|
King of Cheeses posted:This MP4 that was posted despite being recorded at 50fps has just over 40 actual unique frames of gameplay. Many video frames are just the same game play frame. I'm the black rectangle at top right covering the ATV logo.
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 16:35 |
|
|
thatguy posted:Just thinking about this makes me actually laugh. I agree with you. I am thinking that someone taking the assets out of the game and plopping them into a trial version of whatever engine kids use these days is a more likely candidate than someone editing those frames..
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:50
|
|
|
Brazilianpeanutwar posted:Star citizen : I have mental disorders and i'm below average intelligence We know.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:51
|
|
|
Wuxi posted:Blocking people is for the weak Note that Derek hasn't put MoMA on ignore. Also note that MoMA is quite obviously terrible at coming up with witty and biting responses when provoked by an Internet Warlord. I suspect some causal link. If he can't doxx, he will bully.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:51
|
|
|
I'm a little peeved that people are using my posts to get on the list of posters that have defeated the good doctor without doing any work. My weaponized posts are being used like croberts uses other scfi IPs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:55
|
|
|
iron buns posted:I'm the black rectangle at top right covering the ATV logo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rcWkqliP6A&t=1453s The Logo bit  UI seems to match.... Not found the right stair bit, but this looks like the answer.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
Has anyone thought about making a Derek Smart Markov Bot?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:The joke's on them because anyone (aside from those whose opinions and banter I value) who quotes him (and Ol Cactus Dick), gets put on ignore as well. So far, 11 of them are in there. It's marvelous really, because it allows me to skip through all the rubbish. I for one do not believe you for a second that you don't click "show post". You don't have the self control. You are as thin skinned as it gets.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:56
|
|
|
D1E posted:If he can't doxx, he will bully. Next up, water: wet or not? Sickening posted:I for one do not believe you for a second that you don't click "show post". You don't have the self control. You are as thin skinned as it gets. I've only ever blocked one person, and Zaphod42 deserved it. I still click on 'show post'. FFS, people, creating echo chambers got us here. Stop being retards.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:57
|
|
|
AP posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rcWkqliP6A&t=1453s 
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 16:57
|
|
|
AP posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rcWkqliP6A&t=1453s 
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:03
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:Oh right. That makes sense. But yeah, as an engineer, and seeing that my whole claim since July 2015 has always been that "the game as pitched could never be built", that's primarily my focus. All that other stuff (e.g. wasteful spending) is just immaterial to me; but hilarious nonetheless. One would only be hungover if they sipped on your juice, boo boo. But to answer you - SM is very much alive and well in the 2.6 build and is playable (more than just a 4v4 by the way). It runs at 70-90 fps on a mid-range machine and hangars now load fully in less than 5 seconds. Caterpillar is amazing - very functional. It's pretty much all cargo right now and open from the sides. All modular. Great visibility. No. You won't get any proof or evidence from me. This series of NDA is extremely strict. You will very likely not see any leaks from evocati on this on reddit either. But, if screens/vids do eventually leak, feel free to reference this post.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:06
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:One would only be hungover if they sipped on your juice, boo boo. But to answer you - SM is very much alive and well in the 2.6 build and is playable (more than just a 4v4 by the way). It runs at 70-90 fps on a mid-range machine and hangars now load fully in less than 5 seconds. Caterpillar is amazing - very functional. It's pretty much all cargo right now and open from the sides. All modular. Great visibility. Did they have someone else write that NDA after your ironclad ToS?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:One would only be hungover if they sipped on your juice, boo boo. But to answer you - SM is very much alive and well in the 2.6 build and is playable (more than just a 4v4 by the way). It runs at 70-90 fps on a mid-range machine and hangars now load fully in less than 5 seconds. Caterpillar is amazing - very functional. It's pretty much all cargo right now and open from the sides. All modular. Great visibility. Well, sorry I just had to quote this. more than just a 4v4. 70-90 fps on a mid-range machine hangars now load fully in less than 5 seconds Caterpillar is amazing - very functional
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
Wuxi posted:Blocking people is for the weak 
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:One would only be hungover if they sipped on your juice, boo boo. But to answer you - SM is very much alive and well in the 2.6 build and is playable (more than just a 4v4 by the way). It runs at 70-90 fps on a mid-range machine and hangars now load fully in less than 5 seconds. Caterpillar is amazing - very functional. It's pretty much all cargo right now and open from the sides. All modular. Great visibility. Are you 100% sure you didn't get boozed up and launch a different game?
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:08
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:But to answer you - SM is very much alive and well in the 2.6 build and is playable (more than just a 4v4 by the way). It runs at 70-90 fps on a mid-range machine and hangars now load fully in less than 5 seconds. Caterpillar is amazing - very functional. It's pretty much all cargo right now and open from the sides. All modular. Great visibility. I read this in Donald Trump's voice.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:09
|
|
|
Daztek posted:Did they have someone else write that NDA after your ironclad ToS? I wrote neither because I don't work for CIG.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
D1E posted:Modification:
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:11
|
|
|
AP posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rcWkqliP6A&t=1453s
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:12
|
|
|
AP posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rcWkqliP6A&t=1453s 
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:14
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:One would only be hungover if they sipped on your juice, boo boo. But to answer you - SM is very much alive and well in the 2.6 build and is playable (more than just a 4v4 by the way). It runs at 70-90 fps on a mid-range machine and hangars now load fully in less than 5 seconds. Caterpillar is amazing - very functional. It's pretty much all cargo right now and open from the sides. All modular. Great visibility.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
I hope MoMa's right about everything. Because then 1/10th of a part of a game is done, and that will be enough to fuel their wild fantasies this....thing...will ever be finished. And it will continue to feed our amusement.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:14
|
|
|
AP posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rcWkqliP6A&t=1453s No. It's some chat or scoreboard stuff. You can see at the very end some of the letters peep past the black box. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I wrote neither because I don't work for CIG. congrats on the Relay launch.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:15
|
|
|
Derek, you didn't call anything. You don't have evocati, otherwise you'd be playing SM right now. The only thing worse than your pathological lies are your annoying 12-year-old girl quips ('called it,' 'like - totally,').
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:16
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:One would only be hungover if they sipped on your juice, boo boo. But to answer you - SM is very much alive and well in the 2.6 build and is playable (more than just a 4v4 by the way). It runs at 70-90 fps on a mid-range machine and hangars now load fully in less than 5 seconds. Caterpillar is amazing - very functional. It's pretty much all cargo right now and open from the sides. All modular. Great visibility. That wasn't my question. My question (pay attention) was: Was Star Marine enabled for official play in the 2.6 Evocati release (of 48 hrs ago)? I'll await your answer, darling. ps: You seem so sure today, then you were in the past 48hrs. Which leads me to believe that you're using obfuscation (Evocati vs internal build) again.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:17
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:One would only be hungover if they sipped on your juice, boo boo. But to answer you - SM is very much alive and well in the 2.6 build and is playable (more than just a 4v4 by the way). It runs at 70-90 fps on a mid-range machine and hangars now load fully in less than 5 seconds. Caterpillar is amazing - very functional. It's pretty much all cargo right now and open from the sides. All modular. Great visibility. You already broke the NDA by: Saying Star Marine is in Star Marine is playable It is more than 4v4 It runs well The Catapillar is in The way the Catapillar is described So you've completed smashed the NDA anyway you big old berk
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:17
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Derek, you didn't call anything. But you SHOULD call your parents everyone. Because they love you and raised you. And because I am holding them in my basement
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:18
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:I'll await your answer, darling. Gay.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:18
|
|
|
CrcleSqreSanchz posted:I hope MoMa's right about everything. Because then 1/10th of a part of a game is done, and that will be enough to fuel their wild fantasies this....thing...will ever be finished. And it will continue to feed our amusement. It's amazing how incredibly low the bar is for citizens to be impressed.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:18
|
|
|
Ol Cactus Dick posted:Are you 100% sure you didn't get boozed up and launch a different game? There's only a small step between thinking up 200 page fleet doctrins for a game that doesn't exist and playing BF1 while happily dreaming it is Star Marine
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:19
|
|
|
Okay, why is the build called Evocati? It bothers me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:19
|
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:Derek, you didn't call anything. You don't have evocati, otherwise you'd be playing SM right now. The only thing worse than your pathological lies are your annoying 12-year-old girl quips ('called it,' 'like - totally,').
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:19
|
|
|
Meridian posted:Okay, why is the build called Evocati? It bothers me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
I feel like we're watching an episode of DBZ, and Derek and MoMA are screaming at each other while powering up.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
D_Smart posted:That wasn't my question. My question (pay attention) was: No, but that's not what you originally claimed. Want to talk about revisionist history? D_Smart posted:I have an account in Evocati, as do 7 of my contacts. Nobody has received an invite. Not a word on Reddit or RSI forum. So I'm thinking this is a False Flag op that MoMa is running and trying to ride the wave due to some anon poster who may just be posting bullshit. D_Smart posted:Confirmed. It's not in the current 2.6 build. D_Smart posted:I don't think he knew SM wasn't going to be in it D_Smart posted:Yeah, he was on my Discord trolling us earlier today. Clearly he's not in Evocati, and had no clue that SM wasn't in it. D_Smart posted:That's because i) it's shite ii) there is no Star Marine - like at all You made claim, after claim, after claim that SM WASN't in the build like, at all. LIKE AT ALL. And you were so sure of your pompous self because you have 70,000 evocati accounts. GTFO already you pathetic, pathological liar.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:20
|
|
|
TheAgent posted:because nothing about star citizen makes any sense So I am not stupid. Well I am, but that isn't why calling the build evocati makes no sense to me.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
peter gabriel posted:You already broke the NDA by: I'm not an evocati. I never signed an NDA.
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 16:35 |
|
|
ManofManyAliases posted:I'm not an evocati. I never signed an NDA. Your ownage continues and I am the latest victim
|
|
#
?
Dec 1, 2016 17:23
|
|