|
Don't be a drama queen. ##vote pmach artificial af aggressive non-engagement
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 16:11 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 00:24 |
|
Tremendous Taste posted:Action Bronson has had a pretty good year. Aside from his continuing youtube cooking/eating series with Vice, his first major label album, Mr. Wonderful, was released to decent sales and positive critical reception. I'd hardly consider it his best work, but it's a nice milestone for a guy who's only been rapping seriously for half a decade. A former gourmet chef and continual libertine, his lyrics revolve around real and imagined day-to-day adventures in drugs, sex, and cuisine.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 16:18 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Don't be a drama queen. I'd rather have that on d1 than five pages of arguing about confirmation post vt claims.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 20:41 |
|
Taste, does it matter how long it is? I don't know how much I can really talk about weed.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 20:47 |
|
Quality over quantity
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 20:48 |
|
Preface: I re-read the thread quoting posts that pinged me as I went along, then I determined who I would vote based upon plurality of pinging posts or a lack of quality posts. I have a few cases inbound. My first and largest is against Captain Foo. Captain Foo Captain Foo posted:hahahahaha voting someone for an early case, calling anything at all going hard Captain Foo posted:imo i find people jumping on early d1 vt claims scummier than actually doing it, but doing it in the first place is white noise at best Captain Foo posted:pizzapie seems fine2me so far Captain Foo posted:because you're trying to dictate how people think about a certain case by providing logic that can't be determined from the thread, and only exists in your head. Captain Foo posted:it's a miserable pile of shitposts Captain Foo posted:this is a piss bad vote and also contains what seems to be an attempt to distract from real discussion, along w/ the surrounding posts
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 21:28 |
|
Hal IncandenzaHal Incandenza posted:Yeah this is the way to go ##vote Ghostly Gangsta
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 21:31 |
|
Pinterest Mom This isn't a case against you, instead I think you're looking at the statement in Roydrowsy's argument in a weird way. Roydrowsy's second point that you quoted wasn't at all weird. It's a valid point, what does G PP gain by taking credit for getting the game started, regardless of who goaded who. It's pointless and only serves to fluff his own ego. How does it make him more credible as a player in this game? Wouldn't scum, playing a game also want the game to go?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 21:33 |
|
GIUSSEPPE PIZZAPIEGUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Bad post, compadre. You're completely riding on the back of things other people said and did the classic faux +1 to content thing that scum tend to do. You're also framing this argument from an emotional perspective, basically saying without saying it that you find my mannerisms irritating rather than finding me scummy. GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Certainty about what? That I am town? I can post my PM if you want, haha. If you did, and weren't modkilled, wouldn't we also know that you're a liar?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 21:34 |
|
I forgot to vote. ##vote Captain Foo I'm not scum y'all. I'm just a young MC coming up in the game.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 21:35 |
|
None of those are cases. They are you asking a lot of questions directed at specific people. In the case of Foo, it boils down to the fact that he isn't voting me for being mad at Pmom (I will direct you to the fact, again, that I never voted for Pint) and for stifling content. You also seem to blame me for the latter. With Hal, you just called him a lurker. I'm pretty confident he's scum.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:07 |
|
Also, get your stuff in for the contest guys, I submitted mine.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:10 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Also, get your stuff in for the contest guys, I submitted mine. same
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:23 |
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:Preface: okay let's address points here: first and foremost i will admit it's easier to poke holes in other people's posts than build strong cases yourself and i might be a little cavalier about doing it HOWEVUH this is the definition of cherrypicking. you emphasize that i'm providing a limited amount of content, casing, or votes while quoting all things you find scummy. the problem here is that you're letting my posting style dictate your feel towards me; i post a lot of one-thought posts. if you don't like my style that's gonna make me look really bad in your eyes without actually being scummy very much at all. basically your premise lead you to a predetermined conclusion
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:29 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:None of those are cases. They are you asking a lot of questions directed at specific people. In the case of Foo, it boils down to the fact that he isn't voting me for being mad at Pmom (I will direct you to the fact, again, that I never voted for Pint) and for stifling content. You also seem to blame me for the latter. With Hal, you just called him a lurker. There are a lot of questions there, but some are rhetorical statements. There is a section that definitely details why I think Foo's posts are bad, but you fail to actually cite it hoping that people will instead defer to your succinct, innacurate summary. The case for Foo boils down that he hasn't actually contributed to the content value of this game and instead has done a good job dismantling other peoples opinions, not just mine. Also I'm not blaming you for anything or trying to blame you at all. That actually confused me a good deal. I stated that I found your early jumping on P Mom to be scummy. I don't care if you actually voted them, and to make the fuss you did without placing a vote is still suspicious. Hal isn't lurking. He's just making real brief poo poo posts, but clearly following the game.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:29 |
|
it seems like you're deliberately not reading my explanation as to how bottle's attempt at persuasion was scummy; i went into it in pretty good detail and you instead glossed it over with 'trying to persuade people is the name of the game!!'
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:31 |
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:The case for Foo boils down that he hasn't actually contributed to the content value of this game and instead has done a good job dismantling other peoples opinions, not just mine.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:32 |
|
Captain Foo posted:okay let's address points here: It's not your style that I'm against, I'm against your actions in this game and your contradiction that you still haven't addressed. Actually attempt at answering the questions I've asked, I'll gladly do the same of you and anyone else in this thread.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:32 |
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:Preface: calling out votes that appear to be scummy votes is not itself scummy, even if someone else had done it first. I don't rely a ton on what other people are doing D1 because there's no way to really judge any sort of relationships between players (or lack thereof) until there's a piece or two of evidence i.e. the lynch and the nk
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:34 |
|
Captain Foo posted:hahahahaha voting someone for an early case, calling anything at all going hard iirc my logic here was more in the second part? za really wasn't casing as he went on to explain clearly, and you tried to jump down his throat for it.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:37 |
|
Captain Foo posted:iirc my logic here was more in the second part? za really wasn't casing as he went on to explain clearly, and you tried to jump down his throat for it. mafia edit: "you" == GG
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:37 |
|
Captain Foo posted:it seems like you're deliberately not reading my explanation as to how bottle's attempt at persuasion was scummy; i went into it in pretty good detail and you instead glossed it over with 'trying to persuade people is the name of the game!!' BottleKnight posted:This is a bad post. A very lovely attempt to discredit a vote on you, with no alignment calls, which you clearly have only posted as a setup for an OMGUS later on. Captain Foo posted:lmao at calling anything "clear" early d1 or really in mafia at all BottleKnight posted:Are you disagreeing with my reads or specifically just calling out my play? What do you think of Diqnol? Captain Foo posted:i'm specifically calling you on doing people's thinking for them, i.e. "he did x because clearly p and q" BottleKnight posted:Why would that make me scummy? Who do you think is scum in this game so far? Captain Foo posted:because you're trying to dictate how people think about a certain case by providing logic that can't be determined from the thread, and only exists in your head.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:40 |
|
yeah ok i see what you're trying to build here, GG. i explained a general read of mine, that about people jumping on D1 claims as being scummy za jumped on a D1 claim I don't find za scummy CONTRADICTION problem is as follows - everyhing za actually did after calling out the D1 claim, most notably calmly explaining his position as well as also not really going hard on the case, as you seem to think he did. THEREFORE za's behavior doesn't actually fit my general read any longer
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:41 |
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:Well let's look at that explanation that you went into pretty good detail on: did you even read what you quoted also you left out a post of mine where i said za is playing fine, which you're trying to use against me a few posts upthread
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:42 |
|
idk how much more clear i can be, i think bottle is scummy because he's creating a narrative that doesn't exist outside of his post, and using it to justify calling someone else scummy.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:45 |
|
Frankly I think I've made some of the best posts in this game
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:50 |
|
Captain Foo posted:i'm specifically calling you on doing people's thinking for them, i.e. "he did x because clearly p and q" Captain Foo posted:because you're trying to dictate how people think about a certain case by providing logic that can't be determined from the thread, and only exists in your head. OMG, you're doing the same thing you peg him for! Everyone does this, especially so on day 1! It feels like you're being intentionally dense about that and that's twice now that you've established a contradiction in your thoughts. First with the G PP stance, that he did not at all calmly explain. He was acting panicky especially as heat built on him. Now with this logic that justifying your stances from D1 reads is scummy. When your original stance was that telling people what to think was scummy.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:51 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Frankly I think I've made some of the best posts in this game
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:53 |
|
Ghastly Gangstas just don't understand
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:59 |
|
GG, you could probably do with some calming down.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 22:59 |
|
Epsilon Plus posted:GG, you could probably do with some calming down. I'm not being rude or anything, I said I was going to be back to make some cases and I did, and now I have to stand in defense of them. What am I doing wrong?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:01 |
|
Deadline is about 4 hours away, is anyone going to be around?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:04 |
|
I don't think you are doing anything wrong GG, it's not your fault that you're scum.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:10 |
|
Captain Foo posted:idk how much more clear i can be, i think bottle is scummy because he's creating a narrative that doesn't exist outside of his post, and using it to justify calling someone else scummy. I just want to be clear, since you never asked me about it, just accused me of it, I said Diqnol set up an OMGUS because he posted an OMGUS half an hour later, and my read was that he setup that. I wasn't making that up out of thin air. He responded to my questions and then I suspected him less. If you have any questions for me, I'll be happy to answer them.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:19 |
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:I forgot to vote. Are you breadcrumbing your rapper? Isn't alignment random?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:20 |
|
young mc isnt a new act how dare you lie to us
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:20 |
|
oh nevermind im dumb DONT MIND ME
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:21 |
|
BottleKnight posted:Are you breadcrumbing your rapper? Isn't alignment random? Yeah, I guess breadcrumbing my rapper is dumb, but I didn't post my vote for Foo in my case on him so I just decided to spice up the post where I actually did.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:23 |
|
Ghastly Gangsta posted:Yeah, I guess breadcrumbing my rapper is dumb, but I didn't post my vote for Foo in my case on him so I just decided to spice up the post where I actually did. ##vote Ghastly Gangsta
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:25 |
|
|
# ? May 10, 2024 00:24 |
|
Epsilon Plus posted:
Any reason why??? Also you didn't answer the post about calming down?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2015 23:27 |