|
http://i.imgur.com/ybrYgJs.gifv paarp
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 00:50 |
|
|
   https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/319168/to-those-of-you-complaining-about-ships-ptu-releases-progress The first reply 
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:29
|
|
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:Does this man really look like he has a hygienic telephone?
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:30
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:I'm keeping it high brow tonight with an idea on how to make the immersion better Needs more Grieg, but pretty good anyway.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:33
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:I'm keeping it high brow tonight with an idea on how to make the immersion better  everything about this was perfect. 150 is like the highest number, you know?
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:34
|
|
|
AI powered by Google's DeepMind, planets with all the detail of earth generated in CryEngiene fidelity, "dynamically generated" missions that will never get boring, some sort of VR second life. These are all things real people believe Croberts is somehow capable of.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:34
|
|
|
Does anyone even read the Lore? https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/6382717/#Comment_6382717  https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/6384461/#Comment_6384461
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:37
|
|
|
Mirificus posted:Does anyone even read the Lore?
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:42
|
|
|
 https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/6386578/#Comment_6386578
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:43
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I don't care. I know two people who know the origins of that 42 number and which predates Star Citizen fiasco. It has absolutely nothing to do with Douglas Adams. Derek, have you considered that some sources might just be winding you up?
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:45
|
|
|
Ash1138 posted:That's the exact image link I posted, get it together DSizzle! Can I see your copyright filing? Thanks.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:48
|
|
|
the origin of the number 42 is 7 times 6 on the multiplication table. stats goons REPRESENT
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:49
|
|
|
Dusty Lens posted:https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/13626-Letter-From-The-Chairman-40-Million Even that is bollocks. Foundry42, Gemini42 and many other 42 references, pre-date Squadron 42 in specifically that premise. And if you read carefully what he stated "Life, the Universe and Everything", that's precisely Sandi's "spiritual mindset" as to the number being "her" lucky number. Chris, on the other hand, is just an idiot. And a very bad liar. Whether she appropriated it and made it her own, is irrelevant. After all, we're talking about the woman who has been the best marketing person since childhood; and who has been "playing" video games for many years.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:53
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Can I see your copyright filing? Thanks. Fucksakes Derek stop being a twat
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:56
|
|
|
Haha holy poo poo dude.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:57
|
|
|
WhiskeyWhiskers posted:Does this man really look like he has a hygienic telephone? Oh yeah, because they somehow loving invented it. Grow up.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:58
|
|
|
you guys ever feel like you are reading the same posts over and over again?
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:59
|
|
|
AP posted:Derek, have you considered that some sources might just be winding you up? No. I tend not to associate with fucktards. Plus one? Yeah. But two? Not a chance. The part that gets me is that everyone sits on forums, social media etc, playing grab rear end and guessing games, when they have a DIRECT loving line to these rear end-clowns and they can just ask them a loving QUESTION straight up. But no, that's probably too easy I guess.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 02:59
|
|
|
TTerrible posted:you guys ever feel like you are reading the same posts over and over again? You're reading quotes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:00
|
|
|
Quick financial update thanks for the graph thread  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97-fN1sFLvI
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:00
|
|
|
Some Douglas Adams quotes.quote:It is a well-known fact that those people who must want to rule people are, ipso facto, those least suited to do it... anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
 https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/comment/6386409/#Comment_6386409
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:02
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:No. I tend not to associate with fucktards. Plus one? Yeah. But two? Not a chance. Their preview site had a Douglas Adams quote, with an answer you had to guess that was 42. It was a pretty obvious question/answer it wasn't difficult and it was ripped off a popular Space Universe like they've been doing ever since for everything else. Now maybe Sandi has a liking for Douglas Adams but asking people to believe the question/answer was picked because 42 is her favourite number is a pretty high bar to set.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:04
|
|
|
I'd rather pay to join the SA forums than give money to SC, so that's what I just did (this is my very first post). I've been lurking for a while, and have a suggestion for the thread title: Star Citizen - the best thread in the World, and has been ever since it was a little girl
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:08
|
|
|
Chalks posted:Yeah, exploration simply isn't a thing in SC. We've already seen full maps of all the stars, who owns what etc. There's no exploration to be done in the tiny corner that humanity is apparently confined to in this "'universe" quote:LEAVE YOUR MARK Silly goon 
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:09
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Can I see your copyright filing? Thanks. will this do? lol 
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
Mirificus posted:
I've never wanted to mercilessly tea bag someone for hours as much as I do this guy
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
Ponzi posted:I'd rather pay to join the SA forums than give money to SC, so that's what I just did (this is my very first post). I've been lurking for a while, and have a suggestion for the thread title: Good choice of username and also Internet forum.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
AP posted:Their preview site had a Douglas Adams quote, with an answer you had to guess that was 42. It was a pretty obvious question/answer it wasn't difficult and it was ripped off a popular Space Universe like they've been doing ever since for everything else. Yes - that's a perfectly reasonable analysis. But what can I say? We can only assume that she appropriated it, then used it as if she, in her bubble, would be the only one to know the meaning of the number 42. You know, like how she never - in her wildest dreams - realize that all the lies she's been telling since day one would come out, she'd get caught and she'd be derided. Imagine her telling that to a bunch of Hollywood nutjobs at a dinner party and not a single one among them knows that she's full of poo poo and seemingly misappropriated a trope popular only to sci-fi fans. Case in point: she's married to Chris Roberts who obviously has a penchant for sci-fi and he "gets it". It's Sandi. This is perfectly normal behavior.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:10
|
|
|
AP posted:Their preview site had a Douglas Adams quote, with an answer you had to guess that was 42. It was a pretty obvious question/answer it wasn't difficult and it was ripped off a popular Space Universe like they've been doing ever since for everything else. No loving way is it a coincidence. It's just the kind of low-brow reference that Crob seems to cherish. I have no doubt that Sandi could tell people after the fact that it was her favorite number though
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:11
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:I've never wanted to mercilessly tea bag someone for hours as much as I do this guy seriously. i want to buy SC just to grief this guy
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:12
|
|
|
Ash1138 posted:will this do? lol No. That copyright claim would be tossed out on sight. You appropriated data from the public domain. Then made a derivative work out of it; and which is covered by Fair Use. You can't claim copyright. Which was my point that online, we all share these stupid memes, images, some rear end-clown's recipe etc. Nobody gives a poo poo who made, owns it, or maims it. Clearly you do. Hence my point.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:12
|
|
|
Ponzi posted:I'd rather pay to join the SA forums than give money to SC, so that's what I just did (this is my very first post). I've been lurking for a while, and have a suggestion for the thread title: Welcome
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:14
|
|
|
Tijuana Bibliophile posted:No loving way is it a coincidence. It's just the kind of low-brow reference that Crob seems to cherish. it doesn't really matter I do a lot of cheesy, low-rent semi-humourous poo poo (see my CYOAs for evidence of this) and even when i'm working on stuff like that I check almost everything I put in to make sure it's not referencing something by accident. It's not really important whether i consciously rip something off or unconciously do it - one shows me to be dishonest and the other shows me to be stupid, but both show that i'm an unoriginal hack that deserves to be given a hard time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:14
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:No. That copyright claim would be tossed out on sight. You appropriated data from the public domain. Then made a derivative work out of it; and which is covered by Fair Use. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:14
|
|
|
TTerrible posted:Good choice of username and also Internet forum. It was inspired by Star Citizen
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
I'm p sure he was joking internet warlord
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
Ponzi posted:It was inspired by Star Citizen Hello new freind
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:15
|
|
|
Ponzi posted:I'd rather pay to join the SA forums than give money to SC, so that's what I just did (this is my very first post). I've been lurking for a while, and have a suggestion for the thread title: hi Ponzi, welcome to SA. You can trust me, Eonwe and, to a lesser extent, PGabz with your forums experience. Address any questions you have to us and we will point you in the right direction. Ignore everything else any of these other knuckleheads say.
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 00:50 |
|
|
D_Smart posted:Yes - that's a perfectly reasonable analysis. But what can I say? We can only assume that she appropriated it, then used it as if she, in her bubble, would be the only one to know the meaning of the number 42. You know, like how she never - in her wildest dreams - realize that all the lies she's been telling since day one would come out, she'd get caught and she'd be derided. Who gives a poo poo
|
|
#
?
Feb 21, 2016 03:16
|
|