|
I'm beta... Beta than you
|
# ? May 26, 2015 15:38 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 09:19 |
|
ops such a theta
|
# ? May 26, 2015 15:46 |
|
Giblet Plus! posted:You're implying that we are somehow, "different" than animals in fundamental behaviors, despite evolving directly from them? yeah, see, this is the OP's underlying problem he doesn't realize humans are just hairless apes with a cerebral cortex and existential delusions of grandeur 'alpha' and 'beta' social order roles exist inarguably in another hominid species that is genetically 98.8% identical to homo sapiens, and in another apex-predator species that's extraordinary for its domesticated social compatibility with humans. these are just facts
|
# ? May 26, 2015 20:52 |
|
ninotoreS posted:yeah, see, this is the OP's underlying problem Playing devil's advocate, but my understanding was that the Alpha-Omega spectrum in dogs/wolves had been largely discredited?
|
# ? May 26, 2015 20:55 |
|
ninotoreS posted:'alpha' and 'beta' social order roles exist inarguably in another hominid species that is genetically 98.8% identical to homo sapiens, and in another apex-predator species that's extraordinary for its domesticated social compatibility with humans. these are just facts "hi I watched a lot of animal planet and let me tell you all about social hierarchies" alpha/beta doesn't apply to wolves and it is super simplified as applied to apes. quote:This terminology was first used in 1947 by Rudolf Schenkel of the University of Basel, who based his findings on researching the behavior of captive gray wolves. He formally disavowed this terminology in 1999, explaining that it was heavily based on the behavior of captive packs consisting of unrelated individuals, an error reflecting the once prevailing view that wild pack formation occurred in winter among independent gray wolves. Later research on wild gray wolves revealed that the pack is usually a family consisting of a breeding pair and its offspring of the previous 1–3 years.
|
# ? May 26, 2015 20:56 |
|
Social evolution is real, idiots.
|
# ? May 26, 2015 20:58 |
|
Giblet Plus! posted:You're implying that we are somehow, "different" than animals in fundamental behaviors, despite evolving directly from them? animals are just humans who are smart enough not to give a gently caress
|
# ? May 26, 2015 21:02 |
|
Applewhite posted:Playing devil's advocate, but my understanding was that the Alpha-Omega spectrum in dogs/wolves had been largely discredited? i'm just some layman rear end in a top hat not exactly informed up to the minute on recent zoology, but i watched some nat geo doc about a non-captive, wild wolf-pack that was studied by a couple for a decade or something all the social order roles were clearly apparent, including the omega found it, i think. looks like a late 90s or early 00s production https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWmOtXSAr1M Moridin920 posted:"hi I watched a lot of animal planet and let me tell you all about social hierarchies" well, yeah. how else does the LCD (i.e. me) get loosely informed about crap like this? if you have a degree in the field, i'll be happy to defer. guessing you don't, tho Moridin920 posted:and it is super simplified as applied to apes sure, and everything complicated traces its origin to something simple, right? quote:This terminology was first used in 1947 by Rudolf Schenkel of the University of Basel, who based his findings on researching the behavior of captive gray wolves. He formally disavowed this terminology in 1999, explaining that it was heavily based on the behavior of captive packs consisting of unrelated individuals, an error reflecting the once prevailing view that wild pack formation occurred in winter among independent gray wolves. Later research on wild gray wolves revealed that the pack is usually a family consisting of a breeding pair and its offspring of the previous 1–3 years hey, but you're missing something essential here we humans using the social labels of 'alpha', 'beta', et cetera are also using them in the context of interaction between unrelated individuals checkmate ninotoreS fucked around with this message at 13:43 on May 27, 2015 |
# ? May 27, 2015 13:13 |
|
Just a reminder. People who apply terms like alpha or beta male to humans are stupid as gently caress.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 13:32 |
|
Paladinus posted:'Ha-ha, look at that pathetic beta who never touched a woman's tit... Alpha and Beta are meaningless terms for humans. They mean something for dogs and wolves, but not for people. More often than not, "Alpha Males" are far more insecure than "Beta Males". They are not terms that should be used when describing people.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 13:35 |
|
ninotoreS posted:i'm just some layman rear end in a top hat not exactly informed up to the minute on recent zoology, but i watched some nat geo doc about a non-captive, wild wolf-pack that was studied by a couple for a decade or something Without even watching the video, I defer to your cited sources and hereby resume sorting humans into the Alpha-Omega spectrum.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 13:36 |
|
Paladinus posted:Just a reminder. People who apply terms like alpha or beta male to humans are stupid as gently caress. everything you've posted here comes off like raging insecurity, you know dude, you're supposed to play it off like a joke, studies show people consider self-deprecation a trust-engendering behavior Applewhite posted:Without even watching the video, I defer to your cited sources and hereby resume sorting humans into the Alpha-Omega spectrum. the doc is an hour and a half, iirc i was high at the time if that helps ninotoreS fucked around with this message at 13:45 on May 27, 2015 |
# ? May 27, 2015 13:41 |
|
ninotoreS posted:everything you've posted here comes off like raging insecurity, you know Once again, there's nothing I'm supposed to do as a male, as I am a meta male. The very concept of prescribed behaviour is wrong and damaging.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 13:51 |
|
Paladinus posted:Once again, there's nothing I'm supposed to do as a male, as I am a meta male. The very concept of prescribed behaviour is wrong and damaging. Actually social roles give structure to our lives and help us to define ourselves as individuals and how we fit into society as a whole. They are a natural instinct and to some degree necessary for a healthy psyche.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 13:58 |
|
Please donate to my YouTube channel where I talk about how women are evil and all rape is pretend I'm alpha as gently caress
|
# ? May 27, 2015 14:19 |
|
Paladinus posted:Once again, there's nothing I'm supposed to do as a male, as I am a meta male. The very concept of prescribed behaviour is wrong and damaging. Everyone else: "look at this weirdo human being"
|
# ? May 27, 2015 14:41 |
|
Applewhite posted:Actually social roles give structure to our lives and help us to define ourselves as individuals and how we fit into society as a whole. They are a natural instinct and to some degree necessary for a healthy psyche. Your gay as hell bro.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 14:43 |
|
JebanyPedal posted:Your gay as hell bro. Eh normally id agree for seriospostin in a gibbis thread, But then again reality itself trollls these people the op is imitating so jts cool
|
# ? May 27, 2015 14:44 |
|
Mange Mite posted:Eh normally id agree for seriospostin in a gibbis thread, But then again reality itself trollls these people so jts cool What are you talking about man.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 14:44 |
|
Mange Mite posted:"I don't follow societal norms" I didn't say I didn't follow any norms. I just follow them not because they are imposed by society, but because it's right to follow them. Again, just reminding you why my term of choice is meta male.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 14:45 |
|
Applewhite posted:Playing devil's advocate, but my understanding was that the Alpha-Omega spectrum in dogs/wolves had been largely discredited? yeah it's bullshit, there's been a rash of papers about it recently and biologists/animal behaviour specialists have had to rethink their research methodology in order to try not to impose human notions of hierarchy on animals so the whole thing is based on nonsense and then applied to a different species
|
# ? May 27, 2015 14:48 |
|
Paladinus posted:I didn't say I didn't follow any norms. I just follow them not because they are imposed by society, but because it's right to follow them. Again, just reminding you why my term of choice is meta male. I don't think anyone does anything because it is imposed by society except the most weakwilled babies I guess, but people do a lot of things because they haven't thought about why they do them.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 14:49 |
|
the true alpha: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtH7l-dhHZQ
|
# ? May 27, 2015 14:50 |
|
I just say whatever I want to whoever I want whenever I want (except police, and cussing gets modulated around family) it's worked out so far. being an adult is p cool.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 17:03 |
|
Sometimes I sleep with more women than the average man will in their entire life in a single week and I think "Am I alpha?" but then I realize I am a broken piece of poo poo that destroys the lives of everyone around him.
|
# ? May 27, 2015 17:12 |
|
I'm beta right now but hopefully I'll have gone gold by July
|
# ? May 27, 2015 17:30 |
|
mostlygray posted:Alpha and Beta are meaningless terms for humans. They mean something for dogs and wolves, but not for people. More often than not, "Alpha Males" are far more insecure than "Beta Males". They are not terms that should be used when describing people. contender for most gamma post itt
|
# ? May 28, 2015 07:47 |
|
i prefer the term early access male
|
# ? May 28, 2015 07:53 |
|
I'd like the term "alpha male jack off" to remain a thing for as long as possible. For example, I was waiting to get onto the on-ramp, and this alpha male jack off in an escalade is just sitting one lane over with his blinker on. I'm hoping I'll get the chance to look him in the eye and give him the finger, and the car in front of me lets him over. Mooktastical fucked around with this message at 08:53 on May 28, 2015 |
# ? May 28, 2015 08:50 |
|
I'm so alpha male that I gently caress dudes. Chicks are for faggots that cant wrestle a beta bear down, grease up his hairy rear end in a top hat and go to town. (In a gentle and considerate kind of way of course)
|
# ? May 28, 2015 09:18 |
|
the most alpha act of all is pounding a beta guy in the butt to assert your dominance
|
# ? May 28, 2015 09:22 |
|
Zzulu posted:the most alpha act of all is pounding a beta guy in the butt to assert your dominance It's true. Lady dogs even do it
|
# ? May 28, 2015 09:45 |
|
Paladinus posted:Deep down inside you all know I am a better person and your success with 'ladies' is only due to current low feminism awareness. In ten years I'll be enjoying all the attention from women I can, what a feminist attitude
|
# ? May 28, 2015 12:34 |
|
Mr. Hand posted:An alpha male is the sort of man who does not have to offer resources and emotional investment in order to get laid. Women just want to gently caress him, much like men want to gently caress your average woman. become alpha male then embrace glorious feminism and treat the women in your life with utmost respect, dignity, and mindfulness
|
# ? May 28, 2015 12:36 |
|
Paladinus posted:As I said, the attraction to 'alphas' is nothing but peer pressure multiplied by oppression. In a post-patriarchal society sex is no longer a commodity and as such no longer is a goal, so every form of sexual aggression is condemned. how demeaning and condescending for you to proclaim and dictate that any woman's sexual desire or attraction is "nothing but" some half baked theory and loaded words perhaps it would be more interesting to hear from women about their desires and experiences you are a beta male who is falling on his sword of weak dorm room feminism in order to declare yourself "out of the game" like one of those philosopher tier guys on that stupid rear end chart
|
# ? May 28, 2015 12:45 |
|
Lol, women don't want to gently caress you because you're alpha, they gently caress you because you're hot. You can be an uber pathetic piece of poo poo and get hosed non-stop if you're a beefcake just look at me.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 12:49 |
|
JebanyPedal posted:Lol, women don't want to gently caress you because you're alpha, they gently caress you because you're hot. Have never, ever met a beta beefcake and doubt they exist.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 13:35 |
|
Commie NedFlanders posted:what a feminist attitude It was simply a factual statement, not something I aspire. I live without any attention from women now (in intimate sense), and I am perfectly fine to wait ten years or however long it takes for the paradigm to shift. This is not my end goal, as it is for many so-called alphas, which is the reason meta males will be more desirable in the future. That's just how it is, I don't boast or anything.
|
# ? May 28, 2015 13:50 |
|
Paladinus posted:It was simply a factual statement, not something I aspire. I live without any attention from women now (in intimate sense), and I am perfectly fine to wait ten years or however long it takes for the paradigm to shift. This is not my end goal, as it is for many so-called alphas, which is the reason meta males will be more desirable in the future. That's just how it is, I don't boast or anything. How do you know what will be desirable in the future?
|
# ? May 28, 2015 13:55 |
|
|
# ? May 11, 2024 09:19 |
|
Paladinus posted:It was simply a factual statement, not something I aspire. I live without any attention from women now (in intimate sense), and I am perfectly fine to wait ten years or however long it takes for the paradigm to shift. This is not my end goal, as it is for many so-called alphas, which is the reason meta males will be more desirable in the future. That's just how it is, I don't boast or anything. Alphas have been the primary objects of female desire for the past 3 million years so we're definitely overdue for a paradigm shift. It could happen any day now!
|
# ? May 28, 2015 13:59 |