is flailing hard. Beyond what yuming has said, switching his vote between Keane, Ras and CE so fast makes me think he doesn't have any real conviction behind his cases.

##vote merk

"flailing"? cmon. Scum buzzwords 101. This is a megadumb vote/reason. Like I said earlier, switching is fine. Rarity is trying to come up with a reason to dumpster merk.

Oh here's a big old :siren:

, Rarity never voted CE all d1 until his lynch was inevitable. A lot of people were on/off CE all day long but rarity seemed to avoid CE.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:33

CCKeane: Jan 28, 2008; my shit posts don't die, they multiply

tearshed posted:

Stuff like this sets off scumdar;

I think it shows a lack of conviction in your opinion so you're not actually voting for someone you think is scum.

Personally I don't agree. Like what if you had 3 people you thought were equally scum but only 1 was gaining traction? You'd be happy to vote any of them and switch as the situation changes. But rarity is just looking for a reason to poo poo on somber that isn't valid. Yuck.

I know you won't be happy with just that, so have some more

It's D1, besides merks exceptional effort, you can't expect people to put in a ton of effort D1. Lazy voting reason.

"flailing"? cmon. Scum buzzwords 101. This is a megadumb vote/reason. Like I said earlier, switching is fine. Rarity is trying to come up with a reason to dumpster merk.

Oh here's a big old :siren:

, Rarity never voted CE all d1 until his lynch was inevitable. A lot of people were on/off CE all day long but rarity seemed to avoid CE.
[/quote]

This makes sense. I didn't like a lot of the people that voted me after merk defecated in the thread, and I do know Rarity was on my case. I'd buy this. IN FACT~~~~

##unvote
##vote: Rarity

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:41

CCKeane: Jan 28, 2008; my shit posts don't die, they multiply

Also I would like to issue a formal thank you to the scum for not killing me N1. I really appreciate it.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:41

tearshed: Mar 26, 2010; Leave it to me!

gently caress it, I'm on a roll.

Opopanax posted:

Tearshed's contributions today are to be snide to merk¹, discredit winvirus², and then drop a lurker vote with no context while we have several actual good candidates we're discussing³.
So yeah, he's scum.

1. I was being genuine. Merk was right, I was wrong.
2. Discredit? Come on, no actual cop role plays their role that way when they haven't confirmed their sanity. You know this.
3. I ended up explaining my vote so null point. Any vote is better than no vote, y'know.

Opop trying to spin what little content I had earlier today into scum content, and doing a bad job of it. Badguy.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:45

Opopanax: Aug 8, 2007; I HEX YE!!!

Nah I did good job, and your panicky damage control is solidifying that.

tearshed posted:

Every single time man.

Also what the hell does this mean?

# ? Aug 21, 2014 15:49

tearshed: Mar 26, 2010; Leave it to me!

Opopanax posted:

Also what the hell does this mean?

It's been a while between games, so you might not remember. But every time you are town and I am town, you pretty much ignore me, but every time you are scum and I am town, you go after me. Without fail. Every. Single. Time.

I keep trying to tell you this is your scumtell but you don't take it to heart.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:01

JakeP: Apr 27, 2003; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS; Lipstick Apathy

tearshed posted:

It's been a while between games, so you might not remember. But every time you are town and I am town, you pretty much ignore me, but every time you are scum and I am town, you go after me. Without fail. Every. Single. Time.

I keep trying to tell you this is your scumtell but you don't take it to heart.

show your work

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:08

Opopanax: Aug 8, 2007; I HEX YE!!!

How convenient for you

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:08

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

tearshed posted:

It's been a while between games, so you might not remember. But every time you are town and I am town, you pretty much ignore me, but every time you are scum and I am town, you go after me. Without fail. Every. Single. Time.

I keep trying to tell you this is your scumtell but you don't take it to heart.

This is an amazing case. Amazingly bad.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:11

CCKeane: Jan 28, 2008; my shit posts don't die, they multiply

So does anybody want to talk about the Rarity case Tearshed made? Because I think it's pretty good.

It's almost as good as that case yuming made on crazyeyes yesterday, the one that single handedly got him executed. Good work, yuming! Good work yuming AND NO ONE ELSE

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:16

merk: May 20, 2003; ##interact

It's not bad. ##unvote

I'm going to try the thing where I read d1 and d2 like I'm a replacement with no bias whatsoever and see what I can make happen. It's my ~new thing~.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:19

kilran: Jul 22, 2011; "I don't play the odds,
I play the man"

CCKeane posted:

So does anybody want to talk about the Rarity case Tearshed made? Because I think it's pretty good.

It's almost as good as that case yuming made on crazyeyes yesterday, the one that single handedly got him executed. Good work, yuming! Good work yuming AND NO ONE ELSE

Also, screw you, Pony Features

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:23

merk: May 20, 2003; ##interact

Juanito posted:

Seems like you're just chasing after easy targets. Or at least make a real case, but "posting gibberish" and "throwing votes around" isn't a good one for Cpig.

Why did you think your Keane vote was better than a Crazyeyes vote here?

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:26

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

merk posted:

Why did you think your Keane vote was better than a Crazyeyes vote here?

I wasn't actually voting Keane because I never unvoted. I was still on CE.

Later I did change to Keane, and then Rarity.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:49

merk: May 20, 2003; ##interact

Juanito posted:

I wasn't actually voting Keane because I never unvoted. I was still on CE.

Later I did change to Keane, and then Rarity.

Was your attempted vote on Keane a fake vote? What was your thought process in that ordeal?

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:51

CapitalistPig: Nov 3, 2005; A Winner is you!

Here is my state of the bad guy address.

The bad guys are:

Somber
met
Rarity
Merk

Maybe winvirus, but hes probably a paranoid cop I cant decide.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:52

Juanito: Jan 20, 2004; I wasn't paying attention
to what you just said.

Can you repeat yourself
in a more interesting way?; Hell Gem

my thought process was mostly Keane is terrible and if we poke him some he'll probably implode

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:53

JakeP: Apr 27, 2003; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS; Lipstick Apathy

CapitalistPig posted:

Here is my state of the bad guy address.

The bad guys are:

Somber
met
Rarity
Merk

Maybe winvirus, but hes probably a paranoid cop I cant decide.

this post here makes me lean towards CPig being scum, who has reason to believe that winvirus wasn't making up his claim completely, which was my go-to assumption.

He basically accepts that winvirus probably has a scum investigation on him, and questions his sanity rather than his honesty

##vote cpig

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:55

CCKeane: Jan 28, 2008; my shit posts don't die, they multiply

Juanito posted:

my thought process was mostly Keane is terrible and if we poke him some he'll probably implode

Terribly good looking, perhaps.

The Juanito/Rarity votes were atrocious. Merk's case has been debunked but it should have been transparently obvious that it was a bad case for bads. I'm voting Rarity since tearshed convinced me and whatnot, but yeah, both are bads, perhaps even tushies.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:55

JakeP: Apr 27, 2003; by Jeffrey of YOSPOS; Lipstick Apathy

JakeP posted:

this post here makes me lean towards CPig being scum, who has reason to believe that winvirus wasn't making up his claim completely, which was my go-to assumption.

He basically accepts that winvirus probably has a scum investigation on him, and questions his sanity rather than his honesty

##vote cpig

also there was another post like this but I dont feel like looking for it, but I definitely had this feeling since early in the day that cpig is concerned about the winvirus "investigation"

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:56

CapitalistPig: Nov 3, 2005; A Winner is you!

JakeP posted:

this post here makes me lean towards CPig being scum, who has reason to believe that winvirus wasn't making up his claim completely, which was my go-to assumption.

He basically accepts that winvirus probably has a scum investigation on him, and questions his sanity rather than his honesty

##vote cpig

You should perhaps read the other post I made about this winvirus claim.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:56

winvirus: Jan 23, 2009; You only delay the inevitable. All of this island will soon belong to me.

JakeP posted:

this post here makes me lean towards CPig being scum, who has reason to believe that winvirus wasn't making up his claim completely, which was my go-to assumption.

He basically accepts that winvirus probably has a scum investigation on him, and questions his sanity rather than his honesty

##vote cpig

For real when he makes posts like that why do I even need a case

Hey cpig, remember how I owned you in Nu and you lost, ineffectual and lame? How's it feel to have that happen AGAIN :getin:

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:58

merk: May 20, 2003; ##interact

Juanito posted:

my thought process was mostly Keane is terrible and if we poke him some he'll probably implode

So you voted CE with what looked like a joke vote early on and upgraded it from a joke vote to a real vote based on the CPig thing?

# ? Aug 21, 2014 16:59

Opopanax: Aug 8, 2007; I HEX YE!!!

CapitalistPig posted:

You should perhaps read the other post I made about this winvirus claim.

Town pig would just call Jake an idiot

# ? Aug 21, 2014 17:04

CapitalistPig: Nov 3, 2005; A Winner is you!

winvirus posted:

For real when he makes posts like that why do I even need a case

Hey cpig, remember how I owned you in Nu and you lost, ineffectual and lame? How's it feel to have that happen AGAIN

It's not happening again because I'm town you dumb gently caress.

The only way anything like that is happening again is if you are scum.

Ps you are scum.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 17:18

CapitalistPig: Nov 3, 2005; A Winner is you!

Opopanax posted:

Town pig would just call Jake an idiot

Idiot

# ? Aug 21, 2014 17:18

Opopanax: Aug 8, 2007; I HEX YE!!!

Yea, like that

# ? Aug 21, 2014 17:21

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Apr 27, 2024 07:23

merk: May 20, 2003; ##interact

CapitalistPig posted:

It's not happening again because I'm town you dumb gently caress.

The only way anything like that is happening again is if you are scum.

Ps you are scum.

You're not voting the guy you think is scum.

# ? Aug 21, 2014 17:27

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Traditional Games > The Game Room > An Adventure in Arrentia - A Game of Mafia

«‹›75 »