|
Nagato posted:chance of aliens exist is a+b+c+D+e+f+g but we dont se aliens??? what is wrong with maths the earth is a zoo
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 20:45 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 16:26 |
|
me + u + that alien = true luv
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 20:47 |
|
statistically im loving op in the butt
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 20:55 |
|
Parallax Scroll posted:statistically im loving op in the butt in an unlimited universe he's also loving you in the butt
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:03 |
|
VikingSkull posted:in an unlimited universe he's also loving you in the butt whoa
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:04 |
|
i mean embracing the infinite universes infinite time paradigm it's impossible that you won't eventually gently caress your own butt (lol if you can't already f yur own b)
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:10 |
|
Necc0 posted:no mention of the fermi paradox by page 2 wtf is wrong with you guys i'm gettin a fermi in my underpants
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:16 |
|
chances are you like it too
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:21 |
|
Full Metal Jackass posted:Spoiler: we aren't gonna find poo poo That's still something
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:22 |
|
we're all just vibrating strings
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:23 |
|
Moridin920 posted:we're all just vibrating strings
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:27 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Probably not no m theory is pretty cool though
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:29 |
|
Strudel Man posted:Probably not no b-b-but the data from LIGO is...pretty grainy! That m-might mean... something!
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:29 |
|
Moridin920 posted:m theory is pretty cool though
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:31 |
|
sure aliens exist...but are they sexy????
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:32 |
|
numberoneposter posted:sure aliens exist...but are they sexy???? [c]
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:34 |
Time is a flat titty
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:39 |
|
echopraxia posted:Time is a flat titty What's the analogy of the nipple?
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:41 |
|
what are the statistics that aliens would exist in the same timeframe as humans?
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:43 |
|
You'd think that, but fermi paradox
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:45 |
|
Fog Tripper posted:what are the statistics that aliens would exist in the same timeframe as humans? really good! ...anywhere even approaching the same place? really bad! Un-l337-Pork posted:You'd think that, but fermi paradox there really is no paradox, or the answer to the paradox is 'we made bad assumptions'
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:45 |
|
The Protagonist posted:there really is no paradox, or the answer to the paradox is 'we made bad assumptions' Eh, I suppose. I guess only really a paradox if you expect to find star trek aliens -- that what you saying?
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:48 |
|
Early expectations had SETI and their ilk expecting to hear civilizations blasting out radio waves all over the place but it's all quiet on the 4π front. Now we already see rumblings of long-distance communication phasing out old noisy methods for direct optical signaling and such, meaning in less than a century our whole civilization could go em-quiet. So the chances of listening in on someone in the short period we might even be able to hear them are drastically reduced just by the likelihood they won't be broadcasting like that very long.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:54 |
|
radio waves degrade rapidly anyway so our prospective range to hear anything intelligible is super low
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 21:56 |
|
Moridin920 posted:radio waves degrade rapidly anyway so our prospective range to hear anything intelligible is super low Yeah people tend to forget this.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 22:10 |
|
The Protagonist posted:there really is no paradox, or the answer to the paradox is 'we made bad assumptions' inventing hypothesis to resolve the paradox is why it's so fun
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 22:20 |
|
the real fermi paradox: q = total number of cute kind girls that will never betray me t = percentage of them alive right now in time π = constant existence of a girl for me science predicts that qtπ = 1 but why am i single?????
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 22:40 |
|
you should consider the time you're alive is basically 0 out of the infinite time scale and there is probably no aliens at this time
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 22:48 |
|
Your Rain posted:you should consider the time you're alive is basically 0 out of the infinite time scale and there is probably no aliens at this time
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 23:12 |
VendaGoat posted:What's the analogy of the nipple? Death
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 23:52 |
|
Strudel Man posted:That is in fact accounted for in the drake equation, by way of the length of time for which we would expect a civilization to release radio signals into space specifically, radio waves playing Drake's 'Headlines'
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 23:53 |
|
Necc0 posted:inventing hypothesis to resolve the paradox is why it's so fun hmm...
what'd i miss?
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 23:57 |
|
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 23:58 |
|
The Protagonist posted:really good! Aliens could realistically be looking at us from billions of light years away. Sadly, by the time the light/images got to them we no longer exist.
|
# ? Jul 13, 2015 23:58 |
|
Your Rain posted:you should consider the time you're alive is basically 0 out of the infinite time scale and there is probably no aliens at this time Time only exists during the period I observe it.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 00:01 |
|
Professor Shark posted:like we won't ever meet them, but it's cool that they exist somewhere I meet them every morning at 7:00 a.m. in front of Home Depot.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 00:02 |
Mozi posted:specifically, radio waves playing Drake's 'Headlines' The last sound in the heat-death ravaged wreck of the universe will be our post-human noncorporeal descendants listening to Marvin's room as they circle around the dying embers of brown dwarves for warmth and free energy shedding silent invisible tears
|
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 00:04 |
|
Applewhite posted:Yeah Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal is a good comic. yeah but like remember how nothing in our universe needs to exist until it's observed? fractals/noise algorithms are just sets of interacting formulas that take up practically no space at all and doing nothing interesting until you add a render function. through a renderer you have a virtual perspective giving you access to infinite scale and complexity from simple rules. if you're a dumb retard then you've probably played minecraft so take that for example: the world is practically infinite (it's only not because of limits on the coordinate system I think?) and rezzed deterministically as you explore. only your changes to a block are stored: if you find a cool landmark and don't touch anything nothing is saved, but if you come back later it'll still be there. this huge world doesn't require huge disk space because it's just generated from a seed. when i make a simulated universe to torture it will definitely work this way, so i dont see why ours wouldn't. that might also explain why physicists will never run out of weirder and weirder tiny particles to discover: if physics is top down in complexity instead of bottom up like everyone thinks then the harder you look the more poo poo you'll find, forever all of this was revealed to me by a beautiful lady from neptune, telepathically, at the moment of orgasm. except the minecraft stuff which i probably read on a wiki
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 00:58 |
|
The Protagonist posted:hmm... You got a decent amount of them. http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/05/fermi-paradox.html
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 01:18 |
|
|
# ? Apr 29, 2024 16:26 |
|
OP is statistically a butt
|
# ? Jul 14, 2015 01:29 |