|
https://twitter.com/matthewjdowd/status/1217118920991264768
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 22:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 05:26 |
|
|
So Obama is an even bigger sexist for actually defeating Hillary and then becoming president. For 8 years no less.
|
|
#
?
Jan 14, 2020 23:08
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 01:09
|
|
|
now presenting your candidate for us president sarah palin. well it’s sexist not to vote for her so I hate that the alt right ruined the phrase because this poo poo is virtual signaling to the extreme
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 02:14
|
|
|
that's like the one phrase the alt-right uses that they didn't ruin, because nobody else ever used it and it's basically incoherent outside of their specific value set like anyone else looking at this would probably determine that the problem here isn't that this guy is "signaling virtue" it's that this pampered bald gently caress has appointed himself the Lorax of womankind in order to launder his self-serving regressive positions through a more marginalized and sympathetic third party
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 03:36
|
|
|
Shalebridge Cradle posted:So Obama is an even bigger sexist for actually defeating Hillary and then becoming president. For 8 years no less. thanks obama one of the few good things he did
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 03:40
|
|
|
obama beat a white woman and I did nothing
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 05:18
|
|
|
A Wizard of Goatse posted:that's like the one phrase the alt-right uses that they didn't ruin, because nobody else ever used it and it's basically incoherent outside of their specific value set The original, quite probably first, usage was describing corporate advertising that describes their "values" or tells you about the pittance they raised for charity or mentioning the amount of green energy they use. It was absolutely captured by assholes
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 13:40
|
|
|
got any sevens posted:thanks obama I dunno, Clinton beating McCain, or losing to him, might have been overall preferable. Its not like Obama accomplished much, and pushing back "first black president" 10-12 years could've been a net positive. Obama himself has has said he thinks his presidency might have come too early. Another decade of letting the pre-civil rights generations die off and i bet there would've been less visceral backlash (Trump).
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 17:23
|
|
|
One More Fat Nerd posted:I dunno, Clinton beating McCain, or losing to him, might have been overall preferable. Its not like Obama accomplished much, and pushing back "first black president" 10-12 years could've been a net positive. Obama himself has has said he thinks his presidency might have come too early. Another decade of letting the pre-civil rights generations die off and i bet there would've been less visceral backlash (Trump). I don't buy that for a minute. The problem is structural, not demographic.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 17:27
|
|
|
One More Fat Nerd posted:I dunno, Clinton beating McCain, or losing to him, might have been overall preferable. Its not like Obama accomplished much, and pushing back "first black president" 10-12 years could've been a net positive. Obama himself has has said he thinks his presidency might have come too early. Another decade of letting the pre-civil rights generations die off and i bet there would've been less visceral backlash (Trump). having a "right moment" is terminally lib bullshit
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 18:32
|
|
|
One More Fat Nerd posted:I dunno, Clinton beating McCain, or losing to him, might have been overall preferable. Its not like Obama accomplished much, and pushing back "first black president" 10-12 years could've been a net positive. Obama himself has has said he thinks his presidency might have come too early. Another decade of letting the pre-civil rights generations die off and i bet there would've been less visceral backlash (Trump). My presidency came too early! The sun was in my eyes! It wasn't my fault, I swear to God!!!
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 18:34
|
|
|
Obama didn't do poo poo because he didn't want to do poo poo, and assumed the Republicans would continue the status quo in the end of history.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 18:39
|
|
|
p sure that obama was the greatest failure of american democracy for a century or so. but he was black, and thats great
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 18:48
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/TrinityMustache/status/1217187423626510336 Sometimes I wish bernie bros were the rabid monsters everyone thinks they are.
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 20:09
|
|
|
One More Fat Nerd posted:I dunno, Clinton beating McCain, or losing to him, might have been overall preferable. Its not like Obama accomplished much, and pushing back "first black president" 10-12 years could've been a net positive. Obama himself has has said he thinks his presidency might have come too early. Another decade of letting the pre-civil rights generations die off and i bet there would've been less visceral backlash (Trump). You're in the right thread
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 20:46
|
|
|
One More Fat Nerd posted:I dunno, Clinton beating McCain, or losing to him, might have been overall preferable. Its not like Obama accomplished much, and pushing back "first black president" 10-12 years could've been a net positive. Obama himself has has said he thinks his presidency might have come too early. Another decade of letting the pre-civil rights generations die off and i bet there would've been less visceral backlash (Trump). welcome to the Republican party
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 22:14
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Bodyisturd/status/1217545563538894856?s=19
|
|
#
?
Jan 15, 2020 22:16
|
|
|
Koishi Komeiji posted:https://twitter.com/TrinityMustache/status/1217187423626510336 did this ever actually happen cause if it did that owns
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 05:29
|
|
|
Kitfox88 posted:did this ever actually happen yes in that someone created a small debate watch event called "Bern the Witch" on a page anyone could edit, no in the sense that the campaign had nothing to do with it (and images indicating such are forgeries) and the "Hillary at the Stake" image is unrelated, dates from 2017, and has no evidence it actually comes from Clinton opponents vs. Clintonite trolls unsurprisingly David Brock is involved
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 07:03
|
|
|
when you think about it, union organizing is coordinated harassment against the employer. not a good look, tbh
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 09:25
|
|
|
That event was bad because it associates witches, who are good, with Hillary Clinton, who is bad.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 09:46
|
|
|
One More Fat Nerd posted:I dunno, Clinton beating McCain, or losing to him, might have been overall preferable. Its not like Obama accomplished much, and pushing back "first black president" 10-12 years could've been a net positive. Obama himself has has said he thinks his presidency might have come too early. Another decade of letting the pre-civil rights generations die off and i bet there would've been less visceral backlash (Trump). No. I get that you're coming from a good place, but you can never let bigots set the pace of social progress or justice.. Because they will never be ready and there will always be more of them coming along. Forever quoting Letter From Birmingham Jail. quote:I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 13:14
|
|
|
Megillah Gorilla posted:No. That quote should just get the  treatment with how often it gets used on these forums. Same thing with Sartre's Anti-Semite and Jew.
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 13:21
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/kathbarbadoro/status/1217355171757535232
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 13:52
|
|
|
they also thought bernie was a terrible choice for 2020 lmfao loving liberals trying to be cool
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 14:10
|
|
|
Koishi Komeiji posted:https://twitter.com/TrinityMustache/status/1217187423626510336 I don’t know all the new Twitter features so is that person hiding all of the replies that disagree with them? awesome website
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 19:25
|
|
|
Jenny Agutter posted:I don’t know all the new Twitter features so is that person hiding all of the replies that disagree with them? awesome website Yes, but there’s a handy button that shows you all the the ones that have been hidden, so it’s almost like a curated collection of the best replies. Plus you also know that the OP had to interact with each one of those tweets to hide it so it’s the same validation as watching someone crumple a letter or angrily tear a poster off the wall. I thought it was a terrible feature at first but I’m starting to come around
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 19:55
|
|
|
christmas boots posted:Yes, but there’s a handy button that shows you all the the ones that have been hidden, so it’s almost like a curated collection of the best replies. Plus you also know that the OP had to interact with each one of those tweets to hide it so it’s the same validation as watching someone crumple a letter or angrily tear a poster off the wall. I thought it was a terrible feature at first but I’m starting to come around it's a perfect feature to get the sites biggest babies to publicly tell on themselves
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 21:12
|
|
|
Jenny Agutter posted:I don’t know all the new Twitter features so is that person hiding all of the replies that disagree with them? awesome website blocking anyone who disagrees too, which iirc algorithms down the replies
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 21:55
|
|
|
this whole thread reflects a truly amazing lack of self-awareness https://twitter.com/ericacbarnett/status/1217901623562752001 yeah it sure is bad when people weaponize allegations of sexism to suppress criticism of their preferred candidate
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 22:22
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/Andrew_Adonis/status/1217733933393158144?s=20
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 22:34
|
|
|
Barry Convex posted:this whole thread reflects a truly amazing lack of self-awareness B-but I wanna be the victim! When you attack me for attacking trans people you are literally weaponizing reality against me. What about me huh? Did you ever stop and think about that? 
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 22:37
|
|
|
christmas boots posted:Yes, but there’s a handy button that shows you all the the ones that have been hidden, so it’s almost like a curated collection of the best replies. Plus you also know that the OP had to interact with each one of those tweets to hide it so it’s the same validation as watching someone crumple a letter or angrily tear a poster off the wall. I thought it was a terrible feature at first but I’m starting to come around it owns because I replied to that tweet a few hours after she wrote it and she still hid my reply and blocked me which means she was spinning her wheels in that thread for hours loving imagine lol
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 22:42
|
|
|
SpaceGoku posted:it owns because I replied to that tweet a few hours after she wrote it and she still hid my reply and blocked me which means she was spinning her wheels in that thread for hours Seriously. We didn't have these kinds of analytics before. It's fantastic!
|
|
#
?
Jan 16, 2020 23:11
|
|
|
"no biological basis for mental illnesses" holy what https://twitter.com/Labadore64/status/1217824918240481280
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2020 19:46
|
|
|
szasz has some pretty good points, in that what an illness is is fairly arbitrary and we define them from some social purpose - so he has a decent foucaultian narrative going about the pathologisation of previously otherwise handled mental states etc. what an illness actually is is pretty difficult stuff of course, neuropsychology is a Thing which exitsts and is entirely legitimate, there's clear genetic predispositions to stuff like addictions etc so lol of course there's biological bases for mental illnesses the myth of mental illness is one of those texts where i genuinely do think that it's a valuable perspective for mental health professionals, while at the same time being mostly wrong
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2020 19:53
|
|
|
chmods please posted:"no biological basis for mental illnesses" holy what these psyops are getting more sophisticated
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2020 20:01
|
|
|
Hot take: women shouldn't talk about inceldom because it's a male issue. It's the equivalent of a man talking about how periods are gross or c-sections are the best delivery method
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2020 23:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 05:26 |
|
|
O Yeetus posted:Hot take: women shouldn't talk about inceldom because it's a male issue. It's the equivalent of a man talking about how periods are gross or c-sections are the best delivery method wasnt the term incel literally coined by a woman to describe herself
|
|
#
?
Jan 17, 2020 23:10
|
|
