|
https://twitter.com/NotPotBol/status/1392554906192543746
|
#
?
May 13, 2021 20:15
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 13:10 |
|
|
God drat, now THAT is a quark-gluon plasma hot take!
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2021 21:39
|
|
|
This is really weird. Our chapter used to do priorities votes by card at the monthly meeting.
|
|
#
?
May 13, 2021 23:09
|
|
|
Ah yes, the infamous Operation Assorabrab.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 01:53
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/VickerySec/status/1393018036462882816
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 19:36
|
|
|
Big gameshow teaching statistics wrong, as a joke
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 20:11
|
|
|
i love the genre of people who think they're demolishing a mathematical argument by repeatedly asserting that the incorrect intuition that the math falsifies is actually true
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 21:03
|
|
|
Mathematicians HATE him
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:05
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:i love the genre of people who think they're demolishing a mathematical argument by repeatedly asserting that the incorrect intuition that the math falsifies is actually true just proudly shouting to the world about how they don't understand a thing and that they're dumb enough to confidently think otherwise it reminds me of terrence howard's terryology https://twitter.com/terrencehoward/status/925754491881877507
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:19
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:just proudly shouting to the world about how they don't understand a thing and that they're dumb enough to confidently think otherwise I... what on earth? this reads like timecube. is this person mentally ill? e: lol what the gently caress this isn't a rando, this is the guy on Empire, holy guacamole
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:29
|
|
|
World War Mammories posted:I... what on earth? this reads like timecube. is this person mentally ill? https://twitter.com/terrencehoward/status/926045333079117824
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:29
|
|
|
lmao at those terrence howard tweets thank you i sent them to a physicist friend of mine who is struggling to comprehend
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:35
|
|
|
Jose posted:lmao at those terrence howard tweets thank you i sent them to a physicist friend of mine who is struggling to comprehend terrence howard also has a micropenis, if they need more context this isn't a rumor or anything, he did a full-frontal nude scene once
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:56
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:terrence howard also has a micropenis, if they need more context Is his dick bigger or smaller than the amount of grey matter you've dedicated to remembering penis sizes instead of anything else
|
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 22:57
|
|
|
tokin opposition posted:Is his dick bigger or smaller than the amount of grey matter you've dedicated to remembering penis sizes instead of anything else You laugh, but one day his encyclopedic knowledge of celebrity penises will thwart an alien invasion.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 23:00
|
|
|
smaller, but it's also shaped like a penis. it's quite a rare brainial condition that may kill me one day, please show a little respect
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 23:00
|
|
|
Behind every door there's statistically .5 goats so if you kick them all down simultaneously you'll get 1.5 goats for the price of 1 goat.
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 23:06
|
|
|
H.P. Hovercraft posted:terrence howard also has a micropenis, if they need more context So do I come at me
|
|
#
?
May 14, 2021 23:45
|
|
|
paul_soccer12 posted:So do I come at me I don't think you need to worry about anyone coming at, with, for, or around you.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 00:11
|
|
|
lmao cyber security expert with a checkmark https://twitter.com/VickerySec/status/1360812575072481280
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 00:13
|
|
|
Breakfast All Day posted:lmao cyber security expert with a checkmark I'm pretty sure this is one of the dumbest ideas I've ever read
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 00:26
|
|
Breakfast All Day posted:lmao cyber security expert with a checkmark this hurt my brain, which has taken far too much abuse to be this delicate
|
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 02:42
|
|
|
Breakfast All Day posted:lmao cyber security expert with a checkmark This is a description by a crazy person, but is that not what a one‐time pad is? The cyphertext could decrypt to any message of the same length. It just depends on what the key is.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 04:01
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:This is a description by a crazy person, but is that not what a one‐time pad is? Nope. A one-time pad gives you a single correct answer. It does not give you multiple answers, one of which you determine to be correct over time.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 05:25
|
|
|
Hodgepodge posted:i love the genre of people who think they're demolishing a mathematical argument by repeatedly asserting that the incorrect intuition that the math falsifies is actually true Big Bang? There's no air in space, so how could there be sound! Terrence Howard came up in a thread a while ago with his arguments that 1x0 = 1 and all that insanity. I don't even know where to start with someone like that because they're so fundamentally and thoroughly wrong about everything.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 05:26
|
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:Nope. A one-time pad gives you a single correct answer. It does not give you multiple answers, one of which you determine to be correct over time. The correct key gives a single decoding, but if the message has n bits, there are 2n possible keys. Most of them result in complete gibberish, but many of them will be plausible but wrong messages. Without external information, there’s no way to distinguish the correct key from any other. This is possible because the key of a OTP carries as much information as the message itself. It is not possible with most other encryption schemes, where the key is much shorter than the message. They often feature a checksum to explicitly confirm the correct decoding, but even if not, you’ve probably got the right key when the output makes any kind of sense at all.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 05:39
|
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:Nope. A one-time pad gives you a single correct answer. It does not give you multiple answers, one of which you determine to be correct over time. If you wanted to, you could make a one-time pad with multiple keys, then send a message so that recipients with different keys would receive different messages. You'd have to plan them out ahead of time, and it's a terrible idea for anything secure because the whole point of a one-time pad is concealing information by splitting it into two uncrackable halves.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 05:57
|
|
|
Nyy bs lbh ner shpxvat areqf
|
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 08:22
|
|
|
Plausible but wrong 
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 09:17
|
|
|
I stick with the door I originally picked because I’m never wrong bitches
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 13:12
|
|
|
its not easy being a republican let me tell ya https://twitter.com/kvnrogan/status/1393580688495058955
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 16:08
|
|
|
The funny thing with people not getting the Monty Haul problem is there's only 3 doors and you can just model all outcomes to prove it's better to switch. If your intuition was wrong, that's fine; it happens to a lotta good people. But to still not get it after mapping outcomes?
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 17:06
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:The correct key gives a single decoding, but if the message has n bits, there are 2n possible keys. Most of them result in complete gibberish, but many of them will be plausible but wrong messages. Without external information, there’s no way to distinguish the correct key from any other.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 17:20
|
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:Fair. In practice, the decryptors (assuming we're back in the era when this was done by hand) aren't going to be able to traverse the entire keyspace, and the odds of their encountering a message that is meaningful in the target language aren't high. are you or I misunderstanding something completely here? being able to transverse the absolutely 100% entire keyspace is the whole point it’s a 100% uncrackable (no quantum computers backsis, real forever) encryption, if you can ensure the trusted transfer of the key the actual mathematical decryption part is 1000% sure and the actual encryption/decryption math part is comically trivial
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 17:30
|
|
|
like the actual mathematical cipher applied would be entirely for show and could be “ mover every letter move up one”, “do some fancy insane algebra that only the nsa has the funding to do”, or “return 100% unadulterated message”, it wouldn’t matter decryption times have never been an issue with one-time pads and will never be, they are literally unbreakable
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 17:42
|
|
|
Charles Ingalls posted:are you or I misunderstanding something completely here? being able to transverse the absolutely 100% entire keyspace is the whole point I may be misunderstanding Platystemon. I understood Platystemon as saying that with a 2^N keyspace, some keys will generate plaintexts that are readable in some language. That seemed plausible to me. How long it takes to find an incorrect key that generates a readable plaintext is left as an exercise for the reader.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 17:49
|
|
|
Kitfox88 posted:I stick with the door I originally picked because I’m never wrong bitches In 33% of all possible universes this is true. Thus Politifact rates this statement Mostly False.
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 17:59
|
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:I may be misunderstanding Platystemon. I understood Platystemon as saying that with a 2^N keyspace, some keys will generate plaintexts that are readable in some language. That seemed plausible to me. How long it takes to find an incorrect key that generates a readable plaintext is left as an exercise for the reader. the paintexts will potentially will be readable is any possible mathematical permuations and in any language humanity has ever had, it's irrelevant literally any message you can conceive of would be equally likely/unlikely "attack the captiol"/"don't attack the capitol"/"im gay"/"aghsdjahgsdaglsdgf" 100% as likely, as said, provided you trust the key, this encryption is as hard/easy to break as it ever once was and ever will be, if you trust the key, which is just a number of bit as long as the stuff it need to encrypt in plaintext, it's unbreakable, always has been always will be Charles Ingalls has issued a correction as of 18:10 on May 15, 2021 |
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 18:08
|
|
|
Orange Devil posted:In 33% of all possible universes this is true. lol
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 18:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 13:10 |
|
|
so unless you want to encrypt with "love" or something outside the scope of science I'm afraid the holy one unbreakable grail of encryption was discovered and solved at the same instant moment in time
|
|
#
?
May 15, 2021 18:24
|
|