|
3 hours to deadline and I can see the cases (as small as they are) against Hazdoc and E-plus. I'm going to lay my vote on Hazdoc for 3 reasons; 1) Hazdoc has one serious post in the game in its entirety 2) Hazdoc's reason to vote me is less reasonable than E-Plus - not that I see what E+ saw in my interaction with LutR but lynching lurkers does make sense 3) Hazdoc is the current leader and we've got 3 hours left :P ##Vote Hazdoc
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 00:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 17:44 |
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:Amnistar and AnonNarc both only have two posts This is weird. Up to this point the thread was literally Wafflechat. Why call people out? Why?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:I'd be fine with voting out lurkers tbh. It's been a very uneventful d1 and people who come in and say 'just kidding guys I'm just SO busy' aren't gonna cut it IMO. This is also totally garbage, why are we advocating any kind of policy cuddle at all. It's lazy. LAZY.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:17
|
|
|
chaoslord posted:Real talk, with 3.5 days gone and the vast majority of the game at 5 or less posts (1, at least, would have been prior to game start), you can say the majority of this game is lurking. There's one person with double digit posts and a only a second that is ahead of mod in post count. Holiday weekend and all so you can give or not give as much leeway with that as you want, but we've all contributed to how slow this game has been. This is ironic considering he calls out votefinder for posting a summary post that says nothing. This is white noise at its finest.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:18
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:This is also totally garbage, why are we advocating any kind of policy cuddle at all. It's lazy. LAZY. Well we haven't had many people stirring the pot today. It's not just you, but you calling out laziness in a thread where you have 7 posts is not a ton of fun.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
Well that was a fast bandwagon. Now I'm not sure if my vote was right, or just mafia trying to make me out to be a bad guy. At least my vote accomplished something!
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:This is also totally garbage, why are we advocating any kind of policy cuddle at all. It's lazy. LAZY. Meh. At the time it was suggested there was no content to go on yet. And look, it generated some content.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
Kleedrac posted:This is why I should learn to preview posts before submitting I suppose. Thanks GG, this means we shouldn't vote you to spur you to posting as you'll be back later today before deadline. Which also brings up the other thing I forgot to do: I don't get this post, why are you specifically demanding AN come in and post as opposed to everyone else currently absent in this game? Did I miss something?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:19
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Meh. At the time it was suggested there was no content to go on yet. And look, it generated some content. Why are you defending chaoslord for that post?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:20
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:Why are you defending chaoslord for that post? he is not talking about chaoslord. he is talking about me.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:21
|
|
|
Hazdoc posted:Well that was a fast bandwagon. Now I'm not sure if my vote was right, or just mafia trying to make me out to be a bad guy. At least my vote accomplished something! I've never had that many people follow me onto a vote that quickly. It's kind of shocking. But I guess in fairness we are nearing deadline, so people are trying to put themselves out there.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:21
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:Well we haven't had many people stirring the pot today. It's not just you, but you calling out laziness in a thread where you have 7 posts is not a ton of fun. I'm calling out people who are seemingly pretending to generate content while in actuality seem to be testing the waters to see what sticks. I am entirely baffled that anyone has posted anything beyond "let's get some content going, the weekend was long." Calling out specific people for not posting when 2/3rds of the thread has not been here is not fun, you are right.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:This post pinged me as strange from when I first read it. There might be a meta element I don't understand, but it seems like a weird response to Mithross's robosanta wish. You've got to be kidding me. Mafia can't be an SK, and vice versa. But you know, I'm an easy bandwagon, so let's just vote the guy who got a bunch of random votes on them. You're either bad or evil, and I'll bank on the latter. ##Vote: Ghastly Gangsta
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:he is not talking about chaoslord. he is talking about me. You're right, misread my own quote. Why are you defending BottleKnight for that post?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
And just fyi my first vote was mostly a joke. I'm still glad it got this sort of a reaction. This second one is not a joke.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:Why are you defending chaoslord for that post? The post I responded to did not in any way refer to or involve chaoslord. Please elaborate.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:22
|
|
|
Poison Mushroom posted:I am here as well. Have a final interview with Waffle House today! If they put me up full time, I can get my new job and put in my two weeks for my old job at the same time. PM, why are you excusing this laziness as acceptable. What is going on in this game, I am literally  ing right now.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:23
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:The post I responded to did not in any way refer to or involve chaoslord. Wrong person, see my edit. My bad.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:23
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:I'm calling out people who are seemingly pretending to generate content while in actuality seem to be testing the waters to see what sticks. I am entirely baffled that anyone has posted anything beyond "let's get some content going, the weekend was long." Calling out specific people for not posting when 2/3rds of the thread has not been here is not fun, you are right. You just said something entirely different from what I said and then said you agreed with me? For the record, I am not calling you scummy, I am saying that you are being confusing and kind of frantic.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
HOLY poo poo I thought i was triple posting but jesus christ the amount of posts in the last minutes is staggering.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
Hazdoc posted:So I've been distracted with a lot of world of warships, and I haven't been paying attention. I'm assuming nothing's actually happened yet? This is a dumb joke but I don't believe it is a scummy joke.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
Kleedrac posted:Welcome back to the thread AN I really dislike this "Kleedrac deigns who is worthy of voting based on if they're here or not" junk. Why is this your tact, Kleedrac?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:25
|
|
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:Someone is going to make the third vote scum vote post or whatever, let me nip that in the bud, I was typing up the post before I saw BK vote. GG you are far more concerned about how you are looking in this thread than you were from our last game together. What gives.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
Hazdoc posted:Well that was a fast bandwagon. Now I'm not sure if my vote was right, or just mafia trying to make me out to be a bad guy. At least my vote accomplished something! Yeah, I don't want to vote Hazdoc today, I'm not feeling it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:Wrong person, see my edit. My bad. Ok, now your question at least makes sense. I wasn't really defending Bottle. I thought along the same lines, I probably even posted as much. And again, it generated actual content. There was nothing before that. ---- I find it odd that you are attacking people for those posts in a weird and rapid fire fashion after having been absent from the thread and not generating content yourself. Is this some kind of performance piece? You say what they did wasn't content, but you yourself didn't provide any either. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:27
|
|
|
BottleKnight posted:You just said something entirely different from what I said and then said you agreed with me? I'm being frantic because I'm trying to get all my thoughts down and the questions I have answered before I have to start teaching in 30 minutes because I won't be able to check in and want to feel comfortable with a vote before then. ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:28
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:I find it odd that you are attacking people for those posts in a weird and rapid fire fashion after having been absent from the thread and not generating content yourself. Is this some kind of performance piece? You say what they did wasn't content, but you yourself didn't provide any either. You should know this is how I play, I come in and stream of consciousness my thoughts and drop a lot of questions. Remember DBZ Kai? I was wrong a lot but this is what I do.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:29
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:This is weird. Up to this point the thread was literally Wafflechat. Why call people out? Why? Votefinder had posted, we had 0 discussion so far, I wanted to get something going. I mean, it's a holiday weekend, nobody's gonna post. You may notice we're much more active now though!
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:29
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:Yeah, I don't want to vote Hazdoc today, I'm not feeling it. I'm feeling a bit weird about it too now. ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:You should know this is how I play, I come in and stream of consciousness my thoughts and drop a lot of questions. Remember DBZ Kai? I was wrong a lot but this is what I do. Hmmm, fair enough.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:31
|
|
|
These are the things that I'm pondering: 1. There being no content is not surprising at all, and people being sad there is no content with a deadline looming is also not odd, but the amount of discussion on lurker lynches being a viable option right now is absolutely mind boggling. Town mindset is not "well we'll just cuddle someone I guess" it's "let's get some poo poo going!" There's a whole lot I've quoted that doesn't jive with that mindset, and far too much shrug-placency while feigning frustration at the lack of content. 2. I still don't like GG's weird self-consciousness at this point and would like an answer to why he is doing that, as I have asked. 3. BottleKnight I'm giving you a pass because the last time I was really certain you were scum I was 100% wrong and you are playing the same. But I don't understand some of what you are doing. 4. Kleedrac I don't understand that random AN lurker callout when most of the thread wasn't here and I would like to know why that was the direction you went, especially since you've been trying really hard to drive the narrative from what I can see. You should know better than that, so what gives? 5. Everything else I've mentioned I just am having a hard time wrapping my head around the "and why was this posted" aspect.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:Votefinder had posted, we had 0 discussion so far, I wanted to get something going. I mean, it's a holiday weekend, nobody's gonna post. I don't believe you, because you have commented on absolutely nothing other than the Kleedrac/LotR exchange. Please give me your thoughts on basically anything because you are also doing that "driving the narrative" thing that Kleedrac is doing, but in a more "disengaged from everything while prodding stuff" sense.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:35
|
|
|
##vote Kleedrac I'm gonna try to check in as much as I can in the next 2 hours.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:37
|
|
|
Quidnose posted:I don't get this post, why are you specifically demanding AN come in and post as opposed to everyone else currently absent in this game? Did I miss something? Quidnose posted:I really dislike this "Kleedrac deigns who is worthy of voting based on if they're here or not" junk. Why is this your tact, Kleedrac? Quidnose posted:4. Kleedrac I don't understand that random AN lurker callout when most of the thread wasn't here and I would like to know why that was the direction you went, especially since you've been trying really hard to drive the narrative from what I can see. You should know better than that, so what gives? Quidnose posted:##vote Kleedrac I'm gonna try to check in as much as I can in the next 2 hours. Quidnose: This is scummy coming from you as you should know what I'm trying to do - I was vote-prodding someone. I wasn't voting someone and walking away - that I could see how it may look scummy. But I was involved - I've been around most of today - and I was prodding AN to post - once AN had posted I removed the prod as it wasn't necessary and Amni had posted in the interim. You're actively trying to blow this out of proportion and given that I'm currently tied for vote leader it looks a bit suspicious.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:47
|
|
|
While I'm not a huge fan of lurker lynches until poo poo actually hits the fan and lurking is a serious no-no, lynching one now is not a terrible idea either. Admitted I've been doing a terrible job of paying attention to the meat of what people have been saying, if people have been resistant to lynching a lurker they're bad and should feel bad. Lurking is inherently anti-town, as you're not putting your neck out and getting crosshairs put on your head. Of course, that's the reasoning behind my vote on Kleedrac earlier, to see if somebody would come out and call me on it, or on the flip side, agree with my bad logic and hence be an evil motherfucker themselves. Somehow instead I got bandwagoned with some suspect votes thrown on. Even better, IMO.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:48
|
|
|
So I can avoid having to be raked over the coals by you like I was in Earthboundfia, where you were scum who had a hardon for me, let me answer your questions to the best of my ability ( ):Quidnose posted:GG you are far more concerned about how you are looking in this thread than you were from our last game together. What gives. As for this self-consciousness that you reference I honestly don't have a clue as to what you're talking about... Please explain and I'll get you a better response. You already appear scummy to me now that you've started this ridiculous inquisitor bit.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:50
|
|
|
Gone all weekend*
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:51
|
|
|
Kleedrac posted:Quidnose: This is scummy coming from you as you should know what I'm trying to do - I was vote-prodding someone. I wasn't voting someone and walking away - that I could see how it may look scummy. But I was involved - I've been around most of today - and I was prodding AN to post - once AN had posted I removed the prod as it wasn't necessary and Amni had posted in the interim. You're actively trying to blow this out of proportion and given that I'm currently tied for vote leader it looks a bit suspicious. I still don't understand why you dropped a vote on AN over literally anyone else who wasn't around. Can you explain why you specifically called him out? You literally do not mention him at all before you drop a vote on him. Why him?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:53
|
|
|
Hazdoc posted:You've got to be kidding me. Mafia can't be an SK, and vice versa. But you know, I'm an easy bandwagon, so let's just vote the guy who got a bunch of random votes on them. You're either bad or evil, and I'll bank on the latter. Hazdoc posted:And just fyi my first vote was mostly a joke. I'm still glad it got this sort of a reaction. This second one is not a joke. Hazdoc posted:Of course, that's the reasoning behind my vote on Kleedrac earlier, to see if somebody would come out and call me on it, or on the flip side, agree with my bad logic and hence be an evil motherfucker themselves. Somehow instead I got bandwagoned with some suspect votes thrown on. Even better, IMO. Perhaps I'm a bit :tinfoilhat: about this but seriously it reads like scum distancing themselves - your vote on me was now a joke? or a gambit? Causing discussion isn't the same thing as generating content. If I were to scumclaim right now as a gambit It would generate a lot of discussion (and a lot of votes on me) but all of that wouldn't be content as the lie makes it all useless! And now your "serious" vote is on GG in what sure looks like an OMGUS.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 17:44 |
|
|
To answer GG:Ghastly Gangsta posted:Please give it time, I'm out of town visiting family. I'll be back home this afternoon, but it's just been a busy extended weekend, at least for me. You're super concerned here that people will vote you as a lurker when you have no heat on yourself. Why? Ghastly Gangsta posted:Yes and no, I'm sure other lurkers will spill in. I will be here before and at deadline. Once again you REALLY want people to know that you are going to contribute. Ghastly Gangsta posted:I will be here and voting before deadline for sure. ...and you repeat that statement. Ghastly Gangsta posted:Someone is going to make the third vote scum vote post or whatever, let me nip that in the bud, I was typing up the post before I saw BK vote. And finally here you're concerned enough that you're going to look bad for this vote that you make sure to nip in the bud anyone potentially calling you scum. That's weird. I've not seen you do this before. Why?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2015 01:54
|
|