EccoRaven posted:

Venom please stop. If you post again I will report you.

Gamerofthegame posted:

maybe you should have waited until he had more then three content posts to use this argument

tithin posted:

Friends, romans, countrymen, I'm happy to step out for my good friend Venom Soag, a king in exile.

Gwynplaine posted:

Only if you are certain, darling. Doubtless the battlefield calls to you also.

Rarity posted:

Please don't. It's not hurting the actual game at all.

tithin posted:

The Battlefield calls to me, but I am no Big Boss, purely a Marksman with impeccable aim and fashion taste.

I will gladly step aside for the boss.

Kashuno posted:

Just because someone plays stupidly doesn't make them town, rarity.

BabeLiker90 posted:

So anyway guys, I'm the Town Catapultist. I can pick one of you and fling you at the other camp, killing both people involved. I have to do it day 1 (clearly a thinning of the herd tactic by Ecco) so let me know who you're interested in me targeting.

Rarity posted:

Yes but there's a difference someone playing badly yet honestly (Ridonk) and someone playing badly and falsely (you).

100YrsofAttitude posted:

Brother?


You're neither nor. You've just chained a vote for no real reason than other what I can assume is a history with birdstrike, and your eager to actually kill discussion on D1 or either rendering moot by proposing a non-execution.


That's a bad reason.


If it's because of his post voting Ridonkulous I get where your coming from. It's weird he wants a 2nd opinion on a D1 vote, most of which are based on gut or dumb reasons at best. I'd get it if he had more of a case or if the game were further along and he didn't want to toss his vote with abandon, but here there's very little to be lost voting out right.


How is one considered to be irrationally stoic?

Max posted:

I'm interested in hearing other people's thoughts on who from our thread should be catapulted, but I imagine they will all be the same. I will say nothing of who should be targeted in the other thread for painfully obvious reasons.

Kashuno posted:

You haven't mentioned me playing falsely yet iirc.

Rarity posted:

Godammit Kash, sucking up to the King is scummy as gently caress. Why do you never learn?

Rarity posted:

KASH I EXPLAINED WHY THIS VOTE WAS TERRIBLE STOP BEING BAD AT MAFIA

Kashuno posted:

I mean really I don't think I need to spell it out on a silver platter for you but since you seem incapable of actually reading and being able to infer opinions based on words.

I have called out two players (ixt and MMT) who have subsequently put something forward which has resulted in me not pressing them as hard.

I have pushed bowmore as scum who was looking for an easy out and am currently still suss of them. I have put conjecture forward about the possible slip-up from ridonk not mentioning the podima vote (granted, diqnol did as well).

I have clearly shown I have a town read of gwyn, and of diqnol. I have mentioned that gamer and I seem to be on the same wavelength so far this game. I have even responded to MMT's response as finding it agreeable.

you are acting like I am not putting forth alignment guess because I am not posting THIS PLAYER IS A PLAYER I BELIEVE TO BE *ALIGNMENT*


I unironically out of spite started to go down the list of players and comment on each one before I decided to say gently caress it and write this post.

Birdstrike posted:

This post from Podima

led to this vote


Pod's post may be those things, but I didn't think it was scummy. It offered a convenient way for Diqnol to try and appear townie.

VivaNova posted:

I hope diqnol's role is real and he throws 100 years.

tithin posted:

Yeah this is the one that pinged me earlier, it just read as hedging his bets. If you think he's scummy, don't try to just it by saying "Oh, I need time to think on it, I need someone to confirm it for me" say "I think this is scummy as gently caress, for this reason" because if you're town the first person you need to convince of your vote is yourself, and then vote, and provide solid justification why.

voting for someone with a lovely reason, and asking someone to back you up just reads as either stupid lazy town, or being unconfident in your own read, and if you're unconfident in your read you shouldn't be doing the vote in the first place.

VivaNova posted:

What I mean is, he wrote

in all caps.

Which seems like the exact opposite of calling someone is "super scummy", which was your read. So either you are faking an opinion or you need to explain better to me what you saw here that I didn't!

Rarity posted:

If it's only 5 HP damage then I'd say send myself because I'd survive it so we could get ourselves a numbers advantage, which from experience is crucial towards the end game. If we did this I'd appreciate some healing, obviously.

Gwynplaine posted:

This, I could provide.

Better that I went in your place, though.

If anyone were to survive, I would.

Gamerofthegame posted:

nah that vote is actually me being unsure, with the subject (at the time) rubbing me the wrong way but I wasn't one hundred percent on it and was prompting a few people to weigh in or not with their opinion on it. Just letting it go felt after being so stubborn felt super weird to me and just taking the easy way out after a failed tunneling. The vote has been solidified with later posting.

TMMadman posted:

I'm still working on my scum reads, I tend to work a little slower in the bigger games and don't throw my vote around as much. Right now, I'm a bit suspicious of Exakt; I don't like that she is just sniping with her few posts and I especially don't like the way she has dropped shade on me. I'm a little curious about why diqnol included me in his catapult thoughts. He named me, Podima and Birdstrike as three people he is thinking about launching. Podima is who he is currently voting and Bird is one of the people who voted him last night (and he has said he thinks one of the votes on him is scum), but I'm not sure why I got included in the mix. However, I don't really know if I fully believe his claim, so I just let it go at the time. Also think it's curious that he left bowmore off his catapult list when he had earlier said that bowmore had the worst vote. While one of the votes on diqnol may be scum, I think it's more likely a scum bussing/distancing himself from diqnol.

BabeLiker90 posted:

I want everyone to read this paragraph and tell me if the conclusions he draws are logically consistent or not

Birdstrike posted:

Hi Rarity

Rarity posted:

I'm pretty sure we're the same just with slightly different abilities.

EccoRaven posted:

Venom please stop. If you post again I will report you.

Rarity posted:

Diqnol, is this an automatic kill or HP damage a la the mafia NK? And does this require the participant to be in or out of battle or is that irrelevant?

Rarity posted:

This post makes me realise Diqnol has been pretty quiet about lot of the content that's been going on so far.

Diqnol, I would like some Hot Takes. Specifically on Kash, Gamer and Dominoes. If you could please?

BabeLiker90 posted:

Automatic kill, battle is irrelevant

tithin posted:

Rarity posted:

I think I see what you're getting at. The final line of "While one of the votes on diqnol may be scum, I think it's more likely a scum bussing/distancing himself from diqnol" it's a weird way to conclude that analysis. The natural conclusion is "Diqnol's named targets don't match with his previously stated thoughts therefore he is scum" but what TM is doing is going off on a tangent in his conclusion.

In related things, I don't like how TM has reverted to MT's read on his town meta since she made her case. Yes, he's left her alone but he's gone after Diqnol and Exakt for targeting him, just like MT described his town meta to be.

TMMadman posted:

I didn't go after MMT because I wanted to hear her reasoning for voting me which ended up being exactly what I thought it would be

Rarity posted:

I don't believe this statement.

BabeLiker90 posted:

You seem very intent on explaining why you didn't address me naming you earlier on, almost like you're very self conscious and concerned with how you come off to members of the town. I am confident that TMM is scum.

Max posted:

I'm going to bed, please answer these questions for me to mull over and then give my opinion on later tomorrow:

Which vote that has been made thus far bothers you the most? Why?

Which vote do you agree with the most thus far? Why?

Gwynplaine posted:

Do we HAVE to lynch? I feel like things will become more obvious as time progresses.

A nightkill attempt is unlikely to kill someone outright but a lynch will. We run the risk of losing good soldiers.

Birdstrike posted:

gently caress it, the Ixt defence was weird as well
##vote BabeLiker90

Gwynplaine posted:

It's day one and all I can think about is battle.

I'll follow you, brother, until I have my own ideas.

##vote BabeLiker90

Kashuno posted:

This is the worst vote in this thread by far. MMT has a theory that's strong enough for her to throw her vote behind, but it's not strong enough to actually discuss when asked about it? This strikes me as a really coy way to get people thinking about TMM, as after reading this at least I had an urge to go reread TMM to see if I missed something. This way, if someone else had decided to lead the charge against TMM after this vote MMT could easily explain her "meta" case or handwave it away if he flipped town.