|
meatpotato posted:鬼神 hire ‘em all 1099 CPColin posted:2,147,483,647 dev ops
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 03:53 |
|
|
# ? May 2, 2024 22:36 |
|
Pie Colony posted:i said exactly 0 of these things, but quote:- "breathing down your neck" is a really antagonistic way to frame collaborating with your teammates quote:- are you complaining that some coworkers SOCIALIZE on the job? the absolute horror. also arguing is more often debating which is doing the work. quote:- i'm not in a position to force anything on anyone. someone here was considering applying to a company that had an already established pairing policy, and was up front about it
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 04:53 |
|
code reviews are different than pair programming. in pair programming, you get to see which ideas were considered but not used, you get to pick up useful workflows, you get feedback faster in the process. though code reviews are useful too. but ok, you're right. if you think pair programming is two programmers stacked on top of each other (??), if you think the most likely outcome of two coworkers sitting down together is arguing, if you think nothing getting done is an acceptable result of "personalities clashing," or that the end result of pair programming is supposed to be two units of work, yes, pair programming is not for you. Pie Colony fucked around with this message at 05:18 on Sep 21, 2018 |
# ? Sep 21, 2018 05:14 |
Pie Colony posted:yea like a lot of processes (agile, issue tracking) it's possible to do poorly, but i think implemented well it's a net positive. i know that's a tautology, etc etc, but at the end of the day i'll fight for it he would have days where his partner called in sick and literally would not be allowed to work, it was a very bad policy
|
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 05:21 |
|
noone is "right" you loving retard. it's tool which is useful for a subset of people on a subset of projects, not something which should be followed dogmatically in all or even most situations.
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 05:21 |
|
imagine defending pair programming lmao
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 05:21 |
|
talking to your coworkers: good collaborating with your coworkers: good literally sitting in each others laps to work: bad
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 05:22 |
|
the hiring manager talked to me effectively immediately after I finished my interviews to tell me I aced them and I'll be going on to the Final Round imminently. Talking about how making sure to have empathy for the customer when making decisions seems to be a good way to convey that you're not a person whose approach to projects consists of 'if Jenkins lights up green ship it'.
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 05:53 |
|
qhat posted:noone is "right" you loving retard. it's tool which is useful for a subset of people on a subset of projects, not something which should be followed dogmatically in all or even most situations. you don't even know why or how pair programming is used, why do you think you know which subset of people or projects it should be used for? e: also don't use the r word Pie Colony fucked around with this message at 06:05 on Sep 21, 2018 |
# ? Sep 21, 2018 06:01 |
|
I have a lovely phone screen I'm going to bomb for a lovely sysadmin job at a place that would be a pain in the rear end to get to. But at least it wouldn't be third-shift?
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 12:01 |
|
thanks for noticing, Polly and PCjr
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 14:44 |
|
paired programming between senior and junior devs has value as part of a mentorship thing, but for peers i'd probably avoid it
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 14:46 |
|
I know people who love pair programming and swear by it, but I can't imagine the practice not making me 10x more tired at the end of the day.
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 14:51 |
|
we do a lot of pairing at work. I try to keep it to <50% of my time. it’s not especially tiring, but it’s definitely slower, and I don’t get a ton of added value from it. happy to do it with the juniors when I do though, it is great training
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 15:49 |
|
Pie Colony posted:goongrats but also don't bank on anything until
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 16:38 |
|
qhat posted:noone is "right" you loving retard stop
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 17:30 |
|
Paired programming is a great tool for mentoring junior team members or working through a tough problem with an extra head. Required paired programming is dumb though. Sounds like someone heard the benefits of it and decided that more = better in every context in the same way that people think eating tons of carrots will improve your eyesight.
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 17:59 |
|
look, all that matters is that everyone is exactly like me, so they better be doing exactly what i do
|
# ? Sep 21, 2018 21:09 |
Disappointing Dollhouse posted:job search status: no more phone janitor, code janitor starting oct 1. rest in piss
|
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 01:01 |
|
I realized last night that, despite the fact that I love the people I work with at my current job and I love what I'm working on for now, I don't want to stick around for next year when I'll be back in the javascript code mines and under a micromanaging boss. it sucks because I know me leaving is going to make a lot of people I like really sad but god drat I hate the way we write javascript. got two phone interviews lined up for next Tuesday though. I'm having to beat LinkedIn recruiters off with a stick.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 13:43 |
|
anyone that gets sad because their coworker got a better job probably deserves to be sad imo
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 14:28 |
|
I know that being all dehumanize yourself and face to bloodshed is hip but I have some good friends at this job whom I will miss talking to after I leave. that said your point is valid and good friendships only count if they balance out the bullshit, which unfortunately they don't in this case
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 14:35 |
|
Pendragon posted:I'm having to beat [...] recruiters off [...] interesting strategy, pls report back
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 15:20 |
|
for real good luck tho
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 15:20 |
|
newjob trip report +1mo: 30% more money, no late nights, no 24/7 oncall, get to work on cool oss stuff rather than fighting with bad legacy applications, lots more speaking + writing opportunities, 100% remote and not a ton of travel. the futures so bright i gotta wear shades. thanks for the interview tips thrad.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 15:23 |
|
uncurable mlady posted:interesting strategy, pls report back pimp out my hand, or program in javascript... tough call. uncurable mlady posted:for real good luck tho thanks
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 15:38 |
|
Pendragon posted:I'm having to beat LinkedIn recruiters off with a stick.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 18:06 |
|
i know all sillicon valley unicorns are bad and dumb and getting a quarterly equity payments in pre-ipo companies is garbage, but does anyone have any experience with slack? they at least have a product, revenue, and are adapting for the enterprise use cases. they reached out so i think they may be about to adjust their enterprise offering based on what i specialize in, and since the office is in denver and not sv it may not be too hateful an opportunity if it passes the sniff test and offers the opportunity/ducats. someone help me levelset with reality here, ive been a fortune 100+ guy my whole career.
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 19:17 |
|
Turnquiet posted:i know all sillicon valley unicorns are bad and dumb and getting a quarterly equity payments in pre-ipo companies is garbage, but does anyone have any experience with slack? they at least have a product, revenue, and are adapting for the enterprise use cases. they reached out so i think they may be about to adjust their enterprise offering based on what i specialize in, and since the office is in denver and not sv it may not be too hateful an opportunity if it passes the sniff test and offers the opportunity/ducats. someone help me levelset with reality here, ive been a fortune 100+ guy my whole career. slack is big enough to be a real company now instead of a few dudes from California playing office. I say go for it, but continue to value "equity" at ~$0 when considering the offer Denver is pretty good except for the (still better than west coast) skyrocketing rent and godawful traffic e: to be clear I have no knowledge of slack-the-company specific, just that it shouldn't be too rough a transition from gigantocorp - they'll have HR and IT and the usual stuff you'd expect from a real company Arcsech fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Sep 22, 2018 |
# ? Sep 22, 2018 19:32 |
|
agreed slack is a real company but pre-ipo equity is a lottery ticket. if the job looks good id say go for it, worst case is they crash and burn in 2-4 years and you have a hella sweet looking resume entry
|
# ? Sep 22, 2018 22:00 |
i get paid fat stacks to type df = pd.read_csv('somebullshit.csv', low_memory=IDGAF) all day
|
|
# ? Sep 23, 2018 02:44 |
the first line of my grave stone will read "import pandas as pd"
|
|
# ? Sep 23, 2018 02:46 |
|
Turnquiet posted:someone help me levelset with reality here
|
# ? Sep 23, 2018 13:32 |
|
Skim Milk posted:i get paid fat stacks to type df = pd.read_csv('somebullshit.csv', low_memory=IDGAF) all day same op
|
# ? Sep 23, 2018 19:19 |
|
sometimes I have to email someone if it doesn't work because the file is hosed up
|
# ? Sep 23, 2018 19:20 |
|
im a pd.read_csver too and i only work about 32 hours a week but get salary, its the tech industry equivalent of ATM OF EREBUS
|
# ? Sep 23, 2018 19:39 |
|
im more of a \copy table from data.csv with (format csv) kind of guy
|
# ? Sep 24, 2018 18:46 |
|
i have to interview a software engineer. i think im just gonna use that table of "tell me about a time that <blank>" scenarios to generate interview questions until im out of time this one meatpotato posted:think of questions you'll be asked and come up with answers in advance
|
# ? Sep 24, 2018 19:17 |
|
those are good questions but i would add another row. "proud of"
|
# ? Sep 24, 2018 23:17 |
|
|
# ? May 2, 2024 22:36 |
DELETE CASCADE posted:im more of a \copy table from data.csv with (format csv) kind of guy all csv molesters are welcome here, friend
|
|
# ? Sep 25, 2018 01:43 |