|
nm, not sniping with this.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 20:00 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 14:47 |
|
Literally no one cares more about Chrome OS more than fishmech, apparently.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 20:06 |
|
fishmech posted:It's pretty rude of you to say all those fine people defending Chrome Os don't care about it. You sometimes post interesting things, and even now and again have an opinion that isn’t terrible, but you just screech autistically into the void all the time and it’s getting really tiresome.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 20:09 |
|
Noggin Monkey posted:You sometimes post interesting things, and even now and again have an opinion that isn’t terrible, but you just screech autistically into the void all the time and it’s getting really tiresome. So you think everyone saying they liked Chrome OS was pretending, or what? If you're going to make claims, be willing to at least discuss them.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 20:12 |
|
sealionmech
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 20:16 |
|
2018: the year of Linux on the desktop
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 20:27 |
|
On one hand ,chromeOS is pretty good,on the other chrome is a poo poo browser,on the third hand though my abacus never runs out of batery so maybe all phones should run on that?!
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 21:03 |
|
fishmech posted:Chrome OS is literally just Chrome. That is not how computers work. At all
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 22:48 |
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:That is not how computers work. At all You already proved you don't know how computers work long ago. Chrome OS is just running Chrome - that's it.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 22:52 |
|
guys i dont think fishmech has even ever used chromeos
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 22:56 |
I thought you were all talking about Chromeo.
|
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:00 |
|
GrandpaPants posted:I thought you were all talking about Chromeo. Oh Chromeo, Chromeo, wherefore art thou Chromeo? Deny thy browser or, if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love. And I'll no longer be a Linux!
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:03 |
|
Tuxedo Gin posted:guys i dont think fishmech has even ever used chromeos I've used it plenty, including being among the first wave of testers of the Cr-48.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:06 |
|
fishmech posted:Chrome OS is just running Chrome - that's it. literally not how a computer works.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:08 |
|
fishmech posted:You already proved you don't know how computers work long ago. Chrome OS is just running Chrome - that's it. Just go ahead and post the wiki page
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:08 |
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:literally not how a computer works. Big words from someone who was trying to claim Chrome OS and Android were both "Gentoo Linux" yesterday.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:10 |
|
Trabisnikof posted:Just go ahead and post the wiki page https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/boot-design Technically it’s running more than chrome but it’s what you get if you give an embedded engineer the task of “build the minimal Linux system to run chrome”
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:11 |
|
fishmech posted:Big words from someone who was trying to claim Chrome OS and Android were both "Gentoo Linux" yesterday. It literally is. Or rather, it literally was gentoo until google branched it and made it their own thing. Like how chrome doesn't actually run webkit even though everyone says 'webkit" because blink is just google's version of webkit.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:20 |
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:It literally is. Or rather, it literally was gentoo until google branched it and made it their own thing. Like how chrome doesn't actually run webkit even though everyone says 'webkit" because blink is just google's version of webkit. No, Android was never Gentoo, and Chrome OS only used Gentoo-specific kernels and a bit of the Gentoo-specific userland up til 2013. And the current kernel stuff doesn't branch through Gentoo, it is its own entirely separate branch off the mainstream Linux kernel. Please stop embarrassing yourself, you clearly don't understand what you're talking about.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:24 |
|
fishmech posted:Please stop embarrassing yourself, you clearly don't understand what you're talking about.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:34 |
|
Go on and tell the class how Android is secretly a Gentoo branch now, if you would.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:37 |
|
fishmech posted:Go on and tell the class how Android is secretly a Gentoo branch now, if you would. It couldn't matter less
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:39 |
|
Owlofcreamcheese posted:It literally is. Or rather, it literally was gentoo until google branched it and made it their own thing. Like how chrome doesn't actually run webkit even though everyone says 'webkit" because blink is just google's version of webkit. Yes, gentoo is well known for using upstart. Also, https://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/chromiumos-design-docs/chromium-os-kernel quote:Background
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:47 |
|
fishmech posted:So you think everyone saying they liked Chrome OS was pretending, or what? If you're going to make claims, be willing to at least discuss them. Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh When you make really loving strong statement about ethics in operating system development or some similarly stupid poo poo, we're going to call you a stupid poo poo regardless of whether spending a few bucks on instead of OS is important.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:55 |
|
suck my woke dick posted:Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh It's not a strong statement, it's just the facts that Chrome OS is pointless and should be ended, replaced by Android with proper full Chrome support. Just like it's the fact that Uber needs to be destroyed and Soylent has poison in it and people shouldn't be drinking it.
|
# ? Mar 3, 2018 23:58 |
|
fishmech posted:It's not a strong statement, it's just the facts that Chrome OS is pointless and should be ended, replaced by Android with proper full Chrome support. Just like it's the fact that Uber needs to be destroyed and Soylent has poison in it and people shouldn't be drinking it. Well one of these things is not like the others. e: and nobody cares if google could spend a few million less on developer hours for chomeOS if they really wanted to, it's pretty irrelevant in the first place. Even if you really really care about ethics in operating system development financing you're making the classic econ101 mistake of thinking a huge budget works like your credit card, whereas google's budget is so humongous (while at the same time the company isn't exactly making uber-style losses) that the limiting factor in reassigning some moderately well-paid code monkeys is "why should we care" not "but consider the minor cost savings". suck my woke dick fucked around with this message at 00:04 on Mar 4, 2018 |
# ? Mar 4, 2018 00:00 |
|
fishmech posted:It's not a strong statement, it's just the facts that Chrome OS is pointless and should be ended, replaced by Android with proper full Chrome support. Just like it's the fact that Uber needs to be destroyed and Soylent has poison in it and people shouldn't be drinking it. The “normal” Linux chrome build relies on X (see the chromium startup) so an android port would be very different anyways, ie like the current one. Not that you can’t run x on your phone
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 00:06 |
|
suck my woke dick posted:Well one of these things is not like the others. Dude, there's no mistake about it. Chrome OS should have been abandoned long ago and the effort put into Android on form factors Chrome OS runs on now. It's not like this is some bizarre impractical concept, there's been several user projects like RemixOS that on their own make very workable laptop/desktop/settop box form factor Android systems without explicit Google support behind it. And again, since the only thing Chrome OS does is run Chrome, there's no real reason it should still exist when we're talking with a company who already has an entire separate operating system that's also more powerful and more popular. hobbesmaster posted:The normal Linux chrome build relies on X (see the chromium startup) so an android port would be very different anyways, ie like the current one. To put it bluntly, Chrome already can't rely on X on Windows, and that hasn't exactly stopped them. Additionally Mozilla's been able to adapt Firefox for Android from being very much a third class citizen for extension/feature support into being almost entirely on par with the desktop versions, especially post-57 refactor of the browser. Things would take time to actually execute on, but again, they should have been getting done a while ago.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 00:20 |
|
The OSX port doesn’t rely on X either but there’s a similar desktop environment providing those services. Suffice to say - the mobile version of chrome could support more but google has ported exactly what they want to Dalvik
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 00:23 |
|
pangstrom posted:and the best gaming console is the PS4. a bit late, but quite honestly it could be worse
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 00:25 |
|
Somebody contradicted fish guy on a minor point four pages ago, didn't they?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 01:18 |
|
pangstrom posted:I would bet a lot of money that that NOPD-Planatir relationship started with a just-maybe-technically-legal kickback or two. I think the question is, does Palantir have software they can sell to state and federal law enforcement that can analyze cash flow, meeting attendance, and other forms of data to predict kickbacks and bribes?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 01:38 |
|
Arglebargle III posted:Somebody contradicted fish guy on a minor point four pages ago, didn't they? Ayup!
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 01:38 |
|
I'm really confused why Google won't bring full chrome to Android. I pretty much married myself to the chrome ecosystem but I'm really tired of intrusive ads on my phone. I don't want Firefox because of Google docs and passwords and stuff.
anonumos fucked around with this message at 01:49 on Mar 4, 2018 |
# ? Mar 4, 2018 01:44 |
|
if chromeos is literally chrome then is windows 10 literally just edge
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 02:19 |
|
full chrome, much like full communism, is both undesirable and exceptionally unlikely to ever exist
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 02:21 |
|
fishmech posted:Everyone. It could easily be replaced by Android. What part of “easy to administer for schools and businesses ” did you not understand?
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 02:25 |
|
VideoGameVet posted:What part of “easy to administer for schools and businesses ” did you not understand? There is absolutely no inherent reason it can't be, especially if many years hadn't been wasted building that for "Chrome OS" instead.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 02:40 |
|
fishmech posted:There is absolutely no inherent reason it can't be, especially if many years hadn't been wasted building that for "Chrome OS" instead. Something with fewer features is easier to lock down if you're trying to prevent your students/employees from using the devices for purposes other than you intend. Sometimes less is more.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 02:42 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 14:47 |
|
Ditocoaf posted:Something with fewer features is easier to lock down if you're trying to prevent your students/employees from using the devices for purposes other than you intend. Sometimes less is more. You can already lock down a phone or a computer or whatever. Next!
|
# ? Mar 4, 2018 02:45 |