|
all the money being in the hands of just a few people is really tearing this country apart, so we're gonna replace the bad money with good money that even fewer people have, solving the issue once and for all
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 15:16 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:05 |
|
Shame Boy posted:also love that it takes a different coin for each possible variable involved for some bizarre loving reason, but all of them are completely useless without all the other ones lol
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 15:20 |
|
how much to make elon's satellite goatse the world
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 15:20 |
|
novamute posted:Yes
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 15:20 |
|
Hammerite posted:how much to make elon's satellite goatse the world More than you would think. But less than you would hope.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 15:20 |
|
Hammerite posted:how much to make elon's satellite goatse the world probably more than it's worth to have goatse show up on a tiny screen with a webcam pointed at it. you'd get more mileage paying some moldovans to hack a local highway billboard
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 15:30 |
|
lol it happened again https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1425116565670858757
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 16:34 |
|
definitely good for Bitcoin
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 16:40 |
|
the good thing about it being decentralised is that if hackers break in to just one part of it, they can steal all the money wait...
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 16:48 |
|
code is law, that law being fygm
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 16:54 |
|
good news, nothing of value was lost
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 16:56 |
|
Khorne posted:does this mean lightning network people-nodes are now brokers too given this line describes exactly what they are doing omg that is hilarious! Another pitchfork in the dumb-ness haystack of the Lightning Network. edit: Powerful Two-Hander posted:good news, nothing of value was lost A whole lotta “value” stored in some Russian teenagers’ wallet. lol DerekSmartymans fucked around with this message at 17:20 on Aug 10, 2021 |
# ? Aug 10, 2021 17:15 |
|
infernal machines posted:that is so much better than the stated plan in every way not like anyone would be able to tell the difference either. a rare case in which everybody wins! Powerful Two-Hander posted:good news, nothing of value was lost like ones and zeroes lost in the rain
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 17:30 |
|
Powerful Two-Hander posted:"'good' 'news'", '"'nothing' of 'value'" "'was lost'"'
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 17:30 |
|
“”
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 17:39 |
|
quote:Aug 9 (Reuters) - Cinema operator AMC Entertainment (AMC.N) will have the technology in place to receive payment in bitcoin by the end of the year as payment for movie tickets and concessions, the company's CEO said on a call discussing its results.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:02 |
|
Love to spend rand(0,100000) dollars to see a movie
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:07 |
|
this strikes me as a very bad sign for the future of their business the meme investors probably love it, of course, but courting their support feels supremely desperate
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:17 |
|
giving figurative [and maybe literal given the look of that vegas party] handjobs to meme investors is amc's core business right now
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:20 |
|
qirex posted:giving figurative [and maybe literal given the look of that vegas party] handjobs to meme investors is amc's core business right now amc stock is sitting way above where it was, but pretty right now. they're probably looking at other companies that basically turned their stock into synthetic crypto plays by somehow hitching themselves to bitcoin and want to get in on that action
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:25 |
|
njsykora posted:lol it happened again polyfool
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:30 |
|
going to be fun being a cinema that has to comply with kyc
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:36 |
|
kw0134 posted:the thing of course is that by every traditional definition it meets that criteria anyway so the bill doesn't do anything except go "you know, you are in fact a money transmitter so please submit the appropriate paperwork" and this has crypto in conniptions a lot of the wailing and gnashing of teeth seems to be around a reading of the law that assumes every single network node is a money transmitter which seems wrong to me but IDK I'm not a treasury secretary
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:44 |
|
work "innovation" group is having some blockchain thing at the end of the month, so I signed up. going to see how much heckling I can do.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:50 |
|
Love to address the people who stole oodles from me with a stern finger wagging, begging them to come "work something out": https://twitter.com/PolyNetwork2/status/1425123153009803267
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 18:59 |
|
the most hilarious outcome here would be the thieves posting a video of themselves deleting the files or smashing a thumb drive with the only copies
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 19:03 |
|
DominoKitten posted:Love to address the people who stole oodles from me with a stern finger wagging, begging them to come "work something out": "wow, it's like a record how much you stole! definitely better give it back!"
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 19:05 |
|
has anyone said "more like fart contracts" yet
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 19:07 |
|
Shame Boy posted:has anyone said "more like fart contracts" yet It's shart contracts op hth
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 19:09 |
|
The_Franz posted:the most hilarious outcome here would be the thieves posting a video of themselves deleting the files or smashing a thumb drive with the only copies The hacker seems very much into trolling, at least: https://twitter.com/sabotagebeats/status/1425137162199076867
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 19:10 |
|
Ha-ha, you really got me, well done, really impressive. But jokes aside, can you give me my watch back? It's not actually mine.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 19:18 |
|
Munkeymon posted:a lot of the wailing and gnashing of teeth seems to be around a reading of the law that assumes every single network node is a money transmitter which seems wrong to me but IDK I'm not a treasury secretary i'm not sure. the clear intent of congress is just to apply this to exchanges, and regulators will probably follow that intent for at least a while and not try to impose these requirements on anyone else. but if regulators wanted to read it expansively? the definition is "any person who (for consideration) is responsible for regularly providing any service effectuating transfers of digital assets on behalf of another person". i think wallet makers clearly aren't covered by that because they don't themselves provide an actively-involved service. i think people running nodes that just passively validate the blockchain clearly aren't covered by that because they don't themselves effectuate the transfer. but if you run a node that propagates someone else's transactions to miners, or if you mine a block with someone else's transactions, or if you're a lightning network middleman that connects other people, then i dunno, i think you might be providing a service that effectuates transfers of digital assets on behalf of other people it's not like the present technical impossibility of satisfying these reporting requirements is some sort of legal defense against the charge of failing to satisfy them. if e-trade had a policy of setting its trading records on fire as soon as they settled, it would be technically impossible for them to satisfy reporting requirements, but that wouldn't give them a free pass: their policies would be willfully putting them in massive non-compliance with regulations, and they would be vulnerable to major civil and even criminal penalties if congress just wants to establish roughly the current cash/securities regulatory regime for crypto then they should probably define "broker" more narrowly, maybe based around providing accounts denominated in digital assets or something like that
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 20:19 |
|
right, if regulators want to read it broadly...there's nothing prima facie that says they can't. it's hard to argue that if you're mining and actually submitting blocks to be included on the chain, which to remind everyone is the supposed justification for burning an acre of rainforest per block, then you're by your own admission "transmitting money". and it looks real loving bad if your philosophical goal was "well those pesky government regulations don't affect us!" which often ends up being "yeah, watch me," to the likes of the sec.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 20:24 |
|
DominoKitten posted:Love to address the people who stole oodles from me with a stern finger wagging, begging them to come "work something out": if only they'd done some kyc maybe they'd know who has the money lol
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 21:46 |
|
rjmccall posted:if you run a node that propagates someone else's transactions to miners, or if you mine a block with someone else's transactions, or if you're a lightning network middleman that connects other people, then i dunno, i think you might be providing a service that effectuates transfers of digital assets on behalf of other people and in the LN and mining cases, you are literally being paid by the person to process their transaction
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 21:52 |
|
EorayMel posted:It's shart contracts op hth it's actually S-M-R-T i mean S-M-A-R-T contracts
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 22:11 |
|
https://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/1425193106950041600
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 22:18 |
|
I'm not able to connect the dots here.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 22:30 |
|
https://www.raconteur.net/hr/talent-management/the-war-for-crypto-talent/ this is an article from June on the FABULOUS OPPORTUNITIES in crypto, because they can't find anyone actually competent who wants the jobs
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 22:37 |
|
|
# ? Apr 28, 2024 22:05 |
|
basic income. universal healthcare? an end to homelessness. unity, and world peace! we can achieve these things! how do we achieve these things, you say? raise my taxes? oh, how quaint. no, it's magic beans!
|
# ? Aug 10, 2021 22:40 |