|
EccoRaven posted:Venom please stop. If you post again I will report you. Please don't. It's not hurting the actual game at all.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:10 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 11:55 |
|
Gamerofthegame posted:maybe you should have waited until he had more then three content posts to use this argument Maybe you should have allowed MT the time to do that instead of pushing her for a case NOW NOW NOW.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:11 |
|
tithin posted:Friends, romans, countrymen, I'm happy to step out for my good friend Venom Soag, a king in exile. Only if you are certain, darling. Doubtless the battlefield calls to you also.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:11 |
Gwynplaine posted:Only if you are certain, darling. Doubtless the battlefield calls to you also. The Battlefield calls to me, but I am no Big Boss, purely a Marksman with impeccable aim and fashion taste. I will gladly step aside for the boss.
|
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:12 |
|
Rarity posted:Please don't. It's not hurting the actual game at all. Please don't tell me how to run my game. thank you.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:13 |
|
tithin posted:The Battlefield calls to me, but I am no Big Boss, purely a Marksman with impeccable aim and fashion taste. It is up to them, then. I will remember this. Your likeness will be scrimshawed upon the sternum of the first to fall to my blade.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:14 |
|
we may have to accerpt that big boss isn't around now but we can stull strive for his ideals let us live as DIAMOMD DOGS
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:22 |
|
Just because someone plays stupidly doesn't make them town, rarity.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:28 |
|
Kashuno posted:Just because someone plays stupidly doesn't make them town, rarity. Yes but there's a difference someone playing badly yet honestly (Ridonk) and someone playing badly and falsely (you).
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:46 |
|
BabeLiker90 posted:So anyway guys, I'm the Town Catapultist. I can pick one of you and fling you at the other camp, killing both people involved. I have to do it day 1 (clearly a thinning of the herd tactic by Ecco) so let me know who you're interested in me targeting. Diqnol, is this an automatic kill or HP damage a la the mafia NK? And does this require the participant to be in or out of battle or is that irrelevant?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:48 |
|
Rarity posted:Yes but there's a difference someone playing badly yet honestly (Ridonk) and someone playing badly and falsely (you). You haven't mentioned me playing falsely yet iirc. I also think your defense of MMT is pretty poor; while I agree with her statement, calling someone out and then saying "I'll wait on explaining though" gives the player in question all the more reason to play different or ignore it entirely. If you want to see if something plays out, why draw attention to it?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:54 |
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Brother? I'm liking 100 for town, lots of solid rationale here.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:56 |
|
Max posted:I'm interested in hearing other people's thoughts on who from our thread should be catapulted, but I imagine they will all be the same. I will say nothing of who should be targeted in the other thread for painfully obvious reasons. If it's only 5 HP damage then I'd say send myself because I'd survive it so we could get ourselves a numbers advantage, which from experience is crucial towards the end game. If we did this I'd appreciate some healing, obviously.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 12:59 |
|
Kashuno posted:You haven't mentioned me playing falsely yet iirc. I realise I hadn't expressed such in exact words but that's the read I arrived at over the course of these posts: Rarity posted:Godammit Kash, sucking up to the King is scummy as gently caress. Why do you never learn? Rarity posted:KASH I EXPLAINED WHY THIS VOTE WAS TERRIBLE STOP BEING BAD AT MAFIA However, I just got to this part of my catchup: Kashuno posted:I mean really I don't think I need to spell it out on a silver platter for you but since you seem incapable of actually reading and being able to infer opinions based on words. And the emotion in this post does seem genuine. I'm currently of two minds about you.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 13:06 |
|
Birdstrike posted:This post from Podima This post makes me realise Diqnol has been pretty quiet about lot of the content that's been going on so far. Diqnol, I would like some Hot Takes. Specifically on Kash, Gamer and Dominoes. If you could please?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 13:08 |
|
VivaNova posted:I hope diqnol's role is real and he throws 100 years. Why 100? What's he done that you find so egregious?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 13:10 |
|
tithin posted:Yeah this is the one that pinged me earlier, it just read as hedging his bets. If you think he's scummy, don't try to just it by saying "Oh, I need time to think on it, I need someone to confirm it for me" say "I think this is scummy as gently caress, for this reason" because if you're town the first person you need to convince of your vote is yourself, and then vote, and provide solid justification why. How the hell were you the only person to realise this before I got here?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 13:11 |
|
VivaNova posted:What I mean is, he wrote Viva, it looks like you're taking issue with the way tithin worded the case rather than the core message of the case itself. I made the same read on Gamer, how do you feel about it now that you've seen my wording of it as well?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 13:14 |
|
Rarity posted:If it's only 5 HP damage then I'd say send myself because I'd survive it so we could get ourselves a numbers advantage, which from experience is crucial towards the end game. If we did this I'd appreciate some healing, obviously. This, I could provide. Better that I went in your place, though. If anyone were to survive, I would.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 13:37 |
|
Gwynplaine posted:This, I could provide. I'm pretty sure we're the same just with slightly different abilities.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 13:42 |
|
Gamerofthegame posted:nah that vote is actually me being unsure, with the subject (at the time) rubbing me the wrong way but I wasn't one hundred percent on it and was prompting a few people to weigh in or not with their opinion on it. Just letting it go felt after being so stubborn felt super weird to me and just taking the easy way out after a failed tunneling. The vote has been solidified with later posting. Please show the content from Ridonk that has solidified your read and explain why it makes you feel more confident.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 13:46 |
|
TMMadman posted:I'm still working on my scum reads, I tend to work a little slower in the bigger games and don't throw my vote around as much. Right now, I'm a bit suspicious of Exakt; I don't like that she is just sniping with her few posts and I especially don't like the way she has dropped shade on me. I'm a little curious about why diqnol included me in his catapult thoughts. He named me, Podima and Birdstrike as three people he is thinking about launching. Podima is who he is currently voting and Bird is one of the people who voted him last night (and he has said he thinks one of the votes on him is scum), but I'm not sure why I got included in the mix. However, I don't really know if I fully believe his claim, so I just let it go at the time. Also think it's curious that he left bowmore off his catapult list when he had earlier said that bowmore had the worst vote. While one of the votes on diqnol may be scum, I think it's more likely a scum bussing/distancing himself from diqnol. BabeLiker90 posted:I want everyone to read this paragraph and tell me if the conclusions he draws are logically consistent or not I think I see what you're getting at. The final line of "While one of the votes on diqnol may be scum, I think it's more likely a scum bussing/distancing himself from diqnol" it's a weird way to conclude that analysis. The natural conclusion is "Diqnol's named targets don't match with his previously stated thoughts therefore he is scum" but what TM is doing is going off on a tangent in his conclusion. In related things, I don't like how TM has reverted to MT's read on his town meta since she made her case. Yes, he's left her alone but he's gone after Diqnol and Exakt for targeting him, just like MT described his town meta to be.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 13:58 |
|
Tommunist, when you join the battle as a 7th do you join the melee or ranged or what?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 14:02 |
|
Birdstrike posted:Hi Rarity Hi Birdstrike! The man in your avatar looks very suave. Are you suave? Could you beat Diqnol in a suave-off?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 14:03 |
|
And I'm all done. To clarify my thoughts, my main suspicions rest on bowmore (aggressive push on Kash followed by typical lurking) and Dominoes (weird mafia philosophy, using questions as a substitute for content). A little lower down are Kash and Gamer who've done some scummy things but also had moments that seemed genuine then TM is a distant outsider to keep an eye on. For the moment ##vote Dominoes
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 14:08 |
|
Rarity posted:I'm pretty sure we're the same just with slightly different abilities. But you're also easily the most active investigator during the non battle parts of this campaign. So please, if we're both paladins, basically lets have the one whose kind of a bumbler get in the catapult.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 14:15 |
|
EccoRaven posted:Venom please stop. If you post again I will report you. lol
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 14:17 |
|
Rarity posted:Diqnol, is this an automatic kill or HP damage a la the mafia NK? And does this require the participant to be in or out of battle or is that irrelevant? Automatic kill, battle is irrelevant
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 15:29 |
|
Rarity posted:This post makes me realise Diqnol has been pretty quiet about lot of the content that's been going on so far. Kash scummy, Gamer inconclusive, Dominoes inconclusive. The former has done multiple things this game that have piqued my interest, the latter two haven't stood out to me whatsoever so far. I will admit I've skimmed a lot of the thread so far and have been narrowly approaching content revolving around me and the things I've said. I have some working theories.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 15:33 |
|
BabeLiker90 posted:Automatic kill, battle is irrelevant ...I withdraw my volunteering.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 16:01 |
|
oh my god someone does not like you
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 16:10 |
|
Rarity posted:I think I see what you're getting at. The final line of "While one of the votes on diqnol may be scum, I think it's more likely a scum bussing/distancing himself from diqnol" it's a weird way to conclude that analysis. The natural conclusion is "Diqnol's named targets don't match with his previously stated thoughts therefore he is scum" but what TM is doing is going off on a tangent in his conclusion. Why is this a surprise? I am well known for going after the people targeting me when town or scum? I didn't go after MMT because I wanted to hear her reasoning for voting me which ended up being exactly what I thought it would be and while there is an outside chance she is scum, I don't think it's likely, so there is no reason to go after her. Diqnol and Ekaxt are different because Exakt has dropped shade a couple times with no explanation and diqnol named me randomly. I ignored it at first, but look at his reaction as soon as I brought it up; he immediately voted for me. It reads as incredibly defensive. Also, your conclusion that his targets don't match his stated thoughts is completely wrong. I specifically said that he mentioned two targets that he was talking about and then me, so why are you trying to misrepresent what I said?
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 19:12 |
|
You seem very intent on explaining why you didn't address me naming you earlier on, almost like you're very self conscious and concerned with how you come off to members of the town. I am confident that TMM is scum.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 19:14 |
|
TMMadman posted:I didn't go after MMT because I wanted to hear her reasoning for voting me which ended up being exactly what I thought it would be I don't believe this statement.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 19:17 |
|
Rarity posted:I don't believe this statement. Why? You didn't think it was obvious what MMT was trying to do? Maybe it's just because I played a game with her where we were both scum, but it was immediately obvious to me what she was trying to do and I wasn't going to bother with it. poo poo, if i was scum, I'm sure I would have jumped at it in order to try and buddy up to MMT. BabeLiker90 posted:You seem very intent on explaining why you didn't address me naming you earlier on, almost like you're very self conscious and concerned with how you come off to members of the town. I am confident that TMM is scum. You're loving stupid. I didn't address it at first because I don't believe you have the power you have claimed. Here's why: In a game where HP matters and the scum NK is a 5HP attack, why would you be able to not only instantly kill someone from this thread, but also someone in the other thread? It doesn't make sense as a mechanic because you would be removing agency from the other thread. Not to mention that you can only use this ability on D1 when it would basically be a random shot in the dark. This thread shouldn't have any impact on the other thread except during the battle. What's next? Are we going to have people claiming they can cop someone in the other thread? I ended up bringing up my thoughts because I was directly responding to MMT about who I found suspicious and why.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 19:45 |
|
Max posted:I'm going to bed, please answer these questions for me to mull over and then give my opinion on later tomorrow: At the time of this post, Gamer's vote for Ridonk bother's me the most. It is just so hamfistedly waffley. But Tommunists callout of Bowmore and vote about joke phase being over seems like a close second. I didn't really like any of the votes yet. They are all jokes or bad.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 19:50 |
|
Gwynplaine posted:Do we HAVE to lynch? I feel like things will become more obvious as time progresses. Cuddling folks is the only way for us to win.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 19:53 |
|
Birdstrike posted:gently caress it, the Ixt defence was weird as well I'm not sure I understand the reason here. Maybe you explain it later.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 19:54 |
|
Gwynplaine posted:It's day one and all I can think about is battle.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 19:57 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 11:55 |
|
Kashuno posted:
I disagree. I find it interesting.
|
# ? Jan 9, 2016 20:01 |