|
unpacked robinhood posted:how do you fraud humble bundle with bitcoin ?
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 11:12
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 02:16 |
|
|
TVarmy posted:you can't ban me, im a voat. toot toot surevoat
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 11:47
|
|
|
quote:Regarding questionable content (self.announcements) 1213 comments fuctifino fucked around with this message at 12:20 on Jun 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 12:18
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:but why in the gently caress do you spend ungodly amounts of hours staring at pictures of the kind of people who disgust you? to be fair gbs loves reddit.jpeg/goon.tiff threads
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 12:18
|
|
|
fuctifino posted:I wanted Voat to be a bastion of free speech where anyone could say anything and open discussion could prevail. This is still something I believe Voat can be, but we need your help. To make things worse, we may be personally liable for the content you guys submit to Voat. I don’t know about you, but I don’t feel like going to jail just because someone chose to anonymously post a link to an illegal image hosted somewhere on a third party server. Because Voat is being used by so many people, the two of us simply cannot review everything that is being posted. For this reason, as a temporary measure, we have decided to ban any subverses which we discover or which are reported to us, where links to illegal content is being shared. We can’t judge if the content is illegal or not, but we have no choice but to take precautions in order to protect Voat’s future at this very fragile stage. i love watching libertarians have to choose between their crazy ideals and real-world consequnces
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 12:28
|
|
|
fuctifino posted:
I keep clicking the NICE! button. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 12:51
|
|
|
fuctifino posted:
posting naked pictures of girls/women sitting is not pornography. it is art.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 12:53
|
|
|
fuctifino posted:
so many things in there that i don't understand but i'm sure as poo poo am not going to google the hell is fhp?
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 12:53
|
|
|
surebet posted:so many things in there that i don't understand but i'm sure as poo poo am not going to google If you mean FPH it's probably fatpeoplehate. e: i cant type gschmidl fucked around with this message at 13:25 on Jun 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 12:55
|
|
|
[–] lydia 361 points (+427|-66) 14 hours ago (last edited 14 hours ago) I understand that you need to protect the site but this is very disappointing to me. Many of us came over here because we hoped you would not be subject to outside pressures to ban questionable content. I understand the /v/truejailbait ban. They were explicitly encouraging people to post CP. But as a mod of /v/jailbait, myself and the other mod have been working diligently to ensure no illegal content is posted. We state very clearly on the sidebar what is acceptable, with a quote from yourself saying that we will not be playing wack-a-mole, and will comply with takedown requests. If this is going to happen I hope it will only be a temporary measure. On reddit it started with /r/jailbait and similar subs and culminated with the recent FPH banning. I don't want to see voat go down this road. Perplexed as to why we came over if this is going to be the case. 
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 12:56
|
|
|
Alan Smithee posted:why in the gently caress do you spend ungodly amounts of hours staring at pictures of the kind of people who disgust you? because susie cagles drawings are hilarious
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 13:10
|
|
|
surebet posted:[–] lydia 361 points (+427|-66) 14 hours ago (last edited 14 hours ago)
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 13:10
|
|
|
InShaneee posted:i love watching libertarians have to choose between their crazy ideals and real-world consequnces assume a spherical libertarian of uniform density
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 13:22
|
|
|
CENSOR SHIP!!!!! toot toot
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:19
|
|
|
im the free speech absolutist moaning about the media saying mean things about him.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:23
|
|
|
surebet posted:But as a mod of /v/jailbait, myself and the other mod have been working diligently to ensure no illegal content is posted.  it's a forum for posting nudes of 12-15 year old girls. when you delete the illegal content you are left with a blank page
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:23
|
|
|
Heresiarch posted:assume a spherical libertarian of uniform density may I still say arm reduction as a punchline?
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:24
|
|
|
/v/honeypot
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:24
|
|
|
/v/carlmarkforceiv edit: oh wait no illegal content sorry poik007 fucked around with this message at 14:27 on Jun 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:25
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:
he probably thinks swimsuit/school uniform shots are somehow less hosed up
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:29
|
|
|
It's that time of year again, it's Porcfest! See "What Happens When Govt Thugs Threaten Porcfest" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNKObXQ5uTA Warning, it's a FreeKeene video so the obnoxiousness level is high and
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:33
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:
I think that one is "realjailbait".
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:35
|
|
|
Stanley Pain posted:posting naked pictures of girls/women sitting is not pornography. it is art. so what if they're sitting on penises? if sitting isn't illegal, how can it be illegal simply because a penis happens to be there, in fact, who are you to say that this random assortment of 1s and 0s
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:44
|
|
|
surebet posted:But as a mod of /v/jailbait, putting this at the top of my letterhead, going to include it whenever i write to my senator
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:45
|
|
|
Subjunctive posted:I think that one is "realjailbait". Well it is of course true that a detailed taxonomy of the precise shades of the philosophical universe of message boards created to propagate illegal images of naked children is absolutely the nub of the issue here and definitely constitutes a bulletproof defence of Voat's unshakable commitment to freedom of speech and the tittie pics of kids are just along for the ride. With Bitcoins. Any truly dedicated Voater would agree, in between seig heiling, hating fat people and paedophilia. but whatever. I'm sure the key point we can all agree on is: 
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 14:46
|
|
|
Heresiarch posted:i kept scrolling but it just wouldn't stop, like a sisyphean nightmare, forever trapped in an endless wall of sperg
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:00
|
|
|
Heresiarch posted:a sisyphean nightmare, forever trapped in an endless wall of sperg how long can thread titles be?
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:13
|
|
|
Herman Merman posted:to be fair gbs hmmm
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:14
|
|
|
Chris Knight posted:how long can thread titles be? "bitcoin: a sisyphean nightmare, forever trapped in an endless wall of sperg" is exactly at the cap
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:15
|
|
|
poik007 posted:CENSOR SHIP!!!!!
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:15
|
|
|
CoinWallet.eu Stress Test Analysis (self.Bitcoin) submitted 23 hours ago by CoinWalleteu Yesterday, CoinWallet.eu conducted a stress test of the Bitcoin blockchain. Not only was our plan to see the outcome, but also to see how easy it would be for a malicious entity or government to create havoc for the Bitcoin community. As you will see from the analysis below, delayed transactions are not the only issue that Bitcoin users experienced. Surprisingly, executing tens of thousands of transactions that correctly propagate to the network simultaneously is not as easy as we had expected. One of the methods that was used to increase the kb size of our transactions was to send transactions consisting of numerous small outputs (usually 0.0001) to make a single transaction of 0.01. A simple transaction is usually 225-500 bytes, while many of our transactions were 18 kb (A number which limits the blockchain to 5 transactions per minute). In our preliminary testing this was effective, however in practice it caused our servers to crash. Throughout the day and evening, our strategy and methodology changed multiple times. Initially the plan was to spend 20 BTC on transaction fees to flood the network with as many transactions as possible. Due to technical complications the test was concluded early, with less than 2 BTC spent on fees. The events of yesterday were accomplished with less than €500. Timeline 11:57 GMT - Transaction servers initiated. Thousands of 700 kb transactions completed within the first 20 minutes. Transactions were used to break coins into small 0.0001 outputs. 12:30 GMT - Servers begin sending larger 18kb transactions. 14:10 GMT - Mempool size increases dramatically. Blockchain.info breaks. 14:20 GMT - Our servers begin to crash. It becomes apparent that BitcoinD is not well suited to crafting transactions of this size. 14:30 GMT - Our test transactions are halted while alternate solutions are created. The mempool is at 12 mb. 17:00 GMT - Alternate transaction sending methods are started. Servers are rebooted. Mempool has fallen to 4mb. 21:00 GMT - The stress test is stronger than ever. Mempool reaches 15 mb and more than 14000 transactions are backlogged. The situation is made worse by F2Pool selfishly mining two 0kb blocks in a row. 23:59 GMT - 12 hours after starting, the test is concluded. Less than 2 BTC (€434) is spent on the test in total. The following graph depicts the entire test from start to finish: https://anduck.net/bitcoin/mempool.png Observations Delayed confirmation times and large mempool buildups were not the only observation that came from our testing. Many more services were impacted than we had initially envisioned. Blockchain.info Over the past few months, Blockchain.info has become increasingly unreliable, however we are confident that yesterday's stress test had an impact on their website being offline or broken for 1/3 of the day. During periods where we sent excessive transactions, Blockchain.info consistently froze. It appeared as though their nodes were overwhelmed and simply crashed. Each time this occurred, the site would re-emerge 10-30 minutes later only to fail again shortly thereafter. Users of the blockchain wallet were unable to send transactions, login or even view balances during the downtimes. In response to our heavy Bitcoin usage, blockchain.info began to exclude certain transactions from their block explorer. This issue is explored further by the creators of Multibit, who can confirm that some transactions sent from their software were ignored by Blockchain, but were picked up by Blockr. Bitcoin ATMs Many ATMs operate as full nodes, however some ATMs rely on third party wallet services to send and receive transactions. The most prominent Bitcoin ATM of this type is Lamassu, which uses the blockchain.info API to push outgoing transactions from a blockchain.info wallet. Due to the blockchain.info issues, all Lamassu ATMs that use blockchain.info's wallet service were unavailable for the day. MultiBit Both versions of MultiBit suffered delayed transactions due to the test. Gary and Jim from MultiBit have created a full analysis from Multibit's perspective which can be read at https://multibit.org/blog/2015/06/23/bitcoin-network-stress-test.html The outcome was that transactions with the standard fee in Multibit HD took as many as 80 blocks to confirm (Approximately 13 hours). Standard 10000 satoshi fee transactions took an average of 9 blocks to get confirmed. Multibit has stated that they will be making modifications to the software to better cope with this type of event in the future. Tradeblock With Blockchain.info broken, we frequently referred to Tradeblock to track the backlog. Unfortunately Tradeblock was less than perfectly reliable and often failed to update when a new block had been mined. Regardless, at one point 15,000 unconfirmed transactions were outstanding. Bitpay Users reported issues with Bitpay not recognizing transactions during the test. Price Increase of $2. Contrary to some predictions, we did not short Bitcoin. Green Address While this app was not hindered directly by our test, we did send a series of 0.001 payments to a green address wallet. When attempting to craft a transaction from the wallet, an error occurs stating that it is too large. It appears that the coins that were sent to this wallet may be lost. Conclusions From a technical perspective, the test was not a success. Our goal of creating a 200mb backlog was not achieved due to miscalculations and challenges with pushing the number of transactions that we had desired. We believe that future tests may easily achieve this goal by learning from our mistakes. There are also numerous vulnerable services that could be exploited as part of a test, including Bitcoin casinos, on-chain gambling websites, wallets (Coinbase specifically pointed out that a malicious user could take advantage of their hosted wallet to contribute to the flooding), exchanges, and many others. Users could also contribute by sending small amounts to common brain wallets. We also learned that the situation could have been made worse by sending transactions with larger fees. We sent all transactions with the standard fee of 10000 satoshis per kb. If we had sent with 20000 satoshis per kb, normal transactions would have experienced larger delays. In our future stress tests, these lessons will be used to maximize the impact.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:16
|
|
|
I'm the team that spent "1000s of hours" changing /r/ to /v/
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:16
|
|
|
surebet posted:[–] lydia 361 points (+427|-66) 14 hours ago (last edited 14 hours ago) "i wanna look at child porn, but I want a rating for posting good stuff that i wouldn't get on 8chan"
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:36
|
|
|
Hey, let's talk about things that aren't utterly ghastly to every degree! Just in from /r/bitcoin, a captain of industry says: Please help a veteran of the blockchain wars down on his luck posted:My boss wouldn't put up with me babbling about Bitcoin all day. I have since said "you can't fire me 'cos I quit" even though he did, set up a website and I do accept Bitcoin (and I never convert to fiat). Dear God could someone please call me and give me work, I'm living in the closet in my office and the rent is due and I remember what "eating" was like; perhaps if I have some food, my concentration will return sufficiently to spell properly. Please call. Please. Until /r/buttcoin called it out, he was misspelling "edge" as "egde" in his logo. divabot fucked around with this message at 15:45 on Jun 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:43
|
|
|
AlbieQuirky posted:same I actually stopped scrolling a couple of times to see if Brazil or Harry Potter dots txt were posted in the text wall
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:50
|
|
|
divabot posted:Hey, let's talk about things that aren't utterly ghastly to every degree! Just in from /r/bitcoin, a captain of industry says: it's like, it's so stupid it's probably fake but it would be such a pointless troll that you wonder if it's true
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 15:53
|
|
|
Ron Paul Atreides posted:it's like, it's so stupid it's probably fake but it would be such a pointless troll that you wonder if it's true fake sob stories to collect penny shaving pity donations is probably the largest use of changetip
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 16:13
|
|
|
Ron Paul Atreides posted:it's like, it's so stupid it's probably fake but it would be such a pointless troll that you wonder if it's true Remember: declaring yourself a graphic designer - sorry, "creative" - doesn't require e.g. experience, talent, qualifications or any of that other statist oppression. No, all you need is a mobile phone, Gimp and the blockchain. Please Seriously, look at that logo. It looks like he patched it up with MS Paint. I can tell from some of the pixels and having seen quite a few delusional motherfuckers in my time. divabot fucked around with this message at 16:19 on Jun 24, 2015 |
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 16:16
|
|
|
FCKGW posted:[–]boonies4u[🍰] 2 points an hour ago If we ban pics of girls we should just do a sitewide ban of guy pics as well. We can't have feminists fingerbanging to underage boys. In fact, let's just ban ANY pic just to be on the safe side. This is really just a censorship issue. There's porn of all kinds on every single site out there. There's BARELY LEGAL TEEN porn which is extremely popular. Hell, even Brooke Shields and Traci Lords put underage porn into MAINSTREAM MOVIES. Sure we shouldn't be sexualizing naked children, but if you're going to start banning legal content just for the sake of hoping to catch illegal content, how is that any different than an officer firing into the crowd of a fleeing robber with a shotgun just to make sure he gets the bad guy? Do just like any other site: do your DUE DILIGENCE to remove any illegal content just as any site would. But it's definitely not your responsibility to police ALL content. That's just impossible. Even 4chan is notorious for DAILY KIDDIE PORN PICS. but the mods remove them as soon as they can because they CAN'T be held accountable for other people's posts otherwise reddit would likewise be held liable for ANY instance of an illegal pic. Even Iggy Azalea made a child porn video where she tried to seduce an underage little boy with her pussy. That was allowed on YOUTUBE. So let's not get ahead of ourselves here. It's really not about the images themselves as much as the gatekeepers in charge of SEXUALIZING THE CONTEXT according to their feminist agenda. I've seen pics on reddit of parents and strangers posting pics of naked kids playing in a bathtub or near the shower. If ALL naked children are to be removed, those would fall under 'illegal'. If something is sexualizing a child in an obvious manner, we can remove it, no problem. But if someone is using their feminist liberal agenda to say "THAT is sexual TO ME" then we should tell them to gently caress off. I mean social justice warriors support and still buy Lena Dunham's book where she admits to MOLESTING HER LITTLE SISTER. Except it's not considered molestation because the Social Justice Warriors are in charge of setting the context. Instead of Lena Dunham the CHILD MOLESTER touching her sister's vagina, it's warped into a fun childhood game of innocent curiosity. Again, it all depends on the gatekeeper's interpretation of events. Our goal should be to stand against censorship, not give it an excuse to GROW. But wait there's more! Why is this girl allowed to create child porn for YouTube To help voat in answering the legal question, according to the fucktard keyboard warriors on here, this girl is a child porn producer and YOUTUBE is her distribution center. Conclusion: BAN YOUTUBE. CASE CLOSED.
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 16:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 02:16 |
|
|
i'm pretty sure traci lords's underage movies weren't "mainstream"
|
|
#
?
Jun 24, 2015 16:17
|
|
