|
I would not work the hours junior lawyers have to work for pretty much any amount of money
|
# ? Sep 28, 2020 22:32 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 04:28 |
|
qirex posted:I would not work the hours junior lawyers have to work for pretty much any amount of money
|
# ? Sep 28, 2020 22:40 |
|
Uptime Sinclair posted:+400-500 no charge hours logged. fucks sake how many industries would collapse if everyone collectively worked to rule? (almost all of them)
|
# ? Sep 28, 2020 22:47 |
|
what's the ratio of billable hours to actual hours worked? because 1500 hours + 500 unpaid hours, while lovely for the unpaid quarter, is just a regular 40 hour work week
|
# ? Sep 28, 2020 23:10 |
|
Sagebrush posted:what's the ratio of billable hours to actual hours worked? because 1500 hours + 500 unpaid hours, while lovely for the unpaid quarter, is just a regular 40 hour work week did you bring in the business or did a more senior lawyer? if you didn’t, you’re kicking 10-20% of your billings on that file to them, before all else is the client an institutional one, like an insurance company, who negotiated a rate cheaper than your normal one in exchange for volume? there’s another 10-20% haircut is the billable activity one that has a firm-wide cap, like no more than one hour to do a pleading no matter how long it actually takes to do competently? or are you providing a flat fee service, or working on contingency? then there’s your own inefficiency (or prudence so you don’t get sued for malpractice), and mandatory continuing legal education, and further study to keep up on developments in particular areas. some big firms mandate public service, pro bono and community associations like sitting on bords all of this constantly changing but it’s pretty much never going to be as good as 1:1 (consistently) but if your hourly rate gets up there it doesn’t have to be. it’s rarely worse than 1:2 (billed:worked) but it can be especially if you’re not able to pick up 0.1s (minimal billable unit) on short emails or w/e once you get up there you can farm out work to juniors with cheaper billing rates and you can take a cut of their billings because you brought in the business. or you can work your own stuff but with more experience you get access to more complicated multi-party stuff that has lots of 0.1 bullshit to do
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 00:03 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:e: looks like trial next year. july 2021. lol that epic sabotoaged the most popular game on the most popular platform in the US just to get kicked off and then sit around with their thumbs up their rear end for a year to see if they get reinstated
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 00:14 |
|
NoneMoreNegative posted:fucks sake how many industries would collapse if everyone collectively worked to rule? (almost all of them)
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 00:22 |
|
FCKGW posted:lol that epic sabotoaged the most popular game on the most popular platform in the US just to get kicked off and then sit around with their thumbs up their rear end for a year to see if they get reinstated lmao pwned
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 00:28 |
|
FCKGW posted:lol that epic sabotoaged the most popular game on the most popular platform in the US just to get kicked off and then sit around with their thumbs up their rear end for a year to see if they get reinstated it’s not the most popular platform for them, in fact it’s the least popular one they don’t control they could’ve pulled this stunt on PlayStation or Xbox but instead only did it on mobile. I wonder why
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 00:30 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:it’s not the most popular platform for them, in fact it’s the least popular one they don’t control I suspect mobile is much more profitable than console however
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 00:37 |
|
for fortnite? I actually doubt it
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 01:05 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:for fortnite? I actually doubt it its real easy to rack up hundreds in iap on ios. enough so that it was worth going to war with apple over 30%.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 01:12 |
|
lol @ av/av reply chain
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 01:13 |
|
Mobile seems like a really crappy platform to play an FPS on
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 05:18 |
|
Maximo Roboto posted:Mobile seems like a really crappy platform to play an FPS on this but honestly any sort of game
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 05:26 |
|
it’s alright for chess
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 05:27 |
|
you must build a boat was good
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 05:27 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:basically what the judge said yes, this app environment which is one of two viable choices and is basically a requirement to participate in society is just like a playstation. this device that will basically be mandatory for everything from flying on a plane to paying for parking is just like an xbox that is used only for games. hmm yes let me text my friends their concert passes from my nintendo switch. not that I'm on epic's side, they're both being assholes. i guess we can just ken watanabe it up while we wait for an eventual judicial ruling after all the appeals that will probably establish a completely asinine precedent that will haunt us forever
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 06:23 |
|
DuckConference posted:judicial ruling that will probably establish a completely asinine precedent that will haunt us forever that is the only thing we can be sure of in all this
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 06:28 |
|
I enjoy using ue34 and satisfcactory is made in ue4 and I dont want epic to have to shut down my enjoyable game because tim cook cant see the wood for his nose
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 08:31 |
|
DuckConference posted:yes, this app environment which is one of two viable choices and is basically a requirement to participate in society is just like a playstation. this device that will basically be mandatory for everything from flying on a plane to paying for parking is just like an xbox that is used only for games. hmm yes let me text my friends their concert passes from my nintendo switch. i don't understand what this post is complaining about. a walled garden for software on a device is not a bad thing. i don't know how anyone can look at the shitshow that is software distribution on android and think "yeah this is what i want for my device."
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 12:57 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:i don't know how anyone can look at the shitshow that is software distribution on android and think "yeah this is what i want for my device." im not sure what kind of proportion the vocal minority make up but there are at least dozens if not bakers dozens of people who want the ability to treat their phone like its their linux machines its not that they want poo poo on their phones, they just want the choice
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 13:17 |
|
they have the choice, they can pick up an android phone at any price point and absolutely go to town
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 13:19 |
|
echinopsis posted:I enjoy using ue34 and satisfcactory is made in ue4 and I dont want epic to have to shut down my enjoyable game because tim cook cant see the wood for his nose sounds like a certain gaming engine holds a monopoly. might have to break that up.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 13:47 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:i don't understand what this post is complaining about. a walled garden for software on a device is not a bad thing. i don't know how anyone can look at the shitshow that is software distribution on android and think "yeah this is what i want for my device." nerds that want to pirate anime
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 15:02 |
|
DuckConference posted:yes, this app environment which is one of two viable choices and is basically a requirement to participate in society is just like a playstation. this device that will basically be mandatory for everything from flying on a plane to paying for parking is just like an xbox that is used only for games. hmm yes let me text my friends their concert passes from my nintendo switch. that means it isn't a monopoly though, its just a product different from competitors that you want
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 15:06 |
|
"buh buh buh i want an android that doesn't suck" and it turns out that isn't an option and maybe there's a reason why apple's platform is appealing after all
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 15:10 |
|
cant they make a game garden in the phone
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 15:15 |
|
idk. i guess there’s plants vs. zombies or w/e
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 15:37 |
|
remember that amazon had their own android App Store that you can install on your phone. it turns out they immediately hosed app developers. but I’m sure epic won’t do that.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 15:38 |
|
https://twitter.com/misutaaurufu/status/1310641195132096512
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 15:45 |
infernal machines posted:they have the choice, they can pick up an android phone at any price point and absolutely go to town except they can't because google has the same IAP payment requirements for the Play Store. almost like there is a duopoly or something Mr. Nice! posted:i don't understand what this post is complaining about. a walled garden for software on a device is not a bad thing. i don't know how anyone can look at the shitshow that is software distribution on android and think "yeah this is what i want for my device." you can have a walled garden without a requirement that every app uses your payment processor for all purchases within the app. here I've come up with a solution that wipes out Epic's "30% isn't fair!" argument. To put your app in the App Store you must choose between: the current setup with free listing and downloads but all payments must go through Apple and the current 30% cut applies; or you are free to use your own payment processor but you must pay for everything Apple has to spend money to do. Apple meets b2b prices too like $500/hr for app review (minimum five hours, updates do not receive a discount), $1/TB for app/update distribution and install, $1k per month per 10k monthly active installs for each of location API access, advertising ID access, FaceID, etc (still subject to user choice to enable or not, default disabled). no free rides and I'm sure Cook can come up with some pricing structure that would will make him and Apple shareholders happy. for small developers the current setup is a great deal, and for something popular that is a fairly small app, handles nearly all of its content delivery by itself, goes off subscription fees, and doesn't try to scape user info from every API imaginable (assuming they curb their addiction to weekly updates to A-B test poo poo) the later could make sense while still making sure Apple gets theirs for maintaining and improving the iOS platform.
|
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 15:49 |
|
Shifty Pony posted:except they can't because google has the same IAP payment requirements for the Play Store. almost like there is a duopoly or something Only if using their App Store, which you don’t have to do. Their complaint even says “but Google makes it too hard for normal people to download and install an APK!”
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 16:06 |
|
Shifty Pony posted:except they can't because google has the same IAP payment requirements for the Play Store. almost like there is a duopoly or something It's easy to install 3rd party app stores on Android, and there's even a tech gorilla trying to make it easier: Amazon.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 16:11 |
|
nice
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 16:29 |
|
didn't epic originally require you to install their own app store to install fortnite?
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 16:36 |
|
Endless Mike posted:didn't epic originally require you to install their own app store to install fortnite? Yes, Fortnite was out of the Play Store for a while on Android, but they went back in.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 16:41 |
|
didnt spotify go “hey its cool if you wanna just subscribe through here, but if you use the website to subscribe we’d appreciate it” its the easiest workaround
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 16:45 |
|
Endless Mike posted:didn't epic originally require you to install their own app store to install fortnite? just like on the pc apparently the epic store is not doing well on pc and most games they're buying exclusivity on are not meeting their guaranteed targets. the rumor was that control only sold about 100k copies on egs and they were guaranteed 150k, steamdb estimates that since the steam launch last month control has sold 100k-200k copies on that platform. nobody likes epic's store platforms
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 16:45 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 04:28 |
|
Archduke Frantz Fanon posted:didnt spotify go “hey its cool if you wanna just subscribe through here, but if you use the website to subscribe we’d appreciate it” Apple forbids even mentioning being able to make a purchase outside of the App Store. no links, not even verbiage saying to “check out the website”. you can see this with apps like Netflix that have no way to subscribe to the service in the app and don’t even tell you how to do it. there’s just a login box and you gotta figure the rest out yourself.
|
# ? Sep 29, 2020 16:57 |