|
Hiring people you're loving is an extremely bad look.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 03:26 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 12:42 |
|
Yeah, there's a reason it's a disciplinary-worthy offense / ethics violation in basically every company to have a romantic relationship, sexual or otherwise, with a direct subordinate, because it is a complete disruption of the power dynamic. You don't sleep with the people who work for you, plain and simple. Even some of the scummiest companies in the world like Uber eventually figured that poo poo out.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 03:48 |
|
LoL Stephen Miller is getting married to Mike Pence’s personal aide and no one on Earth gives a poo poo, the only reason she resigned was because she knew the revenge porn would be submitted for evidence and people are up in arms because she’s a women and it’s a non-traditional relationship. The “bad look” thing is hot dogshit, what Californian gives a poo poo if she gave her little girlfriend a staff job handing out flyers and making phone calls? This whole “I better set a good example” thing keeps burying dems for literally zero gain. I just feel bad for her, I knew people canvassing for her and she sounded like she cared about her community.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 04:57 |
|
Bust Rodd posted:LoL Stephen Miller is getting married to Mike Pence’s personal aide and no one on Earth gives a poo poo Presumably because Miller and Pence's aide don't have a direct report relationship. Fraternizing within the same organization is one thing. Fraternizing within the same chain of command or reporting structure, different story.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 05:10 |
|
Timby posted:Presumably because Miller and Pence's aide don't have a direct report relationship. Yeah, i'll bet that's it.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 06:15 |
|
Neither is great, but there's a huge difference between loving someone you hired and hiring someone you gently caress. Oh yeah, remember how we all thought trying to impeach the President for loving a 22 year old White House intern was blowing it completely out of proportion? Air Skwirl fucked around with this message at 08:41 on Nov 5, 2019 |
# ? Nov 5, 2019 08:39 |
|
Skwirl posted:Neither is great, but there's a huge difference between loving someone you hired and hiring someone you gently caress. ... not really.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 08:41 |
|
Timby posted:... not really. If the personal relationship predates the professional one there definitely is.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 08:42 |
|
Skwirl posted:If the personal relationship predates the professional one there definitely is. Still the same power dynamic issues exist. Nepotism is just as bad as the latter.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 08:44 |
|
Timby posted:Still the same power dynamic issues exist. Nepotism is just as bad as the latter. You seriously cannot maintain this position when you say three posts up that Stephen Miller being a Chief White House strategist doesn’t conflict with proposing marriage to a White House Aide. That’s ridiculous.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 13:16 |
|
I think most people would also strongly disagree that nepotism is as bad as sexual misconduct.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 16:54 |
|
Bust Rodd posted:You seriously cannot maintain this position when you say three posts up that Stephen Miller being a Chief White House strategist doesn’t conflict with proposing marriage to a White House Aide. That’s ridiculous. You're grossly underestimating, or deliberately misrepresenting, the size and complexity of the White House bureaucracy. She's on the staff of the VP, an entirely different group to him. There is no reason, let alone proof, to think that this woman is not simply exercising her agency. Constantly crying wolf is counter-productive, and does nothing but stop people taking you seriously.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 17:44 |
|
Papercut posted:I think most people would also strongly disagree that nepotism is as bad as sexual misconduct. Yeah and also this current Administration is literally wall-to-wall nepotism as well. Jared Kushner’s resume literally begins with “my dad did similar crimes to the President” and ends with “I smash the president’s daughter” and he’s a senior aide to the POTUS.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 19:50 |
|
The Republicans figured out that if they just do a bad thing and power through it that there aren't any real consequences. It doesn't necessarily mean that the Democrats/the left shouldn't still try to hold themselves to a higher standard. Even if the Katie Hill case is on the lower end of the scale.
|
# ? Nov 5, 2019 21:20 |
|
Somebody finally asked the writers of the Weinstein-produced Scream 3 for the record if they had any idea how prescient they were being about that film's premise (the whole plot is set into motion by a rapist film producer and in general is based around the sleazy behind-the-scenes Hollywood industry rape culture - even the killer is named after Roman Polanski). Their answer; not really. quote:Twisting itself around this convoluted narrative is the fact that Harvey Weinstein executive-produced the movie and appears to have been fine with his brother, Bob, who tended to be the one most involved with Dimension productions, bringing a horror film with this very telling storyline into theaters. Kruger says that while Weinstein never explicitly came up as a source of inspiration during the film’s creation, that kind of imperious disregard was a major point of reference for Scream 3’s John Milton. quote:Lussier remembered that the Milton character’s “reckless approach to innocence” was very much in line with how Wes Craven saw the industry in general. “In Wes’ mind, this was very much how this city works,” he said. “We will eat into our young. Things that you thought you could get away with because you live in a protected climate of power and money.” quote:What about the final bloodbath of retribution, where the big-shot producer and predator has his throat slit in his own lavish home screening room? When I asked Kruger if there were critical executive or studio notes on the Milton character, or what happens to him, his answer was a flat “Nope. Everyone liked that plot.” https://slate.com/culture/2019/10/scream-3-harvey-weinstein-producer-character.amp The article doesn't mention that Rose McGowan, one of Weinstein's most ardent and public accusers, was one of the stars of Scream, which makes the whole thing even more curious.
|
# ? Nov 6, 2019 13:41 |
|
I mean it's like making movies about pedophile priests in 1960
|
# ? Nov 6, 2019 13:46 |
|
Uncle Jesse nooooooo https://twitter.com/jennyenicholson/status/1191841889042829312?s=21 Read this thread it’s pretty good IMO EDIT: Jesus Jon What the gently caress https://twitter.com/jennyenicholson/status/1191956174993797121?s=21 Bust Rodd fucked around with this message at 15:14 on Nov 6, 2019 |
# ? Nov 6, 2019 15:12 |
|
Ah the old revenge of the nerds rape hijinx
|
# ? Nov 6, 2019 15:45 |
|
https://twitter.com/independent/status/1192482434367008769?s=21
|
# ? Nov 7, 2019 21:58 |
|
Woody’s starting to look a little like Oldman in Hannibal.
|
# ? Nov 7, 2019 22:15 |
|
Seriously, why the gently caress do all these people defend woody allen? What's he got on them?
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 00:13 |
|
Roles
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 00:36 |
|
https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts...cancel-culture/ Journalist and former TV personality Mark Halperin's comeback tour out of the sex pest dungeon is not going well. quote:The new book by former NBC senior political analyst Mark Halperin, “How to Beat Trump,” sold just 502 copies in its first week — and his publisher is blaming “cancel culture.”
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 01:01 |
|
Snowman_McK posted:Seriously, why the gently caress do all these people defend woody allen? What's he got on them? My stomach always drops a little with these kinds of stories because it often comes off like trying to get out ahead of a narrative. Hopefully Goldblum has nothing to get out in front of, and I'm not implying that he does, but... blech.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 01:18 |
|
Tart Kitty posted:My stomach always drops a little with these kinds of stories because it often comes off like trying to get out ahead of a narrative. Hopefully Goldblum has nothing to get out in front of, and I'm not implying that he does, but... blech. No, he's just...tactile CelticPredator posted:Roles That's not something Jeff Goldblum is short of.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 01:43 |
|
Tart Kitty posted:My stomach always drops a little with these kinds of stories because it often comes off like trying to get out ahead of a narrative. Hopefully Goldblum has nothing to get out in front of, and I'm not implying that he does, but... blech. Jeff Goldblum being a sex pest has been widely rumored for a long time now.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 01:50 |
|
CelticPredator posted:Roles Yeah, but no one watches Woody Allen films and it looks like his latest won't even be seeing the light of day. What purpose is a role if no one sees it preformed?
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 02:07 |
|
They know which side of the class war they're on and they stick together.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 02:29 |
|
Boomer legacy
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 02:36 |
|
LIVE AMMO COSPLAY posted:They know which side of the class war they're on and they stick together. I get this in general, but Woody Allen's cultural invincibility is really distinctly noticeable even by those standards.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 02:45 |
|
I don't get why anyone would want to watch a Woody Allen movie. They're all just him working out his neuroses on screen.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 02:47 |
|
SimonCat posted:I don't get why anyone would want to watch a Woody Allen movie. They're all just him working out his neuroses on screen. Once upon a time that was considered novel. Now we all have twitter and do the same thing on a microlevel a million times a day.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 03:11 |
Tuxedo Catfish posted:I get this in general, but Woody Allen's cultural invincibility is really distinctly noticeable even by those standards. Speculation, but I believe he absolutely, 100% has dirt in bigger names than him and probably has made it clear that he'll go scorched earth if people actually tried to ruin him.
|
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 03:24 |
|
I could see Allen as a smaller Epstein, definitely.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 03:27 |
|
SimonCat posted:I don't get why anyone would want to watch a Woody Allen movie. They're all just him working out his neuroses on screen. I mean "director working out their neuroses on screen" is what a vast majority of movies are to be fair.
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 04:01 |
|
Tart Kitty posted:Once upon a time that was considered novel. Now we all have twitter and do the same thing on a microlevel a million times a day. Cept when a middle aged man lays out his horny on the table now it’s not seen as cute
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 04:18 |
|
SimonCat posted:I don't get why anyone would want to watch a Woody Allen movie. They're all just him working out his neuroses on screen. they were objectively innovative for the American mediascape and the classics featured groundbreaking photography from Gordon Willis. I'm glad I'm not a historian who has to sift through their implications in a contemporary context because it's pretty difficult to gloss over their impact on filmmakers on a global scale
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 18:24 |
|
Anchor says Buckingham Palace pressure killed ABC's story on Epstein https://news.yahoo.com/abc-news-jeffrey-epstein-amy-robach-buckingham-palace-173025977.html Brit actress reveals Jeffrey Epstein would 'shake' with excitement before raping her https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/us-news/brit-actress-reveals-jeffrey-epstein-20135242 Nearly 800 accuse Boy Scouts of failing to protect them from sex abuse as new lawsuit is filed https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/teachers-doctors-small-town-mayor-003955442.html Michigan Pulls $600 Million From Ken Fisher After Lewd Remarks https://finance.yahoo.com/news/michigan-pulls-600-million-ken-225848914.html
|
# ? Nov 8, 2019 21:43 |
|
https://twitter.com/DEADLINE/status/1192952079498612736 drat i guess polansky gonna have to flee to Russia
|
# ? Nov 9, 2019 06:47 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 12:42 |
|
Statute of limitations in France is like 5 days tho
|
# ? Nov 9, 2019 06:58 |