Hello, I have spent a day without internet. My last game I was scum I got outed for posting to much and literally quoting the OP but having to much information, why would I post a lot of trash the next game? I'm just lovely at posting I guess. I still have a gut on EXACT, but I'll vote for a lynch tomorrow. Which looks like it'll be me or Krell right now, so that'll be fun. I am leaning more towards Krell actually being scum, tho, suddenly not posting and waiting for another lynch to ride after you've been fingered instead of defending yourself strikes me as scum 101. Amnistar posted:Nobody has done what you did. I posted a "list" but it was all solid statements of my opinions. You felt pressured by the attention on you to post reads, and made up a bunch of wishy washy poo poo. That is something scum do. nice scumslip owned idiot
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 05:05 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 08:51 |
paranoia is fun btw but you need to play it in person or at least via skype/whatever, it's trash over IRC/forums
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 05:06 |
|
Quidnose posted:Meta can be used to defend a person based on how it applies to ~gut feelings.~ I don't think you're scum because of the 100% legitimate vote. I read that as a joke as well and overlooked it. I think the fact that you posted a shitstorm in response to someone questioning you on that was way over the top and dramatic and overly defensive, which I find scummy. Your posting escalated suddenly and became frantic about being called scum and how could anyone mistake that joke for scum ever!!! it just felt ridiculously hostile for what happened. If I missed your question in my response I'm sorry for that and not understanding what questions you're referring to. Gamerofthegame posted:nice scumslip Do tell? How is what I posted a scumslip good sir?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 05:11 |
|
What is this?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 06:06 |
|
Amnistar posted:I don't think you're scum because of the 100% legitimate vote. I read that as a joke as well and overlooked it. I think the fact that you posted a shitstorm in response to someone questioning you on that was way over the top and dramatic and overly defensive, which I find scummy. Your posting escalated suddenly and became frantic about being called scum and how could anyone mistake that joke for scum ever!!! it just felt ridiculously hostile for what happened.[/quote] You are calling me out with a meta gameplay argument rather than a meta player argument, i.e. "scum, when called out, will react overly defensive because they are concerned about being lynched due to their small numbers." I could very well have other reasons for not wanting to be the lynch candidate for the day, like wanting to play mafia, or being annoyed I am being voted for lovely reasons. I don't see how you can sit there saying "meta defenses are useless" purely based around a player's meta, when you are using a basic meta gameplay argument as the crux of finding me scummy. Everything in mafia is about reads, and reading the way a player behaves is just as valid as "well scum tend to do this so you are scummy." To me I would add an e.g. of "not very valid at all," I would rather ignore people doing TYPICALLY SCUMMY THINGS and find where people are lying, posting zero opinions, playing safe, etc. Those are actual quantifiable things. "He got defensive" happens as both town and scum, for a variety of reasons, ESPECIALLY in a role madness game. quote:If I missed your question in my response I'm sorry for that and not understanding what questions you're referring to. The question was what I quoted, do you think it's valid for me to say "hey fuckers, you called me out for this when there were 5 other people who posted joke opinions without the '100% serious' thing, and they weren't voted for it." Do you think that is a valid point, or not?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 06:12 |
|
Gamerofthegame posted:nice scumslip If you really thought this was a scum slip you'd be voting and pushing it, not just dropping it casually to see if it gains traction. ##vote Gamerofthegame
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 06:12 |
Quidnose posted:If you really thought this was a scum slip you'd be voting and pushing it, not just dropping it casually to see if it gains traction. ##vote Gamerofthegame
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 06:19 |
|
So you have no interest in sharing with the rest of the class why that's a scum slip?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 06:23 |
|
Quid, my comment about meta defenses being dumb was a joke, I figured you of all people would get that... As for your response, it was too much, too fast and it makes me doubt your alignment. I'm not saying because you defended yourself you're scum, please don't put words in my mouth. Your point about being singled out is valid, but the manner in which you made it is suspect.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 13:55 |
|
The usual Fate going, "oh hey, Apostate is playing Mafia, BETTER DROP SOME DRAMA ON HER" happened. I now have a friend going through a divorce, and a new roommate. Yaaaaaaaaaaaay.Amnistar posted:Quid, my comment about meta defenses being dumb was a joke, I figured you of all people would get that... I didn't want to move my vote, but Krell posted a thing that was actually playing the game. It is a little weird that Quid overreacted that much when someone didn't see through the majesty of his "100% serious" joke. I really don't see how it's so out of the ordinary that it means he's scum- or at least more likely to be scum than Gamer. Gamer is much more likely to be scum because of his wishy-washy textbook scumposts. ##vote Gamer As for this post, Gamerofthegame posted:Hello, I have spent a day without internet. I really hate to say it but with Krell, that could mean Krell is scum, but it could also mean that the sky is occasionally blue.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 14:16 |
|
apostateCourier posted:It is a little weird that Quid overreacted that much... So that is my point entirely. That sentence right there.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 14:41 |
|
Quidnose posted:What is this? it's an emptyquote, indicating that i agree with somber. because his post was also an empty quote, and quotes don't nest, my post was empty.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 14:47 |
|
Amnistar posted:So that is my point entirely. That sentence right there. I totally missed the bit where you didn't vote for Quid, as well.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 14:52 |
|
Amnistar posted:As for your response, it was too much, too fast and it makes me doubt your alignment.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 16:44 |
|
http://votefinder.org/player/gamerofthegame Not feeling it. I'm not saying that we should give Gamer a pass just because he is new, but I am saying that I think that we're getting a false positive because he's new. Quidnose has over a hundred games and flipped out after a modicum of pressure was applied. I don't really care about his meta because arguments based on posting styles are generally bad. He's currently dogging the vote leader hard so I'm not particularly inspired to give him a pass on effort.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 17:03 |
|
Gamerofthegame posted:Hello, I have spent a day without internet. I....just reread this. Is this a legit scumslip?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 17:17 |
|
i don't think so
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 17:22 |
|
Votecount for Day 1 Gamerofthegame (6): Ernie., Harold Krell (3): apostateCourier, Quidnose, Gamerofthegame, Poison Mushroom, CirclMastr, Quidnose (2): Somberbrero, Pinterest Mom EXAKT Science (2): Pinterest Mom, Asiina, Lynch No One! (1): Ernie. Amnistar (1): Kumbamontu, Poison Mushroom, Asiina (1): Pinterest Mom, EXAKT Science, HiipFire (0): Quidnose, apostateCourier (0): Poison Mushroom, CapitalistPig (0): EXAKT Science, Pinterest Mom (0): Somberbrero, CapitalistPig, Meinberg (0): Amnistar, Poison Mushroom (0): Quidnose, Not Voting (2): Max22, Meinberg With 18 alive, it's 10 votes to lynch. The current deadline is January 27th, 2015 at 8 p.m. EST -- that's in about 6 hours, 59 minutes.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 19:00 |
|
Gamer you should probably claim now. The EccoGame deadline is also tonight so I might be distracted.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 19:17 |
|
Amnistar posted:I....just reread this. Is this a legit scumslip? I am curious to what you think you see because I don't see anything that resembles a scumslip Not that I don't think he's scum, I still do, but that's a weird thing to pick out
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 19:25 |
|
Gamerofthegame posted:My last game I was scum I got outed for posting to much and literally quoting the OP but having to much information, why would I post a lot of trash the next game? I'm just lovely at posting I guess. I think Amni sees how Gamer talks about how he got caught last time as scum and why he wouldn't do that behavior this game, the implication being that he is scum this game as well. It's clever but I doubt it's actually a scum slip.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 19:30 |
|
Kumbamontu posted:I am curious to what you think you see because I don't see anything that resembles a scumslip "in the last game i played, as scum, i did X and that led to my being cuddled. why would i do X again in this game [as scum, when i've already learned not to do it]" the part in [ ] is the part that would be a scum slip that i think amni sees, but i don't think it's reasonable to read that in
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 19:30 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:"in the last game i played, as scum, i did X and that led to my being cuddled. why would i do X again in this game [as scum, when i've already learned not to do it]" Ooooooh okay that makes more sense now. I don't agree with his premise but I still agree with the conclusion that he's probably scum he being gamer
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 19:42 |
|
Yea, what they said.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:01 |
|
Kumbamontu posted:Ooooooh okay that makes more sense now. I don't agree with his premise but I still agree with the conclusion that he's probably scum he's only played two games though, does that change your read at all?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:09 |
Kumbamontu posted:Ooooooh okay that makes more sense now. I don't agree with his premise but I still agree with the conclusion that he's probably scum rude Somberbrero posted:Gamer you should probably claim now. Sure, I'll softclaim. I am a mason, Gemini Man. My role gives powers to my fellow if I die and vice versa. I do not know if they are scum, though they're probably town. If they are town, my lynch is pretty much a neutral outcome, so whatever. If they are scum, that's a pretty hefty hit. In a role madness game my role is pretty basic, huh.
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:20 |
|
okay let's go ##vote kumbamontu
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:36 |
|
I don't think that claim by itself says anything essential to the lynch at this point.Ernie. posted:okay let's go nah
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:40 |
|
##vote Gamerofthegame just to prevent no-lynch. I don't generally like the "scum should have better coaching than this" argument but come on.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:45 |
|
it does, it means that if gamer is scum, then they will personally be invested in maintaining keeping their town mason buddy alive all while said town mason buddy can interrogate them a lot more seriously in private
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:46 |
Ernie. posted:it does, it means that if gamer is scum, then they will personally be invested in maintaining keeping their town mason buddy alive Why would I want the townie to survive if I was scum? Allen Wren posted:##vote Gamerofthegame just to prevent no-lynch. I don't generally like the "scum should have better coaching than this" argument but come on. Like Krell has?
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:49 |
|
Allen Wren posted:##vote Gamerofthegame just to prevent no-lynch. I don't generally like the "scum should have better coaching than this" argument but come on. There are five hours until the lynch. This is a weak excuse for a vote Allen. I'm also not sure what you mean by your second sentence, I might just be misreading it. Can you explain?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:49 |
|
Gamerofthegame posted:Why would I want the townie to survive if I was scum? The premise is if you are scum and have a mason buddy you're always putting up an act to them. After a while they'll trust you to be town and defend you if it's needed. Gamerofthegame posted:Like Krell has? Ahh I see someone being irked like this and then feel bad. Guys, I really don't think it's gamer.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:51 |
|
A lot of people have not commented on Quid at all.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:55 |
Ernie. posted:The premise is if you are scum and have a mason buddy you're always putting up an act to them. After a while they'll trust you to be town and defend you if it's needed. Ah, that makes sense. Can't say this would be a priority of mine right now, but. And don't worry about it, I'm still enjoying myself. Don't vote based on some meta newbie bullshit or whatever, if you think I'm scum then go for it.
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:55 |
|
i really like quid the best out of the plausible options today. he's been aggressively defensive in a way that makes me uncomfortable.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:56 |
|
Maybe I should do a thing? I guess I should do a thing. My next post will be a cool one maybe?
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:57 |
|
please!
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:57 |
Somberbrero posted:A lot of people have not commented on Quid at all. Quids done lots of whitenoise posting to make him look like he was involved while not actually adding anything, up until he was accused. I agree with the suspicion, but I would think scum would share with the vote-post-only lurkers over posting a lot and getting hosed over.
|
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:58 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 08:51 |
|
Somberbrero posted:There are five hours until the lynch. This is a weak excuse for a vote Allen. Yeah, five hours where I'll be away from the computer and not shitposting every three minutes. Five hours is close enough for me. I'm just swapping my vote since we're apparently letting Krell live (for no clear reason.) I hadn't figured in the softclaim when I wrote that---or, more accurately thought it was someone else's claim---and had just based the "gamer really should be better coached than this" on his general posting previously. Of course it's a weak excuse. Nobody's got anything but weak excuses or lovely reads.
|
# ? Jan 27, 2015 20:59 |