|
oops
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:26 |
|
|
Wow.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:06
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 2 Those On My Left (7): Mithranderp, Matthew Beet, Asphyxious, white mans burping, Tirade, Bifauxnen, thatbastardken Kleedrac (2): Tirade, MaliciousOnion, white mans burping (1): Those On My Left Bifauxnen (1): Kommando, Tirade, MaliciousOnion (1): Kleedrac Asphyxious (1): Tirade, Gough Suppressant, Kommando, thatbastardken, Tirade (0): Kleedrac, Asphyxious, Not Voting (0): With 13 alive, it's 7 votes to lynch. The current deadline is May 19th, 2015 at 9 p.m. EST -- that's in about 0 minutes.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:08
|
|
|
I know this looks bad for me again but honestly that's pretty funny.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:13
|
|
|
Oh hey, you managed to seamlessly organise a ten minutes to midnight vote on someone for not much at all. Almost as if there was an organised presence pushing for it. Gaspy is scum, kleedrac is either scum or scum are setting them up for a tomorrow lynch by implicating him as important enough to swing the vote that hard.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:16
|
|
|
the doc WITH a resurrection chamber. holy gently caress. okay now we can have a leisurely chat. soag are you really feeling gaspy or is this just a spare of the minute thing? he's pinging me, but he pings me every game and my confidence post toml flip is somewhat shattered. like i've never seen him round on someone like he did you, you're right, and his reasoning to me was that he knows he's town therefore knows you're wrong. That disregards that you might be town and not know his alignment and that we don't know his alignment so that argument doesn't work for me.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:21
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Oh hey, you managed to seamlessly organise a ten minutes to midnight vote on someone for not much at all. Almost as if there was an organised presence pushing for it. I'm sorry are you implying I organised that?
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:23
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Oh hey, you managed to seamlessly organise a ten minutes to midnight vote on someone for not much at all. Almost as if there was an organised presence pushing for it. you've been singularly on gaspy all day though. not feeling kleedrac either i thought he was sort of helpful today. now i've got time im gonna go read his posts.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:24
|
|
|
Matthew Beet posted:the doc WITH a resurrection chamber. holy gently caress. I don't know soags scum, I just thought his approach was a bit off. I dunno. I'd probably still vote for him though.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:25
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:I'm sorry are you implying I organised that? Not alone, obviously. That's the point.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:25
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Oh hey, you managed to seamlessly organise a ten minutes to midnight vote on someone for not much at all. Almost as if there was an organised presence pushing for it. I feel a bit dumb for coming in again in support of kleedrac (even more so after going back and reviewing his post history and not finding much to write home about), but 6 of the 7 votes that sunk TOML were sitting on kleedrac at some point beforehand.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:27
|
|
|
I still think this nightchat stuff feels fuckin weird, but now that we actually have stuff to talk about, it might be nice. Gaspy is your brain seriously wired that backwards from mine when it comes to tactical decisions like night actions, or do you just do that on purpose to rile me up for a better read? I promise I gave up the spreadsheet!
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:27
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Not alone, obviously. That's the point. I dunno. I think what you're doing is sticking your neck out way too far if you're scum so you're probably not, but your focus on me is a bit vexing.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:28
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:I still think this nightchat stuff feels fuckin weird, but now that we actually have stuff to talk about, it might be nice. Not riling you up, I think you're being duplicitous.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:29
|
|
|
What the gently caress just happened? You were all on Kleedrac and then bum-rushed TOML on what? Seriously what? Matthew Beet posted:Not sure. Gaspy sounds wrong but so does toml and out of the two TOML's my stronger feel but no one is interested in him. Mithranderp posted:I'm interested Asphyxious posted:I wouldn't say no to a TOML vote honestly. Tirade posted:I think TOML deserves to get fed to the mindworms for no other reason than pissing off during this posting frenzy. But I doubt we could get anything started on him at this stage. Asphyxious posted:TOML opted to watch game of thrones instead of participate. I'd almost lynch on principle. Mithranderp posted:##vote Those On My Left And then theres just this rambling avalanche onto TOML. Beet. Phyx, Mith, Tirade. Soag was behind a Kleedrac vote and then shifted rapidly. a bit of talking, then bif jumps on for lack of a better direction and tbk drops the bomb.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:30
|
|
|
Gough Suppressant posted:Not alone, obviously. That's the point. hindsight is 20/20 and your posting with the full knowledge toml is town, which you didn't have before. You mentioned Gaspy and Kleedrac as most scummy. Most of the votes were on Kleedrac prior, is this why you're saying he's scum? This was a desperate save of him?
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:30
|
|
|
Kommando posted:What the gently caress just happened? You were all on Kleedrac and then bum-rushed TOML on what? Correction! I said I was never keen on Kleedrac, at least one time, maybe twice. Maybe earlier on today as well I can't remember. I said I'd only switch back on the absolute risk of a no lynch.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:34
|
|
|
I saw TOML sitting one away from hammer and didn't want to miss out on the lynch.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:35
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Not riling you up, I think you're being duplicitous. okay, it just always seems weird to me that when I've got a clever plan that relies more on something solid like tactical game mechanics (as opposed to making vague personal "reads") you often end up disagreeing with it for some reason. Like when I would've wanted to lynch Birb the (fake) hunter in the werewolf game! I was even worried for a while that I could get pulled up for NOT arguing that logical conclusion if anyone else had thought of it.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:38
|
|
|
Personal Log posted:Night 2 on Planet
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:39
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:okay, it just always seems weird to me that when I've got a clever plan that relies more on something solid like tactical game mechanics (as opposed to making vague personal "reads") you often end up disagreeing with it for some reason. Like when I would've wanted to lynch Birb the (fake) hunter in the werewolf game! I was even worried for a while that I could get pulled up for NOT arguing that logical conclusion if anyone else had thought of it. I have a very poor handle on tactical game mechanics so if you're doing some clever mafia thing likely as not it looks like gobbledygook from my end. Also I still think you're scum.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:40
|
|
|
One of the things about being open at night is that Kleedrac might have more opportunity to answer your questions. As would our other overseas friends had Auspol not  them first day 
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:41
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Also I still think you're scum. That's cool, I just tend to go into OMGUS mode when people think I'm scummy for what I think are THE WRONG REASONS  ...but experience seems to have proven this very counter-productive as an actual scumhunting method.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:45
|
|
|
Birdstrike posted:One of the things about being open at night is that Kleedrac might have more opportunity to answer your questions. auspol has traditionally, well early days, anyhow, always killed off foreigners. we got better later on with cumburgs and bees but.. yeah.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:48
|
|
|
Zetsubou-san, please don't stop your fluff. I know it doesn't add to the game tactically but I enjoy reading it.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:51
|
|
|
MaliciousOnion posted:Even now I'm still not convinced. I wasn't aware my gift could be kept until later - I thought it was a same-night thing. Oh yeah, I didn't have time to explain this before - that's the standard way invention items work in Mafia. Trying to coordinate it on the same night would be rather tricky. Before I could even get your item, you'd have to succeed in your night action first. So Birb would have to wait and make sure no one blocked you. Night actions tend to get resolved all together only once everyone's finally submitted. What if a roleblocker waited till real late to submit their action so I only had like 15 minutes to even get the item before the next day started, let alone reply back? also, my using it is subject to being acted on or interfered with just like any other action. What if I'd already done a different action? Would I be allowed to do both? If I did both, would a tracker see both or a blocker block both? It's kind of a mess. In any case, I didn't get the present till this morning.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 12:59
|
|
|
i breadcrumbed that all the way through day one you loving morons, good work
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:25
|
|
|
just staggeringly loving stupid
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:26
|
|
|
i mean, my god
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:29
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:i breadcrumbed that all the way through day one you loving morons, good work Feels weird talking to the dead but I just looked at your posts and I still can't see it. Is the time travel thing another SMAC reference?
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:32
|
|
|
Those On My Left posted:i don't like first days, i am not patient Those On My Left posted:nice. i hope i can make the next one. missing a burger appointment, a shameful toml that's what I found, with hindsight.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:39
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Feels weird talking to the dead but I just looked at your posts and I still can't see it. Is the time travel thing another SMAC reference? yes, I'm sure a post mentioning a delorean and the future is a reference to something in a game set in the future.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:43
|
|
|
Zetsubou-san posted:that's what I found, with hindsight. Jesus tapdancing Christ.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:43
|
|
|
Zetsubou-san posted:yes, I'm sure a post mentioning a delorean and the future is a reference to something in a game set in the future. No! No I get it! DOC Brown!!
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:44
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:No! No I get it! oh, good call. I take back my
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:44
|
|
|
Yes this would all have been super great to spot earlier. Go me. Fuckin idiot.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:46
|
|
|
y'all breadcrumbs need to be a little more bready and a lot less crummy.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 13:51
|
|
|
Asphyxious posted:Feels weird talking to the dead but I just looked at your posts and I still can't see it. Is the time travel thing another SMAC reference? he said PATIENT and he said APPOINTMENT. I called bif's breadcrumbs weak but omg.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 14:12
|
|
|
oh yeah DOC brown.. that's terrible.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 14:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 23:26 |
|
|
It's a shame Kleedrac wasn't around for the last hour or so. Would have been interesting to see what their position was.Bifauxnen posted:Oh yeah, I didn't have time to explain this before - that's the standard way invention items work in Mafia. Trying to coordinate it on the same night would be rather tricky. Before I could even get your item, you'd have to succeed in your night action first. So Birb would have to wait and make sure no one blocked you. Night actions tend to get resolved all together only once everyone's finally submitted. What if a roleblocker waited till real late to submit their action so I only had like 15 minutes to even get the item before the next day started, let alone reply back? Cool, thanks for this. In hindsight, it seems pretty obvious why it would be for later use.
|
|
#
?
May 19, 2015 14:12
|
|