|
ok so searching its basically patreon but focused on sad losers who want to get regular clips of cammers? putting your real information on that site should be considered a secfuck
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 21:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 22:18 |
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:ok so searching its basically patreon but focused on sad losers who want to get regular clips of cammers? yeah, patreon specifically for sex
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 21:41
|
|
|
that's going to be a popular torrent
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 21:57
|
|
|
hope the models info dont get exposed, thats p dangerous 
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 22:07
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:ok so searching its basically patreon but focused on sad losers who want to get regular clips of cammers? i think porn laws pretty much require websites like that to have documentation so they can prove they weren't knowingly hosting child pornography
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 22:24
|
|
|
ewiley posted:this is the end result of corporate sponsored phishing simulations, a farce inside a joke wrapped in nonsense. nah, they're good. i'd rather have people be paranoid and suspicious.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 22:25
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/BuzzFeedNews/status/1233131185460539392?s=19
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 22:36
|
|
|
Why does a clothing department store need the same facial recognition technology as ICE
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 22:38
|
|
|
they're trying to figure out who the gently caress still shops at macys
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 22:39
|
|
|
https://www.cnet.com/news/clearview-ai-had-entire-client-list-stolen-in-data-breach/quote:"Security is Clearview's top priority," Tor Ekeland, Clearview AI's attorney, said in a statement. "Unfortunately, data breaches are part of life in the 21st century. Our servers were never accessed. We patched the flaw, and continue to work to strengthen our security." Just part of life, folks. Not sure what all the commotion is about. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 22:39
|
|
|
Car crashes are a part of life too. We still have government entities work to reduce their occurrence and investigate/punish those deemed responsible for them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 23:29
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:putting your real information on that site should be considered a secfuck
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 23:43
|
|
|
A site like that, if it wants to operate for long, is going to require confirmed personal info for tax reporting purposes, too.
|
|
#
?
Feb 27, 2020 23:58
|
|
|
Krankenstyle posted:hope the models info dont get exposed, thats p dangerous it seems to not actually be a proper info leak, but a huge dump of a shitload of videos that are meant to not be free, curated from a number of sources and not actually acquired through a hack (or at least, their head of marketing says there's no breach lol). obviously still not great, but maybe somewhat less life-destroying god some of the replies are disgusting "serves u right lol" man shut the gently caress up Farmer Crack-rear end posted:i think porn laws pretty much require websites like that to have documentation so they can prove they weren't knowingly hosting child pornography bingo, 2257 compliance baby, here's a little bit of info on laws related to camming and that's not to mention monetary reasons and record keeping for law enforcement if anything happens to your workers, there's a lot of reasons to keep PII for your models on hand
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 00:05
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:I was assuming sports betting lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 02:21
|
|
|
dougdrums posted:how is porn betting not a thing yet? Get in on the ground floor, there's still time
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 02:32
|
|
|
What sort of betting are you imagining? An over-under?
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 02:34
|
|
|
I'd just play the spread
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 02:38
|
|
|
Jabor posted:What sort of betting are you imagining? An over-under? I was imagining more of a spread  E: son of a bitch 
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 02:42
|
|
|
lol @ the guy badly pretending not to know what onlyfans is
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 02:59
|
|
|
dougdrums posted:how is porn betting not a thing yet? crazy propositions crazy pro positions
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 04:47
|
|
|
Methanar posted:Why does a clothing department store need the same facial recognition technology as ICE because every retailer is desperate to shove ~targeted advertising~ and data mining and poo poo online retailers have into real life, but nobody actually knows how to do that because it's a fundamentally stupid goal, so companies buy all sorts of weird bullshit like this to try to track people around the store and see what they're looking at and stuff. spoiler: none of it works worth a drat unless you actively engage with it and help it out as a customer by diligently remembering to use your loyalty card and give them your personal info and all that other stuff, and even then it still doesn't work because the advertising industry is all lies anyway
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 15:13
|
|
|
you don't need a loyalty card if they can look up your face in clearview's database
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 15:23
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:you don't need a loyalty card if they can look up your face in clearview's database in that case you need someone else's loyalty card and they need yours
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 15:24
|
|
|
pseudorandom name posted:you don't need a loyalty card if they can look up your face in clearview's database that's what they're trying to sell yes, but from what i've seen none of this poo poo actually works in practice, let alone works with your company's special snowflake customized version of your POS software
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 15:38
|
|
|
tensorflow your as400
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 15:39
|
|
|
(add a blockchain and quantum and you have ibms business plan)
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 15:40
|
|
|
Oh I get it. The camera staring at you during self checkout at walmart is facial recogniton to track those even without TrackMeCards
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 17:55
|
|
|
evil_bunnY posted:That's some next level victim blaming there. How do you suppose performers are going to document their age? i wasnt talking about the performers. im talking about the customers.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 18:29
|
|
|
Danish police were apparently also on the clear view list. statement from the cops is "nuh-uh, we dont use facial recognition tech (although we really loving want to), we just went to an event they held and signed up for a mailing list"
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 18:37
|
|
|
on the bright side: there’s no way it’s accurate at all since it’s a tech product. on the dark side: that means you’ll randomly be arrested for a murder due to a bad model
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 19:09
|
|
|
this seems like a bad thing
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 19:12
|
|
|
CRIP EATIN BREAD posted:i wasnt talking about the performers. credit cards generally don't like fake names
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 19:41
|
|
|
duz posted:credit cards generally don't like fake names if you are on any site you feel you could be remotely embarrassed about frequenting, you use pre-paid visa/mastercards that don't have real names attached.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 19:45
|
|
|
 What a trash fire
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 19:48
|
|
|
crime always exploits the financially downtrodden
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 20:12
|
|
|
Proteus Jones posted:
Isn't that a natural consequence of allowing accessibility apps? A screen reader needs to be able to read the screen.
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 21:10
|
|
|
PCjr sidecar posted:tensorflow your as400 tensorflow my tears, the policeman said
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 21:19
|
|
|
Dylan16807 posted:Isn't that a natural consequence of allowing accessibility apps? A screen reader needs to be able to read the screen. i guess osx had the right ux for that because its a pain in the rear end you won't do it accidentally
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 21:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 22:18 |
|
|
Dylan16807 posted:Isn't that a natural consequence of allowing accessibility apps? A screen reader needs to be able to read the screen. it's more a problem of google not giving a poo poo about what gets listed in the android app store, combined with device manufacturer fragmentation and refusal to update their devices. also, over the years a lot of legitimate apps have abused the accessibility APIs on android because it was the only way to create certain features, or it was the only way to allow users not on the latest android OS to still get the new feature you've been hyping up in your app's new update. this has trained many android users to not care that apps want to do screen-scraping because "oh that's the same feature that makes it so my (legitimate) password manager can function"
|
|
#
?
Feb 28, 2020 23:04
|
|
