Retro Futurist posted:##vote max Nah you just need to sneeze.
|
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:13 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 01:50 |
|
Aggro posted:Krell is now two votes away from being lynched. Why? I mean, Ecco lead the charge, and then he decided to respond with a horrible post that endeared him to precisely nobody I mean, as much as I'd like to hammer I think an insta-turbo at this point would be pretty bad.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:15 |
Excuse me, I was the first person to vote Krell. Why does no one remember.
|
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:16 |
|
Krunge posted:Here's my best interpretation of the game of Mafia from my experience so far: Is this your role?
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:19 |
|
You voted Krell first but it was Ecco that really stepped things up, I think. I'm not outright opposed to lynching Krell, but as it is right now it's looking like a really awful lynch.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:20 |
At this point I just want to be a part of an actual policy lunch.
|
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:29 |
I can tell my family I was there.
|
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:29 |
|
Aggro posted:Is this your role? What is that?
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:31 |
|
The Lord of Hats posted:I mean, Ecco lead the charge, and then he decided to respond with a horrible post that endeared him to precisely nobody If there is someone a majority of the town doesnt like and isn't going to work well with, then either they are scum or the scum will intentionally keep them around. It's the same concept as a lurker lynch, if the town doesn't vote lurkers out early then they were going to lose anyways. Days are short this game anyways. This is not an insta-turbo, Hats. Getting rid of Krell is good for town regardless of his alignment. I just wanted people to say why we were lynching him on a policy vote instead of lying and joking about it.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:38 |
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:There's wayyy too many lovely votes on krell more like not ENOUGH votes on krell one more let's do this BottleKnight posted:Days are short this game anyways. This is not an insta-turbo, Hats. Getting rid of Krell is good for town regardless of his alignment. I just wanted people to say why we were lynching him on a policy vote instead of lying and joking about it. you didn't get an 800 on the SAT verbal did you
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:41 |
|
BottleKnight posted:If there is someone a majority of the town doesnt like and isn't going to work well with, then either they are scum or the scum will intentionally keep them around. It's the same concept as a lurker lynch, if the town doesn't vote lurkers out early then they were going to lose anyways. You're the first person to articulate a reason for your vote other than "lol Krell", which is appreciated. That's a hell of a reputation to have though, if lynching him really is addition by subtraction. I honestly don't know his history well enough to cast the deciding vote.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:43 |
|
Why has no one lynched this guy yet?
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:45 |
|
Aggro posted:I honestly don't know his history well enough to cast the deciding vote. do it ya poseyflower!!!
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:45 |
I have never played with him before or interacted with him in any significant way, but I think I get the gist based on that lovely post he made about ecco.
|
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:45 |
|
Aggro posted:You're the first person to articulate a reason for your vote other than "lol Krell", which is appreciated. Quit wringing your hands and be the town hero we need.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:46 |
|
EccoRaven posted:you didn't get an 800 on the SAT verbal did you I never took the SAT, I got a 31 on the ACT This is a bit of a pointless snipe though tbh.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:46 |
|
BottleKnight posted:I never took the SAT, I got a 31 on the ACT what I mean is it was obvious by inference the cause of my vote, saying it explicitly was not necessary and making that the condition for your vote is trivial.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:48 |
|
EccoRaven posted:what I mean is it was obvious by inference the cause of my vote, saying it explicitly was not necessary and making that the condition for your vote is trivial. Aggro posted:You're the first person to articulate a reason for your vote other than "lol Krell", which is appreciated.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:52 |
|
Max posted:At this point I just want to be a part of an actual policy lunch. Come on, I'm not the only one seeing this
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:55 |
|
Retro Futurist posted:Come on, I'm not the only one seeing this Seems legit.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:59 |
|
Yeah, the more this goes on, the more I feel justified in keeping my vote on Krell. I don't want to play with someone who has, multiple times, violated the good faith necessary to play Mafia.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 18:59 |
|
Poison Mushroom posted:Yeah, the more this goes on, the more I feel justified in keeping my vote on Krell. I don't want to play with someone who has, multiple times, violated the good faith necessary to play Mafia. You're an idiot. and probably scum
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:12 |
|
Harold Krell posted:You're an idiot. This guy knows what mafia is REALLY about.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:14 |
|
Krell is the best among us, also Max is scum.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:17 |
|
btw, if I'm lynched today, even though I'm town, Ecco's probably going to justify getting rid of me anyways. vv God, what a loser that person will be and is.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:22 |
|
Can Krell's label for Ecco of a loser and Ecco' label for Krell as good policy removal, both be true?
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:24 |
|
BottleKnight posted:I never took the SAT, I got a 31 on the ACT Lookit this scrub. First-try 36 master race standardized testing is a poor metric for future success as I learned the hard way
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:24 |
|
Harold Krell posted:God, what a loser that person will be and is.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:24 |
|
Krunge posted:Can Krell's label for Ecco of a loser and Ecco' label for Krell as good policy removal, both be true? they can be, vote for krell to find out.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:24 |
|
Poison Mushroom posted:I don't like the way you change the tone of games. I don't like your personal attacks on people. I don't like the way you are completely unrepentant about making GBS threads all over other people's fun so you can have your own. In this case Krell didn't change any tones though, people just went totally on the offensive before he had a chance to say anything
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:25 |
|
Harold Krell posted:God, what a loser that person will be and is. Retro Futurist posted:In this case Krell didn't change any tones though, people just went totally on the offensive before he had a chance to say anything I would say that he still escalated that to personal attacks. I mean, there's calling someone miserable in mafia, and then there's saying someone has psychological issues.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:27 |
|
Yeah, gently caress it, I'm not making my first game back be this miserable loving experience.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:28 |
|
Krell's at -1. Someone please end this.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:29 |
|
lol at the concern trolls defending him. "sure, in every game he's been a piece of poo poo, but maybe in THIS one it'd've been different!!" elaine-get-out.gif
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:30 |
|
The Lord of Hats posted:Lookit this scrub. First-try 36 master race I did well on my SATS, but really I credit most of my success to some combination of my incredible good looks, astounding physical strength, and general charm so to each their own.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:33 |
|
krell krell never changes
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:34 |
|
Alright, fine. I'll be the hero that mafia needs. ##vote Krell
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:36 |
|
Harold Krell, we hardly knew ye
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:36 |
|
What happens now?
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:39 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 01:50 |
|
Krunge posted:What happens now? now we wait
|
# ? Sep 29, 2016 19:41 |