Jedit posted:

I hope it never happens, but if you do get banned how do you "rebuy" under your original user name?

LawfulWaffle posted:

It’s the difference between a ban and a perma. A ban strips you of your land and your titles, but you are free to rereg with the same info; a tax if you would. A perma means you are exiled and any alts that you make down the line are executed upon discovery.

That’s how I think it works, anyway.

Malachite_Dragon posted:

There are exceptions- people perma'd as part of a bet (like ing for elections) are allowed to rereg with a new name, I thought?

mind the walrus posted:

Does anyone have that quote about Bronies and how they're really just desperate for anything that sounds like a woman? The key bits I recall were about how, before bronies, no one was fetishizing horses except for "honest-to-god horse fuckers" and how the Brony phenomenon is proof that these guys are so pathetic that they latch onto anything with a woman's voice.

EmmyOk posted:

I can't quote goldmined threads but here's the link to a photoshop thread I enjoyed recently

Danaru posted:

Took a glance at his rap sheet and multiple bans with the description "No means no"

A Man and his dog posted:

Big ole Marsh Pussay I know where you are coming from.

I recently found a very nice lady and we are very happy together.

I really hope it works out. But I've been burned before.

Tread lightly my friend.

swickles posted:

What are you going to do when she wakes up?

Crocoswine posted:

Sandwich Anarchist posted:

A Man is a Dog

VanSandman posted:

You can toxx for a perma but there’s no reason to. There’s no reason to toxx either, honestly. Trust me.

KM Scorchio posted:

Unless you're a Clinton supporter.

Sandwich Anarchist posted:

Now you're a dog-man

Edit: lol holy poo poo

Pick posted:

Everyone ate the ban from that toxx.

Burt Sexual posted:

Who is the pic of?

Burt Sexual posted:

Who is the pic of?

Burt Sexual posted:

Who is the pic of?

Garrand posted:

I don't think he was acquitted, just that he got a slap on the wrist instead of the years in jail he deserved

Sandwich Anarchist posted:

Yeah that's Brock Turner, the Stanford guy that raped a girl behind a dumpster and then got acquitted because "it would ruin his life".

Garrand posted:

I don't think he was acquitted, just that he got a slap on the wrist instead of the years in jail he deserved

Sandwich Anarchist posted:

Yeah that's right, I forgot the the details. But he's basically the American "face of rape" now.

Absurd Alhazred posted:

Powaqoatse posted:

a literal textbook example. nice.

quote:

The statutory definitions of rape in the State of California (where Turner was convicted of three charges of felony sexual assault) differ from those of the FBI. Turner’s actions, as determined by the California jury, fit the standards for the FBI definition of rape, as well as certain other state definitions, but not the California definition as of the time of the final book manuscript. The authors and publisher will further clarify the differing definitions of rape in California compared to the FBI in future reprints of the book.

As stated in the book, Turner was convicted of three counts of felony sexual assault under the California Penal Code. At the time Turner was charged and tried, none of these counts constituted the crime of rape, per the definitions then in effect. These three counts were: (1.) PC220(a)(1): assault with intent to commit felony; (2.) PC289(e): sexual penetration when the victim was intoxicated or anesthetized; and (3.) PC289(d): sexual penetration where the victim was unconscious of the nature of the act. The initial felony complaint in Turner’s case included two counts of rape under the California Penal Code (PC261(a)(3); PC261(a)(4)), however both of these counts were dismissed prior to Turner’s trial. These sections of the California Penal Code have since been amended by the California legislature.