|
I think the implementation of the conference system may in fact be the worst administered thing the AFL has ever done
|
# ? Feb 17, 2019 08:33 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 09:59 |
|
Second worst. Carte blanche for north was the worst.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2019 08:59 |
|
I just looked at the ladder, and every single team in one of the conferences has at least two wins, whereas not one single team in the other conference does. Conferences are a joke. I hope the ladder stays more or less as is, highlight what a joke conferences are, and they get removed.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2019 10:10 |
|
NTRabbit posted:Adelaide are 2-1 with 141% and they're going to miss out on the finals by 2 places because of this trash fire conference system It's still in order, Carlton have one win while the Bulldogs have two.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2019 11:45 |
|
Solemn Sloth posted:I think the implementation of the conference system may in fact be the worst administered thing the AFL has ever done hang on now, you havent seen the latest version of aflx yet
|
# ? Feb 17, 2019 13:58 |
|
snaeksikn posted:hang on now, you havent seen the latest version of aflx yet But the AFLW actually means something to some people.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2019 16:47 |
|
Nutsngum posted:But the AFLW actually means something to some people. Hey now, that extra $50k, invested wisely, could be the difference that lets Patrick Dangerfield fund his run as the LNP candidate for Corangamite 5 years after he's retired.
|
# ? Feb 17, 2019 17:45 |
|
NTRabbit posted:Hey now, that extra $50k, invested wisely, could be the difference that lets Patrick Dangerfield fund his run as the LNP candidate for Corangamite 5 years after he's retired. He does have that Nationals vibe about him
|
# ? Feb 17, 2019 22:31 |
|
Can’t wait for him to shut down the old Ford plant again because gently caress renewables
|
# ? Feb 17, 2019 22:33 |
|
Chairchucker posted:I just looked at the ladder, and every single team in one of the conferences has at least two wins, whereas not one single team in the other conference does. Conferences are a joke. I hope the ladder stays more or less as is, highlight what a joke conferences are, and they get removed. Unfortunately, with 14 teams next year and no plans to extend the season, conferences are the only thing that can "work". The problem isn't really conferences as such this year, the problem is that they divided the conferences in literally the worst way possible. And it's not like this was unforseeable. One conference literally contains the last (only) two premiers, a team that just missed out on GF appearances by percentage in both seasons, the new super team that everyone knew was going to be dominant, and Fremantle. Who could have predicted they'd be so dominant, huh? And hey, it turns out Fremantle are great this year. Meanwhile the other conference contains Carlton who barely won a match last season, Collingwood who have been terrible since AFLW started (oh, and both of them have been raided by North), Geelong who are basically trying to start from scratch by drafting kids, GWS who haven't exactly set the world on fire, and Brisbane. Only one of those teams has been any good the past two seasons, Brisbane, and this year they seem to be off the pace. Short of maybe swapping Brisbane and Freo, you couldn't have picked a more uneven conference division based on what we knew before the season started. And it turns out that one "good" choice made things even worse. cmndstab fucked around with this message at 01:24 on Feb 18, 2019 |
# ? Feb 18, 2019 01:21 |
|
Incidentally, have there been any details released about next year's plans for the fixture? If they don't want to extend the season, the obvious way to do things is to have two conferences of 7, and everyone plays each other once. The "fair" thing is to have one bye in each conference each week, so in the end each team plays the other six teams once, but I doubt the AFL wants this. So will it be that each team will get "paired up" with exactly one team from the other conference and play against them one round? In a seven week season, the team that gets paired up with, say, Collingwood is going to have a massive advantage over the team that gets paired up with North Melbourne. It's not like they can divide 14 teams evenly into three or four conferences. I don't really see an alternative to this. Either the teams only play six matches next year instead of seven and we have two byes a week, or we end up with another horribly inequitable situation where finals positions are massively affected by the fixture.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 01:29 |
|
Do it World Cup Draw style. The 14 teams are divvied in to 4/4/3/3 pools with the two '4' pools with the premiers and runners up in them separately. Each pools teams play eachother once along with their other 'conference pairing' (so 4 & 3 make up a conference, two conferences in the league) for 7 matches. (You could mix up the cross conference/divisional play to randomise the schedule) Tops of each pool goes into finals brackets to grand final based on percentage. Shakes it up each year and makes it work until they get 16 so they can just go to a standard ladder system.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 02:04 |
|
I think that would still necessitate two byes a week, right? Even when we have 16 teams, the ladder system won't work unless we have enough rounds. It's one thing that the AFL season has uneven numbers of matches (ie you play some teams twice and other teams once) but at least in that system you do play each team once. I doubt the AFL is going to have a 15 week AFLW season. Frankly, I'm more worried that the AFL is going to cut the comp down to a four week Swiss system tournament once we get to 16 teams. cmndstab fucked around with this message at 02:54 on Feb 18, 2019 |
# ? Feb 18, 2019 02:52 |
|
New ruck for the swans https://twitter.com/sydneyswans/status/1097312842879881218
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 04:14 |
|
How is Coco a unit as a 55~ yo talk show host
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 05:09 |
|
hiddenmovement posted:How is Coco a unit as a 55~ yo talk show host be a celebrity in the US with celebrity trainers and doctors
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 06:02 |
|
Apparently the Hawks new training facility at Dingley is going to cost $135m. http://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-02-18/hawks-set-to-unveil-grand-plan-for-new-dingley-fortress
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 07:44 |
|
Periphery posted:Apparently the Hawks new training facility at Dingley is going to cost $135m. http://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-02-18/hawks-set-to-unveil-grand-plan-for-new-dingley-fortress Running a double loyalty points campaign for their pokies ought to make short work of that
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 07:46 |
|
Fitting it is being built ontop of a landfill site. A few suspensions lined up for AFLW. Two game suspension as an early plea is a big deal. more than a quarter of the season. https://twitter.com/_sjblack/status/1097377363073982464
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 07:57 |
|
Was expecting that for Scheer
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 08:16 |
|
Good to see Michael Christian is just as off his coked up loving mind in the women’s season as the mens
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 11:16 |
|
Periphery posted:Apparently the Hawks new training facility at Dingley is going to cost $135m. http://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-02-18/hawks-set-to-unveil-grand-plan-for-new-dingley-fortress Dingley will be the Hawks "seaford move" but with more horrid odours and at 10 times the price.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 11:24 |
|
Nutsngum posted:Dingley will be the Hawks "seaford move" but with more horrid odours and at 10 times the price. Hopefully the land subsides and puts a bunch of lumps and hollows in their ground, and some big cracks through their shiny new buildings
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 11:29 |
|
gay picnic defence posted:Hopefully the land subsides and swallows the club whole
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 11:32 |
|
They should have built it further south next to the treatment plant to keep the poo and wee theme going
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 11:46 |
|
gay picnic defence posted:Hopefully the land subsides and puts a bunch of lumps and hollows in their ground, and some big cracks through their shiny new buildings Im banking more on a methane buildup and a colossal explosion lighting up the night sky.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 14:06 |
|
NTRabbit posted:Was expecting that for Scheer I get the penalty for sling tackles since they can be dangerous, but drat, there's always such a fine line between a textbook tackle and one that just goes a bit too far The Crows will miss Scheer bigtime next week. Somehow I don't even remember the Tayla Harris incident with Randall. What happened there?
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 16:21 |
|
cmndstab posted:I get the penalty for sling tackles since they can be dangerous, but drat, there's always such a fine line between a textbook tackle and one that just goes a bit too far The Crows will miss Scheer bigtime next week. Having made the exact same mistake, I can confirm for you that Tayla Harris remains a Carlton player, and hit Giants player Pepa Randall
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 16:58 |
|
NTRabbit posted:Having made the exact same mistake, I can confirm for you that Tayla Harris remains a Carlton player, and hit Giants player Pepa Randall Haha, go figure. I was thinking to myself, I don't even remember her getting a touch, or even being in the match at all!
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 17:06 |
|
cmndstab posted:Haha, go figure. I was thinking to myself, I don't even remember her getting a touch, or even being in the match at all! She's so deep in Chelsea's pocket she goes to all our games, not just the Carlton ones
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 17:34 |
|
cmndstab posted:Somehow I don't even remember the Tayla Harris incident with Randall. What happened there? She played the woman, not the ball is the long and short of it. She ran past the ball to apply a bump.
|
# ? Feb 18, 2019 23:41 |
|
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-02-19/new-rules-will-mean-more-hammerings-says-scott Kind of interesting and I was thinking similar things last night with the new kick in rules. Good teams are going to be able to clear that ball from the backline a LOT easier I think which is going to to make kicking behinds a real risk now. I really hope it doesnt result in more pastings of bottom teams, its just not fun for anyone. Honestly I dont think the AFL has really considered the outcomes of these rule changes thoroughly at all.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2019 05:07 |
|
Here's a shock, Livingstone is defending the conferences in the most condescending way possible.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2019 06:18 |
|
Tayla Harris gets off scot free, Tegan Cunningham will probably still miss over a quarter of the season
Solemn Sloth fucked around with this message at 08:29 on Feb 19, 2019 |
# ? Feb 19, 2019 08:27 |
|
https://twitter.com/triplemfooty/status/1097669855413706752
|
# ? Feb 19, 2019 08:39 |
|
Champion Data are smoking mega drugs Putting out stuff like that only makes them look like a joke. You can spin the numbers how you want but if the end result looks like that, then it's pretty obvious you need to change your algorithms
|
# ? Feb 19, 2019 08:51 |
|
Solemn Sloth posted:Tayla Harris gets off scot free, Tegan Cunningham will probably still miss over a quarter of the season Well she was reprimanded, so not scot free as she now has 'demerit points'. I think it was a fair bump given the circumstance. Harris crouched down into the bump to avoid high contact and they'd have had front of collision if she didn't decide to bump. Harris also helped Randall up off the ground right after and made sure she was okay before the free kick against was taken. Randall also got up holding her shoulder, not her head. Was it the correct decision? Who knows with Micheal Christen.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2019 08:56 |
|
snaeksikn posted:Champion Data are smoking mega drugs I dunno, if you accept that it’s purely looking at raw stats and not stuff like coaching, culture and so on it seems ok.
|
# ? Feb 19, 2019 09:11 |
|
gay picnic defence posted:I dunno, if you accept that it’s purely looking at raw stats and not stuff like coaching, culture and so on it seems ok. A lot of it seems pretty far off being reasonable to me Fremantle have the 2nd worst list, Carlton are 1 spot better. Brisbane are the 10th best team, and North are the 8th. The reigning premiers are the 12th best list in the league. There's not really any stats based arguments I can see for any of those occurring. E: Richmond had 8 players in the 40 man AA squad but are worse than Essendon
|
# ? Feb 19, 2019 09:20 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 09:59 |
|
snaeksikn posted:A lot of it seems pretty far off being reasonable to me But that is looking at the performance of the team as a whole rather than the accumulated stats of each player. All the useless stats like pointless sideways kicks and so on are being picked up as well as stats that actually win games. Their analysis is fine, interpreting it to mean best performed team is probably not justified (although the AFL will probably be happy because there's bound to be a bunch of nuffies on facebook and big footy up in arms that their list is not ranked higher)
|
# ? Feb 19, 2019 10:07 |