|
Is "Scrools" a typo or not? my signup is 100% dependent on this question
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2015 01:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 00:03 |
|
|
I "beat" Skyrim. That's my story. Confirmed.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 16, 2015 22:14
|
|
|
##vote Rarity I agree with Ecco. At first I though, too dumb to be scum, then I remembered that's not a thing. Feels like it came from a place of forced confusion. I also think Ecco and Chili are both fairly town (Hi Chili!)
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 08:37
|
|
|
What is the case on Chili? It looks like various newbs are jumping on him for something that I genuinely am unaware of. Someone whanna clarify for me? Pig, what's with the sudden burst of goofiness? It felt like you were kinda playing the game and then stopped to jump back into old Pig style posting. Also, rarity trying to present her own meta is massively scummy to me.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 22:05
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:I don't know about that, prove it. You called out a couple things you had opinions on (such as my post being scummy)
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 22:36
|
|
|
Asiina is kinda pinging my gut too, Asiina posted:Ecco your case is really, really reaching into setup spec. I am absolutely not buying it. Asiina posted:I feel like fake claims are pretty standard issue these days, so I dunno. Not really feeling that as a scum slip either. These feel like they were not written from the same mindset.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 23:49
|
|
|
Asiina posted:How so? Feels like they weren't written by the same person imo, which makes me think neither is how you really feel. Like I said, mostly gut.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 23:57
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:It's possible, but, if it is then she's town who looked at the warnings in the OP ("your flavor could get you killed, don't claim it!"), and looked at us talking about it in the pre-game ("oh that's interesting we better not do that!"), and said "you know what? I'll do it anyway, to heck with it." I agree with this.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2015 23:57
|
|
|
Rarity posted:So I could set up a joke. I didn't read the OP that closely. Neither did I but I still knew that flavor is tied to role. And I can't imagine you didn't even google Hadvar on Skyrim wiki before bursting in here shouting your name from the rafters.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 00:08
|
|
|
Glockenapfel posted:Because who's stupid enough to throw out a not-town flavor claim? ..what
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 04:09
|
|
|
Glockenapfel posted:I'm not saying Rarity's not lying This is my equivalent of someone saying "disingenuous."
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 05:55
|
|
|
Abyssal Squid posted:So has the case on Rarity moved beyond "she said a thing, it's possible she wasn't being truthful so let's squint at it really hard and maybe we can figure out if it's a lie without any other context" yet? Other than CPig, who's offering the very helpful "she's scum." Have you not been reading or did you genuinely miss the case on Rarity?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 08:53
|
|
|
Byers I think you're barking up the wrong tree, too :/
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
Also I think I want to vote Asiina more than Rarity rn
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 18:21
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Your case is literally that she claimed her fakeclaim. I have no idea how to determine whether Hadvar is a real or a fake claim. No it isn't.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 18:42
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:I guess the only good thing to come from this pointless discussion is that I'm pretty sure Byers is town, because scum wouldn't go ham with something so limp on Day 1. Newbie tip: scum can and will do anything. Never assume something is too outlandish/obvious/dumb to be scum.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 18:43
|
|
|
How does any of that make him scum, Chili
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 19:32
|
|
|
Chili seems really earnest and genuine, so I don't think he's scum. It feels a bit forced but I think that's just because this is his first game in a while and he seems really excited to play, almost trying to speed the game up in the process (I.e. Validate a gut call on Pope)
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 19:54
|
|
|
Chili posted:Who told me that Cpig has gotten better? He seems to have regressed literally for this game only.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 19:59
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:Hypothesis. Byers is making a dumb case and trying to goad me into posting about it at length because he wants us to ignore him. He wants us to know he's posting, but by tunneling on a dumb case, he wants us to not pay any attention to him. I'll give you possible, but likely? I dunno. If he doesn't let off this tunnel-vision it's going to look scummier and scummier, and I doubt he's willing to commit that hard to white noise posting when usually he's pretty good at this game. I think he's just stuck in one of those "gotchas" where only you see it. It happens to just about everyone in mafia.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:01
|
|
|
Honestly, both of you shut the gently caress up. This is the least productive conversation I've ever had to read. Everyone in this loving thread has probably made their mind up about this whole issue and neither of you are on the chopping block so let it go and let's MOVE ON.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:09
|
|
|
Chili posted:To what exactly? MOVE ON TO LITERALLY ANYTHING - I'm tired of reading the same thing over and over again. If you all really whanna let Byers and Ecco slap fight for the rest of the day, go for it. But I don't think either of them are particularly scummy and it gives actual scum a chance to hide in plain sight because they don't have to say anything when BYERS AND ECCO: TALE OF TWO DUMMIES is the focal point of this whole day.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:14
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:It's a subtle difference but I assure you it is an important one. I have noticed but I also think it's very unconvincing. Your point about how he's not engaging others calling his argument crap is a good one, but it's also a symptom of TUNNEL-VISION.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:15
|
|
|
Chili posted:Why are you responding to the people you are telling to shut up? Sandwolf: Honestly, does no one read my loving posts unless they're caustic and full of swears?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:18
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:Yeah but: It doesn't make him town, but it doesn't make him scum either. Meaning, to me, this whole diatribe is 🗿inconclusive🗿
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:20
|
|
|
Chili posted:Yes. Cool thanks, awesome! Really appreciate it, I'll just go gently caress myself now.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
Chili posted:Now where did this bit of saltiness come from? I'm just fed up with being loving ignored by everyone in a community I felt apart of. Nothing personal, sorry.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:24
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I think he's playing like poo poo but I haven't played with him enough to know if it's lazy scum or lazy town. Meta is kind of important to read CPig because he's all over the loving place.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:25
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:Everyone who votes for me on D1 is scum, its a proven fact. Like if anyone else said this, I'd prolly vote them. But I know it could mean literally anything. I think Rarity is very likely scum and I think Asiina is scum. I think Ecco and Chili are town. If you read my posts I've already said these loving things.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:27
|
|
|
Please ignore my mini-meltdown and focus on the game-related posts tia
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:28
|
|
|
Chili posted:Yes. I see that you said them. If people aren't listening you need to say it again, and in a different way. It's not like you put down some big grandiose case I didn't put down a grandiose case because not every case needs to be grandiose and furthermore, it's hard to make a D1 damning case. Instead, I'm posting my feelings as they come, if someone feels scummy I say so and vice versa.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:37
|
|
|
Byers2142 posted:Sandwolf, not sure if you saw this; it was a small question among a bunch of rapidfire posts. I did I just literally didn't remember anything he said and I'm on my phone so post histories are a bit harder to tackle.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:37
|
|
|
Chili posted:Sure, but can you get mad at us for not remembering those things when: I wrote a response and then deleted it because I agree I don't think this is headed anywhere constructive unless someone thinks I'm scum.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 20:56
|
|
|
Abyssal Squid posted:The case on Rarity is so weak that I think between you, Chili, and Ecco there's probably one scum from each team and one town. I really doubt that two scum from the same team would put themselves so far out there together though. ....WHAT
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 21:19
|
|
|
I will vote Asiina but I will also advocate for the lynch of any newbie lurkers because if they're lurking now they're not gonna learn to post later in the game.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 21:44
|
|
|
#vote Asiina
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 22:02
|
|
|
Epsilon Plus posted:I'm not feeling Asiina. Just gave her a reread; still think Chili is the choice for a dragon-free Skyrim or whatever the gently caress we're supposed to be getting up to here. There's something really insidious about this post..
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 22:03
|
|
|
ahahahahaha
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 22:04
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:Reminder that this is the sum total of Rarity's contributions to the game so far: What I think is especially telling is that she disappeared once it became Ecco v. Byers instead of having any real focus be on her.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 22:15
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 00:03 |
|
|
Asiina posted:I think it might be coordinated. Why wouldn't that make sense? I dropped it because I didn't think it was constructive and didn't want to make the content leading up to hammer me and Chili arguing about semantics.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2015 22:43
|
|