|
uncurable mlady posted:hn posters are extremely dumb
|
# ? Feb 28, 2020 23:37 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 00:11 |
|
uncurable mlady posted:hn posters are extremely dumb jimmaswell 10 hours ago [-] That psychological tricks like this are necessary to make people see that 1+1=2 makes me feel hopeless that humanity can ever reach the level of Star Trek without some kind of genetic engineering or letting AI take over. The vast majority of people are like this, incapable of reasoning through anything, only defending the views they grew up with or that they ascribe to their "tribe" by any means possible, never taking a Planck unit of time to self-reflect. There's some respite on select internet corners but even those have their pockets of crazies. I recently had to regrettably leave a fandom Discord server because a sizable portion of the populace including the admin devolved into screeching banshees with no capacity for rational thought at some /slightly different/ view than they preferred being posted in their politics channel, and I could no longer justify expending any energy trying to engage in a reasonable fashion with these people or supporting a server with such a rotten administration I'd lost all respect for. I wonder if those of us who can consider ideas without throwing ourselves on the floor in a tantrum over the fact someone disagreed with us should just move to another planet then come back and conquer Earth in the five years it would take us to develop the capacity to do so without such people in our way. reply
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 15:36 |
|
dude probably used the hard 'r'
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 16:24 |
|
MononcQc posted:dude probably used the hard 'r'
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 16:35 |
|
nothing says "not throwing a tantrum" like a plan to leave earth with an imagined legion of smart clever people much like yourself, so you can return with the physical force to prove everyone who laughed at you wrong
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 16:40 |
|
josh04 posted:nothing says "not throwing a tantrum" like a plan to leave earth with an imagined legion of smart clever people much like yourself, so you can return with the physical force to prove everyone who laughed at you wrong
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 17:16 |
|
they can demonstrate lifting themselves up by their bootstraps there
|
# ? Feb 29, 2020 19:39 |
|
salisbury shake posted:been a while since i saw a "throw a startup at it" this tone deaf i've started on a react/nodejs spa with communication through websockets, bootstrap with some custom css for branding, i'm thinking maybe two weeks for productionizing, running super lean i've stubbed in some detection code for now, does anyone know what's a good dna sequencer you can call from javascript? code:
|
# ? Mar 1, 2020 00:28 |
|
suffix posted:i've started on a react/nodejs spa with communication through websockets, bootstrap with some custom css for branding, i'm thinking maybe two weeks for productionizing, running super lean looks nice - you just need to cast result to bool and you're good to go
|
# ? Mar 1, 2020 00:35 |
|
good stuff but look into using ES6 async/await
|
# ? Mar 1, 2020 00:44 |
|
fritz posted:jimmaswell 10 hours ago [-] i'm almost wondering if this was the cryptofascist I saw get banned in a place a while back. also protip: politics channels are bad. It's universally either people who agree, circlejerking, or those that don't yelling at eachother.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2020 00:59 |
|
on "Open-source “pandemic ventilator” (instructables.com)"popotamonga posted:Can you actually buy a consumer ventilator? I would see myself paying up to 10k for a ventilator to have at home just in case... mjmdavis posted:Doing this could deprive hundreds of people of a life saving device. anonuser123456 posted:Prices and consumption signal producers the relative importance of a good. Its better for people to drive prices up so suppliers can respond appropriately.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2020 05:53 |
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:beep boop my lust for mass death is entirely rational and untainted by humanity I just became convinced that any GAI that is created will indeed come out as a total monster. I mean can you imagine being raised by and having to talk solely to techbros? christ
|
# ? Mar 1, 2020 07:42 |
|
Imagine watching Star Trek's extremely anti-eugenics, anti-slavery, "let people thrive on their own terms", "work for the common good", "every life has intrinsic value", "respect people's boundaries" message and thinking "yeah, eugenics is good actually, we should enslave earth, gently caress those people because they wouldn't let me encroach on their boundaries" alexandriao fucked around with this message at 07:53 on Mar 1, 2020 |
# ? Mar 1, 2020 07:49 |
|
honestly the way modern star trek is and how far from roddenberry it's come people can draw that conclusion. these people watch DS9 but not TOS and think section 31 is the good guys.
|
# ? Mar 1, 2020 10:27 |
|
Internet Janitor posted:on "Open-source “pandemic ventilator” (instructables.com)" They just want to be in the gulag
|
# ? Mar 1, 2020 13:41 |
|
https://twitter.com/ruinedurnight/status/1234612815786319872
|
# ? Mar 3, 2020 15:55 |
|
lmao
|
# ? Mar 4, 2020 01:17 |
|
Zoomers are all right
|
# ? Mar 4, 2020 01:24 |
|
Malcolm XML posted:Zoomers are all right Give me hope for the future of humanity
|
# ? Mar 4, 2020 01:32 |
|
quote:LinuxBender 1 hour ago [-] The real pros, of course, go Full Lobster in their diet and thus become immune to virus infections.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2020 18:18 |
|
now see if it were me i simply wouldn't get sick in the first place
|
# ? Mar 4, 2020 19:03 |
|
PIZZA.BAT posted:now see if it were me i simply wouldn't get sick in the first place
|
# ? Mar 4, 2020 19:31 |
|
dingribanda posted:In some parts of Africa, growing khat is more lucrative than growing food. This causes acute food shortages. I am not sure how this is going to affect growing food, if cannabis is more lucrative than growing food. Koremat6666 posted:> growing khat is more lucrative than growing food lomarf that people apparently cannot read
|
# ? Mar 4, 2020 21:42 |
|
Nah you just don't understand, you get the food from the free market.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2020 21:55 |
|
It seems you just don’t understand how the market works. When food becomes scarcer, prices go up so farmers produce more and make more money in the process. Then poors become incentivized to not being poor so they can still afford food. Everybody wins, and khat becomes cheaper by comparison.
|
# ? Mar 4, 2020 22:25 |
|
what do you mean the free market isn't a literal physical thing like Boyce thinks the App Store is?
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 00:01 |
|
on autonomous shipping predictmktegirl 3 hours ago [-] With how much money everyone is spending, wouldn't it just be cheaper to build a private cross-country interstate where only AI drivers are allowed. Let humans drive the trucks to this interstate then let the AI take over. It seems like almost all the edge cases would be solved if you just got rid of other human drivers and let the vehicles network with one another. reply
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 06:42 |
|
yeah should unironically be putting more money into trains
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 07:03 |
|
Suspicious Dish posted:predictmktegirl 3 hours ago [-] this takes an incredible amount of subject blindness gee how do we make sure a driver is available for both endpoints on a journey? clearly it's impossible to just, put the driver in the vehicle for the duration of the journey...
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 07:20 |
|
that and a complete unfamiliarity with the high capital costs of private right of way
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 07:25 |
|
lancemantis posted:that and a complete unfamiliarity with the high capital costs of private right of way jesus, yeah. i missed the forest for the trees on this one
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 07:26 |
|
I think this idea could actually work though, we just need to workshop it a bit. *erases the last three letters of "truck", slowly starts to draw "a i n" in their place*
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 08:17 |
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:this takes an incredible amount of subject blindness eh, that bit makes sense. drivers can work locally shuttling cargo to the train, then go home at night instead of living in a truck for a week
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 08:19 |
|
Qwertycoatl posted:eh, that bit makes sense. drivers can work locally shuttling cargo to the train, then go home at night instead of living in a truck for a week except then you have to line up another driver to be available on the other end if you are comfortable lining up local drivers on either end of a long automated link, that's normally called "intermodal transport" and is already available at a very reasonable price from your favorite rail lines it doesn't require any self-driving magic or private right-of-ways ---- self-driving trucks, if they existed (and they never will) would only be a driver-assistance technology to make it easier to survive federal limitations on waking hours
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 08:20 |
|
the hackers are discussing a study on universal basic income that showed people continue to work even if they receive ubi. here's the current third comment from the top: sabarn01 1 minute ago [-] People should fear being destitute its the natural human condition. Learning skills is the only way to make wealth. reply
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 17:40 |
|
truly "tough" to watch csa 20 minutes ago [-] I’m guessing you don’t know many people who were born into wealth. The skill that they must learn is how not to lose the money. This skill is difficult to sustain over more than a generation or two — grandparent earns it, parent might keep it, child usually ends up destitute both in terms of financial capital and social capital. If the “child” in this scenario is lucky, they have some social capital that will save them, and their branch of the family tree is at an inflection point. Seeing a family self-destruct like this is tough to watch and surprisingly common within that class of people. reply a0zU 1 hour ago [-] There are absolutely people who would contribute to society in other ways but there are also people who would not work, not contribute and, sit in their rooms all day not having the will to do anything but debate with strangers on internet forums(lol). In my opinion the problem with UBI is that it would take away the necessity for people to do something to survive and it would make a significant minority of the population miserable because they wouldn't have to do anything but consume. reply ctdonath 2 hours ago [-] Problem is the lack of colloquial objective definition of "poor". The US "poverty line" is at 80th percentile of world incomes. The US's vast welfare/entitlement system ensures few indeed net less than that line, shoring up their shortfall with trillions of $. What constitutes "poor" keeps shifting. There will always be a bottom 10%. There is ongoing increase to the standard of living, instilling a sense of "nobody should go without X" (when X didn't exist not long before, broadband internet being the latest). Affordable housing gets overrun by population growth & attracting mobile opportunity-seekers, living space naturally going to the highest bidder; property taxes being a thing, there is no recognized natural right to real estate. Health care relentlessly advances, new lifesaving care objectively costing a great deal ... vs a public sentiment of a right thereto. We need an objective redefinition of "poor", predicated on a baseline of nutrition, housing floorspace, basic tools (stove, disposal, etc), care (minimum optimistic odds of longevity), information access, etc and an understanding that the baseline cannot be shifted - that those doing better are not poor, that accessibility thereto is largely attainable (whatever the sociopolitical system), and acknowledgement that when/if all are above that line, poverty services are officially out of a job. As it stands, "poor" is a moving target for which a great number of people have a vested interest in covering a consistent, if not growing, population. reply salisbury shake fucked around with this message at 19:52 on Mar 5, 2020 |
# ? Mar 5, 2020 19:36 |
|
being able to mind your own business at home and not starve or become homeless: miserable relying on a minimum wage job which you could lose at any time to not starve or become homeless: liberating
|
# ? Mar 5, 2020 20:47 |
|
Not a post on hacker news, but a post on (Less Wronger) Gwern's blog: Hold on. What's that? Zoom. Enhance uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
|
# ? Mar 6, 2020 21:26 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 00:11 |
|
not exactly surprising that lesswrongers would be bitcoiners
|
# ? Mar 6, 2020 21:47 |