|
Comrade Gorbash posted:[drat] That rules. Thanks for including the "Magnificent" !
|
# ? Jul 29, 2017 12:22 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 01:50 |
|
summed up the vault/red/jackie/magpie plan as best I could to make sure i get it
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 00:52 |
|
To provide some clarifying detail of what I was thinking: Magpie has taken over an isolated department store type building, where the structures around it have collapsed. So it's defensible with only a couple ways in - the front door, and some doors on the old loading docks. Magpie keeps the slaves on the first couple floors up from ground so it's harder for them to get out. On like the second floor or so, near the slave pens, there's an old fire escape door that's supposed to have been bricked up, but isn't. The fire escape itself has been removed, though, and the door only opens from the inside. Hence the plan.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 01:03 |
|
Jimmie Christmas, See is just not having a good day. I guess she shouldn't leave the infirmary.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 01:34 |
|
Hey just FYI I'm gonna be away on vacation Wednesday through Sunday, I'll try to post during that time but it'll probably be one post per day max.
|
# ? Aug 1, 2017 15:32 |
|
Sorry about that, Monday was kind of hectic, post forthcoming in a few minutes
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 03:51 |
|
well the 'verter has been pretty
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 12:37 |
|
Whoops, misunderstood the circumstances a bit, let me edit that post a bit real quick e: there we go, edited to take into account the fact that it was already unplugged Mister Bates fucked around with this message at 18:07 on Aug 2, 2017 |
# ? Aug 2, 2017 16:42 |
|
Captain Foo is it kosher to respond to The Mayor, or should I wait for the incoming Hard Move to land?
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 20:47 |
|
Chat away.
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 20:50 |
|
seadee see is not chillstabbing the mayor until later, right?
|
# ? Aug 2, 2017 23:51 |
|
Captain Foo posted:seadee see is not chillstabbing the mayor until later, right? Correct. Since the mayor is at 6:00, I figure its better to have a functional but in pain quasi-ally
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 02:24 |
|
PoultryGeist posted:Correct. Since the mayor is at 6:00, I figure its better to have a functional but in pain quasi-ally 👍 update tomorrow
|
# ? Aug 3, 2017 02:48 |
|
That's about what I expected to happen. So given who Vault is, even though it's probably a bad idea I was going to try and take the gun from Jackie and then kill everybody. Would that fall under the new Seize by Force?
|
# ? Aug 7, 2017 00:03 |
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:That's about what I expected to happen. Yes. Jackie's revolver is a big fuckin gun and it's 3-harm, ap since it's at your face; Walter's rifle is 2-harm but he is fighting in close quarters so he's not likely to get a shot off, honestly.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2017 01:01 |
|
I rolled an 8 and am choosing: • You take definite and undeniable control of it. I'm leaning towards: • You inflict terrible harm (+1harm). but since I also have NOT TO BE hosed WITH I'm not sure I need the extra damage. For narrative purposes, I was also wondering if I should just describe killing Jackie and Walter?
|
# ? Aug 7, 2017 03:02 |
|
hm well... I think NOT TO BE hosed WITH doesn't apply in this case since it's not really a pitched battle, if that makes sense. Jackie's gun does 3-harm, which is enough to kill either of them. If you want to cleanly kill them both, you might want to pick up an extra harm. or one of them might survive, since you need 4-harm to reliably kill two NPCs. Unless you're interested in talking to either of them, you can go ahead and kill them both, though.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2017 13:25 |
|
Makes sense. I'll grab the extra harm then - it's definitely Vault's MO to "solve" this problem by making everyone dead. And then realize it's created a whole bunch more problems. Post up soon.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2017 13:37 |
|
Post coming today, sorry about that. I try to post once per day but Sundays and Mondays are generally bad days for me.
|
# ? Aug 7, 2017 19:37 |
|
I'll be posting too, got sidetracked by the end of summer semester
|
# ? Aug 7, 2017 20:00 |
|
Let's see just how much more screwed up Vault can make this situation.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2017 16:11 |
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:Let's see just how much more screwed up Vault can make this situation. Michael_jackson_eats_popcorn.gif (Phoneposting, best I could do)
|
# ? Aug 9, 2017 16:18 |
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:Let's see just how much more screwed up Vault can make this situation. well, you can gtfo as fast as you can or you can look for loot, but you don't have time for both...
|
# ? Aug 9, 2017 16:50 |
|
Fair enough, I was going more for the "anything I can literally grab on the way out" than any sort of proper looting.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2017 17:19 |
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:Fair enough, I was going more for the "anything I can literally grab on the way out" than any sort of proper looting. you could take the gun if you don't want to put it down, but otherwise you'll have to spend a few moments to sort everything out
|
# ? Aug 9, 2017 17:47 |
|
Well, I have "gently caress This poo poo" so I'll risk it. EDIT: I'm imagining the revolver is immediately identifiable as "Jackie's gun." Which brings up a question - is it AP inherently, or due to the ammo she was using? If it's inherent then I'd take it but not if it's the ammo. Comrade Gorbash fucked around with this message at 18:12 on Aug 9, 2017 |
# ? Aug 9, 2017 18:09 |
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:Well, I have "gently caress This poo poo" so I'll risk it. nah it's AP because it was pointed at your face, i'd give it (3-harm loud close reload ornate)
|
# ? Aug 9, 2017 20:17 |
|
Fair enough, I'll pass on it. It's a nice gun but not nice enough to be worth the headache of people being able to ID it.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2017 20:21 |
|
Hey Captain Foo, is the fighting outside bad enough that will I need to roll under fire to get from the house to the hole?
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 00:50 |
|
PoultryGeist posted:Hey Captain Foo, is the fighting outside bad enough that will I need to roll under fire to get from the house to the hole? we'll say....yes, but you get +1 due to the sitch roll
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 01:42 |
|
Captain Foo posted:we'll say....yes, but you get +1 due to the sitch roll Coolness, gonna give Mister Bates a chance to come up with a better plan than 'just run really fast' but I figured I'd ask
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 02:30 |
|
Vault endorses the run really fast plan.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 02:41 |
|
PoultryGeist posted:Coolness, gonna give Mister Bates a chance to come up with a better plan than 'just run really fast' but I figured I'd ask As a matter of fact, no, I do not have a better plan
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 10:31 |
|
Dunno if I'm getting too cute there, I can change Max's contact in the Charming Grandsons if Guo Lin's too much a pain in the neck.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 16:07 |
|
that's fine i would also like to point out that despite their use of language, I don't believe the Church is a religious organization, really
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 16:09 |
|
Cool, I'll back off that angle.
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 19:14 |
|
I'm amused by the concept of a hardcore hierarchical gang taking the language and building of a church but none of their beliefs
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 20:13 |
|
I'll address this a bit in some upcoming posts I guess
|
# ? Aug 11, 2017 20:14 |
|
Before I try to get the gently caress out, I want to make sure I follow the trade offs for my options. Option 1: Try to find more stuff in here before I split, will definitely end up fighting some of Jackie's goons. Option 2: Head West, this is the safest but it'll take a while to loop back around anywhere else. Will avoid Jackie's goons, but might run into some of Magpie's. Option 3: Head South, this will get to me to medical attention fastest. But I'll probably run into Jackie's goons, and it'll take me a while to loop back East (on top of whatever time medical takes). Option 4 (?): Head East, this will get me to Red's soonest. But I'll probably run into Jackie's goons, and it'll take a while to loop back South to get medical attention. Does that sound about right? My main question is, how soon do I need to get to medical attention? Also I'm assuming I only get the +1 for acting on Option 2, given my question.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2017 01:23 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 01:50 |
|
Comrade Gorbash posted:Before I try to get the gently caress out, I want to make sure I follow the trade offs for my options. 1. nailed it 2. nailed it 3. nailed it 4. nailed it re: medical attention. it's gonna get worse the more active you are. I'll say if you enter combat, you automatically will take 1-harm ap at the end of combat, assuming you otherwise survive.
|
# ? Aug 14, 2017 02:15 |