Fancy_Lad posted:

The program really should have told you somewhere that you could also find it in Config->General

Skarsnik posted:

SSH tunnel?

You sure it doesn't just need an SSL connection?

And if not, uh, get a better provider?

Skarsnik posted:

well that sounds like a ball ache

You considered just buying a cheap block instead?

The Diddler posted:

Fancy_Lad posted:

It sounds like you may have changed sab to not actually unpack or delete what it downloads (configurable on a per download basis, defaults are in Config->Categories on the processing column), but I wouldn't expect you to see .txt files if this is the case - you would generally have a ton of small archive files (rar, rxx, simply numbered files, or something similar)...

Vykk.Draygo posted:

What do the text files look like? How are they named?

wolrah posted:

That's an obfuscated post, the files with the hexadecimal names are your RARs. The PAR stage should normally figure this out, but sometimes it doesn't for reasons.

Edit: There doesn't seem to be a PAR2 file there so that'll be your problem.

I haven't used SAB in a while but if it was only told to Download and not to Repair/Extract I think it might end up doing this. Or it could just be a broken NZB that doesn't have the PAR files.

wolrah posted:

If you know where the NZB came from, look at its file listing on the indexer and see if it has PAR files included. If it doesn't, it's just a bad NZB and you should go look for a different one (possibly for the same post of the same files even) which does list them.

If it does list them, then something went wrong on your side and if you are sure that it was set to run the full postprocessing then you'll need to dig in to the SAB log files to figure out anything more.

Those logs will contain a lot of file and post names, so as noted above do not post them here.

Vykk.Draygo posted:

I didn't get a chance to see what the files are, but did you try unpacking the main archive file (either .rar or .part01 usually, or something similar) and seeing if it works?

Rooted Vegetable posted:

Their releases are here, including a source download if you wish. Cloning from Github isn't listed as a method.

xtal posted:

Wrong Python version

Make sure the script is invoked with a recent version of Python 3. You may need to execute "python3 myscript.py" instead of relying on the hashbang. If that doesn't work then the system version of Python is also too old.

xtal posted:

If you're using Debian this is probably some crap with update-alternatives. What if you explicitly run "python3.9"?

EL BROMANCE posted:

MKVs will make up the vast majority of releases, and Sonarr should play fine with them.

Rooted Vegetable posted:

That obfuscated filename is normal, Sonarr et al will rename it when importing to your media library. If downloading yourself it's a quick job to rename it manually.

Nitr0 posted:

Dude this isn’t for you. Maybe you should go buy blu rays.

Nitr0 posted:

No u

Every post you’ve made here could have been resolved by just slowing down and searching the solutions and / or not making poo poo so loving complicated and using ur brain.

Your overcomplications of using Debian thru a socks proxy on a rasp Pi while transferring it to 8 hard drives buried in your backyard connected by fibre optics and powered by potato batteries are probably why you can’t handle the simple steps of install program, download nzb, enjoy file.

alexandriao posted:

File access permissions, you need to set a new group, add sonarr's user to it (and whoever else you want) then change the group of the root nzb folder

then you can do `chmod +s nzbfolder` to make sure any new files and directories inherit from that :P

edit: this is basical linux system stuff, please go look up a tutorial on groups and perms!! I used to have the same problem lmao and I only learned about the s flag to chmod while searching out how to not manually set that every drat time

Rooted Vegetable posted:

In plain terms, what is running where?

Matt Zerella posted:

If I can make a suggestion here, move your download mechanisms to your windows machine and your automations stay on the PI.

I'd also recommend dockerizing them so you don't have to deal with system dependency bullshit. Don't let sonarr radarr managed the files, let NZBget do it on the windows box.

You've got a complicated setup here and it's kind of scotch taped together (not your fault!).

Simplify. Wherever you want your downloads to end up is where your downloader should be.

Ideally you'd run everything on a Linux host dockerized and keep your system clean. Maybe you have an old machine you can set up for this?

Rooted Vegetable posted:

In your Sonarr configuration, have you entered details about your NZBGet instance, such as it's IP, u/p, download folder etc.

wolrah posted:

Sorry if I missed it, but why WebDAV of all things? I can't imagine that being anything but horrible for any use that isn't transferring complete files over an internet connection.

It may not be related to your problem, but it is going to drastically limit how many people are capable of helping you work with it.

If there is not some really weird requirement in play you should definitely use Samba for local network shares being accessed by Windows machines.

xtal posted:

You can use many protocols to connect remote drives, the ones that are better than WebDAV are Samba, NFS and maybe even SSHFS. The process of mounting a Samba drive is very similar to a WebDAV one but with a better protocol.

https://www.redhat.com/sysadmin/samba-windows-linux

Specifically, look at the sections about hosting a Linux share and accessing it from a Windows client with a drive mapping. I don't know if this will fix any problems you're having but it's definitely possible the webdav connection has some problems, the drive having 8 EB of space is also an indicator.

Rooted Vegetable posted:

Can't help you here. You're also now mixing mountain duck into the mix as well

My suggestion, like others have said, is to start with a typical configuration on a single machine and get it working. Once you understand it better you'll can try abstracting between machines (if you must, I also don't see a good reason too).

Nitr0 posted:

I’m chill as ice water buddy