|
yuming posted:It's me here I am! Does my post have valid points on you? Or am I way off on yuming Tell me things
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 18:00 |
|
|
I don't feel like it's overly specific at all. Like do you not see how the post he's referencing is super hedgy?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:01
|
|
|
Asiina posted:If you think that's what this is about, then you're just as dumb as him and you all deserve to lose this game. It looks to me like capps is posting town-nonsense, not scum-nonsense.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:02
|
|
|
Asiina posted:If you think that's what this is about, then you're just as dumb as him and you all deserve to lose this game. Asiina, maybe it would be for the best to put Capps on ignore for a little while.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:03
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:It looks to me like capps is posting town-nonsense, not scum-nonsense.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:03
|
|
|
EXAKT Science posted:I don't feel like it's overly specific at all. Like do you not see how the post he's referencing is super hedgy? If I was entirely wishy washy on both of them I can see something being made of it. The fact that I think both are really lovely lynches means I feel a certain way. How's that not specific? He's bringing up a situation that would not have happened in the first place. I mean you can say "how do we know that wouldn't have happened?" and I could say "it wouldn't have!" and we can have this circular discussion forever.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:04
|
|
|
I think an underlooked aspect of D1 that Capps pointed out that nobody touched on was the whole deadline / no vote thing after the vig.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:05
|
|
|
Deadbeat Dad posted:That seems like a very specific thing to pinpoint. You're firstly assuming I live long enough in the game to "refer back to the posts later" to have to defend myself from accusations that may or may not ever form without regard to my playstyle. However I have such strong ~feels~ about Hurt I am really stuck on that idea.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:19
|
|
|
yuming posted:I don't find DBD's opinions on Hurt and GG scummy. Who else do you think is scum?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:30
|
|
|
Well let's see let me read 20 pages and I will let you know  I have a vague town read on Asiina atm. I haven't even read the whole recent conversation, but the ~aura~ of it is town. Wow it sounds like I am writing total bullshit but I mean it really I do.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:32
|
|
|
I am trying to drop my ~FEELING~ but I can't, I can't.Deadbeat Dad posted:But I also really want to vote Dr. Hurt. He answered Amnistars post pretty seriously (although Amnistar asked him to answer it seriously to head off joke phase or was that a joke? and I think it was before the game even began? It's just really weird) - and then did this weird thing I've seen people as scum do a lot which is inform people when or if they'd be around because they're busy. I just don't see town doing that. He doesn't have many posts so I'm not sure though but I want to vote him.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:46
|
|
|
yuming posted:I am trying to drop my ~FEELING~ but I can't, I can't. Yes, but that was before the vig. It pretty much trumped my "I don't like you informing the thread where you are thing" and his Amni response.
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:48
|
|
|
Yuming, you think Dr. Hurt would pull a gambit/bus like that on D1 and think people would be naive to the fact that he could be doing that to a scumbuddy? It's an extremely lucky shot to me, but at the same time, how would doing that benefit him?
|
|
#
?
Mar 5, 2015 23:52
|
|
|
Because it looks town. You tossing Hurt out as a possibility is exactly the reason he'd do it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:08
|
|
|
Max posted:This is tiresome. I have found some potential cases in the votes on Max and now am panning for gold. People do that in the West, ja?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:14
|
|
|
Capps is scum w byers Prob
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:15
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Capps is scum w byers Prob
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:16
|
|
|
Rarity posted:I literally don't understand what GG is doing here. GG, you realise we have to lynch the scum, right? I don't find GG's strange D1 reasoning for his vote scummy. Actually, it leans a bit town for me because he was so flippant about it.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:18
|
|
|
Guys we are getting somewhat close to deadline and it's a really terrible idea to not lynch anyone today.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:26
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:I mentioned this; I can see a bus here. But overall I think he's town. My top choice atm is Meinberg (aside from Hurt, but nobody cares about that theory so!)
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Okay I did a big reread of the thread and I really think GG is scum. I'll make a post tomorrow with all the quotes to back me up but now is bedtime. AnonymousNarcotics, can you please post your reasoning behind me like you said you would?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:30
|
|
|
##unvote ##vote Meinberg If people want to do this, I will. I don't want to vote GG at all. Although no lynching 2 days in a row would be loving pathetic
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:31
|
|
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Capps is scum w byers Prob Would you like to share with the class how you cam to these conclusions?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
Deadbeat Dad posted:##unvote Is this primarily from just a lack of input from the berg or something juicier?
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
I'm ok with a Meinberg lynch
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:33
|
|
|
Dr. Hurt posted:Is this primarily from just a lack of input from the berg or something juicier? It's not my ideal vote but out of him and GG or a no lynch, I'd rather vote somebody that is actively disengaged with this game that has a chance to be lurking scum. There seems to be no traction with the other people I feel are scummy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:36
|
|
|
I'm not sure how useful a lurker lynch would be today. I mean, I won't stop you if that's the direction you want to go, but there won't be a whole lot revealed by my flip.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
Fast version of my case as I continue reading: ##vote Meinberg Meinberg posted:It seems like Max isn't particularly interested in engaging with the game in the first place. I don't find that to be promising behavior in general. Meinberg posted:It's all about quality, not quantity. And it seems to me that you're trying to generate a lot of noise right now, Max. Meinberg posted:Say no more than is needed. These two posts speak to a very specific and intentional disengagement on your part:
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:37
|
|
|
##vote Meinberg
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:I'm not sure how useful a lurker lynch would be today. I mean, I won't stop you if that's the direction you want to go, but there won't be a whole lot revealed by my flip. Ugh.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:39
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:I'm not sure how useful a lurker lynch would be today. I mean, I won't stop you if that's the direction you want to go, but there won't be a whole lot revealed by my flip. I'm not voting you for lurking ##vote Meinberg
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
yuming posted:The "I'm not sure about" comment speaks from the perspective of a fake opinion to me. "I'm not sure how I feel about the JOAT claim, BUT your reaction to the pressure on you does not speak favorably." Meinberg's opinion on Max is very one note. He gets new information in the claim, but can't compile it into his read. So he reiterates the sole point he has against Max. And again with the third quote. That is a very scummy perspective.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:41
|
|
|
Meinberg posted:I'm not sure how useful a lurker lynch would be today. I mean, I won't stop you if that's the direction you want to go, but there won't be a whole lot revealed by my flip. Then change that yourself, berg.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:42
|
|
|
I'm VT. Capps, Hurt, and Byers are reading town to my ~gut~ I'm feeling ambivalent towards Asiina on account of her interaction with capps. I also like the look and sound of Byers' case on GG. ##vote Ghostly Gangsta I'll try to get some more thoughts out, but I will admit that my mental energy levels are fairly low.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:43
|
|
|
 *lays down in cave, lets snake crawl up my arm, is ambivalent towards everything*
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
I still prefer GG, but would switch to Meinberg if I need to. I'll be around until deadline this time.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
I am reading GG vs. EXAKT now. I do not think GG is scummy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:58
|
|
|
Ghostly Gangsta posted:Truth be told, I had started typing most of that before you asked me for my top three scumreads. I mean like I said I was uncertain about Ecco. I labeled town in the post but I should have put undecided just as I am with TT. And that is not scummy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 00:59
|
|
|
Exakt seems fairly on point this game, despite my wariness in regards to his use of the content game. I think the idea of scum dayvigging another scum on D1 to be an absolutely ludicrous proposition. I may be alone in this idea. I also think that the presence of one town vigilante makes the possibility of another town vigilante less (but not nil), and so Dr. Hurt being on the scum team that decides to kill PMom makes no sense to me. Because of this, I am quite wary of yuming in this game. She's also calling me scummy when, in fact, I'm just bad. In a similar vein, let's look at these two posts from Rarity: Rarity posted:No way town has two vigs. My vote on PMom's not moving. Rarity posted:Ok, back to Hurt's vig. Finally, Ecco's defense of Rarity seems ~weird~ to me, as it did to a lot of other folks. Taste coming in an tunneling on capps does not alleviate my worries.
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 18:00 |
|
|
Oh this is GG's first game. Hmmmm.
|
|
#
?
Mar 6, 2015 01:05
|
|