|
What are Canada's growing NSS cost overruns even attributed to? Labor? Materials? Engineering? I thought these things had already been designed.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2021 23:03 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 04:56 |
|
MrYenko posted:So, if I did my math right, Canada could buy FORTY brand new Arleigh Burkes for what they’re planning on spending for fifteen ships-on-paper-only. Buying 40 Burkes introduces a whole other problem of recruiting that many sailors! (I know, just don't buy as many and save $$ ) I was annoyed that Canada didn't get in on the Mistrals that were built for Russia, I thought they'd be good flagships for various humanitarian/disaster relief support as well as being capable air platforms to fly helicop-oh, poo poo yeah lol nevermind. (The Cyclones seem to not be a complete disaster now that they are being delivered, at least).
|
# ? Apr 13, 2021 23:12 |
|
For my entire adult life I don't think I've heard of a single good ending to Canada's procurement.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2021 23:14 |
|
I still feel like Canada turning over their procurement dollars over to the DoD along with a list of their requirements would result in a lot of positives for Canada. There would be a massive cost savings for Canada, it would eliminate a political football, result in stuff being delivered in a reasonable period, and probably not catch fire on their way to Canada. I mean even with extremely healthy profit margins, Canada would still come out ahead.
|
# ? Apr 13, 2021 23:18 |
|
Raenir Salazar posted:For my entire adult life I don't think I've heard of a single good ending to Canada's procurement. There's very little positive upside, it's either well that went pretty much as expected or god drat this shat the bed extra hard and it's still going, there is literally no end to it! One that "just worked" were the mad scramble to procure Leopard 2s for afghanistan (driven by a failure of planning, of course but thankfully the dutch and germans had some tanks they were motivated to sell) Also the recent selection of the new rifle for the Rangers went alright but realistically if they can't select and purchase a bunch of bolt action rifles I don't know what the gently caress
|
# ? Apr 13, 2021 23:21 |
|
Raenir Salazar posted:For my entire adult life I don't think I've heard of a single good ending to Canada's procurement. The arrow
|
# ? Apr 13, 2021 23:26 |
|
Stravag posted:The arrow
|
# ? Apr 13, 2021 23:29 |
|
Didn't some of the Avro engineers gently caress off to the US space program, and the LM project in particular? Having a hand in putting people on the moon is an ok consolation prize imo
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 00:12 |
|
Phy posted:Didn't some of the Avro engineers gently caress off to the US space program, and the LM project in particular? Having a hand in putting people on the moon is an ok consolation prize imo But it isn't the Maple Leaf on the moon though!
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 00:13 |
|
priznat posted:There's very little positive upside, it's either well that went pretty much as expected or god drat this shat the bed extra hard and it's still going, there is literally no end to it! As we've observed here before, the only time procurement goes correctly in Canada is when it bypasses the procurement apparatus and the government writes a check C-17 being another successful example Somebody please re-post that OSS document on institutional sabotage, because I think somebody at some point replaced the first page of it with block letters "MILITARY PROCUREMENT FOR SMART PEOPLE" Oh, and while thrashing around on the NSS, I discovered that when Irving got the contracts for the Halifax class, it bought out several small shipbuilders, hoping to go international with their naval shipbuilding--- Only to have these dreams crushed when the program ended and no new work was forthcoming So this is the second time Irving has tried this. Question, is their ambition to be a shipyard bidding on international naval contracts a grift, or does somebody think they can actually be competitive and can they explain how MrYenko posted:So, if I did my math right, Canada could buy FORTY brand new Arleigh Burkes for what they’re planning on spending for fifteen ships-on-paper-only. lol Where did you get the price, and are there yards out there that in could theory build some ABs? asking for a friend Nebakenezzer fucked around with this message at 00:52 on Apr 14, 2021 |
# ? Apr 14, 2021 00:49 |
|
I swear to god they taught the baby boomers this in kindergarten.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 01:00 |
|
shame on an IGA posted:I swear to god they taught the baby boomers this in kindergarten. Aren't these the sabotage orders for occupied France?
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 01:29 |
|
One thing I'll say for the Airborne Laser is that while it never was any good at its advertised purpose of shooting ballistic missiles, it was a great testbed for beam control, atmospheric optics, and all kinds of other technologies and phenomena. We got our money's worth, and those research dividends are still paying off today now that laser technology has improved to the point where high beam powers are more viable without carrying around tons of toxic chemistry for a few seconds of firing.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 01:31 |
|
I was looking up some flights near me and stumbled upon this crazy list of military/government call signs. Tag yourself: https://henney.com/chm/callsign.htm On a first random look I’m taking PRIME BEEF edit: what I looked up is that VIKNG and PACKER are indeed both used by the C-130s at MSP hobbesmaster fucked around with this message at 01:35 on Apr 14, 2021 |
# ? Apr 14, 2021 01:33 |
|
I'm AXE OPS Maybe BEAVER OPS [BEAVER OPS CP for 7th Bomb Wing (B-1Bs), Dyess AFB TX]
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 02:20 |
|
The one that always gets me are the DOOM callsigns from the 2nd BW out of Barksdale. Every so often one of their B-52H will show up on ADS-B and it's impossible to miss because it's got a custom icon. The E-6Bs occasionally have fun or callsigns, and the E-4B has some funny/scary ones like ADIOS.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 02:40 |
|
Raenir Salazar posted:Aren't these the sabotage orders for occupied France? yes
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 02:47 |
|
DOOM is just trying too hard though. All the regional ones (mostly ANG it seems) are fantastic.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 03:35 |
|
Raenir Salazar posted:But it isn't the Maple Leaf on the moon though! we put the robot arm on the space shuttle though and then we were so proud we put the robot arm on the money Raenir Salazar posted:Aren't these the sabotage orders for occupied France? yes, it's the OSS Simple Sabotage manual. Here's the entire thing, which includes all kinds of cool tricks like dumping scrap metal into a steam pipe under maintenance so that it gets shot into the turbine when the boiler comes back online, or flushing a ball of string soaked in flour down the toilet to explode the plumbing system. It used to be hosted on the CIA's own website so it's definitely real. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/26184/page-images/26184-images.pdf The section quoted above is "organizational sabotage" and yeah it's like a loving playbook for the worst people you've ever had to deal with at work Sagebrush fucked around with this message at 04:10 on Apr 14, 2021 |
# ? Apr 14, 2021 04:04 |
|
Sagebrush posted:yes, it's the OSS Simple Sabotage manual. Here's the entire thing. It used to be hosted on the CIA's own website so it's definitely real.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 04:07 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:DOOM is just trying too hard though. All the regional ones (mostly ANG it seems) are fantastic. We had a doom supporting us in Afghanistan a couple times. Fuckers never dropped tho. Even if they did, a GBU-38 does the same thing from a buff as it does from a viper
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 04:12 |
|
Captain von Trapp posted:One thing I'll say for the Airborne Laser is that while it never was any good at its advertised purpose of shooting ballistic missiles, it was a great testbed for beam control, atmospheric optics, and all kinds of other technologies and phenomena. We got our money's worth, and those research dividends are still paying off today now that laser technology has improved to the point where high beam powers are more viable without carrying around tons of toxic chemistry for a few seconds of firing. It's a great example of "stupid" military spending paying off. Of course, there are far more examples of the opposite, but taking a second look is often worthwhile. LibCrusher posted:We had a doom supporting us in Afghanistan a couple times. Fuckers never dropped tho. Even if they did, a GBU-38 does the same thing from a buff as it does from a viper Yeah but it doesn't have to be carried to a tanker every half hour.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 04:33 |
|
Godholio posted:It's a great example of "stupid" military spending paying off. Of course, there are far more examples of the opposite, but taking a second look is often worthwhile. They yo-yo and all viper pilots sound the same so it doesn’t really affect anything
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 05:01 |
|
LibCrusher posted:They yo-yo and all viper pilots sound the same so it doesn’t really affect anything Maybe not from the ground side.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 05:54 |
|
Sagebrush posted:we put the robot arm on the space shuttle though and then we were so proud we put the robot arm on the money When I first saw this document I thought it was a brilliant double play. Accidentally leak it to the enemy and watch them tie themselves in knots chasing all the "spies" in their organization.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 10:48 |
|
https://twitter.com/marinahyde/status/1382265673246777344?s=21 Somehow every time I learn something about the UK, it grows more foreign to me.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 11:55 |
|
shame on an IGA posted:I swear to god they taught the baby boomers this in kindergarten. It's like my previous job's HR manual.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 14:56 |
|
ZEPEL RC-135 55th Wing, Offutt AFB, NE ZEPPELIN 56 Warning Group - Mt Yoza Okinawa
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 16:52 |
|
mlmp08 posted:https://twitter.com/marinahyde/status/1382265673246777344?s=21 Should be wing commander - lolita express
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 17:37 |
|
hobbesmaster posted:I was looking up some flights near me and stumbled upon this crazy list of military/government call signs. Which one of you is GOONY?
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 19:56 |
|
https://twitter.com/senhydesmith/status/1382394344867512321?s=21
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 19:59 |
|
Must have been a real bon mot for it no longer exists.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 22:33 |
|
Guest2553 posted:Must have been a real bon mot for it no longer exists. Weirdly cached in the awful app: Happy 73rd Birthday to the @USAFReserve! Thankful for all the reservists who are constantly on the ready to serve our nation. #FlyFlightWin pic.twitter.com/eU4juEcOWY — U.S. Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (@SenHydeSmith) April 14, 2021
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 22:37 |
|
priznat posted:Weirdly cached in the awful app: let me guess, somebody posted rah-rah USA text alongside a pic of some sexy Russian planes? e: or was it Navy hardware?
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 22:49 |
|
Space Gopher posted:let me guess, somebody posted rah-rah USA text alongside a pic of some sexy Russian planes? Yeah it was a "Happy Birthday to the USAF Reserve!" post but the airplane silhouettes in the background were Su-34s.
|
# ? Apr 14, 2021 22:56 |
|
Sagebrush posted:Yeah it was a "Happy Birthday to the USAF Reserve!" post but the airplane silhouettes in the background were Su-34s. That's a common screwup for not-military media people/non-spergs, even for those in fields that should know better.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2021 00:42 |
|
ArmyGroup303 posted:That's a common screwup for not-military media people/non-spergs, even for those in fields that should know better. A Senator from Mississippi? I'm impressed she managed to spell USAF.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2021 01:31 |
|
|
# ? Apr 15, 2021 06:04 |
|
They're just reminding us who the real enemy are! Photoshop designers
|
# ? Apr 15, 2021 07:21 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 04:56 |
|
What annoys me most about these stupidity posts is that all these services have PAO kits with all the graphics needed. Posts like this exemplify the laziness of public officials. If there were competence, this wouldn't happen. If there were a bare minimum of effort, this wouldn't happen. These people want to seem to support something, but just don't actually care, at all.
|
# ? Apr 15, 2021 16:40 |