|
Mahatma Goonsay posted:Arrrg I just totally messed up one of those shared coder pad screens. Oh well. meatpotato posted:Im about to mess one up in five minutes hahah, turns out that they still want me for an in person interview.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 20:44 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 00:36 |
|
Mahatma Goonsay posted:hahah, turns out that they still want me for an in person interview. It's nice when interviewers know that their tests suck
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 20:47 |
|
DONT THREAD ON ME posted:still woulda been nice not to gently caress up, but i hosed up so catastrophically that i dont really mind.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 20:52 |
|
Diva Cupcake posted:like, did you accidentally start talking about goat loving or something? how could it be that bad? it was real dumb. i chose to try and solve the problem in scala because it's what i was the most comfortable with of the given languages, but the problem they wanted me to solve was incredibly imperative and i confused the gently caress out of myself trying to write imperative scala, basically. also i completely forget everything i know about programming when i'm in the middle of a coding session.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:04 |
|
DONT THREAD ON ME posted:also i completely forget everything i know about programming when i'm in the middle of a coding session. yeah, likewise... first technical phone interview in a few years: i didn't do great, but i didn't outright fail. I struggled to remember some some C++ stuff but remembered and fixed it however i probably looked goofy. the guy didn't leave much time for yospos canonical reverse interview questions and cut me off before i could finish, so hmm. a few red flags, sounds like a pretty typical (disorganized) startup. get this, their interview process is: technical phone screen (one hour) another technical phone screen (one hour) day onsite of several one hour one-on-one interviews another onsite where you give a one hour presentation about a technical subject to a panel (~20-30 minutes presenting, ~30 minutes Q/A) take-home project
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:23 |
|
q not e
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:23 |
That's too much work for an interview
|
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:35 |
|
agreed, but it's just bonus interview practice for me, somebody who needs to practice interviewing
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:45 |
|
wow that's a lot of effort to work at a startup
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:49 |
|
Having to take multiple days off is a red flag for me.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 21:55 |
|
Chiming in with the chorus of "give me a loving break thats too much stuff". Two technical phone screens and a loving presentation? They're out of their mind if they think they're gonna get anyone with actual responsibilities at their current job. At the other end of the spectrum, I recently did a phone screen with microsoft (one of their cloud teams) and it was a very reasonable tech phone screen and now they want me to come in... and I guess after that its yes/no? Very bullshit free so far compared to the process I've heard about at the other big shops.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:07 |
|
ADINSX posted:Probably; but at least they gave you a bit more. If I suspect I'm underpaid, I've had success in the past by talking to my manager and saying 'I know I screwed up negotiating when hired and would like a raise to compensate'. Obviously depends on the company policy/culture/how much they need you, etc. I feel like i'm in the correct ballpark at least from my palz that work there. Joke's on them they could have offered half as much and I would have said yes yes yes.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:09 |
|
meatpotato posted:I’m about to mess one up in five minutes i did really well on mine, and we had a great time although it was nerve wracking having three people staring me down. i was able to spin the questions that they were asking into things that were relevant to their business and that got a lot of happy noises. i wouldn't have done really well if i hadn't spent a lot of time practicing on my own and roleplaying it out in my head.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:12 |
|
ultravoices posted:I feel like i'm in the correct ballpark at least from my palz that work there. Well thats great, severely underpaying someone just means they're gonna be pissed when they find out what they really should have been making, so good for them thinking long term. Hope it works out.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:12 |
|
Fiedler posted:some people insist that their team doesn't suck, but the general consensus is, "you don't want to work for amazon" There was another one that was even more into taking the "ure" out of "corporate culture", but apparently she did a lot of time at Apple so she's practically to the manner born. DONT THREAD ON ME posted:also i completely forget everything i know about programming when i'm in the middle of a coding session.
|
# ? Sep 4, 2018 22:32 |
|
Just went to an in person tech screen. Pretty sure I flunked it, they asked me to whiteboard an algorithm to serialise a binary tree structure (not a binary search tree, just any unsorted binary tree) and one to deserialise it into the same structure. I got there in the end but there was a lot of prompting. Also not sure if the company culture is really my thing anyway though, but I would've been interested in seeing the salary they offer.
qhat fucked around with this message at 02:17 on Sep 5, 2018 |
# ? Sep 5, 2018 02:12 |
|
qhat posted:Just went to an in person tech screen. Pretty sure I flunked it, they asked me to whiteboard an algorithm to serialise a binary tree structure (not a binary search tree, just any unsorted binary tree) and one to deserialise it into the same structure. I got there in the end but there was a lot of prompting. Also not sure if the company culture is really my thing anyway though, but I would've been interested in seeing the salary they offer. ooh, did you have it read and write depth first so you always had the parent of the node you were reading or writing one up the stack?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 02:48 |
|
jit bull transpile posted:ooh, did you have it read and write depth first so you always had the parent of the node you were reading or writing one up the stack? ugh gently caress, my first thought was to do it breadth first like an array representation of a binary tree but this is obviously the answer how the gently caress am i employed?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 03:34 |
|
it never comes up at most people’s jobs they just wanted an in order tree traversal?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 04:34 |
|
carry on then posted:ugh gently caress, my first thought was to do it breadth first like an array representation of a binary tree but this is obviously the answer I mean, your answer is right if you can assume array backing and serde directly from and to that storage. but if you're assuming a generic api where all you have is get and set for left and right I can't think of a better way than dfs but also like nobody's job depends on poo poo like this, don't feel bad. dumb code golf like this is like being good at bar trivia. it's not indicative of anything but my old job being boring and giving me too much time to implement algos for fun.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 05:23 |
|
qhat posted:Just went to an in person tech screen. Pretty sure I flunked it, they asked me to whiteboard an algorithm to serialise a binary tree structure (not a binary search tree, just any unsorted binary tree) and one to deserialise it into the same structure. I got there in the end but there was a lot of prompting. Also not sure if the company culture is really my thing anyway though, but I would've been interested in seeing the salary they offer.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 06:04 |
|
qhat posted:Just went to an in person tech screen. Pretty sure I flunked it, they asked me to whiteboard an algorithm to serialise a binary tree structure (not a binary search tree, just any unsorted binary tree) and one to deserialise it into the same structure. I got there in the end but there was a lot of prompting. Also not sure if the company culture is really my thing anyway though, but I would've been interested in seeing the salary they offer. you should've asked if this was a good starting place code:
code:
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 06:20 |
|
FamDav posted:you should've asked if this was a good starting place in Java you're fine but I think in .net you need to implement the actual serialize function when you contain fields that aren't standard types. probably a good way to get rejected by someone who's team literal about the specific platform they use.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 06:55 |
|
alternatively ask if this is a good definition of a binary treecode:
code:
FamDav fucked around with this message at 07:12 on Sep 5, 2018 |
# ? Sep 5, 2018 06:58 |
|
jit bull transpile posted:in Java you're fine but I think in .net you need to implement the actual serialize function when you contain fields that aren't standard types. probably a good way to get rejected by someone who's team literal about the specific platform they use. considering thats not valid c# and this is the standard for defining a class serializable by any conforming jvm i dont really get your comment
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 07:02 |
|
FamDav posted:alternatively ask if this is a good definition of a binary tree OK now do it so your serialized format is just the value plus sigils for having parent or children. you know, for space efficiency. because that matters for some reason. I assume that's the sort of dumb way the question was posed because doing it with standard library stuff is too easy for dumb whiteboard interviews and I assume he would have nailed it if the question was asked sanely enough to allow this answer.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 07:06 |
|
FamDav posted:considering thats not valid c# and this is the standard for defining a class serializable by any conforming jvm i dont really get your comment it's late and I'm trying to imagine what sort of pedantic crap came up in the interview. I haven't touched c# in a while.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 07:07 |
|
jit bull transpile posted:OK now do it so your serialized format is just the value plus sigils for having parent or children. you know, for space efficiency. because that matters for some reason.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 07:08 |
|
this is the thread for picking apart interview bs. take your nerd poo poo somewhere else *flexes jock muscles at u*
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 07:37 |
|
jit bull transpile posted:ooh, did you have it read and write depth first so you always had the parent of the node you were reading or writing one up the stack? My eventual solution was to have a non member serialize function that prints -1 if null is passed in, else print the value of the node and pass the left and right subtrees into the serialize function recursively. Deserializing is pretty trivial. qhat fucked around with this message at 08:06 on Sep 5, 2018 |
# ? Sep 5, 2018 08:00 |
|
jit bull transpile posted:this is the thread for picking apart interview bs. take your nerd poo poo somewhere else *flexes jock muscles at u* I served with Frederick "The Ogre You rear end in a top hat" Palowaksi. I knew Ogre. Ogre was a friend of mine. Jit, you are no Ogre.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 08:01 |
|
jit bull transpile posted:this is the thread for picking apart interview bs. take your nerd poo poo somewhere else *flexes jock muscles at u*
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 08:10 |
|
Peeny Cheez posted:Really? I fought in the άβ/ λ λ λ wars of 1984. Didn't see you there, when our jockstraps were burning with liquid heat. lmao
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 08:25 |
|
guys I'm whacked up on ambiem so u should probably disregard everything but my original post lol
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 08:30 |
|
qhat posted:It's nice when interviewers know that their tests suck Lol this is apparently where I work.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 14:46 |
|
jit bull transpile posted:guys I'm whacked up on ambiem so u should probably disregard everything but my original post lol “the musk defense”
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 15:14 |
|
jit bull transpile posted:guys I'm whacked up on ambiem so u should probably disregard everything but my original post lol new thread idea: "We Are The Walrus: ambienposting ONLY! (~~DON'T DOX YOURSELF YOSPOS GHOST~~~)"
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 16:27 |
|
prisoner of waffles posted:new thread idea: "We Are The Walrus: ambienposting ONLY! (~~DON'T DOX YOURSELF YOSPOS GHOST~~~)" just me n low tax to the end of time
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 18:45 |
|
TimWinter posted:Lol this is apparently where I work. Ha, no this is a different place. I have a chance to fail that one tomorrow.
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 19:05 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 00:36 |
|
hey guys, know any law professor part-time doctors who would rather be a computer toucher?
|
# ? Sep 5, 2018 19:33 |