CapitalistPig posted:

anyone still wanting to vote yuming after her current posting is either dumb or a scum.

pick one of those rarity.

Are you dumb or are you a scum?

Poque posted:

The Ninth Layer posted:

Why don't we just lynch Diqnol AND yuming? Problem solved.....?

Rarity posted:

What, you mean the post where she just summarises things that have happened to look helpful without having to add anything new? Or the one offering advice on Lid's cop actions that was already the obvious move? Or the one where she wrote off my post as bad without providing a single reason despite having a ton of words to go off?

Point me to the posts that make you think she's town.

Rarity posted:

What, you mean the post where she just summarises things that have happened to look helpful without having to add anything new? Or the one offering advice on Lid's cop actions that was already the obvious move? Or the one where she wrote off my post as bad without providing a single reason despite having a ton of words to go off?

Point me to the posts that make you think she's town.

JakeP posted:

Guys currently Harold Krell is in a position to be lynched. Can we please divert votes off of him onto Yuming DIqnl or Lumpen. TIA TYVM TTYL

Lid posted:

The issue I see in contrast is that, apart from arguably Diqnol, the lets says "secondary votes" to replace Yuming are policy lynches. In a game with uncertain investigations as you might say people are more interested in just lynching for the sake of lynching. Again this goes back to yuming being a liked player as opposed to one of the policy players is rubbing me the wrong way even if on any other day one i'd be all on board because seriously gently caress Krell. It's players falling into the trap of "oh its day one theres no information yet" but we have information today, in fact we have a LOT of information today. My result is supported by the oracles statement that one of the three players including yuming isn't town. It's not a slam dunk by any stretch but players treating this day one like "oh lol its like every day one lets turbo those guys we dont like" ignores night zero.

yuming posted:

Why do you want to lynch me Jake.

Tell me more.

JakeP posted:

I dont want you to die yuming I need you to

for krell

yuming posted:

Your reasoning is terrible. You wrote opinions that were based on outdated information and then didn't bother to update them when the circumstances change.

Do you still think Asiina is scum? I have a better read of her than you imo.

Rarity posted:

- yuming's reaction to the votes on her was very self-serving, she was only focused on survival and not doing anything to help town. Also unless it comes up later, nobody's claimed as the person giving yuming her orders

- Ah there's the additional claim from MMM for yuming's role. I think I remember seeing a similar setup in I think it was one of Ecco's games? There were three players who'd submit a name to an assassin and then the assassin would pick one of the three to kill. I'm pretty sure there was scum in that little group so I'm not going to write yuming off based on her claim just yet. Also, MMM's play in general looks very towny.

- Mills being confirmed masons with yuming is such horseshit. Most likely, Mills doesn't know or care about yuming's alignment, he's just trying to let her keep playing for longer because ~*emotions*~

JakeP posted:

Guys currently Harold Krell is in a position to be lynched. Can we please divert votes off of him onto Yuming DIqnl or Lumpen. TIA TYVM TTYL

yuming posted:

... ok. I am baffled by this.

And also by the fact that JakeP has more posts than me.

How does he have more posts than me I have read most of this thread and can remember none of his opinions.

CapitalistPig posted:

oh i dont know maybe, her giant comprehensive case on diqnol which is very good.
also the fact that you are being scum rarity.

CapitalistPig posted:

I tried to have you do this and told you we should try to get lumpen and diqnol lunched

rarity came in and messed it up by voting yuming and you jumped right on the bandwagon so if yuming is getting lynched i'm making drat sure krell is too.

JakeP posted:

stop smoking so much weed

Lid posted:

The issue I see in contrast is that, apart from arguably Diqnol, the lets says "secondary votes" to replace Yuming are policy lynches. In a game with uncertain investigations as you might say people are more interested in just lynching for the sake of lynching. Again this goes back to yuming being a liked player as opposed to one of the policy players is rubbing me the wrong way even if on any other day one i'd be all on board because seriously gently caress Krell. It's players falling into the trap of "oh its day one theres no information yet" but we have information today, in fact we have a LOT of information today. My result is supported by the oracles statement that one of the three players including yuming isn't town. It's not a slam dunk by any stretch but players treating this day one like "oh lol its like every day one lets turbo those guys we dont like" ignores night zero.

yuming posted:

I haven't ever

Lid posted:

I as a matter of fact agree with this except, unless i'm thinking incorrectly, someone earlier said the existence of multiple scum teams which would make sense as any scum team being uniform in this game would easily be able to accomplish plurality votes just by voting as a bloc. Is there a reason they can't both be scum?

Rarity posted:

Holy poo poo, you are terrible at this.


Oh look, there's me continuing to record my opinions on you as new info comes up

Yeah, Asiina's still scum. I just don't want to risk having you drop out of the top 2 places.

CapitalistPig posted:

this is not scum yuming

Pinterest Mom posted:

Rarity's been doing a thing lately where she writes down her thoughts as she reads the thread and then dumps all of them. That's what was going on in that post. I like it

yuming posted:

No Rarity. Poque is correct. You are terrible at this. Have you ever been consist in finding scums? Because this isn't going to cut it.

That is the post AFTER which a bunch of new information has come up. And you just quote it... to show your opinion changes... it makes no sense.

;;;;

yuming posted:

No Rarity. Poque is correct. You are terrible at this. Have you ever been consist in finding scums? Because this isn't going to cut it.

That is the post AFTER which a bunch of new information has come up. And you just quote it... to show your opinion changes... it makes no sense.

;;;;

tithin posted:

I fundamentally disagree with the existence of Harold Krell.

Lid posted:

I as a matter of fact agree with this except, unless i'm thinking incorrectly, someone earlier said the existence of multiple scum teams which would make sense as any scum team being uniform in this game would easily be able to accomplish plurality votes just by voting as a bloc. Is there a reason they can't both be scum?

Lid posted:

Scum yuming in a game with one scum team or scum yuming in a game with multiple scum teams?

DizzyCow posted:

Can you just summarize this or something? Don't take "longer is better" to heart, dude.

yuming posted:

qft

Harold Krell posted:

Oh, I disagree. Longer is INDEED better.

Know what I'm sayin'?

Like a four-inch wiener? Get it?