Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
T-man
Aug 22, 2010


Talk shit, get bzzzt.

Erulisse posted:

There is a reason I prefer discussing shows mostly in-universe and/or contained within universe-told borders. isis or palestine are totally different things with their own history.
Marco is depicted as being a force to be reckoned with, a faction with a following and a big one. It's not like he has his policule, a stolen martian cruiser and a few shuttles. So he has a following that is willing to die for him, to commit war crimes in his name and all this because belters are 'being used'? God, capture all the belter production, stop selling to inners and state your terms. But as he went straight to terrorism its either a veil for something else, a warning as you mentioned or just plain simple villain depiction.Wonder if Drummer is planning to correct her 'mistake' at this point :v:

"if i were being exploited i would simply form a union" is some purestrain tviv politicsposting lol

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Erulisse
Feb 12, 2019

A bad poster trying to get better.

gfarrell80 posted:

Correct, the show has already shown what the Inners do to peaceful belters.


Absolutely correct, the analogy isn't perfect by any stretch, but I'll say again: a lot of the principal fire behind Islamic radicalism IS blowback to colonialism. The belt is set up as a place enduring hundreds(?) of years of Inner exploitation:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/nov/24/theobserver

(Parts of Osama's letter to America that ring notes with Marco's speech)


(Marco didn't feel the need to justify civilian casualties, but I left that bit in there)


Well this is a good chunk of info. Thanks. There is some missing info afaik but helps with putting actions into perspective.
My main gripe with Marco's actions is still the uncertainty of his actions. We are not being shown something really important and it feels. Hope it plays out well in true spirit of the show.
Don't want to spoil myself with books.

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Erulisse posted:

Don't want to spoil myself with books.

Yeah I'm not going to post anything but do keep in mind we're only partway through the story. A lot of the stuff you guys are confused about or think doesn't make sense is addressed later.

twistedmentat
Nov 21, 2003

Its my party
and I'll die if
I want to

GABA ghoul posted:

I think the collapse of the Soviet Union is a good comparison. Total collapse of life as people knew it, a decade of hell and then existence as a mid level player.

So Mars will eventually help elect their whipping boy in John Barron Trump?

Azhais
Feb 5, 2007
Switchblade Switcharoo
I'd answer that but everyone hates book spoilers

Sab Sabbington
Sep 18, 2016

In my restless dreams I see that town...

Flagstaff, Arizona

Erulisse posted:

God, capture all the belter production, stop selling to inners and state your terms. But as he went straight to terrorism its either a veil for something else, a warning as you mentioned or just plain simple villain depiction.

The UN/Mars have done absurd amounts of horrible, seriously hosed up, impossible to forget poo poo to the Belters and framing retaliation as Just Terrorism(TM) ain't it. Mass Death on this scale also absolutely ain't it, but given that their previous attempts to figure out any sense of liberation resulted in getting murdered at best taking extreme measures isn't just an understandable reaction, it's expected.

Like, killing potentially billions of people and holding them hostage with a bioweapon is hosed up on a whole level of its own, but when historically a group like the Belters has held very little of the actual power while simultaneously being forced to beg for poo poo like water it's not a huge leap to see how the people following Marcos got where they did. Especially when the whole "If you don't like it just move somewhere else lol" refrain literally isn't an option.

T-man posted:

"if i were being exploited i would simply form a union" is some purestrain tviv politicsposting lol

Was it the Expanse that has Space Pinkertons or am I mixing it up with some other sci fi media because if it is this series between that and Fred Johnson's backstory I think we have a pretty good picture of how the Inners react to Unionization, lmao

Crazycryodude
Aug 15, 2015

Lets get our X tons of Duranium back!

....Is that still a valid thing to jingoistically blow out of proportion?


Pinkwater is a fusion of the Pinkertons and Blackwater, they've been mentioned as corporate hired muscle before. Also yeah Fred Johnson's origin story is "I murdered a bunch of Belters for the crime of going on strike, with full UN sanction" so lol at "just go on strike" as a useful political option

Lamebot
Sep 8, 2005

ロボ顔菌~♡

Sab Sabbington posted:

The UN/Mars have done absurd amounts of horrible, seriously hosed up, impossible to forget poo poo to the Belters and framing retaliation as Just Terrorism(TM) ain't it. Mass Death on this scale also absolutely ain't it, but given that their previous attempts to figure out any sense of liberation resulted in getting murdered at best taking extreme measures isn't just an understandable reaction, it's expected.

Like, killing potentially billions of people and holding them hostage with a bioweapon is hosed up on a whole level of its own, but when historically a group like the Belters has held very little of the actual power while simultaneously being forced to beg for poo poo like water it's not a huge leap to see how the people following Marcos got where they did. Especially when the whole "If you don't like it just move somewhere else lol" refrain literally isn't an option.


Was it the Expanse that has Space Pinkertons or am I mixing it up with some other sci fi media because if it is this series between that and Fred Johnson's backstory I think we have a pretty good picture of how the Inners react to Unionization, lmao

There's multiple pinkerton outfits. Star Helix is the most prominent one we see. There is also Royal Charter Energy but they're more like resource extraction mercs.

T-man
Aug 22, 2010


Talk shit, get bzzzt.

ASCASB

all space cops are space bastards

piL
Sep 20, 2007
(__|\\\\)
Taco Defender

T-man posted:

ASCASB

all space cops are space bastards

I don't know. Bastard, I get--it's a pejorative, but I think Space Bastard sounds kind of cool. I think I wouldn't mind being known as a Space Bastard.

Kazinsal
Dec 13, 2011



piL posted:

I don't know. Bastard, I get--it's a pejorative, but I think Space Bastard sounds kind of cool. I think I wouldn't mind being known as a Space Bastard.

Space Bastard sounds like the name of a little-known anime that aired between 1979 and 1982 and is only available via fansub VHS to this day.

Jakabite
Jul 31, 2010

Lamebot posted:

There's multiple pinkerton outfits. Star Helix is the most prominent one we see. There is also Royal Charter Energy but they're more like resource extraction mercs.

I think RCE is just an energy company, but basically all massive corporations either have a direct line to mercs or, in the case of RCE, just happen to have their own security force anyway because so much of what they do involves needing that. So I wouldn’t say RCE is a security company so much as an energy corp with a security division. I believe Protogen was the same sort of setup in that respect.

Everyone
Sep 6, 2019

by sebmojo

Kazinsal posted:

Space Bastard sounds like the name of a little-known anime that aired between 1979 and 1982 and is only available via fansub VHS to this day.

If somebody could digitize that, I'd watch the gently caress out it.

GigaPeon
Apr 29, 2003

Go, man, go!

Collateral posted:

Like slaves, orgies and vomitariums? No fascism in ancient Rome, nope.

If you leave an arena or stadium you’re a fascist?

How are u
May 19, 2005

by Azathoth
I find Martian society to be pretty compelling and sympathetic in many ways. A society fully dedicated to a single, beautiful vision of creating a paradise from dust and rocks. Everybody works, everybody eats, everybody plays their part.

The opening of the gates really did gently caress everybody who was a true believe in that vision, that's for sure. Both Mars and the belt, utterly hosed. Belter culture and the belt as a civilization is pretty inexorably doomed. Can't compete with 1,300 brand new planets that will be floating trade ships that can fly faster along with warships that can fight harder. But, you know, this kind of thing has happened throughout human history and ultimately that's just the way the cookie crumbles.

etalian
Mar 20, 2006

T-man posted:

ASCASB

all space cops are space bastards

Baron Fuzzlewhack
Sep 22, 2010

ALIVE ENOUGH TO DIE
"My wife, Caty, wanted to start having babies, like all good Martians do..." was all I needed to hear out of Epstein's mouth to tell me what Martian culture is like.

T-man
Aug 22, 2010


Talk shit, get bzzzt.

How are u posted:

I find Martian society to be pretty compelling and sympathetic in many ways. A society fully dedicated to a single, beautiful vision of creating a paradise from dust and rocks. Everybody works, everybody eats, everybody plays their part.

The opening of the gates really did gently caress everybody who was a true believe in that vision, that's for sure. Both Mars and the belt, utterly hosed. Belter culture and the belt as a civilization is pretty inexorably doomed. Can't compete with 1,300 brand new planets that will be floating trade ships that can fly faster along with warships that can fight harder. But, you know, this kind of thing has happened throughout human history and ultimately that's just the way the cookie crumbles.

arbiet macht frei you could say

also i don't get this thread's obsession with belters being ill suited to life in the gates. high Gs do get you places faster, but they are riskier (oops our engine cut on on deceleration *splat*), require stronger and therefore more expensive ships, and aren't all that needed for most things. (not much call to transport live mayflies, and anything really time sensitive isn't gonna work with the weeks+ transit time even at high G). more to the point, would wellwallahs *want* to be in their high G ships, looking at bulkheads for months on end? especially if there's some belter going the right way you can pay to do it for you.

there's also the question of space stations, ship building, and generally taking care of space based assets. plus with so many new asteroid belts, you can just mine your own water and air. belters are probably well suited to becoming Space Traders, and run the resupply of settlers. don't like wellwallahs geting in your biz? move to some other star system, hollow out your own moon, and have your polycule grow ever larger.

Crazycryodude
Aug 15, 2015

Lets get our X tons of Duranium back!

....Is that still a valid thing to jingoistically blow out of proportion?


Putting a few extra structural elements into the spaceframe so your freighter can handle 1g instead of 0.3g is basically nothing compared to the cost of all the rest of the spaceship, and if your engine cuts out you don't smack into the destination any more than you would if your engine failed on a 0.3g burn, you just keep going on your old trajectory until you get it working again. Absolute worst case is you were on final approach and need to use the teakettle thrusters to nudge you off to the side a bit. And the benefits of being able to burn at 1g all day every day instead of 0.3g really add up when you're trying to move tens of billions of people and all the goods they produce/consume/trade across multiple solar systems. One single supply run having a few weeks of travel time knocked off it isn't huge, but multiply that by thousands of ships over decades and the Earther corporations would be idiots not to take the free speed upgrade and get all their cargo where it's going in like half the time. There's an infinite bottomless pool of manpower that can stand up to 1g, and they're all jonesing to get out beyond the gates anyways, finding Earther crews that can move more stuff in less time shouldn't be hard and it's good for the profit margins.

The bottleneck on it is really how many new spaceships can the shipyards churn out, and yeah sure there's some room for Belters there maintaining and working in space infrastructure, but it's not going to support the entire population and even if it could there's plenty of Belters who didn't get a fancy Inya engineering degree or vac welding certification or whatever and are still out in the cold. Not everyone wants to be "one of the good ones" and be some Inya's pet engineer, even Sakai who Bull and Holden so helpfully pointed out was made comfortable by the Earthers and their shipyards just hates them all the more for it.

Crazycryodude fucked around with this message at 21:17 on Jan 3, 2021

Azhais
Feb 5, 2007
Switchblade Switcharoo
Belters are like 100% of the pirates we've seen, they clearly have no issues with space chases, et

They also have a huge advantage in that they still own the navoo which is now a heavily armed space station that is a gateway to the 1300 planets

Crazycryodude
Aug 15, 2015

Lets get our X tons of Duranium back!

....Is that still a valid thing to jingoistically blow out of proportion?


In combat you can strap down in your acceleration couch and hit the juice to deal with the hard burns for a little while, but you can't cruise along juiced up and strapped in for months on end if you're doing a supply run out to the colonies. The payroll and rations savings alone from having your Earther freighter crew get there and back in half the time of a Belter crew is probably worth it to the accountants running the major shipping lines, without even bringing in possible business advantages from faster delivery etc.

Infidelicious
Apr 9, 2013

Do Earth ships even normally do 1G constant burns?


Seems like .3G is pretty normal cruising speed for everyone... Earth isn't explicitly given a strategic mobility advantage vs. Mars when talking about their navies... perhaps there's a fuel efficiency sweet spot.

Crazycryodude
Aug 15, 2015

Lets get our X tons of Duranium back!

....Is that still a valid thing to jingoistically blow out of proportion?


I got bored and did some math (well, I used a calculator that did the math for me), a ~80 AU round trip out to a colony and back (~20 from the Inner Sol System to the Sol Ring, presumably another ~20-ish from the Sol-ish colony system's ring to the Sol-ish colony system's inner system, and back again) can be done in literally half the time burning at 1g instead of 0.3g

Getting your poo poo weeks earlier is probably worth paying the extra shipping fee, and even if it isn't saving a month of rations and payroll and maintenance cycle on every freighter on every trip multiplied over hundreds of freighters and trips has got to be making the accountants at Mao-Kwikowski Mercantile nut all over their spreadsheets. The speed benefits aren't a huge difference when humanity is constrained to cargo routes that are generally less than 10 AU long round-trip (Inner System to Jupiter and back) so there wasn't much need with the way things were, but when you scale up to dozens of AU across multiple systems the difference really shows.

Crazycryodude fucked around with this message at 21:53 on Jan 3, 2021

Phi230
Feb 2, 2016

by Fluffdaddy
In the books Earthers burn at 1g, Mars at ~.5g and Belters at .3g and its more clear that Belters can't handle space chases or pursuits. Alex even remarks on this during the Razorback chase

Gobbeldygook
May 13, 2009
Hates Native American people and tries to justify their genocides.

Put this racist on ignore immediately!
From book two:

quote:

As a junior lieutenant Holden had spent days in scout ships so small that you literally could not bend over to scratch your feet. He’d climbed around between the inner and outer hulls of warships. He’d once been confined to his crash couch for twenty-one days during a fast-burn trip from Luna to Saturn. He never had nightmares of being crushed or being buried alive.
This requires poop tubes to exist in The Expanse.

Wheeee
Mar 11, 2001

When a tree grows, it is soft and pliable. But when it's dry and hard, it dies.

Hardness and strength are death's companions. Flexibility and softness are the embodiment of life.

That which has become hard shall not triumph.

Is there any particular explanation for the lack of automated ships?

Given the power and software capabilities of the computers displayed in the series, it would make sense that drone ships would be heavily utilized given the tremendous advantages offered by removing humans from the equation.

swickles
Aug 21, 2006

I guess that I don't need that though
Now you're just some QB that I used to know

Wheeee posted:

Is there any particular explanation for the lack of automated ships?

Given the power and software capabilities of the computers displayed in the series, it would make sense that drone ships would be heavily utilized given the tremendous advantages offered by removing humans from the equation.

Pirates I would guess. A crew would be more discerning on how/when to act against a priate crew while an AI system would be easy pickings.
Plus I am sure there are a lot of other bureaucratic reasons as well. Computers are probably bad at paperwork/bribes.

Crazycryodude
Aug 15, 2015

Lets get our X tons of Duranium back!

....Is that still a valid thing to jingoistically blow out of proportion?


Light lag on control inputs and needing squishy meat crew on-site to fix the things that break maybe?

The real reason is the authors wanted the books/show to be about humans in space instead of robots in space though, they said that pretty explicitly somewhere to nerds asking why hundreds of millions of Belters even exist to begin with when robot miners with a tiny handful of human minders/technicians would make more sense given the shown computer technology.

Boris Galerkin
Dec 17, 2011

I don't understand why I can't harass people online. Seriously, somebody please explain why I shouldn't be allowed to stalk others on social media!

swickles posted:

Pirates I would guess. A crew would be more discerning on how/when to act against a priate crew while an AI system would be easy pickings.
Plus I am sure there are a lot of other bureaucratic reasons as well. Computers are probably bad at paperwork/bribes.

So give them AI controlled gunship escorts. Hell, why do you even need people on these ships anyway? A cargo container ship could be built to burn at a constant, I dunno, 5g burn and no human crewed pirate fleet is going to catch that.


Which is probably why they don’t have fully automated AI controlled ships because then you get into that kind of sci-fi setting.

E: not related to this topic but how realistic are the space battles we see in the show? Is “target locking” an actual thing? Would 2 ships in combat even get into visual range of each other if missiles exist?

For target lock, I feel like every episode up to the current one made it seem like once you’ve been target locked you’re 100% dead because there’s no escape (if you can’t shoot down the missiles). It felt weird that in this episode the Razorback was target locked and they just somehow escaped.

Boris Galerkin fucked around with this message at 22:29 on Jan 3, 2021

Crazycryodude
Aug 15, 2015

Lets get our X tons of Duranium back!

....Is that still a valid thing to jingoistically blow out of proportion?


If your robot freighter burning at 5g pings off a micrometeroid or has a coolant leak that scrams the reactor or whatever else usually goes wrong and breaks in space you're kinda hosed and out a super expensive robot freighter though. A human crew can just put on a spacesuit and go fix whatever broke, a robot ship is mostly hosed, especially if the thing that broke is the communications system or the computer.

Lamebot
Sep 8, 2005

ロボ顔菌~♡
Why hasn't humanity already disassembled Mercury with Von Neumann machines for a dyson swarm of hematite mirrors? :v: :science:

Lamebot fucked around with this message at 22:42 on Jan 3, 2021

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


Wheeee posted:

Is there any particular explanation for the lack of automated ships?

According to Ty, robots are boring, stories are about people. So, limited automation.

Everyone
Sep 6, 2019

by sebmojo

GigaPeon posted:

If you leave an arena or stadium you’re a fascist?

Maybe if it's for NASCAR?

Crazycryodude
Aug 15, 2015

Lets get our X tons of Duranium back!

....Is that still a valid thing to jingoistically blow out of proportion?


Boris Galerkin posted:

E: not related to this topic but how realistic are the space battles we see in the show? Is “target locking” an actual thing? Would 2 ships in combat even get into visual range of each other if missiles exist?

For target lock, I feel like every episode up to the current one made it seem like once you’ve been target locked you’re 100% dead because there’s no escape (if you can’t shoot down the missiles). It felt weird that in this episode the Razorback was target locked and they just somehow escaped.

Missiles are mostly negated by an effective PD network I think, a single ship's PD cannons can get overwhelmed if you jump it alone but a full fleet with all the PD computers talking to each other and coordinating fire can shoot down an arbitrarily large number of missiles. That's why they put railguns on the capital ships, you skirmish with missiles and maybe get a few lucky hits in, but to really destroy an evenly matched enemy fleet in a reasonable amount of time you need to get in railgun range and start punching holes in their PD network with the big guns. If you have a 10:1 numerical advantage or something you can just drown the other guy under more missiles than their PD can handle but generally torpedoes are expensive and PDC rounds are cheap so the math comes out terrible.

The Razorback didn't manage to escape, the torpedo was a quarter of a second from flying up their tailpipe when Alex dumped the reactor core and the torpedo exploded when it hit the big cloud of plasma. You can dodge one single torpedo like that if you time it just right, but the downside is it leaves you floating dead in space with no power, which isn't useful for warships. Alex is gambling on them thinking the Razorback is a bunch of space junk now, if they put another torpedo into the "wreck" just to be sure he and Bobby are incredibly dead.

swickles
Aug 21, 2006

I guess that I don't need that though
Now you're just some QB that I used to know
Also, even at a 5g burn, you still jave to slow down (presumably at a 5g decel), its on the slow down that pirates would hit. But also yeah at those sustained g burns, space dust becomes a warhead. These ships seem to require a lot of maintenance.

404notfound
Mar 5, 2006

stop staring at me

Crazycryodude posted:

The Razorback didn't manage to escape, the torpedo was a quarter of a second from flying up their tailpipe when Alex dumped the reactor core and the torpedo exploded when it hit the big cloud of plasma. You can dodge one single torpedo like that if you time it just right, but the downside is it leaves you floating dead in space with no power, which isn't useful for warships. Alex is gambling on them thinking the Razorback is a bunch of space junk now, if they put another torpedo into the "wreck" just to be sure he and Bobby are incredibly dead.

On the episode 5 podcast, Ty is saying that you can restart the reactor, so I don't think it's meant to be so much of a death sentence. But the close scrape where the explosion clips the corner of the ship certainly doesn't make things any easier.

BrotherJayne
Nov 28, 2019

Wheeee posted:

Is there any particular explanation for the lack of automated ships?

Given the power and software capabilities of the computers displayed in the series, it would make sense that drone ships would be heavily utilized given the tremendous advantages offered by removing humans from the equation.

Why, is there a shortage of humans?

Chalks
Sep 30, 2009

BrotherJayne posted:

Why, is there a shortage of humans?

They're the weakest part of a ship, limiting its acceleration and manoeuvring as well as requiring a bunch of additional systems and resources. It's a plot device to have humans in all the ships, but in reality removing them would be a pretty high priority.

Crazycryodude
Aug 15, 2015

Lets get our X tons of Duranium back!

....Is that still a valid thing to jingoistically blow out of proportion?


404notfound posted:

On the episode 5 podcast, Ty is saying that you can restart the reactor, so I don't think it's meant to be so much of a death sentence. But the close scrape where the explosion clips the corner of the ship certainly doesn't make things any easier.

You can turn it back on but that takes time and probably is super obvious to people watching, if there's more than one torpedo coming at you all that dumping the core does is ensure you die to the second one before you can power up again. Luckily for our heroes it seems they only had the one torpedo launched at them, I guess the Free Navy/Martian arms dealers/whoever want to save ammo?

Or the second torpedo is gonna annihilate the Razorback in the first 20 seconds of next episode, which would be a hilarious way to get rid of Alex. Bobby would go down too though :(

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

T-man
Aug 22, 2010


Talk shit, get bzzzt.

Crazycryodude posted:

If your robot freighter burning at 5g pings off a micrometeroid or has a coolant leak that scrams the reactor or whatever else usually goes wrong and breaks in space you're kinda hosed and out a super expensive robot freighter though. A human crew can just put on a spacesuit and go fix whatever broke, a robot ship is mostly hosed, especially if the thing that broke is the communications system or the computer.

i mean, unless it pings the air, water, or skulls of your human crew, in which case you're out an even more expensive ship, air, water, and workers. :v putting in a few independent maintenance spiderbots makes more sense than canned monkeys

we're gonna hafta automate most space tasks if we're ever getting off this rock, but it will unfortunately be bad for storytelling if we do.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply