|
##vote Mithross Sure, I was thinking about making that vote too.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:28 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:07 |
|
I remembered I have a bit of wine in the fridge. Happy birthday me!
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:28 |
|
HiipFire posted:I like rarity as town now Why does this post make no mention of merk?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:29 |
|
Guys, can we not hang Ecco. I know I know I KNOW I've been pushing her all day but I want to play another day with her at least, I feel Real Bad suddenly. The stipulation is that you don't in turn hang me because I'm a good guy looking out for the town. ?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:29 |
|
Okay, time is up and I'm gone now and won't be back until after deadline. Don't lynch me tia
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:29 |
|
##vote mithross
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:30 |
|
TMMadman posted:
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:30 |
|
I just got home and got a text to go out with some friends. I can vote before deadline but I'll be honest, I'm not going to catch up before it. I won't have the time until afterward.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:31 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Guys, can we not hang Ecco. I know I know I KNOW I've been pushing her all day but I want to play another day with her at least, I feel Real Bad suddenly. Wait what? Dude you really HAVE been pushing this all day. What's up here?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:32 |
|
Why Mithross? Just because he's the worst lurker or what?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:33 |
|
EccoRaven posted:you would think so but unfortunately you would be mistaken. yeah i know your argument on it im just trying to flesh out if merk was agreeing with it for the same reasoning.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:33 |
|
I really don't care about what I have done, I care about what I am doing. Ecco...well, Ecco is probably scum. But she wants to have some fun. Lets let her.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:33 |
|
At the end of the day I don't even mind if this costs us the game somehow, I just want to be Fair.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:34 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Guys, can we not hang Ecco. I know I know I KNOW I've been pushing her all day but I want to play another day with her at least, I feel Real Bad suddenly. Meh. I'm feeling pretty confident about Ecco. But if we want to put her back in the battle I'll move my vote.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:34 |
|
FoxTerrier posted:Why Mithross? Just because he's the worst lurker or what? yes
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:34 |
|
King Burgundy posted:Well there is bound to be at least one scum in there if not more and in the last soldiers game scum had sabotage abilities in combat. Isn't there bound to be at least one scum in a group of active players?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:34 |
|
CapitalistPig posted:##vote mithross Dude this is the second time you've just bandwagoned a vote without explanation. Why Mithross? Use your words!
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:35 |
|
diqnol I thought you said your scumtell was being nice to people
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:35 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:Guys, can we not hang Ecco. I know I know I KNOW I've been pushing her all day but I want to play another day with her at least, I feel Real Bad suddenly. This is exactly why Ecco is playing the resigned card.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:35 |
|
merk posted:Isn't there bound to be at least one scum in a group of active players? Not really. I've been in games where all the scum were lurkers.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:37 |
|
FoxTerrier posted:Dude this is the second time you've just bandwagoned a vote without explanation. Nope.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:37 |
|
CapitalistPig posted:Nope. The gently caress
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:38 |
|
King Burgundy posted:Not really. I've been in games where all the scum were lurkers. To further expand on this. I don't think I've personally been in a game where the opposite is true. There is always a lurking scum.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:39 |
|
King Burgundy posted:Not really. I've been in games where all the scum were lurkers. I've been in games where all the scum were active players. The scum team was randomized at the start of the game. There is just as likely active players in the scum team as there are lurkers. I don't understand anything you've said in the last five posts.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:39 |
|
King Burgundy posted:To further expand on this. I don't think I've personally been in a game where the opposite is true. There is always a lurking scum. THERE IS ALWAYS AN ACTIVE SCUM IS JUST AS WRONG OF A THING TO SAY
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:39 |
|
CPig are you jester again?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:40 |
|
merk: Let's put all the lurkers in to battle to kill them. Responses: King Burgundy posted:Hahaha. I don't remember how bad a loss is for us but that would certainly solve the lurker problem. Probably only worth it if we think there are at least a couple of scum there. King Burgundy posted:Well there is bound to be at least one scum in there if not more and in the last soldiers game scum had sabotage abilities in combat. King Burgundy posted:Not really. I've been in games where all the scum were lurkers. King Burgundy posted:To further expand on this. I don't think I've personally been in a game where the opposite is true. There is always a lurking scum. Can anyone be this wrong or is this fake?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:41 |
|
HiipFire posted:CPig are you jester again? In a soldiers game? Also he'd be way more active in looking to get hung instead of just drive by posting.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:41 |
|
GUISSEPPE PIZZAPIE posted:At the end of the day I don't even mind if this costs us the game somehow, I just want to be Fair. I'd switch to Diqnol if we aren't doing Ecco. I have a bad gut read on Diqnol.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:42 |
|
But I very much prefer Ecco.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:42 |
|
merk posted:I've been in games where all the scum were active players. I've never seen it. I could go through my whole game history and point out the examples if you like. I realize that is still anecdotal. I think the reason it happens is that even if you end up with scum who normally post a lot there is always at least becomes more lurky as scum.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:43 |
|
TMMadman posted:In a soldiers game? mostly a joke, but out right refusing to explain why he's voting someone reminds me of the games he played as jester actually its like cpig is being edgy for no good reason wait a minute cpig are you a taste parachute???????????
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:45 |
|
HiipFire posted:mostly a joke, but out right refusing to explain why he's voting someone reminds me of the games he played as jester It's scummy as hell and idk why I've been basically the only one calling him out on it.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:47 |
|
Cpig is being Cpig, ie. purposefully obtuse and useless so he doesn't get lynched early.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:48 |
|
Rarity posted:Cpig is being Cpig, ie. purposefully obtuse and useless so he doesn't get lynched early. thats dumb and very unfun
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:48 |
|
I think everyone is joking about CPig being a Jester, but please remember this:busb posted:RULE: The Scum No third parties
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:49 |
|
merk posted:Alternatively, Keane could put all lurkers into combat. holy poo poo its almost what i've been saying the entire time. manipulating the battle is key to rooting out scum. but cckeane doesn't want to play ball.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:49 |
|
Rarity posted:Cpig is being Cpig, ie. purposefully obtuse and useless so he doesn't get lynched early. Sliding by on a meta of being useless is dumb and people should get called out on that poo poo. Blatantly refusing to generate anything resembling useful content hurts town and I'm still considering switching my vote to him for it because drat.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:50 |
|
merk, didn't cckeane say something about an item creating a survivor? maybe third parties don't exist at start but can be added by shenanigans?
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:50 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:07 |
|
Verr posted:merk, didn't cckeane say something about an item creating a survivor? maybe third parties don't exist at start but can be added by shenanigans? That was the most obvious gambit to have ever been made on the Something Awful forums.
|
# ? Oct 19, 2015 23:50 |