Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

BravestOfTheLamps posted:

One of them was a special agent working for the US who helped overthrow foreign governments. The other was a special agent working for the US who helped overthrow foreign governments.

How dare Cap try to topple the Nazi regime! :rolleyes:

Give me a loving break. They are not equivalent in any sense of the world.

Charlz Guybon fucked around with this message at 13:32 on Feb 26, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Snowman_McK posted:

If you ever want to remember how cynical the MCU is, remember that Iron Man invented free unlimited energy like 15 movies ago, yet every view of the world is exactly the world we recognise.

Can he actually mass produce large scale plants? I was under the impression that he couldn't.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Snowman_McK posted:

It's unlimited energy. He doesn't need to mass produce it.

Also, he makes the element he needs in his house while drying out.

That's not how power plants work, even scifi cold fusion ones. If a company invented working fusion reactors tomorrow, they still would have to mass produce them to provide the world with clean energy and depending on the design that could be ruinously expensive.

No idea what your referncing in the second sentence, obviously I have to rewatch the Iron Man movies.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

garycoleisgod posted:

To me the question is more why his methods make him the villain. Is it
a) Because they extremely violent and have a large body count
or
b) Because they wouldn't work

If it's b), then T'Challa's plan at the end is wrong too, as let's face it, it's not gonna change poo poo.
If it's a), then everything just about every hero has done (except maybe Spidey, Dr Strange and Ant-Man?) in the MCU is also wrong. Did you see what Cap did at the end of Winter Soldier? He sure didn't resolve that poo poo peacefully, nor should he have.

Saying Killmonger is right, but he's just too extreme is a real life tactic that has been used against real life activists for longer than either of us has been alive, so when it appears in this film it feels like it does in real life: like a load of anti-change horseshit.

ninja edit for terrible typing

It's because it's a and b. Violence can be excused if it will work to achieve a disirable goal, but not if it won't.

Cap's violence successfully stopped Hydra's coup and genocide.

As for T'Challa's plan, it's kind of vauge, but yeah it's not going to make any over arching changes. If that's the standard, then yeah he shouldn't bother. But depending on how it's carried out it could improve things on the margins, and one could argue that's better than nothing. Hard to say since we don't really know what these outreach centers will do and what other, if any economic/technical aid Wakanda plans to give.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

YOLOsubmarine posted:

Well, his predecessor uses the plant to stage a coup and reclaim his throne, so it seems like Erik was pretty spot on.

Hey, T'Challa was technically correct. He neither died nor yielded, thus the challange that Killmonger brought forth was still ongoing and T'Challa was still the legal King. :colbert:

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

garycoleisgod posted:

Yes,the violence would be horrible and cost untold innocent lives.
But if you want change, what are the other options? As I said, we all know the outreach center ain't gonna do poo poo.
How many died in the French Revolution? The American Civil War? WWII? Were they worth it? Whats the difference between someone killed deliberately, accidentally or by inaction?

The more damning part abiut Killmongers plan is it would fail.
1) Arm people
2)????
3) Revolution!
Not much of a plan.

The more violent a revolution gets, the more likely it is to fail at it's proclaimed ideological aims. The aforementioned French revolution failed because of it's descent into retalitory violence and purges, while the mild American revolution succeeded because it's was a relatively peacefull transition.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Nodosaur posted:

They were the ones attempting to secede. By definition they were the insurrectionists.

Insurrectionists, yes. But they were rebelling to protect the status quo.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Gatts posted:

Greece, Rome, America, that sort of thing lasts a longer time because it allows the conquered to become citizens and have a voice in the process. Or at least that's the idea. If you're going to have a revolution, it can't be one that oppresses or victimizes constantly and separates the haves from the have nots. Killmonger's revolution would fail and is doomed, it is false. T'Challa's is more even tempered.

Greece didn't do this and it's the primary reason they got rolled over by the Romans.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Snowman_McK posted:

Black Panther is yet another 'as soon as the oppressed are on top, they become worse than the oppressors' story, just like Bioshock Infinite and Far Cry 4. Or the Frost Giants. In fact, it's almost like there's a tendency to assume all revolutionaries are inherently worse than their oppressors.

EDIT: I mean, it makes a very good case for revolution, but makes the in movie advocate a broken psychopath who is beyond redemption.

Also, lol at 'His plan wouldn't work' in the loving Marvel universe, where someone invented an element. Things work the way the plot says they do.

Have you seen what happens after most revolutions? Humans suck.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Kurzon posted:

How well-known was Black Panther outside of comics fandom before this movie? I always thought of Black Panther as a C-list hero. He never had a movie or cartoon show, just some guest appearances on the Avengers cartoons. I don't think anyone outside of the fandom knew who he was. He was, I think, on par with Doctor Strange, which is why I expected this movie to make under $700 million.

I'd say he was well bellow Strange in the comics, since Strange often showed up in Avengers/F4 comics.

Just hit $501 million domestic, $897 million total

http://www.boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=4376&p=.htm

quote:

It was yet another monster weekend for Disney and Marvel's Black Panther as the superhero feature became the third fastest film to ever reach $500 million domestic. Meanwhile, the weekend's new wide releases came up just a bit short of Mojo's pre-weekend forecast with Fox's Red Sparrow taking runner-up position behind Black Panther and MGM's Death Wish landing in third. It's also Oscar Sunday, which means we'll end this recap with a brief look at this some of year's nominees and how they stack up at the box office.

With an estimated $65.7 million, Disney and Marvel Studios's Black Panther topped the weekend box office for the third straight weekend, becoming only the third film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe to accomplish that feat over its first three weeks in release, the others being Captain America: The Winter Soldier and The Avengers. As noted above, the film also topped $500 million domestic, becoming the third fastest film to do so, bringing in $501.1 million in just 17 days, tied with Jurassic World and one day behind Star Wars: The Last Jedi.

Black Panther's performance so far has it ranked as the tenth highest grossing domestic release of all-time, third highest grossing comic book adaptation and superhero film and it has now found a spot within the all-time top 50 worldwide. This weekend's performance was also the third largest third weekend of all-time and should the past two weekends be any indication, it could leapfrog Avatar for second largest if actuals come in ~$2.8 million higher than estimates.

Speaking of worldwide, Black Panther added another $56.2 million internationally this weekend, pushing its overseas cume of $396.6 million for a global tally just shy of $900 million. This weekend saw the film open in Japan with an estimated $2.4 million ($4.2M including previews), besting Ant-Man, Guardians of the Galaxy and Thor: Ragnarok. The UK still leads all international markets with nearly $50 million followed by South Korea ($41.4 million). Black Panther will open in China, its final international market, next weekend.

  • Locked thread