|
Deadbeat Dad posted:I still don't know what you're trying to get at here, explain to me like I'm a child because I'm either dumb or you're just flinging stuff at the wall You claim Sandwolf is both fighting to survive but also being apathetic. You vote saying you don't want a no lunch, then turn around and throw out an OMGUS vote on me. If you can't see how these are similar attitudes then idk
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2024 06:46 |
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:And selective omission! Outstanding! You asked one single question about Kash and provided no context to why you asked about it in any response. Did you think he omitted Kash because him and Kash are scum partners? There's no reason to even bring that up, literally only as a "lol I actually DID bring up Kash in that I asked a question about him!" way instead of there being a legit thing that I missed.. Secondly, I'm on record in saying the lurker callout thing by Sandwolf was dumb anyway, so I don't even care who he omitted or included in there because it was so early.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:26
|
|
|
Eating dinner brb
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:27
|
|
|
Deadbeat Dad posted:You asked one single question about Kash and provided no context to why you asked about it in any response. Did you think he omitted Kash because him and Kash are scum partners? There's no reason to even bring that up, literally only as a "lol I actually DID bring up Kash in that I asked a question about him!" way instead of there being a legit thing that I missed.. Oh ok so you get to decide what is and isn't legit? this entire response from you is extremely defensive, just admit you cast a shrug vote dude
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:28
|
|
|
The only thing worse is Kash jumping from Sand to me when he thinks momentum is changing.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:30
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:You claim Sandwolf is both fighting to survive but also being apathetic. My post was giving reasoning as to why people would lean towards Sandwolf in a deadline that even though is two hours away, needs a majority vote and had some people needing to actually put votes down on players that weren't the 3 top vote leaders at the time. I never said my Sandwolf vote was staying where it was, but again, I said I would vote anybody to avoid a no lunch. My vote on you isn't OMGUS compared to your response to me. I thought your initial thing that I replied to was more aimed at Kash than me anyway (although I'm sure I was grouped in it), I just wanted to explain it to you and thought your post was really bad.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:30
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Oh ok so you get to decide what is and isn't legit? Your tone sounds way more defensive dude ##vote Hum
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:30
|
|
|
##unvote I'm here and reading. Fell asleep drunk last night 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:32
|
|
|
Deadbeat Dad posted:Multiple people have voted and won't be around for deadline. Deadbeat Dad posted:With your vote on Hum he'd b pretty much tied or 1 less than anybody else, don't see why a Hum lynch couldn't happen. Deadbeat Dad posted:My post was giving reasoning as to why people would lean towards Sandwolf in a deadline that even though is two hours away, needs a majority vote and had some people needing to actually put votes down on players that weren't the 3 top vote leaders at the time. I never said my Sandwolf vote was staying where it was, but again, I said I would vote anybody to avoid a no lunch. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:32
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:Your tone sounds way more defensive dude yeah I can't imagine why I would be defensive about this dude trying to cause a no lunch
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:32
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:yeah I can't imagine why I would be defensive about this dude trying to cause a no lunch He's not trying to cause a no lunch mate he's trying to lunch you, key difference there hey
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:34
|
|
|
Bifauxnen posted:He's not trying to cause a no lunch mate he's trying to lunch you, key difference there hey Ah yes after multiple posts never mentioning me (but mentioning several other players) he's miraculously decided I should be the lunch for today
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:35
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:Oh ok so you get to decide what is and isn't legit? I mean you can hold a public vote right now and ask if you questioning Sandwolf early on in the game why he omitted Kash while providing no context or mentioning him after that is a legit criticism on Kash, enough so that you provide 3-4 smaller reads on other players and then vote Kash out of nowhere again. I'll humbly apologize if I'm wrongly de-legitimizing it . Mr. Humalong posted:this entire response from you is extremely defensive, just admit you cast a shrug vote dude I already gave my response about toal which was it being a weak case, feel null on Kash (which I also provided a read on), and said I didn't like Sandwolf's lurker call out and claim but still didn't like any 3 candidates being the top 3 choices. Of course I will vote the guy with more checks against them because my case on RF was not going anywhere. You trying to make me look bad in this only makes sense if I said I wasn't going to move from Sandwolf. Luckily, you came around with some sus poo poo and suddenly there is a candidate that I would like to push more than leaving a vote on Sandwolf, amazing how mafia works!
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:37
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:The only thing worse is Kash jumping from Sand to me when he thinks momentum is changing. I actually unvoted for a bit, putting myself in a tie with the vote leader, and then swapped to you. don't make a fake narrative
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:46
|
|
|
Or it's like Hum wanted me to push my RF case like I'm pushing him or something and thinks it's hypocritical I didn't? That's the vibe I'm getting. I literally said all I had to say about RF but it had no traction today and RF isn't really acknowledging it either or actively responding (which doesn't make me feel great) which makes the traction harder as well. I switched to Sandwolf after only having vote support from Hal without anybody else really commenting on RF too much (I think a few people started to in the last few pages). It just so happened the tone and timing of your post just seemed out of place as well as your history which I had ignored and went back to check because I was looking at other people. You became really defensive out of nowhere, and I'm the first to admit my playstyle is hella defensive which was discussed earlier with the Yami back and forth. AND EVEN WITH ALL OF THIS, I would hop back a Sandwolf vote to avoid a no lunch because he checks off more boxes than the other people with votes on them. Shrug.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:48
|
|
|
Who’s here? Hum, DBD, Inf, Bif, Kash, Moat?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:50
|
|
|
I like Sandy better, but would vote hum if it comes to it.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:50
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Who’s here? Hum, DBD, Inf, Bif, Kash, Moat? Yup still here
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:50
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Who’s here? Hum, DBD, Inf, Bif, Kash, Moat? I am passively reading while D&Ding.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:51
|
|
|
I'm here and I'm trying to process. Still don't like Sandwolf's claim. Don't like Hum's defensiveness. Don't like Kash's reasoning on mark roles. I'd be fine lunching any of the three but it looks like it'll come down to either Sandwolf or Hum.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:52
|
|
|
i'm here i'm just lost
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:52
|
|
|
Kashuno posted:Who’s here? Hum, DBD, Inf, Bif, Kash, Moat? I'm reading and making a big catch-up post.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:52
|
|
|
CirclMastr posted:I'd be fine lunching any of the three but it looks like it'll come down to either Sandwolf or Hum. Disingenuous. Moat is at 3 along with Hum.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:54
|
|
|
I'll be around but I pretty much have all my thoughts out, my fingers hurt!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:56
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:Disingenuous. To clarify: Of the three I mentioned, it looks like it'll come down to either Sandwolf or Hum.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:57
|
|
|
Votecount for Day 1  Sandwolf (4): Retro Futurist, ilmucche, Mr. Humalong (3): Moatillata, Toalpaz, Moatillata (3): CirclMastr, Kashuno (2): Infinitum, Bifauxnen, dmboogie, dmboogie (1): Bifauxnen, Yami Fenrir, Toalpaz (1): Moatillata, Grandicap, Retro Futurist, Yami Fenrir, Grandicap (0): ilmucche, Bifauxnen (0): Yami Fenrir, Kashuno, Infinitum (0): Bifauxnen, Kashuno, Retro Futurist (0): Toalpaz, Deadbeat Dad, CirclMastr (0): Bifauxnen, Hal Incandenza (0): Mr. Humalong, ilmucche (0): Infinitum, Deadbeat Dad (0): Hal Incandenza, Kashuno, Yami Fenrir (0): Bifauxnen, Mr. Humalong, Not Voting (1): InfinitumWith 15 alive, it's 8 votes to execute. The current deadline is April 09th, 2020 at 10 p.m. CDT -- that's in about 1 hour, 1 minute. Deadbeat Dad was MARKED day one! dmboogie was MARKED day one!
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 02:58
|
|
|
rn sand is giving me heavy vibes from the other times ive played with him as town when he had a sizable lunch train on him but i dont think ive ever played with scum sand so not sure how much that matters...
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:01
|
|
|
##vote Humalong Still typing post, but this is where I am currently.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:02
|
|
|
Unlikely to vote a claimed protective role D1
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:02
|
|
|
Oh hey I've caught updmboogie posted:hey infininitum do you have any opinions on literally anything My opinion is that I work long hours, then come home and play video games, and often can't commit as much time to mafia as I previously have in the past. --------------------------------------- Yami Fenrir posted:Because I am Stacey. My role PM makes mention of a sort of doppleganger and, well... I thought that circl was the second stacey. The reason I thought that was because... Dopplegangers are always good and inherently trustworthy. Would be worth looking closer at the Circl + Yami 'pair' later. --------------------------------------- dmboogie posted:wow Tonally I don't like this after joke phase has well and truly ended. That said I can't recall playing with boogie previously, so don't know what their general play style is like. -------------------------------------- Toalpaz posted:really feel like this case was rehearsed in scumchat multiple times. I really don't like this though. There's usually very little collusion in scumdocs, as most players prefer to do their own thing. Alleging that players are using specific keyword phrases strikes me as somebody trying to manufacture discontent rather than actually analysing the content. "Hmmm but you don't know guys" isn't a read, and trying to nudge players towards a conclusion. Would vote Toalpaz as scum. --------------------------------------- Hal Incandenza posted:Out of the current crop I feel ##vote RF Hal Incandenza posted:Haha oh come on Hal immediately agreeing with Toalpaz, then immediately distancing themselves from them. RF wasn't on anybodies radar at this point in the day, so it's a weird timing push. For the record:  ----------------------------------------- Sandwolf posted:I’m a bodyguard, it’s not the most protective role so you’re not losing too much, but like!! Not sure what to make of this claim. As it feels like one step away from just claiming doc, and wanting to hedge their bets and be a bit 'safer' with the claim. Admittedly that's level analysis, and I'd probably err on not lynching a claimed protective role D1 (Until someone can check on them)---------------------------------------- Deadbeat Dad posted:##vote Sandwolf This is lovely reasoning talking themselves into a vote on Sandwolf. "Yeah if you're town and we'd lose a protective roll that'd suck, still.. gonna vote you cause I didn't like the way you're defending yourself" Do Not Like This Post©. Kashuno posted:##vote sandwolf THIS post sucks even harder. ----------------------------------- Not liking the whole slapfight on page 14 with Humalong at the middle (Rather than quoting the whole thing) Thinking Hum comes off looking worse. Mr. Humalong posted:"don't want to cause a no lunch" This is probably the stand out post for me. It's crappy name calling lattttttte in the game.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:04
|
|
|
I'm back and now fat and sassy I would like to see hum or sandwolf die Prefer sandwolf at this point but will switch to hum to avoid a NL
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:06
|
|
|
Humalong is the correct vote. I would vote Sandwolf to avoid a no-lynch, but would prefer we don't lynch a claimed protective role D1.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:08
|
|
|
Moatillata posted:I'm back and now fat and sassy Dude this is pretty much all Moat has posted all day long, why does no one care? Is he jus getting a pass for it? Like I’d disagree with that but everyone just seems to be ignoring them for no loving reason!
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
Infinitum posted:Humalong is the correct vote. I'm under the impression He's not a bodyguard he's 1 shot BP lemme recheck
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
Realistically I'd like to vote off Toalpaz, but it is very much too late in the day for that to happen.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Dude this is pretty much all Moat has posted all day long, why does no one care? Is he jus getting a pass for it? Like I’d disagree with that but everyone just seems to be ignoring them for no loving reason! This is all I post all the time 24/7
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:09
|
|
|
50min until deadline.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:10
|
|
|
Moatillata posted:I'm under the impression He's not a bodyguard he's 1 shot BP lemme recheck I am bodyguard with a 1shot BP
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:10
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Dude this is pretty much all Moat has posted all day long, why does no one care? Is he jus getting a pass for it? Like I’d disagree with that but everyone just seems to be ignoring them for no loving reason! Since you're here what's your flavor?
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 16, 2024 06:46 |
|
|
Moatillata posted:This is all I post all the time Flagrant, come on
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2020 03:10
|
|