|
I am ninety nine percent sure it says 'You have to lift *word*'.
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 12:09 |
|
|
You have left us? Edit: You have to lift it up?
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:32
|
|
|
"you have to lift it up " Desmond says it to jack.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:46
|
|
|
This rules. This rulz.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:57
|
|
|
Tears In A Vial posted:"you have to lift it up " This is meaningful nah j/k
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 02:58
|
|
|
   
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 03:16
|
|
|
RCarr posted:We have lift off? I think it says "you have to lift it up." I don't remember that being a quote from Lost, but I guess it is one.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 05:26
|
|
|
I liked this a lot when I saw it as a thumbnail and thought it was a picture of Brad Pitt.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 06:57
|
|
|
loving bitcoins. Probably has something to with this annoying song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyb7bmU4qzc
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 08:49
|
|
|
"14 understated cat tattoos every owner should see" (SFW) http://blog.theanimalrescuesite.com...ERSTATEDCATTOOS Next time, just get the same thing from the 25-cent machine in the Pizza Hut lobby.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 09:05
|
|
|
Found on a list of the best tattoos of 2014 or whatever. These two stuck out. That's just loving gross. The knuckle fold eye-lids are fun.  That's a top-shelf pairing right there.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 10:12
|
|
|
JoelJoel posted:Found on a list of the best tattoos of 2014 or whatever. These two stuck out. The second one is really weird - whatever is on her stomach doesn't look like a tattoo and the head (if it's a head) looks like it's coming off her body. Otherwise the leg scales look awesome.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 15:54
|
|
|
REAL MUSCLE MILK posted:do you know what dreamcatchers are It is uneven though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 16:57
|
|
|
Niche role prostitution is probably becoming a pretty big thing these days
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 19:15
|
|
|
ICHIBAHN posted:It is uneven though. It isnt. Womens breasts arent symmetrical and a lot of artists consider that and so the designs look a little 'off' in a photo, but in person, when the woman in question isnt holding herself, would look just fine.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 19:20
|
|
|
REAL MUSCLE MILK posted:do you know what dreamcatchers are What appears to be a poorly drawn willow hoop/net decorated with feathers. Nope, definitely couldn't be taken for a dream-catcher thing. Taste is subjective and I see none in that tattoo nor its placement. It's also asymmetrical and the line work is pretty weak. The negative space and closing loving suck too. Blah blah, white chick (probably) and cultural appropriation blah blah. You must have some real treasures on your bloated body to be angrily defending garbage like that. Now, tell me how beautiful this one is  
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 19:47
|
|
|
I'll tell you how beautiful the taco bell shoulder is: extremely.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 20:15
|
|
|
JoelJoel posted:What appears to be a poorly drawn willow hoop/net decorated with feathers. Nope, definitely couldn't be taken for a dream-catcher thing. That ain't a goddamn dreamcatcher. It has a big gently caress-off cut gem on it and a fleur-de-lis. And even if it didn't, with the shape there's no way it could even be a section of a dreamcatcher. It looks more like a generic old-fashioned decoration and is pretty okay. Not sure why you're so mad about it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 20:18
|
|
|
Telemaze posted:That ain't a goddamn dreamcatcher. It has a big gently caress-off cut gem on it and a fleur-de-lis. And even if it didn't, with the shape there's no way it could even be a section of a dreamcatcher. Because those sluts and their underboob tattoos new tramp stamps I tell you Have you seen this awesome website it's called Return of Kings
|
|
#
?
Oct 30, 2014 21:49
|
|
|
Telemaze posted:That ain't a goddamn dreamcatcher. It has a big gently caress-off cut gem on it and a fleur-de-lis. And even if it didn't, with the shape there's no way it could even be a section of a dreamcatcher. Isn't it a mandala?
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 00:47
|
|
|
Lechtansi posted:The second one is really weird - whatever is on her stomach doesn't look like a tattoo and the head (if it's a head) looks like it's coming off her body. Otherwise the leg scales look awesome. It's a Porn star lass called Babe Ink and she's been getting the Mermaid legs for ages. The rest of her is...Giger inspired or metal /japanese stuff. None of it fits together but hey, that's her thing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 01:13
|
|
|
dpack_1 posted:It isnt. Womens breasts arent symmetrical and a lot of artists consider that and so the designs look a little 'off' in a photo, but in person, when the woman in question isnt holding herself, would look just fine. This. Another example is my own back tattoo. If you look at it dead on, it looks crooked - but thats because people normally focus on landmarks like the spine (or her boobs) instead of, you know, the whole body. In my case, my spine is hosed and does not run down the centre of my back - so its looks definitely "off".
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 01:38
|
|
|
The tiny gun has me cracking up
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 03:45
|
|
|
Lechtansi posted:The second one is really weird - whatever is on her stomach doesn't look like a tattoo and the head (if it's a head) looks like it's coming off her body. Otherwise the leg scales look awesome. That's the hell of it. The head looks goofy as poo poo but on their own I really dig those leg scales.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 04:23
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:The tiny gun has me cracking up Tiny?! That gun is nearly half the size of that person! And the bullet is like the size of their heads!
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 04:53
|
|
|
Improbable Lobster posted:The tiny gun has me cracking up I thought it was one of those novelty foam hands you get at sporting events.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 06:12
|
|
|
Would be better if it said Taco Belle.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 07:10
|
|
|
The perfect tattoo for someone too lazy to put on pants.
|
|
#
?
Oct 31, 2014 07:16
|
|
|
JoelJoel posted:mildly Not a dream catcher more of an Art Deco thing also, not bad even though I've seen better.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 00:56
|
|
(under boob)
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:What would you even get from Lost, anyway? A portrait of your favourite I was going to suggest a dharma thingy or the hieroglyphics from the button-timer or maybe a polar bear playing backgammon But I can't beat the plane-crash gun-island LOST RULEZ suggestion.
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 03:36
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Nov 2, 2014 05:18
|
|
|
Y'all want some West Virginian tattoos? Of course you do. These are all directly from the "artist's" Facebook pages:     
jess has a new favorite as of 05:44 on Nov 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 05:16
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 08:47
|
|
|
I think this is beautiful.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 13:23
|
|
|
I'm surprised nobody has noticed that the mermaid legs tattoo is completely ripped off from Elayne Angel, a famous body piercer who got it over 20 years ago. http://i.imgur.com/wXAfEop.jpg :nsfw: just to be safe When you compare both versions side-by-side, the new one looks like crap. It's also tasteless because it's a blatant rip-off. DeKalb has a new favorite as of 16:52 on Nov 3, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 16:46
|
|
|
DeKalb posted:I'm surprised nobody has noticed that the mermaid legs tattoo is completely ripped off from Elayne Angel, a famous body piercer who got it over 20 years ago. Right, and I'm sure you'll also say every set of wings is a complete ripoff of the first person that ever had them done. I'll meet you halfway and say 'inspired by', but the one originally posted is different enough that I'd say it can't really be called a ripoff. Side question, what happens to large sleeves if the person tans? How physically deep in the skin even is the change of skin color? Do certain inks/colors basically have UV blocking properties that would make any change of color blotchy rather than uniform?
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 17:06
|
|
|
Sentient Data posted:Right, and I'm sure you'll also say every set of wings is a complete ripoff of the first person that ever had them done. I'll meet you halfway and say 'inspired by', but the one originally posted is different enough that I'd say it can't really be called a ripoff. Side question, what happens to large sleeves if the person tans? How physically deep in the skin even is the change of skin color? Do certain inks/colors basically have UV blocking properties that would make any change of color blotchy rather than uniform? Ink is under your skin. Not on top of it. It doesnt have any UV protective properties. Infact a lot of the inks break down and turn blotchy as gently caress with UV exposure so tattoos should really be kept out of direct sunlight for prolonged periods of time.
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 17:22
|
|
|
The knight helmet looks like Kermit's neck. 
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 17:27
|
|
|
canyoneer posted:The knight helmet looks like Kermit's neck. Its a frogmouth great-helm so go figure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frog-mouth_helm
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2014 17:29
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 12, 2024 12:09 |
|
|
dpack_1 posted:Ink is under your skin. Not on top of it. It doesnt have any UV protective properties. Wear your sunscreen. Also my concern about getting tattoos below my thighs or on my shoulders/arms. I really don't know how quickly they tan and I want to be able to spend time outside in the sun.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2014 19:28
|
|