|
Truga posted:Yes, and that reason isn't a copyright issue. You just did the worst thing possible on youtube. You took down a video claiming copyrights when it was evidently not. Yes, it's a copyright issue because it wasn't a video made for public distribution. That's why I flagged it as private. I have had several discussions with YouTube showing that their lovely YouTubeGaming portal, failed to make the video private when the stream was completed. Had that not happened, there would be no video to make a parody of. YouTube doesn't just take a video down because it's flagged. It stays up until you go through a series of back and forth questions with their DMCA people. If they are not satisfied, the video stays up. Then you have to take legal action. FYI, YouTube's interface does not have the option for reporting such an issue without filing a DMCA claim. That's why I did it. Note that the video casts her in a poor light, than it does me. So it's not like it's something that I would rather not be out there. It's about the principle of it all. ps: I dunno what shitstorm you're talking about, considering that it was more of a fizzle and a non-issue. pps: When it comes to questions of legality, I tend not to mess around. I have attorneys on retainer who answer to emails and phone calls that I send. For a public figure like me, there is always some opportunist around the corner looking for something to grab onto and make a case out of.
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:13
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 01:16 |
|
|
Wulfling posted:I mean hell, just look at how their FPS with all the fancy new animation systems are working for them. In an FPS engine. With the engine developers on staff. Have patience guys, Maximum Realism takes time! Afterall Rome wasn't built in a day 
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:15
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:There was a reason for that. All there is in that blog post is you denying the DMCA takedown had anything to do with you hating the creators guts.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:16
|
|
|
Io_ posted:Have patience guys, Maximum Realism takes time! Afterall Rome wasn't built in a day gently caress your rome reference bullshit
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:16
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Yes, it's a copyright issue because it wasn't a video made for public distribution. That's not a copyright issue, that's a personal issue you have. The interview was publicly viewable and therefore of public domain, nobody broke into a vault and stole it from you.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:18
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:YouTube doesn't just take a video down because it's flagged. It's a good thing this has nothing to do with youtube and everything to do with how to a 3rd party, it looks like you censored someone else's content you didn't like by claiming copyright, then. That's a really really bad position to be in.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:18
|
|
|
Fang The Parrot posted:Do you really think you'll be able to get a result from litigation within 12 months? Yes, since it is an open and shut issue, the odds are that discovery will happen sooner rather than latter. Especially given what the attorneys are planning to put together for the judge, showing the urgency of the situation. That's why I'm not even bothering with a defamation (if you read his Derek Smart / Escapist diatribe you'll see what I mean e.g. associating me with group said to be a hate group, is a slam dunk) suit that would be distracting. The legal action is all about Star Citizen and the search for accountability. Even if they collapse - which I fully expect will happen if they don't get bailed out - it won't matter. Remember that 38 Studios collapsed, and Schilling didn't go bankrupt until months later. That case is still going on.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:19
|
|
|
Friendly Tumour posted:All there is in that blog post is you denying the DMCA takedown had anything to do with you hating the creators guts. That was the gist of it, because some were saying that I took it down because I didn't like it. And that's false. Truga posted:It's a good thing this has nothing to do with youtube and everything to do with how to a 3rd party, it looks like you censored someone else's content you didn't like by claiming copyright, then. I dunno man, but a very expensive attorney disagrees. Truga posted:It's a good thing this has nothing to do with youtube and everything to do with how to a 3rd party, it looks like you censored someone else's content you didn't like by claiming copyright, then. It's the Internet; dramatic bullshit occurs every minute of the day. D_Smart fucked around with this message at 12:22 on Oct 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:20
|
|
|
I'm sorry to say this, but your expensive attorney is a quack.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:21
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I dunno man, but a very expensive attorney disagrees. What does the opinion of a professional rear end in a top hat have to do with any of this? You're acting like an rear end with no good reason, going "it's legal!" doesn't change that.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:22
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:That was the gist of it, because some were saying that I took it down because I didn't like it. And that's false. Yeah, but in the absence of anything but your denials about it being personal, that's what people are going to think. You don't convince people by going "nuh-uh!" for 500 words.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:24
|
|
|
Friendly Tumour posted:What does the opinion of a professional rear end in a top hat have to do with any of this? You're acting like an rear end with no good reason, going "it's legal!" doesn't change that. I am a content creator, I know my rights. And regardless of what you - or any fool thinks - there are times when you have to defer to those who know what they're talking about. The crux of the matter is that, in a term that attorneys tend to use, "she's conflicted out". And she put herself in that position when it became clear that there was a COI at play and was most likely the impetus for her creating the video and using my content without my permission. You don't have to like (that's largely irrelevant), but that's just the way it is.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:26
|
|
|
Friendly Tumour posted:Yeah, but in the absence of anything but your denials about it being personal, that's what people are going to think. You don't convince people by going "nuh-uh!" for 500 words. Not to be a Derek Smart apologist, but what is he supposed to do other than deny it? Give money to a charity? Buy starship jpegs?
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:26
|
|
|
Friendly Tumour posted:Yeah, but in the absence of anything but your denials about it being personal, that's what people are going to think. You don't convince people by going "nuh-uh!" for 500 words. Yes, I agree. And it was because of the COI that came to light when some people pointed it out, that caused me to write it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:27
|
|
|
Friendly Tumour posted:That's not a copyright issue, that's a personal issue you have. The interview was publicly viewable and therefore of public domain, nobody broke into a vault and stole it from you. That's not how copyright/public domain works. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:28
|
|
|
Ledenko posted:Buy starship jpegs? no one should be subject to such a fate no one
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:29
|
|
|
Ledenko posted:Not to be a Derek Smart apologist, but what is he supposed to do other than deny it? Give money to a charity? Buy starship jpegs? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DGNZnfKYnU
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:31
|
|
|
In other news...and you're not going to believe your eyes and ears when you review this....Star Citizen: Early Multi-crew action in Free Flight This is what some Star Citizen White Knights are calling an "amazing" game. Seriously. Watch.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:31
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I am a content creator, I know my rights. And regardless of what you - or any fool thinks - there are times when you have to defer to those who know what they're talking about. D_Smart posted:Yes, I agree. And it was because of the COI that came to light when some people pointed it out, that caused me to write it. Yeah? Where are you going with this? She doesn't like you and therefore made a video mocking you. You censoring her video because she doesn't like you doesn't make it ok, legal or not. It's still a dick move and the law is an rear end for giving you the right to do it.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:31
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:In other news...and you're not going to believe your eyes and ears when you review this....Star Citizen: Early Multi-crew action in Free Flight lmao "this is AMAZING"
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:34
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:In other news...and you're not going to believe your eyes and ears when you review this....Star Citizen: Early Multi-crew action in Free Flight Well I wouldn't call it a game but it did look pretty good, and it at least shows that some of what they demo'd at CitCon does work. Probably the best video I've seen that actually shows some of what CIG has promised actually working.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:36
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:In other news...and you're not going to believe your eyes and ears when you review this....Star Citizen: Early Multi-crew action in Free Flight Oh look they perfectly demonstrated the gameplay experience of the boarding team.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:37
|
|
|
I find it disturbing that DickWulf is taking screenshots of the thread. The same Dickwulf that leaked details from Sandi Roberts about the "real" reason for Alex Mayberry's department, the same thread that Sandi sent a screenshot of to that radio guy in some ludicrous attempt to warn him off . There's a 93 million dollar company with 1 million backers (ok actually 700k accounts that backed so probably ~500k real people) and it seems a major part of their spin and damage control is being handled by a fedora wearing, sword wielding, unemployed helpdesk agent that spent 30k on pretend spaceships. Dickwulf start selling your ships mate, you at least should be bright enough and honest enough with yourself to realise that any company that takes you seriously is pretty hosed up and heading for disaster. No saying how long the market is going to last and you're going to lose all that money, do you really think Sandi is still going to talk to you after all this is over?
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:38
|
|
|
Fang The Parrot posted:Well I wouldn't call it a game but it did look pretty good, and it at least shows that some of what they demo'd at CitCon does work. Yeah except sitting down in the cabin of someone else's ship while the netcode vainly tries to update everyone's position before spazzing out and giving up has been in free flight since like March.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:40
|
|
|
3 posted:Yeah except sitting down in the cabin of someone else's ship while the netcode vainly tries to update everyone's position before spazzing out and giving up has been in free flight since like March. star citizen 13: clowns and poop
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:46
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I agree. Mr. Dr. Smart, I appreciate your contribution to the thread, I really do. And it's cool that thanks to you some people could get their money back. As I said, with Sandi, I can understand why it's important to research her background to some extent, since it may have direct effect on how the company operates. With Wulf Knight, I also understand that you get all that info from open sources and and it's technically not doxing, and I've got to say his photos are quite funny, but there are still some lines that I think shouldn't be crossed. I've mentioned Doobie in my post. He's a man from Alabama who, with help of goons, has kickstarted a hot dog restaurant in Bumfuck, AL. He is also pretty inept and for quite awhile it was fun to make jokes about his poorly designed menus and casual racism, but people got so obsessed with him, they would meticulously dissect every family photo in his album and make fun of his children. They would know what he's doing at any given moment, what his wife's wearing, etc. It wasn't healthy and more importantly it wasn't fun anymore. Wulf is a sad sad man that we already know more than we'd ever wanted to know about. Adding his wife to the mix only makes it harder to laugh at him, and I really just feel bad for that poor woman. Wulf means very little to success/failure of Star Citizen and as such shouldn't be paid more attention than he's already given. I believe it's John Keats, who said that Newton had destroyed all poetry in rainbow turning it into a mere combination of prismatic colours. By doing extensive research on funny internet clowns, you do the same. They turn into a combination of tragic life choices and mental illnesses. Please, don't unweave that rainbow, Mr. Dr. Smart. Paladinus fucked around with this message at 12:54 on Oct 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:46
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:Mr. Dr. Smart, I appreciate your contribution to the thread, I really do. And it's cool that thanks to you some people could get their money back. As I said, with Sandi, I can understand why it's important to research her background to some extent, since it may have direct effect on how the company operates. With Wulf Knight, I also understand that you get all that info from open sources and and it's technically not doxing, and I've got to say his photos are quite funny, but there are still some lines that I think shouldn't be crossed. I've mentioned Doobie in my post. He's a man from Alabama who, with help of goons, has kickstarted a hot dog restaurant in Bumfuck, AL. He is also pretty inept and for quite awhile it was fun to make jokes about his poorly designed menus and casual racism, but people got so obsessed with him, they would meticulously dissect every family photo in his album and make fun of his children. They would know what he's doing at any given moment, what his wife's wearing, etc. It wasn't healthy and more importantly it wasn't fun anymore. Wulf is a sad sad man that we already know more than we'd ever wanted to know about. Adding his wife to the mix only makes it harder to laugh at him, and I really just feel bad for that poor woman. Wulf means very little to success/failure of Star Citizen and as such shouldn't be paid more attention than he's already given. I believe it's John Keats, who said that Newton had destroyed all poetry in rainbow turning it into merely a combination prismatic colours. By doing extensive research on funny internet clowns, you do the same. They turn into a combination of tragic life choices and mental illnesses. Please, don't unweave that rainbow, Mr. Dr. Smart. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:49
|
|
|
But the real question is will baby PU be bigger than Ben Lesnick?
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:52
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:But the real question is will baby PU be bigger that Ben Lesnick? are we talking 32bit  or 64bit ?
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:53
|
|
|
AP posted:I find it disturbing that DickWulf is taking screenshots of the thread. The same Dickwulf that leaked details from Sandi Roberts about the "real" reason for Alex Mayberry's department, the same thread that Sandi sent a screenshot of to that radio guy in some ludicrous attempt to warn him off . There's a 93 million dollar company with 1 million backers (ok actually 700k accounts that backed so probably ~500k real people) and it seems a major part of their spin and damage control is being handled by a fedora wearing, sword wielding, unemployed helpdesk agent that spent 30k on pretend spaceships. Dude, this is the most attention anyone has probably ever paid him. He'll ride this one out until the bitter end, and then probably still flog the purulent corpse for at least a decade while sending his "friends" Ben 'I don't leave my bed anymore' Lesnick, and co more pizzas in the hope that if the game somehow gets resurrected, he'll have a job on the team.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:55
|
|
|
It's starting to look like Derek Smart is approaching the "you live long enough to see yourself become the villain" stage of participating in this thread.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:57
|
|
|
Someone in this thread posted about space games that are out or are coming out before star citizen but I can't seem to find it. Does anyone know who it was posted by?
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 12:58
|
|
|
3 posted:Yeah except sitting down in the cabin of someone else's ship while the netcode vainly tries to update everyone's position before spazzing out and giving up has been in free flight since like March. Shameless plug. Any Goon who already has access to the WIP Line Of Defense, probably knows that the networking code is solid and that we've had multi-crew for over two years now. In fact, we have an Automated Transport System (one test node on Heatwave and the other in space) in the builds and which multiple people can sit in while it flies around. Oh, and the Starguard carrier is an entire ship. In space. You can run around inside. And in the final version, it too will fly around space. While gamers are doing all kinds of poo poo inside. 1) 2010 - 2015 (exclude one year after I trashed the entire engine and built a new one starting in mid 2011) 2) less than 16 (currently 7, going up to 12-14 now that we're revamping some of the asset textures such as characters, weapons, vehicles etc) 3) less than $12m (to date) Bigger, more feature rich and technologically efficient, and complete than this $93m disaster in the making. Just sayin' 
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 13:01
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:
I don't know why you're putting so much effort in getting into a pissing match with this guy. I mean, you've already won by not being the guy who can't sexually satisfy his wife and has to resort to sending unwanted dick pics to strangers. How can anyone be a bigger sadder loser than someone who's unemployed, on disability and then proceeds to spending $20+k on spaceship photos and a further $8+k on buying internet friends? A man who sits all day at home alone on places like Reddit to defend a literal cult. Responding to him just gives him the validation he is desperately craving. Sit back and mock/pity him for his poor life choices but don't touch the poop.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 13:04
|
|
Dickwulf
|
Sappo569 posted:Jesus christ how is it the pitch video is more polished, and looks fun Whenever I consider pledging more I go back and watch the older videos... Much better.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 13:04
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Shameless plug. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Lw-cwIGuy0 lmao
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 13:07
|
|
|
macnbc posted:It's starting to look like Derek Smart is approaching the "you live long enough to see yourself become the villain" stage of participating in this thread. It's wrong to look at him as the (morally) good guy, he's not and never has been - it just happens that he's on the same side as goons when it comes to SC
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 13:08
|
|
|
Star Citizen has revolutionised gaming with their pay-to-pay model. The game's already a success.
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 13:09
|
|
|
More likePaladinus posted:their pay-to-not-play model
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 13:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 01:16 |
|
|
Ledenko posted:It's wrong to look at him as the (morally) good guy, he's not and never has been - it just happens that he's on the same side as goons when it comes to SC So essentially he's Catwoman? Derek Smart - transgender furry confirmed!
|
|
#
?
Oct 19, 2015 13:10
|
|
