|
Loel posted:I hope A12s and Supertoms are a thing I was hoping A-12s were some kind of mythical A-10 upgrade.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 02:40 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 18:32 |
|
I suggest that at the end of every theater, every fighter/ground attack plane (not specialist equipment like radar, tankers, drones, ECM etc) we have only one of is forcefully sold by the company due to injustifiable maintenance cost (need a full ground crew just to maintain that one plane)
|
# ? May 21, 2017 02:43 |
|
I want A-6Fs because I am intrigued by an Intruder launching AMRAAMs
|
# ? May 21, 2017 02:44 |
|
I just want a flight of B2s with tactical nukes, is that so much to ask
|
# ? May 21, 2017 02:49 |
|
Loel posted:I just want a flight of B2s with tactical nukes, is that so much to ask Inflicting B2 maintenance on the ground crews should count as a warcrime by itself.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 02:53 |
orcbuster posted:I suggest that at the end of every theater, every fighter/ground attack plane (not specialist equipment like radar, tankers, drones, ECM etc) we have only one of is forcefully sold by the company due to injustifiable maintenance cost (need a full ground crew just to maintain that one plane) That's an interesting idea. I like it.
|
|
# ? May 21, 2017 02:55 |
|
we can afford half a B2. We could not afford to keep it flying. would have to construct special environmentally controlled shelters at each new base.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 02:56 |
|
We're handwaving the maitenance, therefore its okay
|
# ? May 21, 2017 02:59 |
|
orcbuster posted:I suggest that at the end of every theater, every fighter/ground attack plane (not specialist equipment like radar, tankers, drones, ECM etc) we have only one of is forcefully sold by the company due to injustifiable maintenance cost (need a full ground crew just to maintain that one plane) Nah, the more esoteric stuff (B-2s, A-12s, etc) should be sub-contracted, so if we use it for a mission they'd cost us a pretty penny to use. Maybe a limited number also, especially in the longer day or two ops.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:01 |
|
orcbuster posted:we can afford half a B2. We could not afford to keep it flying. would have to construct special environmentally controlled shelters at each new base. The government probably sells them like printers, sell the B2 for $19.99 and make your bones on the JDAMs.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:02 |
|
Coffeehitler posted:Nah, the more esoteric stuff (B-2s, A-12s, etc) should be sub-contracted, so if we use it for a mission they'd cost us a pretty penny to use. Maybe a limited number also, especially in the longer day or two ops. Is . .. is there a merc unit with B2s??
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:04 |
|
Apple can afford those insane guided shells for the Zumwalt! Perfect operator for that platform. In my mind they've altered the payload so that each of those shells is just full of old Apple products that were warehoused for recycling.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:05 |
|
15,000 ton destroyer... Why do we even have naval ship class designations anymore if everything is a destroyer?
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:06 |
|
Question: Can we somehow steal Apple's Zumwalt? Because that would be swell.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:10 |
|
sparkmaster posted:Question: Can we somehow steal Apple's Zumwalt? Because that would be swell. If we had botes or helos we could try something cute (and most likely die). Sadly we have neither.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:13 |
|
Loel posted:I just want a flight of B2s with tactical nukes, is that so much to ask The correct strategic bomber purchase would be a B-1R. Which weirdly isn't in the database, I don't think, even as a hypothetical. But who wouldn't love a B-1 crapping AMRAAMs everywhere?
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:14 |
|
power crystals posted:The correct strategic bomber purchase would be a B-1R. Which weirdly isn't in the database, I don't think, even as a hypothetical. But who wouldn't love a B-1 crapping AMRAAMs everywhere? Well the new update does have the Boeing 747-CMCA, beter known as the cruisemisslie pooping Jumbo Jet.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:19 |
|
Jimmy4400nav posted:If we had botes or helos we could try something cute (and most likely die). Well, we have 2 aircraft that could probably disguise themselves as airliners. Drop our fearless mercs from high altitude with a little inflatable bote, get in said bote, drive over to Zumwalt, board her, steal. This sounds like a fully practical plan.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:19 |
|
Personally I love having just a couple of each thing - it makes for some interesting pairings, things like "Man, X's patload would be really useful with Y's mission, but they'd have to go skow with it - or we could put X with Z over here but that's leaving very little room for error..." etc Rather than just say "All our X do this, all our Y do that mission"
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:21 |
|
Even with extensive automation it takes 140 people to crew a Zumwalt. Stealing that would not be practicable.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:22 |
|
Night10194 posted:Even with extensive automation it takes 140 people to crew a Zumwalt. Not with that attitude
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:28 |
|
Loel posted:Is . .. is there a merc unit with B2s?? There could be, if Tesla Aeronautics has drone F-22s and Apple has/is selling iZumwalts.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:30 |
|
Coffeehitler posted:There could be, if Tesla Aeronautics has drone F-22s and Apple has/is selling iZumwalts. We need to find them and steal from them
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:32 |
|
Have we ever actually successfully stolen anything?
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:33 |
|
Night10194 posted:Have we ever actually successfully stolen anything? Tibet?
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:34 |
|
Night10194 posted:Have we ever actually successfully stolen anything? We've never tried. I think it's time to try.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:35 |
|
entebbe Entebbe ENTEBBE
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:39 |
|
Night10194 posted:Have we ever actually successfully stolen anything? If you count bribing some pilots to defect then yes. If not, then no, we've never stolen anything, but it doesn't stop us from pretending like we're hot poo poo when it comes to that. *Edit* Loel posted:entebbe Entebbe ENTEBBE Pretty much this anytime someone mentions another group having X.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:39 |
|
Jimmy4400nav posted:If you count bribing some pilots to defect then yes. Ah, right. That was a good get.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:43 |
|
orcbuster posted:I suggest that at the end of every theater, every fighter/ground attack plane (not specialist equipment like radar, tankers, drones, ECM etc) we have only one of is forcefully sold by the company due to injustifiable maintenance cost (need a full ground crew just to maintain that one plane) As a pilot of the Hawk I hate this idea. I just wanna keep launching Mavericks and Sidewinders at anything that moves. I like the motley crew of airframes. Requires flexibility and creativity in crafting missions, plus just the neat visual of a Hawk, a Frogfoot, a couple Mirage F.1's and AMXs in a nice formation.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 03:46 |
|
Yooper posted:That's an interesting idea. I like it. Same. It makes life easier, reflects the fact that our company is focused on profitability, and also gives us a chance to make arguments for upgrades (like swapping the German Tornadoes to a Saudi configuration). Out of curiosity how moddable is CMANO? Could you create new fighters, or make a variant with a new loadout?
|
# ? May 21, 2017 04:21 |
|
I don't care what we have as long as we buy at least one F-35.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 04:54 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:Out of curiosity how moddable is CMANO? Could you create new fighters, or make a variant with a new loadout? It's very locked down, to the point where the best way to get database changes is to request them from the developers.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 04:56 |
|
Operation Finest Hour is a go! Here is your briefing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kh6cwET1Rns And some theme music. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFEXitPn1ko
|
# ? May 21, 2017 04:58 |
|
Bacarruda posted:
Video is unavailable
|
# ? May 21, 2017 05:06 |
|
Quinntan posted:It's very locked down, to the point where the best way to get database changes is to request them from the developers. That is dumb and bad.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 05:32 |
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:That is dumb and bad. Apparently the other option is to pay several hundred dollars or so for the version they only sell to the military.
|
|
# ? May 21, 2017 05:34 |
|
Hexenritter posted:Apparently the other option is to pay several hundred dollars or so for the version they only sell to the military. That explains quite a bit.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 05:41 |
Just a reminder for you folks, after you get out of the hellhole that is Angola, that I have some really neat toys for sale. B1-B B2 (maybe) A/C-130 Superhornets C-5,17,130
|
|
# ? May 21, 2017 05:47 |
|
|
# ? Jun 1, 2024 18:32 |
|
Hexenritter posted:Apparently the other option is to pay several hundred dollars or so for the version they only sell to the military. I'd pony up some money for that.
|
# ? May 21, 2017 05:48 |